|
itsSIRtou -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/28/2015 10:11:37 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: JVoV
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
FR
When a liberal (current definition not the original one) see a problem he says what can the government do to fix this.
When a conservative sees the same problem he says how can we fix this without the government.
And anyone with sense doesn't leave out any options.
Conservatives use government as last resort.
Liberals try the government option for twenty or thirty years then try another government solution.
The reason CONservatives use the federal Government as last resort, is so there's over 50 variations of the so-called "solution" with accompanying variations of CONfusing loopholes so that the problem continues for the people least likely to be able to pay for the over-priced solution, and the Real constituents of conservatives continue to profit from the problem, and the middle class gets told all they have to do is work harder to fix the problem. (don't forget to wear your flag pin while you do that, BTW.)
Liberals want ONE uniform nationwide government solution to the problem for the middle class and the poor, without the CONfusion, loopholes, and the profit centers the CONservatives like. WHY? Because the private sector has proven it will never affect the complete solution or a solution at all without profits being first priority over people.
The idea that conservatives want to avoid helping people is a key excuse for insisting on a government solution to any problem. It isn't true but what does that have to do with ideology? BTW they also look to state or local government to solve more localized problems so the uniformity across the nation argument is bogus justification for what they already wanted to do.
Your response tells it all, even what you are unaware of. You know the more you splinter a law the less effective the law is to solve the problem, so Why are you agreeing with this when you know it is true? 50+ law variations in per state times 50+ law variations in per state governments = 2,500+ variations of a law and that's supposed to work on a nationwide problem??? THATS WHATS BOGUS.
The fact that every time there is an idea of a tax cut conservatives are the ONLY people holding out the whole process to give the wealthy the cut too. Higher minimum wages, child tax credits, and every financial advantage Originally purely intended for the middle-class and poor a has been held hostage by Republicans and conservatives for tax cuts for the wealthy, and you have the nerve to say I'm wrong??
If I'd had to wait for the state, county and city governments to make the Federal Civil Rights Act into law, not a damn thing would have changed in many areas of this nation, and not a damn body anywhere to enforce the law in the places that did.
The only things that conservatives will vote for is a wartime economy, deficit spending,& tax cuts for the wealthy,... In no particular order.
It is unfortunate that you actually believe that.
It is unfortunate that your party actually gives anyone the reason in any way to believe that. Seeing is believing, BamaD. Oh wait, u don't see....
So when your party votes for a purely middle-class and poor tax cut with no wealthy tax cut Attached... I'll change my mind then for a moment or two.
|
|
|
|
