Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Jade Helm 15


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Jade Helm 15 Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 5:35:26 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

An that is just a fantasy. Unfortunately a fantasy that conservatives have worked into their minds as being a future reality (with all the levels of anxiety, frustration, fear, and anger that would logically come with it). This would be a real example of a people suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. While both paranoia and schizophrenia by themselves can be serious illnesses; combining the two creates an even more dangerous individual.


...and they are all armed to the teeth. Am I the only one who finds that scary?

People with severe mental problems (eg paranoia, schizophrenia, high anxiety and anger levels etc) and guns are not a healthy mix. It's not good for their own health, or the health of any one around them.



Have you always been this bigoted or is it something you have worked on over the years? And does it stretch to other areas of your life or is it solely a political thing? Just curious where all the hate comes from.


Check the Pope is making a treaty with Palistine thread if you really want to see hate and racism.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 5:35:37 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
Joether tried to imply that conservatives were suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. You took it a step further and claimed you were fearful because they are armed to the teeth and have severe mental problems. Sorry sweetcheeks but you are the only one sounding paranoid around here and if you can't see the bigotry in your words than there is really no point in trying to explain it to you. Now you can pretend you meant something else but I doubt anyone is going to buy it. Your past history speaks for itself.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 5:44:02 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
ALL THE QUESTIONS at the town meeting in Bastop, TX were directed NOT to the politicians sitting in chairs. But to a Lt. Colonel in the United States Army. Last I checked, members of the US Military can not hold elected positions in government.

You are such a liar.

You have never checked because that is a bald-faced LIE!


Here is Lt. Col. Mark Lastoria giving the opening remarks.

And the questions.

If I'm a liar, Aylee, please do the following things for me:

1 ) Prove all those people in both videos do not exist in reality
2 ) The videos are simply computerized and digitized movies and no one was really there.
3 ) There is no one named Lt. Col. Mark Lastoria in the US Military
4 ) The questions were aimed completely at the politicians sitting down, and not to the guy in camos.

I was waiting for some 'Low Information Voter' to take the bait. Your name was one of three I had guessed would take it. Your 'self-righteous' attitude, combined with your ignorance, and impulsive personality; are easy to take advantage of. I don't do it, because it would be unethical of me (do you even know what ethics are?); but there are other people in America that would be all to happy to fuck you over.

An the issue of whether or not active duty members of the US Military can be elected to public office (i.e. government): Should check the with Department of Defense.

Or are you going to rant that the Department of Defense doesn't exist either?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
ETA:

The rest of your post and the next was filled with lies as well. But that one. . . seriously? Why would you even say that?


The rest of my post was too complicated for you to understand, much less mount a successful rebuttal. It must suck to be an idiot.....

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 5:48:23 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

FR

No worries re jade 15

Theyre just practicing for when the "not guilty" verdicts are read in Baltimore

(Carry on)



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 5:57:22 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
Joether tried to imply that conservatives were suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. You took it a step further and claimed you were fearful because they are armed to the teeth and have severe mental problems. Sorry sweetcheeks but you are the only one sounding paranoid around here and if you can't see the bigotry in your words than there is really no point in trying to explain it to you. Now you can pretend you meant something else but I doubt anyone is going to buy it. Your past history speaks for itself.


An here is an example of 'assuming things without evidence'. Your know for it.

I didnt claim all conservatives were suffering from it. Just the ones that seem to have problems with reality; hence, the characterizations. Just because you can follow and read all the words, does not mean you understand the underlying meaning of those words. Most people can read the ingredients section of a Pepsi Can; how many can fully explain what they are, do, and handle within the human body?

Bigotry? Yes, I hate people whom go out of their way to dumb themselves down and than bitch about reality being to complicated for them to understand. Ya got me there...

Its safe to say that conservatives have plenty more hate towards other people, concepts, and events.

A person suffering from anything deeper than 'a mild form' of paranoid schizophrenia whom is not under a doctor's care (or other medical health professional) with easy access to firearms....*IS*....dangerous. I notice that you have not been around such to find out how 'fun' these individuals can be. If you had, you would be agreeing with me.

One moment they are fine, the next they want to kill the man sitting across the hall from you both because he is spying on you and him (in reality there is no one sitting on that chair across the hall from you). But then, your paranoid schizophrenic states he can see him, because the government once installed a chip to see invisible people. That person, is invisible. Even if you got up, cross the hall and placed your hand not only where a person's body my rest on the seat, but the seat itself; your paranoid schizophrenic friend has an answer for THAT too! "His body can phase in and out of reality; and doing it just now".

You want a person like this, supporting your political viewpoints?


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 5:59:39 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
No worries re jade 15

Theyre just practicing for when the "not guilty" verdicts are read in Baltimore
(Carry on)


You said something funny; you get a cookie!


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 6:02:31 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

That you ignore the many instances of threads and the posts within them, of conservatives behaving dimwitted towards what ever the state topic was defined, is not my problem. The evidence exists on the forum. Go look it up!

Need an example to help 'wet your appetite'? Having to explain to someone what the concepts of 'paranoia', 'schizophrenia', and 'paranoid schizophrenia' are in medical terms and sourcing the Diagnostics and Statistics Manual (5th Ed.). That this person didn't know these three terms nor that I obtained them using a technology known as 'The Internet'. Further, that he would label persons suffering from any of these three illnesses in a manner the health community would not: 'crazy'.

Your thought-disordered perceptions are always a source of wonder and surprise, but all I actually said was that I don't think psychodiagnostics is within your range of competence (though it is not uncommon for paranoid schizophrenics to imagine that they possess delusional abilities). I hope you will find this information helpful.

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 5/21/2015 6:06:14 PM >

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 6:18:57 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

That you ignore the many instances of threads and the posts within them, of conservatives behaving dimwitted towards what ever the state topic was defined, is not my problem. The evidence exists on the forum. Go look it up!

Need an example to help 'wet your appetite'? Having to explain to someone what the concepts of 'paranoia', 'schizophrenia', and 'paranoid schizophrenia' are in medical terms and sourcing the Diagnostics and Statistics Manual (5th Ed.). That this person didn't know these three terms nor that I obtained them using a technology known as 'The Internet'. Further, that he would label persons suffering from any of these three illnesses in a manner the health community would not: 'crazy'.

Your thought-disordered perceptions are always a source of wonder and surprise, but all I actually said was that I don't think psychodiagnostics is within your range of competence (though it is not uncommon for paranoid schizophrenics to imagine that they possess delusional abilities). I hope you will find this information helpful.


An I showed that you were wrong. For the second time in one thread page....

The doctor states I don't have any of the three. I'll take his advice on medicine and psychology than yours any day of the millennium.

Always trying to goad me into something, and always failing. You do know that trying the same thing, getting the same result, when expecting another result is often an identification you might need professional help?


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 6:30:53 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

That you ignore the many instances of threads and the posts within them, of conservatives behaving dimwitted towards what ever the state topic was defined, is not my problem. The evidence exists on the forum. Go look it up!

Need an example to help 'wet your appetite'? Having to explain to someone what the concepts of 'paranoia', 'schizophrenia', and 'paranoid schizophrenia' are in medical terms and sourcing the Diagnostics and Statistics Manual (5th Ed.). That this person didn't know these three terms nor that I obtained them using a technology known as 'The Internet'. Further, that he would label persons suffering from any of these three illnesses in a manner the health community would not: 'crazy'.

Your thought-disordered perceptions are always a source of wonder and surprise, but all I actually said was that I don't think psychodiagnostics is within your range of competence (though it is not uncommon for paranoid schizophrenics to imagine that they possess delusional abilities). I hope you will find this information helpful.


An I showed that you were wrong. For the second time in one thread page....

The doctor states I don't have any of the three. I'll take his advice on medicine and psychology than yours any day of the millennium.

Always trying to goad me into something, and always failing. You do know that trying the same thing, getting the same result, when expecting another result is often an identification you might need professional help?



Yes, but it's been a while hasn't it? Perhaps you should call and get a second/new opinion.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 6:52:41 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

The doctor states I don't have any of the three.

What does the doctor say you have then?

K.






< Message edited by Kirata -- 5/21/2015 7:20:13 PM >

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 6:53:56 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
ALL THE QUESTIONS at the town meeting in Bastop, TX were directed NOT to the politicians sitting in chairs. But to a Lt. Colonel in the United States Army. Last I checked, members of the US Military can not hold elected positions in government.

You are such a liar.

You have never checked because that is a bald-faced LIE!


Here is Lt. Col. Mark Lastoria giving the opening remarks.

And the questions.

If I'm a liar, Aylee, please do the following things for me:

1 ) Prove all those people in both videos do not exist in reality
2 ) The videos are simply computerized and digitized movies and no one was really there.
3 ) There is no one named Lt. Col. Mark Lastoria in the US Military
4 ) The questions were aimed completely at the politicians sitting down, and not to the guy in camos.

I was waiting for some 'Low Information Voter' to take the bait. Your name was one of three I had guessed would take it. Your 'self-righteous' attitude, combined with your ignorance, and impulsive personality; are easy to take advantage of. I don't do it, because it would be unethical of me (do you even know what ethics are?); but there are other people in America that would be all to happy to fuck you over.

An the issue of whether or not active duty members of the US Military can be elected to public office (i.e. government): Should check the with Department of Defense.

Or are you going to rant that the Department of Defense doesn't exist either?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
ETA:

The rest of your post and the next was filled with lies as well. But that one. . . seriously? Why would you even say that?


The rest of my post was too complicated for you to understand, much less mount a successful rebuttal. It must suck to be an idiot.....



Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina is in the Air Force reserves. President Harry Truman stayed in the Army Reserves until after he left office in 1953. Twit.

Still going to hold onto your lie about military members? Or is it too complicated for you?

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 7:23:38 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3664
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
Reservists aren't bound by the same rules as active military.

the rules

Cannot - Hold civil office in the federal government, if that office:

is an elective office.
Requires an appointment by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, or
Is a position on the executive schedule under sections 5312 through 5317 of title 5, U.S.C.
This prohibition does not apply to retired and reserve members who have been called to active duty for a period of 270 days or less, as long as the office does not interfere with military duties. If the retired or reserve members receives orders which state active duty recall will be for more than 270 days, the prohibition begins on day one of active duty.
A member on active duty may hold or exercise the functions of a civil office in the U.S. Government that does not fall into one of the three categories described above, including when assigned or detailed to such office to perform such functions, provided there is no interference with military duties.

Cannot - Hold local civil office (state, county, city), with the following two exceptions:

Any enlisted member may seek, hold, and exercise the functions of nonpartisan civil office as a notary public or member of a school board, neighborhood planning commission, or similar local agency, provided that the office is held in a non-military capacity and there is no interference with the performance of military duties.

Any officer may seek, hold, and exercise the functions of a nonpartisan civil office on an independent school board that is located exclusively on a military reservation, provided that the office is held in a non-military capacity and there is no interference with the performance of military duties.

Again, this prohibition does not apply to retired and reserve members who have been called to active duty for a period of 270 days or less, as long as the office does not interfere with military duties. If the retired or reserve members receives orders which state active duty recall will be for more than 270 days, the prohibition begins on day one of active duty.

Finally, a catch-all: When circumstances warrant, the Secretary concerned or the Secretary's designee may permit a member covered by the prohibition against holding public office, above, to remain or become a nominee or a candidate for civil office. What that means is that if a Congressman, retired from the military were recalled to active duty for more than 270 days, the Secretary of the service could allow them to retain their public office (or, even become a candidate for re-election).

< Message edited by JVoV -- 5/21/2015 7:24:29 PM >

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 7:52:21 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

Reservists aren't bound by the same rules as active military.

the rules

Cannot - Hold civil office in the federal government, if that office:

is an elective office.
Requires an appointment by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, or
Is a position on the executive schedule under sections 5312 through 5317 of title 5, U.S.C.
This prohibition does not apply to retired and reserve members who have been called to active duty for a period of 270 days or less, as long as the office does not interfere with military duties. If the retired or reserve members receives orders which state active duty recall will be for more than 270 days, the prohibition begins on day one of active duty.
A member on active duty may hold or exercise the functions of a civil office in the U.S. Government that does not fall into one of the three categories described above, including when assigned or detailed to such office to perform such functions, provided there is no interference with military duties.

Cannot - Hold local civil office (state, county, city), with the following two exceptions:

Any enlisted member may seek, hold, and exercise the functions of nonpartisan civil office as a notary public or member of a school board, neighborhood planning commission, or similar local agency, provided that the office is held in a non-military capacity and there is no interference with the performance of military duties.

Any officer may seek, hold, and exercise the functions of a nonpartisan civil office on an independent school board that is located exclusively on a military reservation, provided that the office is held in a non-military capacity and there is no interference with the performance of military duties.

Again, this prohibition does not apply to retired and reserve members who have been called to active duty for a period of 270 days or less, as long as the office does not interfere with military duties. If the retired or reserve members receives orders which state active duty recall will be for more than 270 days, the prohibition begins on day one of active duty.

Finally, a catch-all: When circumstances warrant, the Secretary concerned or the Secretary's designee may permit a member covered by the prohibition against holding public office, above, to remain or become a nominee or a candidate for civil office. What that means is that if a Congressman, retired from the military were recalled to active duty for more than 270 days, the Secretary of the service could allow them to retain their public office (or, even become a candidate for re-election).


Unless you are saying that reservists are NOT members of the military, what is your point?

joether said: " Last I checked, members of the US Military can not hold elected positions in government. "

He lied about checking and he lied about whether they can hold elected positions. He was just making stuff up. Again.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 8:02:18 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3664
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
My point is that joether left out the key word "active" in his statement, and you are attacking him on semantics.


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 8:10:19 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

Reservists aren't bound by the same rules as active military.

the rules

Cannot - Hold civil office in the federal government, if that office:

is an elective office.
Requires an appointment by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, or
Is a position on the executive schedule under sections 5312 through 5317 of title 5, U.S.C.
This prohibition does not apply to retired and reserve members who have been called to active duty for a period of 270 days or less, as long as the office does not interfere with military duties. If the retired or reserve members receives orders which state active duty recall will be for more than 270 days, the prohibition begins on day one of active duty.
A member on active duty may hold or exercise the functions of a civil office in the U.S. Government that does not fall into one of the three categories described above, including when assigned or detailed to such office to perform such functions, provided there is no interference with military duties.

Cannot - Hold local civil office (state, county, city), with the following two exceptions:

Any enlisted member may seek, hold, and exercise the functions of nonpartisan civil office as a notary public or member of a school board, neighborhood planning commission, or similar local agency, provided that the office is held in a non-military capacity and there is no interference with the performance of military duties.

Any officer may seek, hold, and exercise the functions of a nonpartisan civil office on an independent school board that is located exclusively on a military reservation, provided that the office is held in a non-military capacity and there is no interference with the performance of military duties.

Again, this prohibition does not apply to retired and reserve members who have been called to active duty for a period of 270 days or less, as long as the office does not interfere with military duties. If the retired or reserve members receives orders which state active duty recall will be for more than 270 days, the prohibition begins on day one of active duty.

Finally, a catch-all: When circumstances warrant, the Secretary concerned or the Secretary's designee may permit a member covered by the prohibition against holding public office, above, to remain or become a nominee or a candidate for civil office. What that means is that if a Congressman, retired from the military were recalled to active duty for more than 270 days, the Secretary of the service could allow them to retain their public office (or, even become a candidate for re-election).


Unless you are saying that reservists are NOT members of the military, what is your point?

joether said: " Last I checked, members of the US Military can not hold elected positions in government. "

He lied about checking and he lied about whether they can hold elected positions. He was just making stuff up. Again.
Of course, this the same Joether that said that Obama would not overly influence the military that was under his command. And yet:

“President Obama delivered the keynote address at the United States Coast Guard Academy commencement Wednesday in New London, Connecticut. In his commencement speech, Obama warned graduates climate change is one of the largest threats they will have to face as they defend the United States and our nation’s interests abroad.”

“In his speech, Obama said denying climate change or refusing to deal with it is negligence and “dereliction of duty.”
“If you see storm clouds gathering or dangerous shoals ahead you don’t just sit back and do nothing,” President Obama said Wednesday. “You take action to protect your ship, to keep your crew safe. Anything less is negligence. It is a dereliction of duty. So too with climate change.”
“Denying it or refusing to deal with it endangers our national security,” Obama also said. “It undermines the readiness of our forces.”

http://allenbwest.com/2015/05/you-will-not-believe-what-obama-now-defines-as-dereliction-of-duty/

So, a question (tongue in cheek): does a soldier's disbelief in man-made global warming while still believing in climate change...does that count as only partial dereliction of duty? How much brig time do you suppose that will be worth?

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 8:42:48 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3664
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
Considering the Coast Guard is tasked with containment and cleanup of oil spills, I suppose ignoring those would be dereliction of duty. Even if you don't believe the methane gas leaked into the atmosphere because of incidents like the BP spill deplete the ozone or contribute to global warming any more than gassy cows.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 9:07:44 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

My point is that joether left out the key word "active" in his statement, and you are attacking him on semantics.




No, I am pointing out that once again he is making pronouncements about something he has no clue on. It is part of his M.O.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 9:21:42 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
ALL THE QUESTIONS at the town meeting in Bastop, TX were directed NOT to the politicians sitting in chairs. But to a Lt. Colonel in the United States Army. Last I checked, members of the US Military can not hold elected positions in government.

You are such a liar.

You have never checked because that is a bald-faced LIE!


Here is Lt. Col. Mark Lastoria giving the opening remarks.

And the questions.

If I'm a liar, Aylee, please do the following things for me:

1 ) Prove all those people in both videos do not exist in reality
2 ) The videos are simply computerized and digitized movies and no one was really there.
3 ) There is no one named Lt. Col. Mark Lastoria in the US Military
4 ) The questions were aimed completely at the politicians sitting down, and not to the guy in camos.

I was waiting for some 'Low Information Voter' to take the bait. Your name was one of three I had guessed would take it. Your 'self-righteous' attitude, combined with your ignorance, and impulsive personality; are easy to take advantage of. I don't do it, because it would be unethical of me (do you even know what ethics are?); but there are other people in America that would be all to happy to fuck you over.

An the issue of whether or not active duty members of the US Military can be elected to public office (i.e. government): Should check the with Department of Defense.

Or are you going to rant that the Department of Defense doesn't exist either?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
ETA:

The rest of your post and the next was filled with lies as well. But that one. . . seriously? Why would you even say that?


The rest of my post was too complicated for you to understand, much less mount a successful rebuttal. It must suck to be an idiot.....



Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina is in the Air Force reserves. President Harry Truman stayed in the Army Reserves until after he left office in 1953. Twit.

Still going to hold onto your lie about military members? Or is it too complicated for you?



Hum, a town nearby has two army officers sitting on its elected board. Two out of five. The problem tends to be if they are sent away for extended periods.

Hummm...after seeing JVoV's thingy above I'll have to check and see if they're active. Could be my bad on this. I just see them at parades and they both wear uni's so perhaps I just assumed.

< Message edited by HunterCA -- 5/21/2015 9:26:27 PM >

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 9:41:15 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
Joether tried to imply that conservatives were suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. You took it a step further and claimed you were fearful because they are armed to the teeth and have severe mental problems. Sorry sweetcheeks but you are the only one sounding paranoid around here and if you can't see the bigotry in your words than there is really no point in trying to explain it to you. Now you can pretend you meant something else but I doubt anyone is going to buy it. Your past history speaks for itself.


An here is an example of 'assuming things without evidence'. Your know for it.

I didnt claim all conservatives were suffering from it. Just the ones that seem to have problems with reality; hence, the characterizations. Just because you can follow and read all the words, does not mean you understand the underlying meaning of those words. Most people can read the ingredients section of a Pepsi Can; how many can fully explain what they are, do, and handle within the human body?

Bigotry? Yes, I hate people whom go out of their way to dumb themselves down and than bitch about reality being to complicated for them to understand. Ya got me there...

Its safe to say that conservatives have plenty more hate towards other people, concepts, and events.

A person suffering from anything deeper than 'a mild form' of paranoid schizophrenia whom is not under a doctor's care (or other medical health professional) with easy access to firearms....*IS*....dangerous. I notice that you have not been around such to find out how 'fun' these individuals can be. If you had, you would be agreeing with me.

One moment they are fine, the next they want to kill the man sitting across the hall from you both because he is spying on you and him (in reality there is no one sitting on that chair across the hall from you). But then, your paranoid schizophrenic states he can see him, because the government once installed a chip to see invisible people. That person, is invisible. Even if you got up, cross the hall and placed your hand not only where a person's body my rest on the seat, but the seat itself; your paranoid schizophrenic friend has an answer for THAT too! "His body can phase in and out of reality; and doing it just now".

You want a person like this, supporting your political viewpoints?



It is no more safe to say that conservatives are bigots than to say that liberals are anti American. Some are in both cases but that does not mean you can paint all with that brush. Unless you are more than a little paranoid yourself.

You still have a tendency to define a disconnect with reality as disagreeing with you.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Jade Helm 15 - 5/21/2015 10:06:53 PM   
Moderator3


Posts: 3289
Status: offline
There are some that are making attacks upon the same person, repeatedly, and the majority of your post to or about this other person are at a rate that staff must take action on.

The thread has so much in the way of attacks, that it could be shut down.

It might be a good idea not to push too far in Feisty.

_____________________________

FAST REPLY




(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Jade Helm 15 Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.155