GoddessManko -> RE: thoughts on the power of religion (3/29/2015 8:05:50 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874 Doesn't the bible also mention something about blasphemers and adulterous women being stoned to death too ? It's a long time since I read it, so I may be completely off-track. That was the old thinking in days where girls were married young and people had a simple way of viewing things. But it is less about the act and more about the deception and intent. I truly believe the worst of us are those who do things with malicious intent, no matter how small. The Bible was right, rules are for the unruly. Lord of the Flies was allegorical to this fact. Rules allow us to draw lines in the sand, keep healthy boundaries and be able to acknowledge our sin even when we commit them. quote:
ORIGINAL: joether Allow me to place it more in terms of this thread. Your original idea here. Let's assume (for the sake of the argument here) that religion is a discovery of mankind. Like fire, navy ships, airplanes, and even super computers; religion was a concept that allowed two possible uses: A positive and negative use. Take nuclear energy. In a positive use, we have energy to power homes, treat cancer patients, and understand more concepts of the universe around us. In negative use, we have nuclear weapons. Religion can be the same was. In the Christian faith, the power of forgiveness is a good thing. Yet, the Spanish Inquisition was NEVER seen as a good thing. I'm sure if I studied this further, I could give the positive and negative examples of each faith. But dragging science into the whole discussion is doing a disservice to science itself. Because science has one mechanism that most religions of the world do not possess: The ability to correct itself. If we were able to prove that Jesus was really some guy name 'Jack Bank' from New Jersey would created a time travel device and went back in time; would every part of Christianity correct itself given this new and profound knowledge? Hard to say. Some parts might. Other parts would not. With science, if you could confirm in test after test, of a cow being born from a horse; that would undermine the Theory of Evolution pretty quickly. To which scientists would discuss and debate things and go from there. Finally, one bad apple ruins the barrel; as the saying goes. A few hateful people of one religion blowing up stuff and killing people may not be the truth reflection of the whole of people in that faith. I've sat in on community discussions in which religious leaders voices solidarity as one group, when someone from one faith or another did something bad. When good people get together, good things tend to happen to those around them. When evil people get together, pain and tragedy are not to far behind. Telling the two apart can sometimes be easy and other times, very difficult. I truly love your frame of thought here, you have a refreshing take on things. Because the truth is it really is 0.0001% of people doing it. quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri For clarification, this was likely intended for me, not bounty... Who are the truly needy? Those who can not support themselves. That is, those who have no choice in the matter. Those are the truly needy. Does someone with a mental illness they have no control over constitute a truly needy case? Yup. Does someone with a physical handicap that prevents him from providing for himself constitute a truly needy case? Yup. Those who do not deserve help, in my opinion, are those who are fully capable (mentally, emotionally, and physically) to support themselves, but, instead, choose to not do so. Do not judge me. You have not walked in my shoes. You don't know what I have or have not gone through. You have an addiction problem? I truly hope you are getting help with it. I so agree with this. Also to Nthrall, for the most part I believe all religions are different versions of the same truth. We as humans tend to distort truth even unintentionally.
|
|
|
|