RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tj444 -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/13/2015 10:29:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

If a person can't handle bringing a child into the world and raising it, then that person should not be doing thing things that bring a child into the world. If you (none of the "you's" in this paragraph are specific to you, but are used in general) can't responsibly deal with the consequences of your actions, you shouldn't be taking those actions. I agree that one responsible way to deal with a pregnancy is to abort it, but if you can't pay for an abortion, you are relying on other people to pay for it, that's not quite as responsible of an option. And, since you are relying on others to pay for your abortion, why not rely on those people who are choosing to help you pay (people who donate to Planned Parenthood, etc.), and not those who are being forced to pay (taxpayers)?


dude.. if you don't think you should, as a taxpayer, pay for abortions, then why should I as a taxpayer pay for smokers that get lung cancer.. or for an overweight/obese person's diabetes meds when adhering to a healthy diet & exercise program could have avoided him from getting diabetes in the first place.. or for a cyclist that rides like a moron and gets hit.. there are tons of things I don't want to pay for that are avoidable but until you can get the overweight to all stop eating crap and sitting on their duff and smokers to stop smoking and cyclists to stop riding, your argument totally fails.. I also doubt very much if you have lived your entire life perfectly..

If DS's objection reduces to a financial one, then he might like to consider that the cost to the taxpayer of an unaborted unwanted foetus might exceed the cost of an abortion in the long run. I personally don't think this is a very good argument to advance as a general proposition, but if one's objection to federally funded abortions is entirely a financial one, then this aspect must also be considered.

I brought that up already but his response was for no one to have sex.. ever,.. unless they could afford to raise a child/children.. of course you can be in a good financial position at the time and shite happens.. then you aren't.. like what happened to many people with the economy under Bush jr..




tweakabelle -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/13/2015 10:38:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

If DS's objection reduces to a financial one, then he might like to consider that the cost to the taxpayer of an unaborted unwanted foetus might exceed the cost of an abortion in the long run. I personally don't think this is a very good argument to advance as a general proposition, but if one's objection to federally funded abortions is entirely a financial one, then this aspect must also be considered.

I brought that up already but his response was for no one to have sex.. ever,.. unless they could afford to raise a child/children.. of course you can be in a good financial position at the time and shite happens.. then you aren't.. like what happened to many people with the economy under Bush jr..

DS's argument in favour of abstention is not entirely without merit. The problem with this argument and it is a fatal flaw, is that it simply unrealistic to expect all people to stop having sex unless they are financially sound. It just isn't going to happen.




tj444 -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/13/2015 11:01:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

If DS's objection reduces to a financial one, then he might like to consider that the cost to the taxpayer of an unaborted unwanted foetus might exceed the cost of an abortion in the long run. I personally don't think this is a very good argument to advance as a general proposition, but if one's objection to federally funded abortions is entirely a financial one, then this aspect must also be considered.

I brought that up already but his response was for no one to have sex.. ever,.. unless they could afford to raise a child/children.. of course you can be in a good financial position at the time and shite happens.. then you aren't.. like what happened to many people with the economy under Bush jr..

DS's argument in favour of abstention is not entirely without merit. The problem with this argument and it is a fatal flaw, is that it simply unrealistic to expect all people to stop having sex unless they are financially sound. It just isn't going to happen.

yeah, that's what I told him.. that it was unrealistic.. just as unrealistic as expecting everyone to eat a healthy diet, exercise, stop smoking, etc etc.. and I would say doing the things I mentioned is more merit-worthy than not having sex which is actually good for you (unless you accidentally get pregnant)..




tweakabelle -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/13/2015 11:22:14 AM)

tj444, it seems that we are on the same page ! It would be nice if our collective efforts might have a positive effect!

Sadly though, if DS didn't pay any attention to your words of wisdom, he's unlikely to pay any attention to mine. [:D]




kdsub -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/13/2015 11:40:25 AM)

tj I don't want us arguing of how a problem is stated... If you are saying we need strict rules on deadly force...and increased training...and strict rules on racial profiling then we have nothing to argue over... But if you are condemning the million or so police over the actions of a few then I am with you and tweak as long as I can condemn all of Islam over the actions of a few...., otherwise i will continue to call you out on your prejudice.

Butch




tj444 -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/13/2015 12:43:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

tj I don't want us arguing of how a problem is stated... If you are saying we need strict rules on deadly force...and increased training...and strict rules on racial profiling then we have nothing to argue over... But if you are condemning the million or so police over the actions of a few then I am with you and tweak as long as I can condemn all of Islam over the actions of a few...., otherwise i will continue to call you out on your prejudice.

Butch

I don't think cops should be shooting people in the back or if they are already on the ground with other officers subduing them.. or a swarm of cops beating the crap out of a suspect.. and a stop to racial profiling.. all of what cops do in the country has caused an extremely high distrust of them, and not just from blacks and hispanics.. I don't think that cops protecting the bad apples has done them any good either.. I question just how "few" the bad ones are.. especially when there are cover-ups..

I am not sure what Islam has to do with this.. I don't think I have ever commented on Islam..




kdsub -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/13/2015 2:27:02 PM)

No you haven't and not very nice of me I apologize... I don't believe police should be doing those things either... I just believe you are disparaging those that should be getting your respect... putting their lives on the line every day to protect you and I and their families... Yet you just can't see past a few bad apples among the million... well i can't change your mind so time for me to move on.

Butch




DesideriScuri -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/13/2015 5:16:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
If a person can't handle bringing a child into the world and raising it, then that person should not be doing thing things that bring a child into the world. If you (none of the "you's" in this paragraph are specific to you, but are used in general) can't responsibly deal with the consequences of your actions, you shouldn't be taking those actions. I agree that one responsible way to deal with a pregnancy is to abort it, but if you can't pay for an abortion, you are relying on other people to pay for it, that's not quite as responsible of an option. And, since you are relying on others to pay for your abortion, why not rely on those people who are choosing to help you pay (people who donate to Planned Parenthood, etc.), and not those who are being forced to pay (taxpayers)?

dude.. if you don't think you should, as a taxpayer, pay for abortions, then why should I as a taxpayer pay for smokers that get lung cancer.. or for an overweight/obese person's diabetes meds when adhering to a healthy diet & exercise program could have avoided him from getting diabetes in the first place.. or for a cyclist that rides like a moron and gets hit.. there are tons of things I don't want to pay for that are avoidable but until you can get the overweight to all stop eating crap and sitting on their duff and smokers to stop smoking and cyclists to stop riding, your argument totally fails.. I also doubt very much if you have lived your entire life perfectly..


I most certainly haven't lived my life perfectly.

Why, as a taxpayer, are you paying for smokers, or the obese, or the ill, or the crazy drivers?




DesideriScuri -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/13/2015 5:25:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
If DS's objection reduces to a financial one, then he might like to consider that the cost to the taxpayer of an unaborted unwanted foetus might exceed the cost of an abortion in the long run. I personally don't think this is a very good argument to advance as a general proposition, but if one's objection to federally funded abortions is entirely a financial one, then this aspect must also be considered.


That assumes that the poor are the only ones that have abortions, and that pregnancy is going to end as a drain on society.

Note how I'm all for "personal responsibility?" That's how it should be taken care of, and if you can't personally be responsible for the consequences of an action you are choosing to take, you ought not be choosing to take it. If that action is with another person, the two of you had better be able to be personally responsible for the consequences of that action, or you ought not be choosing that action.

Taxpayers not paying for your abortion isn't imposing their morality on you. It's you not imposing your morality on them. People preventing you from having the option of an abortion because of moral opposition, would be imposing their morality on you.

Plus, there are lots of people who choose to donate their own money (as opposed to having their money forced to be "donated" by the IRS/government) to organizations like Planned Parenthood.






DesideriScuri -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/13/2015 5:30:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
DS's argument in favour of abstention is not entirely without merit. The problem with this argument and it is a fatal flaw, is that it simply unrealistic to expect all people to stop having sex unless they are financially sound. It just isn't going to happen.


Right. It isn't going to happen. I've never stated that it would. But, that doesn't mean the financial burden has to be borne by the taxpayer. I know people who had sex once, and gotten pregnant at a very young age. One just recently got her Master's Degree, after dropping out of school and spending many years living with her parents so she could support her child (I do not know if the father had anything to do with the child; I never discussed that with her).

There are options other than taxpayer funded abortions. Allowing people to not take responsibility for their actions is enabling that irresponsibility. I don't think we should do that.




Lucylastic -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/14/2015 6:35:04 AM)

so what is the hyde amendment for, and how many tax payer funded abortions are there ACTUALLY. figures please.





Lucylastic -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/14/2015 6:39:44 AM)

kinda back to the topic, but with the other cop who just shot a guy, because he thought it was his taser in response to this...

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Lucy...as with many of these cases the incidents only happen because of the actions of the alleged criminal. Your example may be a prosecutable case I don't know but it would most likely be poor training on the officers part. I am all for better training requirements and deadly force regulations. But I am very much against railroading police officers that make mistakes in stressful situations.

The subject has moved from the actions of the officer in this thread, which are clearly wrong, to condemning police in general and I do not believe statistics show this...despite attention getting headlines that are irresponsible in my opinion...and bias.

Butch

I have NOT and will not plaster all cops with the same brush,all blacks, all whites, all asians, all jews, all christans, all muslims and oh fuck even all doms or all dommes.
Not even dems, liberals, repubs, cons, libertarians...so dont pull that bs on me.
This particular guy you are talking about HAS been charged with manslaughter,

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — Prosecutors charged a reserve sheriff's deputy with manslaughter Monday in the death of a man who was fatally shot as he lay on the ground at the officer's feet — a shooting that was certain to raise questions about the use of volunteer officers to supplement full-time police.

The sheriff's office has said Robert Bates, a 73-year-old insurance executive who was volunteering on an undercover operation in Tulsa, mistakenly pulled out his handgun instead of his stun gun and shot the suspect as he struggled with deputies.

Bates, who is white, was charged with second-degree manslaughter involving "culpable negligence" for the April 2 death of Eric Harris, a 44-year-old black man. If convicted, he could face up to four years in prison.

It was the latest fatal shooting by a police officer to draw national attention after months of investigations and protests of other deaths in Ferguson, Missouri, New York City, Los Angeles and other elsewhere.

UPDATE: Raw Story reports that Bates is a pay-to-play cop:

Bates is part of a group of wealthy donors who make large contributions to the department for the privilege of playing police officer.
According to Tulsa World, Bates, who made the fatal mistake that cost a man his life, is a local insurance company executive who has donated multiple vehicles, weapons, and stun guns to the Sheriff’s Office since becoming a reserve deputy in 2008.
A video of the incident shot by a deputy with a sunglass camera and released Friday at the request of the victim's family, shows a deputy chase and tackle Harris, whom they said tried to sell an illegal gun to an undercover officer.

As the deputy subdues Harris on the ground, a gunshot rings out and a man says: "Oh, I shot him. I'm sorry."

Harris screams: "He shot me. Oh, my God," and a deputy replies: "You f---ing ran. Shut the f--- up."

When Harris says he's losing his breath, a deputy replies, "F--- your breath."

Harris was treated by medics at the scene and died in a Tulsa hospital.

The family said in a statement that it was "saddened, shocked, confused and disturbed."

"Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of all of this is the inhumane and malicious treatment of Eric after he was shot," the family wrote. "These deputies treated Eric as less than human. They treated Eric as if his life had no value."

At a news conference on Monday, Andre Harris, the victim's brother, said he does not believe the shooting was racially motivated.

Oklahoma law defines culpable negligence as "the omission to do something which a reasonably careful person would do, or the lack of the usual ordinary care and caution in the performance of an act usually and ordinarily exercised by a person under similar circumstances and conditions," Tulsa County District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler said in a statement.

A telephone message left Monday with Bates' attorney, Scott Woods, was not immediately returned.

Tulsa Police Sgt. Jim Clark, who investigated the shooting as an independent consultant at the request of the sheriff's office, concluded that Bates had been so engrossed in the stress of the moment that he did not think clearly about what he had in his hand.

The use of reserve officers is commonplace across Oklahoma and much of the nation. Cities and counties often turn to them for extra manpower because of a lack of resources and tight budgets. They are sometimes used to free up regular officers to concentrate on high-priority duties.

Reserve deputies are permitted to carry firearms but have far less training than regular officers.

About 4,000 reserve officers are active in Oklahoma, according to the Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training. Most are unpaid and volunteer simply out of a sense of civic duty, said council Director Steve Emmons.

While there's no current official tally, an article in the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin in 2006 estimated the national total of reserve officers at 400,000.

In Oklahoma, reservists are required to complete 240 hours of basic training on subjects like civil and criminal law, traffic enforcement, investigations, firearms and defensive tactics. That is a fraction of the training required of regular officers, who must undergo 640 hours.

There is no age requirement for reserve officers, but they all must annually recertify with a minimum score on a firearms-training course.

"A lot of agencies, especially the smaller agencies in the state, have only one full-time officer on their staff," Emmons said.

Tulsa County, the state's second largest, has about 130 reservists who receive a minimum of 320 hours of training.

Bates, who was briefly a full-time officer with the Tulsa Police Department from 1964 to 1965, is now an insurance executive who updates his certification every year and has completed more than the state-required hours, said Tulsa County sheriff's spokesman Shannon Clark.

Bates was acting in a support role during the April 2 sting operation and does not typically confront suspects, Clark said.

Tulsa County Sheriff Stanley Glanz has described Bates as a personal friend, and records show he has been a generous donor to the department since he became a reserve deputy in 2008.

Besides a $2,500 donation to Glanz's re-election campaign in 2012, records released on Monday by the sheriff's office show Bates donated five vehicles, including a new Dodge Charger, a computer and forensic camera and a hand-held radio to the department from 2009 to 2011.

The Oklahoma chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union called Monday for an end to the use of reserve officers for significant police work.

"There are lots of legitimate functions for those reserve officers, like helping out in national disasters or putting up sandbags during flooding," said the chapter's executive director, Ryan Kiesel. "But under no circumstances should we be arming people who essentially want to play a grown-up version of police officer with deadly consequences."




slvemike4u -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/14/2015 7:01:50 AM)

Disgusting,how does any police department assume that wannabe's ,armed and dangerous,is a good idea baffles me ?




tj444 -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/14/2015 8:00:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
If a person can't handle bringing a child into the world and raising it, then that person should not be doing thing things that bring a child into the world. If you (none of the "you's" in this paragraph are specific to you, but are used in general) can't responsibly deal with the consequences of your actions, you shouldn't be taking those actions. I agree that one responsible way to deal with a pregnancy is to abort it, but if you can't pay for an abortion, you are relying on other people to pay for it, that's not quite as responsible of an option. And, since you are relying on others to pay for your abortion, why not rely on those people who are choosing to help you pay (people who donate to Planned Parenthood, etc.), and not those who are being forced to pay (taxpayers)?

dude.. if you don't think you should, as a taxpayer, pay for abortions, then why should I as a taxpayer pay for smokers that get lung cancer.. or for an overweight/obese person's diabetes meds when adhering to a healthy diet & exercise program could have avoided him from getting diabetes in the first place.. or for a cyclist that rides like a moron and gets hit.. there are tons of things I don't want to pay for that are avoidable but until you can get the overweight to all stop eating crap and sitting on their duff and smokers to stop smoking and cyclists to stop riding, your argument totally fails.. I also doubt very much if you have lived your entire life perfectly..


I most certainly haven't lived my life perfectly.

Why, as a taxpayer, are you paying for smokers, or the obese, or the ill, or the crazy drivers?


don't taxes (in part or in whole) pay for medicare, Medicaid, obamacare, policing, etc etc?.. just as you/everyone pays for abortions that you object to paying for? The costs to taxpayers also (imo) extends to taxes not collected, such as the taxes churches and religious organizations don't pay but should.. not everyone is religious but they more in tax to make up for it cuz the govt allows those religious orgs to be non-profits, including those fat cat religious leaders/evangelists that live in lavish homes that they pay no tax on..

I doubt very much you paid in full for all your mistakes, I expect for certain things taxpayers contributed.. its the thing about living in glass houses and all..




tj444 -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/14/2015 8:14:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

No you haven't and not very nice of me I apologize... I don't believe police should be doing those things either... I just believe you are disparaging those that should be getting your respect... putting their lives on the line every day to protect you and I and their families... Yet you just can't see past a few bad apples among the million... well i can't change your mind so time for me to move on.

Butch

I know not all cops are like that but they don't wear a sign to let me know which one they are.. and if they protect their own and lie, don't investigate thoroughly and properly, do things to help the bad ones get away with their bad/criminal deeds then they too are just as responsible and criminal.. so how many supposedly good cops have done that during their career? I expect its much more than "a few".. There was one poor black guy in florida that was stopped 258 times.. he was even at his place of work, working and a cop arrested him (62 times) for trespassing at his place of work over the objections of his employer, ffs! this is outrageous.. how many cops were involved in the harassment of this young man & others like him? If the "good cops" are so friggin' good, then why aren't they doing anything to get rid of the bad ones? You cant tell me they don't know who the bad ones are..

http://www.ibtimes.com/who-earl-sampson-meet-florida-man-arrested-62-times-trespassing-work-1483364




Aylee -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/14/2015 8:55:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

kinda back to the topic, but with the other cop who just shot a guy, because he thought it was his taser in response to this...

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Lucy...as with many of these cases the incidents only happen because of the actions of the alleged criminal. Your example may be a prosecutable case I don't know but it would most likely be poor training on the officers part. I am all for better training requirements and deadly force regulations. But I am very much against railroading police officers that make mistakes in stressful situations.

The subject has moved from the actions of the officer in this thread, which are clearly wrong, to condemning police in general and I do not believe statistics show this...despite attention getting headlines that are irresponsible in my opinion...and bias.

Butch

I have NOT and will not plaster all cops with the same brush,all blacks, all whites, all asians, all jews, all christans, all muslims and oh fuck even all doms or all dommes.
Not even dems, liberals, repubs, cons, libertarians...so dont pull that bs on me.
This particular guy you are talking about HAS been charged with manslaughter,

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — Prosecutors charged a reserve sheriff's deputy with manslaughter Monday in the death of a man who was fatally shot as he lay on the ground at the officer's feet — a shooting that was certain to raise questions about the use of volunteer officers to supplement full-time police.

The sheriff's office has said Robert Bates, a 73-year-old insurance executive who was volunteering on an undercover operation in Tulsa, mistakenly pulled out his handgun instead of his stun gun and shot the suspect as he struggled with deputies.

Bates, who is white, was charged with second-degree manslaughter involving "culpable negligence" for the April 2 death of Eric Harris, a 44-year-old black man. If convicted, he could face up to four years in prison.

It was the latest fatal shooting by a police officer to draw national attention after months of investigations and protests of other deaths in Ferguson, Missouri, New York City, Los Angeles and other elsewhere.




It is a reasonable charge. It does look like an accidental shooting.

Another thing worth keeping in mind: the mere fact that he elected to try to taser the bad guy is not evidence that lethal self-defense was not justified. It's possible that he was entitled under the threat to use lethal force, but attempted non-lethal force. That would clear him despite the fact that he fired the wrong weapon.

It will make his briefing relevant, too. If they had told him before the controlled buy that bad guy was armed and dangerous, and he's remote from the buy, and all he sees at the time of the shooting is the bad guy rushing toward him, it's reasonable for him to legitimately fear for his own life, but decide to try to use non-lethal force.

The pre-buy briefing will also be relevant to determining whether fear makes his mistake just a mistake, or whether it is negligence. If he's told the guy is dangerous, and then he sees the guy rushing at him, it's certainly reasonable to be afraid, and make a terrible mistake due to that fear, that is far more understandable than it otherwise would be.

I'm sort of shotgunning here, trying to cover a lot of scenarios, because we don't know exactly what happened yet. But in my mind, I have a hard time justifying any charges in the basic scenario of fleeing felon rushing toward officer who tries to use non-lethal force but grabs the wrong weapon.

That's "tragic mistake" territory, not criminal misconduct. Hash out negligence or not in a wrongful death case, not in a criminal trial. Unless something we see on the forthcoming video radically changes my understanding of what happened, I'm likely to stick with "tragic mistake."

Negligence is simply judged by a reasonable person standard. So the issue in this deputy's case will be whether, given the situation, was mistaking his pistol for a taser a mistake that a reasonably prudent deputy might have made. If yes, it'll be an excusable homicide; if no, second degree manslaughter.

TCSO was pushing for no charges, yet the DA went ahead and filed charges. In the back of my mind I have to wonder if this is an effort to head off another Ferguson situation. At least in local media, there appears to be an effort to make the Thug into some kind of saint, which he definitely wasn't, and to turn the Reserve Deputy into some kind of monster. Time will tell how this all shakes out.




Aylee -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/14/2015 8:56:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Disgusting,how does any police department assume that wannabe's ,armed and dangerous,is a good idea baffles me ?


He was on the outer outer perimeter of a controlled buy gone bad. I don't think they were expecting him to have to do anything. However. . . a 73 year old insurance salesman? Ummm. . . wha??




kdsub -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/14/2015 9:11:20 AM)

Oh I agree it is not smart to put reserve officers with little to no training in that type of situation. In our town they are unarmed and used for traffic control and such. If you saw the picture on yahoo that showed the gun and the taser The handles are almost identical. I believe him that it was a mistake but that is little solace to the family involved.

But don't you think that incident and the one in SC are different. I believe the SC officer purposely killed that man and deserves punishment... In the Oklahoma case I am not so sure. I will bet he gets no prison time but the department will pay a lot of money for his stupid mistake.

Butch




BamaD -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/14/2015 10:02:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Oh I agree it is not smart to put reserve officers with little to no training in that type of situation. In our town they are unarmed and used for traffic control and such. If you saw the picture on yahoo that showed the gun and the taser The handles are almost identical. I believe him that it was a mistake but that is little solace to the family involved.

But don't you think that incident and the one in SC are different. I believe the SC officer purposely killed that man and deserves punishment... In the Oklahoma case I am not so sure. I will bet he gets no prison time but the department will pay a lot of money for his stupid mistake.

Butch

There is no relationship between the two. I would be hesitant to put a 73 year old even on the perimeter. What we have is muscle memory. His hand came into contact and grabbed the first thing he found, if they look alike most likely you pull the trigger when leveled in both. The mistake was in the the way his equipment was organized. But he is a cop, we must assume malice till we can prove otherwise, how else can we protect ourselves from the small number of cops who shouldn't have the job.




slvemike4u -> RE: It Looks Like This Police Officer Fucked Up (4/14/2015 10:23:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Disgusting,how does any police department assume that wannabe's ,armed and dangerous,is a good idea baffles me ?


He was on the outer outer perimeter of a controlled buy gone bad. I don't think they were expecting him to have to do anything. However. . . a 73 year old insurance salesman? Ummm. . . wha??

Aylee does it really matter where he was.This was a pay to play plan gone horribly wrong.
Definitely a wannabe,and armed at that....no self respecting police force should countenance such an arrangement.
A disaster waiting to happen that did.
Add to that.....73 years old,wtf ?




Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625