tweakabelle
Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007 From: Sydney Australia Status: offline
|
It is sad that some are questioning the rehabilitation of the two young men who were executed. Especially so as it is unlikely those doing the questioning have the slightest idea whether their rehabilitation is genuine or otherwise. One person in a position to form an educated opinion is the governor of the prison where they spent 10 years awaiting their executions: "It was always hard at the time to elicit sympathy for the two organisers of this mid-level smuggling attempt. But a decade on there is no doubt that if Indonesia executes Chan and Sukumaran, it will be killing different men. They have admitted their crimes and expressed remorse. They are leaders at Bali’s Kerobokan prison, organising classes in everything from computers to philosophy. They have learnt Indonesian and counsel other prisoners. Their reform is at the heart of their last attempts to save their lives, and it is the plea of their desperate families. Why kill two young men who have had a decade to change, to contribute, to reform? It is not just their lawyers and families who say so. In a highly unusual intervention, then governor of the prison, Siswanto, told an appeal hearing in 2010 that the pair were model prisoners whose lives should be spared. Their reform was “not a camouflage act”, he said. “They are still young. They deserve to be given time to fix their past behaviour. I personally cannot accept it if they are executed.” http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/27/bali-nine-hard-won-public-sympathy-appears-no-match-for-judicial-resolve "
_____________________________
|