Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Free Range Parenting


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Free Range Parenting Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 7:31:54 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

The problem comes in when you want to make the state enforce YOUR beliefs on everyone else.



I don't know the exact date when the jackass party stopped being "for the people" but as near as I can tell, it was somewhere right around Carter (at least, their "public" face).


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

the problem is, your ilk is not content to leave it at that and you (the generic you) work to make it illegal for parents to discipline their kids the way they want to, in time-tested and biblically supported ways.

which points to another difference between us all---if a conservative disagrees with something, he doesn't engage in it. if a liberal disagrees with something, he makes it so no one else can engage in it either.


The PPLs succeeded in getting smoking wiped out in quite a few states and bars and restaurants. That wasn't enough. Now, you can't even smoke outdoors. Then, when people discovered e-cigs, there is now a movement afoot to treat them just like conventional cigarettes 'cause the Pablum©-Pukers just can't stand anyone enjoying their lives in a way that doesn't jibe with DNC talking points.



Michael


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 10:59:33 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

And your solution .....?
One solution? Anybody involved with CPS...whether it be the case workers or the therapist who brainwashed Alicia Wade into testifying her father raped her And who was later found to be innocent...gets penalized for their zealous nature. Oh wait...she was...to the tune of 11/2 million dollars for her part in the disruption of a family, the ruining of a good man's name and his career. Oh...And thank GOD, the California CPS was too...to the tune of 2 million dollars.

Another solution? Quit wasting time and money spent on bogus investigations into Free Range parents...those who dare defy the system...And spend that time and those dollars on investigating cases where ACTUAL harm may be being done. Stop going after fathers like me and others who dared to swat our kids butt because sometimes, timeouts and reasoning don't work with a smart-ass resentful 11 yr old and soon to be ex-wife is pissed off and go after parents leaving marks on their kids.


Okay I'm not the guy you want to be talking to.I'm one of those people who feel it's wrong,in all instances, to hit/swat/smack or otherwise strike a child.
Sorry,that's just the way I feel.To me when an adult resorts to striking a child that adult has already lost control of the situation.
I managed to raise a child without hitting that child......IMO(and only in my opinion) there's isn't an 11 year old smart assed enough to convince me that reaching that child is thru striking that child.
As I said that's my opinion,it's also a core belief that it's going to change.....so don't waste your time.

I won't try to waste your time. But since you've never done it and, as far as I know, weren't there, you really have no idea whether I was in control or not, do you? Apparently, the state agrees with my point of view since it is legal in Colorado to spank your child...within limits.

So ,because you and the state of Colorado disagree I should change my opinion on what is out of bounds for a parent in dealing with their child....I don't think so.
My opinion on these matters is a firmly held belief .You do as you wish,within the law,with your own children.
I'll keep my opinions and beliefs thanks all the same...
Again...you're wrong in what you think I think. You are free to raise your child the way you want...and that includes what you think is out of bounds for YOU and your child. Keep those beliefs.

But I was also free to raise my child as I wished. And for me, that included a swat on the ass, when needed. It wasn't done out of anger or a loss of control, despite your belief.

The problem comes in when you want to make the state enforce YOUR beliefs on everyone else.


Liberals favor freedom of choice as long as you choose the way they want you too.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 12:14:03 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

And your solution .....?
One solution? Anybody involved with CPS...whether it be the case workers or the therapist who brainwashed Alicia Wade into testifying her father raped her And who was later found to be innocent...gets penalized for their zealous nature. Oh wait...she was...to the tune of 11/2 million dollars for her part in the disruption of a family, the ruining of a good man's name and his career. Oh...And thank GOD, the California CPS was too...to the tune of 2 million dollars.

Another solution? Quit wasting time and money spent on bogus investigations into Free Range parents...those who dare defy the system...And spend that time and those dollars on investigating cases where ACTUAL harm may be being done. Stop going after fathers like me and others who dared to swat our kids butt because sometimes, timeouts and reasoning don't work with a smart-ass resentful 11 yr old and soon to be ex-wife is pissed off and go after parents leaving marks on their kids.


Okay I'm not the guy you want to be talking to.I'm one of those people who feel it's wrong,in all instances, to hit/swat/smack or otherwise strike a child.
Sorry,that's just the way I feel.To me when an adult resorts to striking a child that adult has already lost control of the situation.
I managed to raise a child without hitting that child......IMO(and only in my opinion) there's isn't an 11 year old smart assed enough to convince me that reaching that child is thru striking that child.
As I said that's my opinion,it's also a core belief that it's going to change.....so don't waste your time.

I won't try to waste your time. But since you've never done it and, as far as I know, weren't there, you really have no idea whether I was in control or not, do you? Apparently, the state agrees with my point of view since it is legal in Colorado to spank your child...within limits.

So ,because you and the state of Colorado disagree I should change my opinion on what is out of bounds for a parent in dealing with their child....I don't think so.
My opinion on these matters is a firmly held belief .You do as you wish,within the law,with your own children.
I'll keep my opinions and beliefs thanks all the same...
Again...you're wrong in what you think I think. You are free to raise your child the way you want...and that includes what you think is out of bounds for YOU and your child. Keep those beliefs.

But I was also free to raise my child as I wished. And for me, that included a swat on the ass, when needed. It wasn't done out of anger or a loss of control, despite your belief.

The problem comes in when you want to make the state enforce YOUR beliefs on everyone else.


And I could say that the problem starts when states decide that this form of corporal punishment is okay and that form is too far.
How about I disagree with that slippery slope.
You firmly believe banning one type of weapon or ammunition is the first step to a slippery slope that ends with all weapons being banned.
I believe that one swat on the ass,in the name of discipline,is nothing more than the first step that ends with physical child abuse.
I applaud the state of Texas for bringing charges against Adrian Peterson and the Vikings for suspending him.
Who is the arbiter of where the line fall between abuse and discipline ?
You ?
Perhaps you are able to draw a hard line in the sand and not go past it,what about the child being raised by an asshole who moves from swatting to thrashing ?
Who protects that child?
I'm not only of the belief that it is right for my child not to be hit,I also believe it's right for your child not to be hit.
Once again we find ourselves on opposite ends of a subject.....no big surprise.
I'll stick with believing that an adult should be able to reach/discipline a child without resorting to physical discipline and I applaud localities that enforce that principal.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 12:16:38 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

So ,because you and the state of Colorado disagree I should change my opinion on what is out of bounds for a parent in dealing with their child....I don't think so.


I see cd beat (no pun intended) me to it...

the problem is, your ilk is not content to leave it at that and you (the generic you) work to make it illegal for parents to discipline their kids the way they want to, in time-tested and biblically supported ways.

which points to another difference between us all---if a conservative disagrees with something, he doesn't engage in it. if a liberal disagrees with something, he makes it so no one else can engage in it either.

Bullshit with the time tested and biblically supported ways.....you can take that reasoning and stuff it.
The bible has a lot to say about a lot of things.....do you know what people who take the bible literally are called ?
Hint.....asshole,fanatics and idiots are all correct answers.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 12:18:34 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

And your solution .....?
One solution? Anybody involved with CPS...whether it be the case workers or the therapist who brainwashed Alicia Wade into testifying her father raped her And who was later found to be innocent...gets penalized for their zealous nature. Oh wait...she was...to the tune of 11/2 million dollars for her part in the disruption of a family, the ruining of a good man's name and his career. Oh...And thank GOD, the California CPS was too...to the tune of 2 million dollars.

Another solution? Quit wasting time and money spent on bogus investigations into Free Range parents...those who dare defy the system...And spend that time and those dollars on investigating cases where ACTUAL harm may be being done. Stop going after fathers like me and others who dared to swat our kids butt because sometimes, timeouts and reasoning don't work with a smart-ass resentful 11 yr old and soon to be ex-wife is pissed off and go after parents leaving marks on their kids.


Okay I'm not the guy you want to be talking to.I'm one of those people who feel it's wrong,in all instances, to hit/swat/smack or otherwise strike a child.
Sorry,that's just the way I feel.To me when an adult resorts to striking a child that adult has already lost control of the situation.
I managed to raise a child without hitting that child......IMO(and only in my opinion) there's isn't an 11 year old smart assed enough to convince me that reaching that child is thru striking that child.
As I said that's my opinion,it's also a core belief that it's going to change.....so don't waste your time.

I won't try to waste your time. But since you've never done it and, as far as I know, weren't there, you really have no idea whether I was in control or not, do you? Apparently, the state agrees with my point of view since it is legal in Colorado to spank your child...within limits.

So ,because you and the state of Colorado disagree I should change my opinion on what is out of bounds for a parent in dealing with their child....I don't think so.
My opinion on these matters is a firmly held belief .You do as you wish,within the law,with your own children.
I'll keep my opinions and beliefs thanks all the same...
Again...you're wrong in what you think I think. You are free to raise your child the way you want...and that includes what you think is out of bounds for YOU and your child. Keep those beliefs.

But I was also free to raise my child as I wished. And for me, that included a swat on the ass, when needed. It wasn't done out of anger or a loss of control, despite your belief.

The problem comes in when you want to make the state enforce YOUR beliefs on everyone else.


Liberals favor freedom of choice as long as you choose the way they want you too.

And conservatives favor small government except when they tell you what you can do in your bedroom with who....so you can have your conservative views and I guess you can shove them where the sun doesn't shine

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 12:23:31 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

The PPLs succeeded in getting smoking wiped out in quite a few states and bars and restaurants. That wasn't enough. Now, you can't even smoke outdoors. Then, when people discovered e-cigs, there is now a movement afoot to treat them just like conventional cigarettes 'cause the Pablum©-Pukers just can't stand anyone enjoying their lives in a way that doesn't jibe with DNC talking points.


interesting. In the UK I associate the anti e-cig movement with conservative farties, not lefties. Old people, generally, who don't understand what they are and how they work, but 'just don't like the look of them'. At one of the local cafes their new policy is to ban them. When I asked the proprietor why, his answer was 'Because they make people feel uncomfortable'.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 12:26:00 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
No one thinks that actual child abuse is okay. Abuse where there is a significant threat to the child's well being and safety.

Many of us DO think that 14th amendment violations are NOT okay.

In the 2000 case of Troxel v. Granville, SCOTUS reaffirmed (Based on rulings from the 1920s.) the “fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children,” which it called “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court.”

There was NO compelling state interest to kidnap, terrorize, and lie to these children.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 12:29:31 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

No one thinks that actual child abuse is okay. Abuse where there is a significant threat to the child's well being and safety.

Many of us DO think that 14th amendment violations are NOT okay.

In the 2000 case of Troxel v. Granville, SCOTUS reaffirmed (Based on rulings from the 1920s.) the “fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children,” which it called “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court.”

There was NO compelling state interest to kidnap, terrorize, and lie to these children.

I think the conservation has moved beyond this one case Aylee,seems to me the subject now is whether or not it is okay to hit a child as a form of parental discipline.
I'm ,obviously,of a mind that says no....and I have zero tolerance for those that disagree.
I'm probably going to catch some flak for that,but when I consider who the flak will be thrown by....I'm fine with it.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 12:47:59 PM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

The PPLs succeeded in getting smoking wiped out in quite a few states and bars and restaurants. That wasn't enough. Now, you can't even smoke outdoors. Then, when people discovered e-cigs, there is now a movement afoot to treat them just like conventional cigarettes 'cause the Pablum©-Pukers just can't stand anyone enjoying their lives in a way that doesn't jibe with DNC talking points.


interesting. In the UK I associate the anti e-cig movement with conservative farties, not lefties. Old people, generally, who don't understand what they are and how they work, but 'just don't like the look of them'. At one of the local cafes their new policy is to ban them. When I asked the proprietor why, his answer was 'Because they make people feel uncomfortable'.


I've been trying to figure out when those "Pablum Puking Liberals" sneaked into the Idaho legislature and took it over. As near as I can tell, the last time the Democrats controlled either the senate or house in Idaho was all the way back in 1958, and in my lifetime there have only been 2 Democratic governors for Idaho (though one, Cecil Andrus, was elected for two non-consecutive terms.) And yet, somehow those damned, sneaky liberals got those very same smoking laws passed in Idaho that DS was complaining about. Those sneaky, sneaky bastards!

_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 1:15:12 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

No one thinks that actual child abuse is okay. Abuse where there is a significant threat to the child's well being and safety.

Many of us DO think that 14th amendment violations are NOT okay.

In the 2000 case of Troxel v. Granville, SCOTUS reaffirmed (Based on rulings from the 1920s.) the “fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children,” which it called “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court.”

There was NO compelling state interest to kidnap, terrorize, and lie to these children.

Many people do not seem to understand that there is a major difference between spanking a child and beating them.
It is very distinct and there is a broad gap between them.
An example, when my son was about 2 or 3 and we would go out to eat he would sometimes start acting up and make a problem for everyone around us. I suggested that we go for a walk. He jumped at it. We went outside I popped him on the bottom a couple of times and went back inside. After that he would start acting up, I would suggest that we go for a walk, and he would say no daddy, I'll be good.
Now if I had taken him somewhere and beaten him black and blue that would be horrible.
On the other hand if acting up had gotten him my undivided attention it would have never ended.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 1:17:41 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: igor2003


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

The PPLs succeeded in getting smoking wiped out in quite a few states and bars and restaurants. That wasn't enough. Now, you can't even smoke outdoors. Then, when people discovered e-cigs, there is now a movement afoot to treat them just like conventional cigarettes 'cause the Pablum©-Pukers just can't stand anyone enjoying their lives in a way that doesn't jibe with DNC talking points.


interesting. In the UK I associate the anti e-cig movement with conservative farties, not lefties. Old people, generally, who don't understand what they are and how they work, but 'just don't like the look of them'. At one of the local cafes their new policy is to ban them. When I asked the proprietor why, his answer was 'Because they make people feel uncomfortable'.


I've been trying to figure out when those "Pablum Puking Liberals" sneaked into the Idaho legislature and took it over. As near as I can tell, the last time the Democrats controlled either the senate or house in Idaho was all the way back in 1958, and in my lifetime there have only been 2 Democratic governors for Idaho (though one, Cecil Andrus, was elected for two non-consecutive terms.) And yet, somehow those damned, sneaky liberals got those very same smoking laws passed in Idaho that DS was complaining about. Those sneaky, sneaky bastards!

Come on now, you know that liberalism isn't confined to the Democratic party, I have even seen a couple of conservative Democrats.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 1:20:06 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

No one thinks that actual child abuse is okay. Abuse where there is a significant threat to the child's well being and safety.

Many of us DO think that 14th amendment violations are NOT okay.

In the 2000 case of Troxel v. Granville, SCOTUS reaffirmed (Based on rulings from the 1920s.) the “fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children,” which it called “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court.”

There was NO compelling state interest to kidnap, terrorize, and lie to these children.

I think the conservation has moved beyond this one case Aylee,seems to me the subject now is whether or not it is okay to hit a child as a form of parental discipline.
I'm ,obviously,of a mind that says no....and I have zero tolerance for those that disagree.
I'm probably going to catch some flak for that,but when I consider who the flak will be thrown by....I'm fine with it.


This is likely due to you only having one child. If you had at least one spare, than all sorts of opportunities for types of discipline opens itself up.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 2:05:23 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

So ,because you and the state of Colorado disagree I should change my opinion on what is out of bounds for a parent in dealing with their child....I don't think so.


I see cd beat (no pun intended) me to it...

the problem is, your ilk is not content to leave it at that and you (the generic you) work to make it illegal for parents to discipline their kids the way they want to, in time-tested and biblically supported ways.

which points to another difference between us all---if a conservative disagrees with something, he doesn't engage in it. if a liberal disagrees with something, he makes it so no one else can engage in it either.

Bullshit with the time tested and biblically supported ways.....you can take that reasoning and stuff it.
The bible has a lot to say about a lot of things.....do you know what people who take the bible literally are called ?
Hint.....asshole,fanatics and idiots are all correct answers.


I guess I happen to be then, an idiot/fanatic/asshole. apparently like the many millions (now and throughout history) of well educated, intelligent, wise, loving, people who are devoted Christians and who find guidance from the scriptures---who think similarly.

sorry---your name calling and your personal disenchantment with the catholic church in no way changes what the bible has been, or is to others, or the testimony of people who have engaged with corporal punishment either as receivers or givers, and have had it successfully work as correction.





< Message edited by bounty44 -- 4/17/2015 2:06:52 PM >

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 2:40:35 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

No one thinks that actual child abuse is okay. Abuse where there is a significant threat to the child's well being and safety.

Many of us DO think that 14th amendment violations are NOT okay.

In the 2000 case of Troxel v. Granville, SCOTUS reaffirmed (Based on rulings from the 1920s.) the “fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children,” which it called “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court.”

There was NO compelling state interest to kidnap, terrorize, and lie to these children.

I think the conservation has moved beyond this one case Aylee,seems to me the subject now is whether or not it is okay to hit a child as a form of parental discipline.
I'm ,obviously,of a mind that says no....and I have zero tolerance for those that disagree.
I'm probably going to catch some flak for that,but when I consider who the flak will be thrown by....I'm fine with it.


This is likely due to you only having one child. If you had at least one spare, than all sorts of opportunities for types of discipline opens itself up.

I could have had a dozen children,my views wouldn't have changed.
As a matter of fact due to my sister marrying an asshole,I had a hand in raising her three(walked the eldest down the aisle last june)add my younger brothers early death due to leukemia and his three boys get added to the mix.
I played father to all of them,never saw the need to strike any of them.
Interesting how the slippery slope argument is,in this instance ,rejected by the gun advocates.
They use that argument to great effect and here it means nothing.


Unlike bounty and cd I don't see a difference between swatting and hitting.
I'm still left to wonder why any adult feels the need to "swat" a two or three year old child.
Aren't you smarter than said child ? Can you not reason with said child ?
What is wrong with you,as a parent,that your skill set seems to begin and end with "swatting "?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 2:45:51 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

So ,because you and the state of Colorado disagree I should change my opinion on what is out of bounds for a parent in dealing with their child....I don't think so.


I see cd beat (no pun intended) me to it...

the problem is, your ilk is not content to leave it at that and you (the generic you) work to make it illegal for parents to discipline their kids the way they want to, in time-tested and biblically supported ways.

which points to another difference between us all---if a conservative disagrees with something, he doesn't engage in it. if a liberal disagrees with something, he makes it so no one else can engage in it either.

Bullshit with the time tested and biblically supported ways.....you can take that reasoning and stuff it.
The bible has a lot to say about a lot of things.....do you know what people who take the bible literally are called ?
Hint.....asshole,fanatics and idiots are all correct answers.


I guess I happen to be then, an idiot/fanatic/asshole. apparently like the many millions (now and throughout history) of well educated, intelligent, wise, loving, people who are devoted Christians and who find guidance from the scriptures---who think similarly.

sorry---your name calling and your personal disenchantment with the catholic church in no way changes what the bible has been, or is to others, or the testimony of people who have engaged with corporal punishment either as receivers or givers, and have had it successfully work as correction.





I didn't call anyone any names,but I'll tell you this....if the shoe fits than wear it.
As a matter of fact I'll repeat it for you.
If you are reading the bible,and taking what it says literally you are indeed either an asshole,a fanatic or an idiot.
Which one of those that you choose to self identify with I could give a flying shit.
The bible taken literally is pure fucking nonsense....if you aren't intelligent enough to know that sue your local school system,don't bitch at me.
Somewhere along the line someone failed to teach you reasoning skills,logic...hell a whole shit load of stuff.
Maybe you could move to Tennessee ?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 3:08:04 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

No one thinks that actual child abuse is okay. Abuse where there is a significant threat to the child's well being and safety.

Many of us DO think that 14th amendment violations are NOT okay.

In the 2000 case of Troxel v. Granville, SCOTUS reaffirmed (Based on rulings from the 1920s.) the “fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children,” which it called “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court.”

There was NO compelling state interest to kidnap, terrorize, and lie to these children.

I think the conservation has moved beyond this one case Aylee,seems to me the subject now is whether or not it is okay to hit a child as a form of parental discipline.
I'm ,obviously,of a mind that says no....and I have zero tolerance for those that disagree.
I'm probably going to catch some flak for that,but when I consider who the flak will be thrown by....I'm fine with it.


This is likely due to you only having one child. If you had at least one spare, than all sorts of opportunities for types of discipline opens itself up.

I could have had a dozen children,my views wouldn't have changed.
As a matter of fact due to my sister marrying an asshole,I had a hand in raising her three(walked the eldest down the aisle last june)add my younger brothers early death due to leukemia and his three boys get added to the mix.
I played father to all of them,never saw the need to strike any of them.
Interesting how the slippery slope argument is,in this instance ,rejected by the gun advocates.
They use that argument to great effect and here it means nothing.


Unlike bounty and cd I don't see a difference between swatting and hitting.
I'm still left to wonder why any adult feels the need to "swat" a two or three year old child.
Aren't you smarter than said child ? Can you not reason with said child ?
What is wrong with you,as a parent,that your skill set seems to begin and end with "swatting "?


Umm. . . I meant that with a spare child or two if you screw one up you have an extra to try again with.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 6:18:53 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
I know you well enough to know your tongue is firmly in your cheek.
My mother had four(I'm not about to offer her as Mother of the year material) but she once told me the only batting average a parent care about is 1,000
A .750 batting average for her meant one child was lost.....no parent would accept that average....lol
So one are a dozen we both know it makes no difference



How is the little guy doing ?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 6:47:45 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

No one thinks that actual child abuse is okay. Abuse where there is a significant threat to the child's well being and safety.

Many of us DO think that 14th amendment violations are NOT okay.

In the 2000 case of Troxel v. Granville, SCOTUS reaffirmed (Based on rulings from the 1920s.) the “fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children,” which it called “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court.”

There was NO compelling state interest to kidnap, terrorize, and lie to these children.

I think the conservation has moved beyond this one case Aylee,seems to me the subject now is whether or not it is okay to hit a child as a form of parental discipline.
I'm ,obviously,of a mind that says no....and I have zero tolerance for those that disagree.
I'm probably going to catch some flak for that,but when I consider who the flak will be thrown by....I'm fine with it.


This is likely due to you only having one child. If you had at least one spare, than all sorts of opportunities for types of discipline opens itself up.

I could have had a dozen children,my views wouldn't have changed.
As a matter of fact due to my sister marrying an asshole,I had a hand in raising her three(walked the eldest down the aisle last june)add my younger brothers early death due to leukemia and his three boys get added to the mix.
I played father to all of them,never saw the need to strike any of them.
Interesting how the slippery slope argument is,in this instance ,rejected by the gun advocates.
They use that argument to great effect and here it means nothing.


Unlike bounty and cd I don't see a difference between swatting and hitting.
I'm still left to wonder why any adult feels the need to "swat" a two or three year old child.
Aren't you smarter than said child ? Can you not reason with said child ?
What is wrong with you,as a parent,that your skill set seems to begin and end with "swatting "?

I guess you'll be left to wonder then because I'm pretty sure you won't listen to what these people have to say:

"Dr. Diana Baumrind of the University of California, asserted that social scientists had overstepped the evidence in claiming that spanking caused lasting harm to the child.

''The scientific case against the use of normative physical punishment is a leaky dike, not a solid edifice,'' Dr. Baumrind said.

Dr. Baumrind, a psychologist known for her classic studies of authoritative, authoritarian and permissive styles of child-rearing, said she did not advocate spanking. But she argued that an occasional swat, when delivered in the context of good child-rearing, had not been shown to do any harm.

The studies cited by opponents of corporal punishment, Dr. Baumrind contended, often do not adequately distinguish the effects of spanking, as practiced by nonabusive parents, from the impact of severe physical punishment and abuse. Nor do they consider other factors that might account for problems later in life, like whether parents are rejecting or whether defiant or aggressive children might be more likely to be spanked in the first place."

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/25/us/findings-give-some-support-to-advocates-of-spanking.html

http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Spanking

The research does not point to an occasional spanking as causing long-term harm in children. If you must use spanking, use it sparingly to make a strong point that you will not tolerate potentially harmful behavior. Use spanking with a clear purpose in mind after you have tried other methods of discipline.

...Other times, a child seems to increasingly accelerate the misbehavior and ignore verbal warnings, time out and other forms of discipline. He appears to be testing the limits to see how far he can go in acting out. My mother used to say that this child with frenzied energy and behavior out of control needed to have a'knot jerked in his tail.' It is the surprise of the spanking, rather than the force that breaks the child's escalating acting-out-behavior...

http://www.angriesout.com/parents10.htm

You see, Mike...part of your problem is "assumption". You assume...because I mentioned a well-timed swat (not a series of them)...that it was the only recourse I had, the only form of discipline I utilized, the only skill-set I had. If you can find a post...somewhere, anywhere...where I stated OR even suggested that swatting was the beginning or end of my skill set, bring it out. But you can't...

Once again, you were wrong...blinded by your arrogance as what? A liberal? Or a non-spanking parent?

The articles above came down more on the side of NON-spanking side than the spanking side but, unlike many of the other articles, we're unafraid of stating the fact that there was a lot of research purporting to show the negative effects of spanking, much of it had not been conclusive.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 6:56:07 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
I didn't have to assume shit...you told us about it.
Maybe I'm not making myself clear enough for you to understand.....I don't care what other "skill sets" you had as a parent...or didn't have for that matter.
If you think hitting your child(why dress it up ,a swat is a hit,no?) than as far as I'm concerned(as in my opinion) you were wrong...plain and simple I think it's wrong to hit a child.


Let's put it this way....how much do you weigh ?
How much do you think your two or three year old child weighed ?
See the difference ?
What you call discipline I call abuse.....Don't care whether or not you agree with me.
This is my opinion,I'm not calling the cops on you and reporting you,I'm simply telling you that in my opinion a 200 lb man "swatting" a two or three year old is an asshole
Just how I feel about it,don't get upset about it.
It's not like I thought you were a great guy before you told us about "swatting" a two/three year old...so no harm done

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Free Range Parenting - 4/17/2015 7:13:05 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I didn't have to assume shit...you told us about it.
Maybe I'm not making myself clear enough for you to understand.....I don't care what other "skill sets" you had as a parent...or didn't have for that matter.
If you think hitting your child(why dress it up ,a swat is a hit,no?) than as far as I'm concerned(as in my opinion) you were wrong...plain and simple I think it's wrong to hit a child.


Let's put it this way....how much do you weigh ?
How much do you think your two or three year old child weighed ?
See the difference ?
What you call discipline I call abuse.....Don't care whether or not you agree with me.
This is my opinion,I'm not calling the cops on you and reporting you,I'm simply telling you that in my opinion a 200 lb man "swatting" a two or three year old is an asshole
Just how I feel about it,don't get upset about it.
It's not like I thought you were a great guy before you told us about "swatting" a two/three year old...so no harm done

Whether an arrogant, touch-feely prick like you thinks it's abuse matters little to me. The speed of your response tells me all I need to know about your willingness to read something that might poke at your narrow little "Kim-bay-ya" world. As long as scientists and others are, and my kids loved and respected me through childhood and as adults...and turned out to be responsible adults...that's all I cared about. Two kids...Two responsible adults who love and respect their father and mother.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Free Range Parenting Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125