HunterCA
Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tkman117 quote:
ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote:
ORIGINAL: Tkman117 Let's put it this way, if I listed my expertise do you think that you would care or change your tune? No, of course not. So in the end the point you're making is what? That I actually don't know what I'm talking about? I could point out your blatant disregard for the scientific process to refute your expertise. So in the end we reach a stalemate and the discussion goes where? You get the chance to make character and ad hominem attacks and you get to feel superior to someone, good for you. Con psychology isn't terribly difficult to predict bud, if you want to catch someone with their pants down who isn't expecting it, try the Catholic Church, they're experts at that sort of thing. LMAO, you worked in the Catholic Church. As I look back I'm pretty sure I provided a link to an expert every time I chided your lack of understanding. I'm pretty sure that there were no ad hominum attacks since everything was linked to show you were wrong. For your use, here's a definition of ad hominem http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Which is to attack the person rather than the topic. I've always pointed out why you were an idiot before I said so. So, technically, there were no ad hominem attacks on you by me. As to whether or not I'd change my tune if you had said you had any education, training and experience, I will have to say that I'd probably have mentioned you were not a sterling credit to your educators, trainers or supervisors. I worked in the Catholic Church...you know if you're going to make stupid accusations....actually, that's probably not possible, you can't seem to help yourself. And yet when I point out your stupidity I'm suddenly a butt hurt liberal, which last time I checked would be considered an ad hominem. Funny how that works, seems we got a bit of a hypocrite on our hands here Tkman117...who worked the Catholic Church into the conversation? I'm pretty sure if I followings posts above it was you. Are you not understanding or did I over look someone else's comment you were referencing? Yes I mentioned butt hurt by observing your tone and content. Having years of experience with the English language I consider I'm qualified to do that. So I'm gonna have to call this one as not ad hominem. I know. You feel I should be shamed. I apologize for not being so.
|