Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Jade Helm 15


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Jade Helm 15 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 12:10:50 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Conservatives are supposed to give a shit about Jade 15 but it takes a "liberal" to start a thread on it?


I held off for a while to see if anyone would bring this forth in all honesty. If not from the conspiracy fringe, from someone else on here on either side of the 'debate'.

If conservatives didn't give a shit about it, why all the fuss? Logic seems to point out that so many have problems and fears about a military training exercise.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
An all straw man thread too, no substance. Plenty of the typical lies we have come to expect from "liberal" posters


An what lies are those?

You dont state what they are, nor give evidence.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Your clip on Ted Cruz for example, you wrote that he was milking it etc, but anyone can click on the link and see how that is just another in a long series of your bloviating and outright lies


The guy is milking the issue. He's a politician and a bad one at that! This is a guy that wanted to shut down the entire US Government. Not one bit of an argument. Just bullshit upon bullshit from you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
The only one trying to "milk it" is you


Amusing, but wrong. I have nothing to gain from the Military training or it taking Texas over.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 12:22:51 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
I think you have your facts wrong again. Been going on since 1940 and possibly before but not sure.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisiana_Maneuvers


US Military training has gone on for as long as we've had a US Military. Before that it was collections of militia in various towns. But for JH15, its originals seem directly tied to a plan from the GHWB administration. It makes sense given places like Texas and California have terrain similar to places in the Middle East. If we had problems with say, Russia, the US Military might be training people in other parts of the nation.

Normally something like this would simply fly without much of a problem. That its generated so much 'buzz' by elected officials whom should be sane and stable, rather than listening to conspiracies and half truths.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 12:50:20 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
Holy Shit, the first rational response....

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Hmmmm...when 3rd Brigade, 82nd Airborne, jumped into Missoula, Montana in 1977, we jumped into an area that was a mix of ranchers and blue collar timbermen and college students, conservatives and liberals. Not surprisingly...given the times...we weren't welcomed all that warmly by the college population, despite most of us being closer to their age and shared interests. No, where we found our warmer welcome was amongst the "older" folks...Those over 30, 35.


Dont be quick to lump me in with other liberals. I love my military. Those guys are both playful in airsoft and paintball; but when they put their game face on, its professional and deadly. I myself almost joined the military. Unfortunately I was to tall....

When I played Planetside 2 in the first few months of the game's release and leading platoons. I had a number of current and former military ask if I was in the military. When I stated I was just a 'civie', they were rather surprised by it. I had squad tactical knowledge and did many unorthodox maneuvers to out flank the enemy. Combined with my 'passive aggressive' nature, they said I should have been an officer. What I do in the game, and what the actual soldiers do in real life, are two very different things. I've been in one or two gang level moments of violence, but NOTHING, like some of the stuff of friends and associates who saw actual action in Iraq and Afghanistan. I give those people a serious amount of respect!

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Believe it or not, Joether...your side did not always feel very warmly towards the military. And, given the animosity shown on many college campuses towards anything that smacks of a military presence...in the form of R.O.T.C. or many recruiters...I'd say that still holds true, at least among the young. And I'd be willing to bet fairly good money that the majority of those parents displaying those "my son/daughter is in the Army/Navy/Marines/Air Force" are conservative.


Its an odd thing with college campuses and the US Military. Some of it today is the fading bad blood from the Vietnam War. Some of it how college educated people look down on the US Military. While in college, a bunch of us 'gamers' gave a friendly challenge to the USAF ROTC guys in a 'air battle game'. We cleaned the skies of them! At the end of it, the winners bought the losers beer at the pub and we all chatted about the various moments. Good laughs and such. Very intelligent guys. No doubt they have done well in life.

As for stickers on a car? Its hard to say. I've seen the gambit of political views. Once I saw a "Proud Parent of a US Marine" sticker next to a peace symbol. Its a stereotype that all liberals hate the military and all conservatives are stupid. You will find the opposite and even 'in between' folks. I think we have seen not just on this issue but other issues that our perception of truth and the actual truth have been two different things.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
So why would conservatives in Texas...if they do...have a distrust of the President's military? Hmmmm...could it be his comments about certain segments of the population clinging to their Guns and Bibles? Could it be the clashes between their state and the Feds over issues such as border control? Could it be the President declaring what happened at Fort Hood a "workplace tragedy" rather than the terrorist act it was?


First off, its not the President's military. Its the United States of America's military. The President's army, if you were to call it that, is called the Secret Service. Their job is not to be the private army of the guy in the Oval Office. I think the distrust among the population of Texas has more to do with the man's skin color, rather than his policies, viewpoints, or even token moments of speech taken out of context.

The issue with the Fed and their state handling border security is the by product of the two parties not agreeing on a decent compromise on immigration. That the issue is used like Abortion; something to bitch about to gain votes but accomplish nothing on it. The ACA for example could use improvements. All the conservatives have to do is offer those improvements but get better border security and immigration reforms.

What happened at Fort Hood was awful. The President does have a freedom to speak his mind just like anyone else. Do you see me saying Gov. Abbott and Sen. Ted Cruz should be disallowed to talk? Of course not! If we declare what happened at Fort Hood an act of terrorism, we'd have to state the same of many more moments in which conservatives behaved beyond 'a tragedy'. How exactly would that heal the ever growing metaphorical rift between the political views in this nation?

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 1:00:45 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
This is the United States Military these people are questioning.

Joe you have this part wrong. The people who see this as a plot do so not because they don't trust the military, but because they don't trust the civilians who give them orders.


An what orders are those exactly?

"Go to these places, train as the military instructs, go back to your home base". That's the executive summary of the concept.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 1:03:27 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
which they cant legally speaking).

Joe, the world court says otherwise, since Texas was an independent nation when they joined the Union.


And the Commonwealth of Massachusetts was a colony when it joined the United States of America. What's your point?

Once Texas jointed the United States, it was no longer an independent area/nation. It was one state of many in the nation. That Texans can not understand these 'elementary level' concepts speaks badly of their education system!


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 1:26:12 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Since the whole of the US Military would easily overwhelm Texas if it did.

Joe try talking out of only one side of your mouth at a time, either the military would not take action against civilians or they would, but not both depending on what you want to see.


While your style of 'replying to the OP' is certainly curious and new, its a pain in the ass to respond to. Just saying..... :)

According to JH15, this is a training exercise that has nothing to do with the civilian population at large. That in some cases it would take place near population areas but on land that is sectioned off from the public. In the case of Bastop, TX, the US Military would be training on the same land used by the Texas National Guard.

Lets just say for the sake of the argument (to which I was getting at above), that this whole training op is just cover for an invasion into Texas. The people of Texas would be up against the most powerful military in the world right now. When the US Military launched operations into Iraq in 1991, that military was the 4th largest in the world. And the US Military nearly eradicated them! Do you really and honestly think Texas would handle any better under that awesome display of firepower?

An that is just a fantasy. Unfortunately a fantasy that conservatives have worked into their minds as being a future reality (with all the levels of anxiety, frustration, fear, and anger that would logically come with it). This would be a real example of a people suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. While both paranoia and schizophrenia by themselves can be serious illnesses; combining the two creates an even more dangerous individual.

My point here is that elected officials should be the ones trying to keep the public calm, rational, and informed.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 1:42:24 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
If in 18 Cruz holds an exercise in which Mass is declared to be hostile territory how secure will you feel?


I'm not even understanding what your asking here exactly, BamaD. Normally you do ask questions I can understand. So I'm going to take an educated guess on the question and try to answer it, OK?

If Massachusetts was declared a 'hostile' place on some training exercise for the US Military, I really wouldn't be 'flying off the handle' in rage or insanity. Yeah, as a typical 'Masshole' I would inquire with the folks from the Military what they are doing. Getting all the normal questions out of the way. Asking for clarification on military slang or acronyms (The US Military loves its many acronyms). I can't really speak how others in the state might react to it.

I could give you an comparison to what it might look like. A few years ago our Federal Representative tried to explain the Affordable Care Act in a 'town hall' style meeting (similar to the Bastop, TX video with that Lt. Colonel. While the majority of the people were civil and mature, the conservative ring wingers behave like a bunch of children. They were distracting, rude, threatening, and obnoxious. The person is just explaining what the law is and does; not staying why they support the law.

Needless to say the Representative doesn't do these 'Town Hall' meetings anymore. They and others have to spend more time with the conservative 'children' then the adults whom are mature and civilized and wished to have information on what ever issue was currently being discussed.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 1:50:41 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/02/17/justice-scalias-thoughts-on-state-secession-penned-to-one-man/


"If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede. (Hence, in the Pledge of Allegiance, “one Nation, indivisible.”)"

That is Justice Antonin Scalia — who would probably rank No. 1 or 2 in a parlor-game bet over which Justice is most likely to sign a secession petition.

Texas is allowed to break-up into five states.

My point was that an international court (which Joe reveres much more than either of us). Joe will also tell us, on any issue than this that Scalia is an idiot who is always wrong. I was merely demonstrating how Joe has himself in a bind. If his view of the world is right he claim about Texas not being able to leave the Union is wrong and if Texas is not able to leave the Union it harms his world view.

As I said there is no ground swell for leaving. I like the Idea of five states, that would mean 8 more senators that Joe would hate.


Texas can not leave the United States of America. Its been discussed in legal debates for the last forty years. The only people not aware of reality just happen to be the same ones that are not living in reality!

Texas can not leave unless Congress votes for it, and then sent to the states for a vote. Just not going to happen.

If Texas were to become an independent nation, they would be the bitches of the Mexican drug cartels within 5-8 years. Most of the population is either a slave, dead, or to frighten to step outside. And those people will come crawling back on their knees begging the rest of us to bring them 'back into the fold' To which Congress would have to vote, and then the states would have to vote. We've seen how hard the first process is; now imagine the second process. The second process also has alot of 'drug money' flowing in to convince members of Congress to keep Texas 'as is'.

Thanks to all those nice SuperPAC's that conservatives love so much; it effectively hides where all that drug money is coming from.....

Now back to reality....

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 1:57:56 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/02/17/justice-scalias-thoughts-on-state-secession-penned-to-one-man/


"If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede. (Hence, in the Pledge of Allegiance, “one Nation, indivisible.”)"

That is Justice Antonin Scalia — who would probably rank No. 1 or 2 in a parlor-game bet over which Justice is most likely to sign a secession petition.

Texas is allowed to break-up into five states.

My point was that an international court (which Joe reveres much more than either of us). Joe will also tell us, on any issue than this that Scalia is an idiot who is always wrong. I was merely demonstrating how Joe has himself in a bind. If his view of the world is right he claim about Texas not being able to leave the Union is wrong and if Texas is not able to leave the Union it harms his world view.

As I said there is no ground swell for leaving. I like the Idea of five states, that would mean 8 more senators that Joe would hate.


WTF are you even babbling here? It doesnt make any rational sense. Scalia loves anal fucking chickens?!?!?!?!?! Where the fuck do you come up with this lame and stupid garbage?

You ask a set of three questions (in three separate posts). Those are sane and I gave you the benefit of the doubt. But here? This is just....insanity....

When did I bring up the World Court or Scalia? The topic of the discussion is 'Jade Helm 15'. That you are aware of the topic (give the previous posts) means you can not fake ignorance. Neither concept has anything to do with the topic.

Whether or not Texas can succeed from the Federal Governemnt....*IS*....its own thread. So please, cease with the thread hi-jacking.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 4:11:11 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/02/17/justice-scalias-thoughts-on-state-secession-penned-to-one-man/


"If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede. (Hence, in the Pledge of Allegiance, “one Nation, indivisible.”)"

That is Justice Antonin Scalia — who would probably rank No. 1 or 2 in a parlor-game bet over which Justice is most likely to sign a secession petition.

Texas is allowed to break-up into five states.

My point was that an international court (which Joe reveres much more than either of us). Joe will also tell us, on any issue than this that Scalia is an idiot who is always wrong. I was merely demonstrating how Joe has himself in a bind. If his view of the world is right he claim about Texas not being able to leave the Union is wrong and if Texas is not able to leave the Union it harms his world view.

As I said there is no ground swell for leaving. I like the Idea of five states, that would mean 8 more senators that Joe would hate.


Texas can not leave the United States of America. Its been discussed in legal debates for the last forty years. The only people not aware of reality just happen to be the same ones that are not living in reality!

Texas can not leave unless Congress votes for it, and then sent to the states for a vote. Just not going to happen.

If Texas were to become an independent nation, they would be the bitches of the Mexican drug cartels within 5-8 years. Most of the population is either a slave, dead, or to frighten to step outside. And those people will come crawling back on their knees begging the rest of us to bring them 'back into the fold' To which Congress would have to vote, and then the states would have to vote. We've seen how hard the first process is; now imagine the second process. The second process also has alot of 'drug money' flowing in to convince members of Congress to keep Texas 'as is'.

Thanks to all those nice SuperPAC's that conservatives love so much; it effectively hides where all that drug money is coming from.....

Now back to reality....

Bottom line, for the purposes of this thread Scalia knows his stuff and the world court is of no importance, I will remember this. And you are the one who brought up Texas leaving the Union not me.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 4:13:20 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
If in 18 Cruz holds an exercise in which Mass is declared to be hostile territory how secure will you feel?


I'm not even understanding what your asking here exactly, BamaD. Normally you do ask questions I can understand. So I'm going to take an educated guess on the question and try to answer it, OK?

If Massachusetts was declared a 'hostile' place on some training exercise for the US Military, I really wouldn't be 'flying off the handle' in rage or insanity. Yeah, as a typical 'Masshole' I would inquire with the folks from the Military what they are doing. Getting all the normal questions out of the way. Asking for clarification on military slang or acronyms (The US Military loves its many acronyms). I can't really speak how others in the state might react to it.

I could give you an comparison to what it might look like. A few years ago our Federal Representative tried to explain the Affordable Care Act in a 'town hall' style meeting (similar to the Bastop, TX video with that Lt. Colonel. While the majority of the people were civil and mature, the conservative ring wingers behave like a bunch of children. They were distracting, rude, threatening, and obnoxious. The person is just explaining what the law is and does; not staying why they support the law.

Needless to say the Representative doesn't do these 'Town Hall' meetings anymore. They and others have to spend more time with the conservative 'children' then the adults whom are mature and civilized and wished to have information on what ever issue was currently being discussed.

So you would do the same thing that Texans are doing. You just put it in a different light when you do it.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 4:25:14 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
FR

This thread is based on a false premise.
There were numerous questions when jade helm 15 was announced, but, as already pointed out, only the left seems to still be making something out of it. Let's get back to reality and close the thread.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 5:31:14 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
id be happy to somewhat bend the direction this way:

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether I myself almost joined the military. Unfortunately I was to tall....


i just read the height maximum is 80 inches. so you are taller than 6'8"?

but more interesting to me (since your premise seems to largely rest on this):

quote:

...conservatives as a mass make up 80-90% of 'The Low Information Voter' bracket in this nation.


id absolutely love to see evidence of that.

and also, evidence of another part of your premise---there are no liberals or moderates in texas, only conservatives.

found myself saying this to you just a couple days ago: good luck on those...which is really just another way of saying youre doomed from the start along those lines.




< Message edited by bounty44 -- 5/20/2015 5:37:30 AM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 6:31:10 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Texas can not leave the United States of America.


FUCK!

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 7:43:07 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

<snip>I held off for a while to see if anyone would bring this forth in all honesty. </snip>

What Joe says in his post at the top of the page is true...waiting to see if people will comment on subjects that are more taboo than USPS scandals or *conspiracies*, when there are so many things NOT being brought up.
Texas seems blessed right now in the minds of some of our participants.
hell of a shame...

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 7:43:32 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
LOL, we are going to take over Texas, which we own anyway.

The stupid is strong with these cretins.

You have to trust the civilians that oversee the military, otherwise you have to admit that GWB lied. And you are strict constitutionalists.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 8:01:03 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, we are going to take over Texas, which we own anyway.

The stupid is strong with these cretins.

You have to trust the civilians that oversee the military, otherwise you have to admit that GWB lied. And you are strict constitutionalists.



This seemed apropos, altho im sure, the mileage may vary on the reader.
I may have to update it with all the other "conspiracies" that have happened since that was made...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 8:15:45 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

This thread is based on a false premise.
There were numerous questions when jade helm 15 was announced, but, as already pointed out, only the left seems to still be making something out of it. Let's get back to reality and close the thread.


The US Army did a piss-poor job of announcing Jade Helm. Their PR was a day late and a dollar short.

Why has the media turned this into so huge of a deal? The media has created a smokescreen for something. While they have everyone's attention on this exercise, what are they trying to take everyone's attention off of? I keep hearing rumors of a huge increase in illegal alien children crossing the border again, yet no serious media attention to that. Or could it be that this is meant to take attention off of Billary's campaign problems? It seems the media is fanning the flames of this for some reason, my concern is why. And no I don't really think this is a smokescreen for the Coward in Chief to become Coward in Chief for Life, but there is something that the media is trying to keep everyone's attention off of. If we could figure out what that is, this whole little fiasco over a training exercise would make sense.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 8:34:56 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
LOL Aylee it couldn't possibly be the media ran out of fun stuff to report so it had to create it. LOL

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/20/2015 8:36:36 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

An that is just a fantasy. Unfortunately a fantasy that conservatives have worked into their minds as being a future reality (with all the levels of anxiety, frustration, fear, and anger that would logically come with it). This would be a real example of a people suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. While both paranoia and schizophrenia by themselves can be serious illnesses; combining the two creates an even more dangerous individual.


...and they are all armed to the teeth. Am I the only one who finds that scary?

People with severe mental problems (eg paranoia, schizophrenia, high anxiety and anger levels etc) and guns are not a healthy mix. It's not good for their own health, or the health of any one around them.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 5/20/2015 8:37:25 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Jade Helm 15 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094