bounty44
Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: crazyml Oh fuck me! You mean that all of those scientists are members of the "Socialist Project". Well, that changes everything! Unless, of course, it turns out that only a tiny minority of them are members of a Socialist political party, cuz then.... well you look stupid. Hmm. the social/political persuasion of the "scientists" whose articles are referenced are inconsequential to the relationship between socialism and global, errr, climate change. and unfortunately, what you've said there bears absolutely no resemblance as a reply to anything that's actually been said. you also didn't answer my question to you, which is completely germane to the point at hand (never minding what your fellow comrades out there are saying about it themselves). exactly what part of "more regulation, more government control, less private industry, less freedom, and redistribution of wealth" isn't part and parcel of socialism? unless you want to try again, I trust a non-biased reader of the interchange wouldn't be putting the "stupid" moniker on my side of the equation. or maybe you can enlighten us as to exactly what "socialism" is so we can all be on the same page??
< Message edited by bounty44 -- 6/18/2015 12:29:43 PM >
|