Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: GotSteel quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD As usual you didn't answer the question. What do you think the 1st amendment is? Asking if I think it's toilet paper isn't a real question it's craziness from a guy who wears his tinfoil hat with pride. Now since you've asked a reasonable question I'd be happy to answer. I think the 1st amendment is not a protection from libel because that's the law, which I learned about in grade school by the way. quote:
ORIGINAL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_statements_of_fact In United States constitutional law, false statements of fact are an exception from protection of free speech under the First Amendment. In United States law, a false statement of fact will not be exempt from some civil or criminal penalty, if a law has imposed one. This exception has evolved over time from a series of Supreme Court cases that dealt with issues such as libel, slander, and statutes which barred fraudulent solicitation of charitable donations. And there is no libel in this. He is however attacking freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of speech. Freedom of speech does not protect against libel this fact does not give someone a blank check to attack and destroy other peoples freedom. You cannot libel someone 2000 years before they were born. He could, I suppose, make a case for hate speech rather than "freedom of religion." It has nothing to do with freedom of the press or freedom of speech, as the government doesn't have a dog in this fight--nor in the freedom of religion sphere either. So he's not attacking any of that. The government isn't suppressing anyone. He is, however, attempting to suppress others. Or present the theater of doing so.
|