Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 8:58:42 AM   
JVoV


Posts: 3659
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: online
A pdf file of the arrest affadavit is linked in this Texas Tribune article. The cop left out quite a bit. https://www.texastribune.org/2015/07/21/waller-county-press-conference/

If there were an active warrant, the officer should have told her. With all of the articles and information currently available on the matter, including the arrest affadavit, I think it's safe to assume there was no outstanding warrant for her arrest. More importantly, the arresting officer didn't know of any.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 9:08:29 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Her agitated state was cause for reasonable suspicion.

Chris Rock - How To Not Get Your Ass Kicked By The Police (YouTube)

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 9:11:38 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
I have an absolutely clean record... never even a speeding ticket in my life... The only blemish is a bad muffler ticket and a parking ticket when i was a kid.... Yet I was pulled over at night for a tail light out and was asked to get out of the car by a Missouri state trooper... I did it even though i was not happy about it.

Now when her record was checked...which he did... she was combative and refused to follow a valid order... I don't think it unreasonable for the incident to escalate to an arrest.

I am not trying to say the officer was right...but I am saying he was within his rights under the circumstances. She should have followed his valid orders and if she had perhaps there would have been a different outcome. Otherwise as usual there is fault all around and this is often the case with these situations become public.,

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 7/27/2015 9:12:33 AM >


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 9:15:44 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

A pdf file of the arrest affadavit is linked in this Texas Tribune article. The cop left out quite a bit. https://www.texastribune.org/2015/07/21/waller-county-press-conference/

Yeah that's pretty terse, but it states the facts. The article you linked, not so much.

The video released after the news conference shows Encinia losing his temper with Bland when she refuses to put out her cigarette when he tells her to and refuses to come out of her Hyundai when told to do so.

Bullshit. He didn't "tell her to," he asked her to, "please, if you don't mind."

"People don't appreciate the danger of escalating a situation with law enforcement," said Charles "Sid" Heal, a former L.A. County sheriff's commander and force expert. "If a person believes they have a case, wait until after jail and sue. You don't want to escalate the situation to the point the officer feels threatened. Heal said the roadside confrontation is all too common. "As far as what I saw on the video I wouldn't say that it was outside of standards nationwide," he said. In terms of courtesy, Heal said, "raising your voice to a suspect is lowest level of force...."

Retired Los Angeles Police Capt. Greg Meyer said Bland's behavior led to the result. "Officers have complete discretion to control the movements of the violator, including making them get out the car," he said. Meyer said it is standard practice to have someone put out their cigarette. "No one, including a police officer, wants to get a burning cigarette jammed into their face or eye; it’s basic procedure," he said. "The officer asked politely if she would mind putting out her cigarette. The violator then raised her voice, actively resisted multiple lawful directions to get out of the car... This is yet another case of someone who chooses to illegally resist the directions of a police officer, thus escalating the situation," he said.


http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-sandra-bland-arrest-experts-20150722-story.html

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/27/2015 9:23:03 AM >

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 9:36:44 AM   
JVoV


Posts: 3659
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: online
I was less interested in the article than finding the actual arrest report. At this point, every article is going to have a slant, one way or the other.

It was interesting to see that the cause of Bland's death will be handled by a grand jury though.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 9:59:10 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

I was less interested in the article than finding the actual arrest report. At this point, every article is going to have a slant, one way or the other.

Well, we don't have to rely on just news articles. The woman was fighting the cop. It took two officers to subdue her, and all the while she's screaming to a camera about the force that only she herself is making it necessary for them to use, as if little Miss Sweetness was being cruelly attacked by the evil police for not signalling a lane change.

"Thank you for recording! Thank you! For a traffic signal, slammed me into the ground and everything!"

She continues the scam in a phone message obtained by CBS News:

"They got me set at a $5,000 bond. I'm just still at a loss for words about this whole process, how this switching lanes with no signal turned into all of this, I don't even know."

Seriously? Not even a guess? Apparently that didn't work with her mother...

Before she was found dead of apparent suicide in a Texas jail cell, Sandra Bland called a bail bondsman hoping to get out. "I talked to her when she first went to jail," Joe Booker of Hempstead told The Daily Beast on Thursday. "I called her mother for her." Booker then hung up and didn’t respond to further requests for comment.

Bystander video
Daily Beast
CBS News

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/27/2015 10:37:17 AM >

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 10:12:00 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

A pdf file of the arrest affadavit is linked in this Texas Tribune article. The cop left out quite a bit. https://www.texastribune.org/2015/07/21/waller-county-press-conference/

Yeah that's pretty terse, but it states the facts. The article you linked, not so much.

The video released after the news conference shows Encinia losing his temper with Bland when she refuses to put out her cigarette when he tells her to and refuses to come out of her Hyundai when told to do so.

Bullshit. He didn't "tell her to," he asked her to, "please, if you don't mind."

"People don't appreciate the danger of escalating a situation with law enforcement," said Charles "Sid" Heal, a former L.A. County sheriff's commander and force expert. "If a person believes they have a case, wait until after jail and sue. You don't want to escalate the situation to the point the officer feels threatened. Heal said the roadside confrontation is all too common. "As far as what I saw on the video I wouldn't say that it was outside of standards nationwide," he said. In terms of courtesy, Heal said, "raising your voice to a suspect is lowest level of force...."

Retired Los Angeles Police Capt. Greg Meyer said Bland's behavior led to the result. "Officers have complete discretion to control the movements of the violator, including making them get out the car," he said. Meyer said it is standard practice to have someone put out their cigarette. "No one, including a police officer, wants to get a burning cigarette jammed into their face or eye; it’s basic procedure," he said. "The officer asked politely if she would mind putting out her cigarette. The violator then raised her voice, actively resisted multiple lawful directions to get out of the car... This is yet another case of someone who chooses to illegally resist the directions of a police officer, thus escalating the situation," he said.


http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-sandra-bland-arrest-experts-20150722-story.html

K.




I think the quote from the Los Angeles Police Captain speaks volumes about the overall mentality and culture within police departments. This idea that "officers have complete discretion" is where most of these problems emanate from. In this traffic stop, the only pretext the officer had to pull her over was failure to signal. So, his whole purpose in this instance was to cite the driver for failure to signal. Anything he did which deviated from that specific purpose was improper. He should have just written the ticket and kept his mouth shut, so it's his behavior which was out of line. But if Police Captains and others in the field believe they have "complete discretion" to do things beyond the scope of their job, then it seems that the source of this problem is very much embedded and deep-seated in the mindsets of our law enforcement community.



(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 127
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 2:15:58 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
All fine and dandy Zonie... just so long as you dismiss the racial aspect of it...which many here seem to find impossible to do.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 128
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 2:32:42 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

I think the quote from the Los Angeles Police Captain speaks volumes about the overall mentality and culture within police departments. This idea that "officers have complete discretion" is where most of these problems emanate from. In this traffic stop, the only pretext the officer had to pull her over was failure to signal. So, his whole purpose in this instance was to cite the driver for failure to signal. Anything he did which deviated from that specific purpose was improper. He should have just written the ticket and kept his mouth shut, so it's his behavior which was out of line. But if Police Captains and others in the field believe they have "complete discretion" to do things beyond the scope of their job, then it seems that the source of this problem is very much embedded and deep-seated in the mindsets of our law enforcement community.



Sorry. That's not quite right.

She failed to stop at a stop sign. She did a "rolling stop". Something that lots of people are guilty of. It drives me nuts (especially at a "four-way stop" intersection).

He turned around to follow her and possibly issue a warning (later on, in the video, he points her to his note pad and says: "You were getting a warning until you did all this" (or words to that effect). When she committed a second summons-worthy infraction (failure to properly signal a lane change), he hit the lights.

He was still well within policy for any police department of which I'm aware.

He took her credentials, asked her for a few minutes while he went back to his car and ran those credentials. At this point, obviously, her past history didn't come up (either because everything was satisfied, previously or because of an error) because he went back to her car with a written warning (as he later pointed out to her, while she was screaming about "all of this over a traffic signal" he said: "All of this over a warning").

When he asked if she was upset (which might have been him, throwing some itching powder into the situation), she started getting mouthy. That's when he asked her to put out her cigarette. She got even mouthier and was escalating the situation when he decided it was time to ensure his safety to the best of his ability.

When she refused to put out the cigarette (after him telling her, at least twice that it was a lawful order), was when he decided she needed to get out of the car; possibly still worried about that cigarette landing in his eye.

This situation could have ended in a written warning (which you can safely use to wipe your ass with no repercussions) and her, driving away. Instead, she had to get all mouthy and indignant and "know her rights".

Unfortunately, she didn't know them well enough.



Michael


< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 7/27/2015 2:33:21 PM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 129
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 7:33:10 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
Well in all fairness, I think the officer could and probably should have handled it differently. For example, he might have said, "I'm sorry, I have bronchitis. Could you at least leave it in the ashtray until we're finished?" Or he might have said, "I'm not going to ticket you, I'm just going to give you a no-penalty warning." But that's easy to say when we're reflecting after the fact.

Judging from the way the officer handled the previous stop, all Bland had to do was not behave like jilted princess and he'd have wished her a good day. But instead, he's got somebody pulling an attitude on him. Where is this going? She could flick her cigarette in his face and come up with a gun, or hit the gas and provoke a high-speed pursuit that would put innocent lives at risk. He doesn't know.

So yeah, out of the car. And then she thinks she's entitled to resist arrest and even kick the cop! Now she's in jail for assaulting an officer, the fines she ran out on are going to catch up to her, she's going to lose her job, and from the looks of it not even her own family is going to help her out this time.

I feel sorry for her, but given her sense of entitlement and narcissistic rage, the tragedy here started long before her suicide. And with Al Sharpton involved, it will probably continue long after. Enter Benjamin Crump in 3..2..1...

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 7/27/2015 7:34:31 PM >

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 130
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 10:02:00 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

Ok I just checked, her mug shot in that video, [the one with her eyes open] has clearly been been photoshopped. (pretty poor job I might add)


May I ask how on such a low resolution picture you base your " clearly Photoshopped claim? What in your opinion are the tell tail signs of manipulation.

Butch




gotta put it in picture editing software and use filters. the one with the eyes open is either 1) a fake or 2) made to look like a fake. the one with the eyes closed has no anomolies that stick out like a sore thumb. If it is fake is a damn good one. (not that it cant be done it sure can just takes a hell of a lot of work to get it right)

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 131
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 10:46:44 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

To simply state a cop can ask you to get out of your car for any reason is insufficient since other elements must exist to make it legal.

Yeah, no. The Supreme Court ruled in Pennsylvania v. Mimms that "once a motor vehicle has been lawfully detained for a traffic violation, the police officers may order the driver to get out of the vehicle without violating the Fourth Amendment’s proscription of unreasonable searches and seizures." Period.

K.







nah nah nah.....not period.

Remember I told someone in an earlier post that there are 3 reasons the officer can ask someone to step out of his car, DUI, Drugs, Officer Safety.


we need presently deal only with the narrow question of whether the order to get out of the car, issued after the driver was lawfully detained, was reasonable and thus permissible under the Fourth Amendment.


It hinges on reasonable, not simply because the car was detained. (it was not reasonable in grimms but I wont get into that now. The PA supreme court was 100% correct)


I maintain that he lacked probable cause asking bland to get out of her vehicle and was unreasonable.

Asking her to put out her cigarette then to demand she step out of the car then arrest her, when all that was left to do was to simply to hand her a warning was not reasonable imo. Thge officer made no implication she was drunk had drugs or threatened his safety.

Therefore how do we make this event fit grimms?





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 7/27/2015 11:33:00 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 132
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/27/2015 11:20:58 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

A pdf file of the arrest affadavit is linked in this Texas Tribune article. The cop left out quite a bit. https://www.texastribune.org/2015/07/21/waller-county-press-conference/

Yeah that's pretty terse, but it states the facts. The article you linked, not so much.

The video released after the news conference shows Encinia losing his temper with Bland when she refuses to put out her cigarette when he tells her to and refuses to come out of her Hyundai when told to do so.

Bullshit. He didn't "tell her to," he asked her to, "please, if you don't mind."

"People don't appreciate the danger of escalating a situation with law enforcement," said Charles "Sid" Heal, a former L.A. County sheriff's commander and force expert. "If a person believes they have a case, wait until after jail and sue. You don't want to escalate the situation to the point the officer feels threatened. Heal said the roadside confrontation is all too common. "As far as what I saw on the video I wouldn't say that it was outside of standards nationwide," he said. In terms of courtesy, Heal said, "raising your voice to a suspect is lowest level of force...."

Retired Los Angeles Police Capt. Greg Meyer said Bland's behavior led to the result. "Officers have complete discretion to control the movements of the violator, including making them get out the car," he said. Meyer said it is standard practice to have someone put out their cigarette. "No one, including a police officer, wants to get a burning cigarette jammed into their face or eye; it’s basic procedure," he said. "The officer asked politely if she would mind putting out her cigarette. The violator then raised her voice, actively resisted multiple lawful directions to get out of the car... This is yet another case of someone who chooses to illegally resist the directions of a police officer, thus escalating the situation," he said.


http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-sandra-bland-arrest-experts-20150722-story.html

K.




I think the quote from the Los Angeles Police Captain speaks volumes about the overall mentality and culture within police departments. This idea that "officers have complete discretion" is where most of these problems emanate from. In this traffic stop, the only pretext the officer had to pull her over was failure to signal. So, his whole purpose in this instance was to cite the driver for failure to signal. Anything he did which deviated from that specific purpose was improper. He should have just written the ticket and kept his mouth shut, so it's his behavior which was out of line. But if Police Captains and others in the field believe they have "complete discretion" to do things beyond the scope of their job, then it seems that the source of this problem is very much embedded and deep-seated in the mindsets of our law enforcement community.





Bingo!

Because they ahve gotten away with it in the courts. Grimms was just another scotus cluster fuck ruling, and marshal nailed it. PASC had it right; The officers actions were unconstitutional. Its the way courts operate now days, and that was a per curium decision no less. Do I hear PAID OFF? I didnt want to stray too far by disecting grimms.

If you read some of the posts here every car on the road should be systematically searched because of what they might do, not what they actually did.

Cop pulls out a taser and endangers her life but thats ok because she might be osama bin laden or a suicide bomber in disguise, for we all know that if you have a gun you intend to shoot someone, if you have a cigarette you intent to burn someone if you have a car you intend to run someone over and if you are alive the only reason why is because you will kill some officer in the line of duty.

These arguments in support of the state are becoming so frivolous and outrageous fantastical this thread is starting to bore me.

You are 100% correct, the rolling stop had nothing to do with it since that is not what she was cited for. The only thing the court will or should consider is what she was cited for.

the cop had the warning in his hand walked up to the car. All he had to do was hand it to her and walk away. There would not have been anything to deescalate. Nope instead he asked a question that had nothing to do with the stop and got all butt hurt.




< Message edited by Real0ne -- 7/27/2015 11:29:44 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 133
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/28/2015 2:17:54 AM   
Oneechan


Posts: 50
Joined: 8/31/2012
Status: offline
From what i've seen, the cop said some things which were very inappropriate. But all the actions he took were legal and within police regulations.
During a traffic stop an officer has the right to order you, and anyone else, out of the vehicle. As far as i'm aware no reason at all is required for this.

It's the duty of citizens to know the laws of the land, and comply with orders from an officer of the law.

Did his actions break any laws or regulations?

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 134
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/28/2015 4:12:57 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
Well thats what we are arguing about. Presently I am waiting for the those who support the cop to give a bonafide reason that cop escalated it instead of simply handing her the warning.

Have to think of it like football, no matter how pissed off this officer may have been he must maintain a profession composure. Comes with the turf. He did not, and in losing it violated her due process rights. That is why grimms was cited and where the argument stands right now. We are also arguing about what is admissible and what the court would actualy review at trial etc etc.

Here is some info, not from lying attorneys who will misdirect people with 1/2 the story but the whole enchilada.

Here is Jim Harrington, director of the Texas Civil Rights Project:

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4826444

from DCnovice: http://tpr.org/post/10-things-about-sandra-bland-traffic-stop-every-texan-should-know

X-Sheriff from texas https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3nok7Cby28

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Oneechan)
Profile   Post #: 135
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/28/2015 9:37:15 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
What filters RealOne... I must tell you I am quite competent with Photoshop so I am all ears.

What may be used to determine manipulation are things like light direction… difference in noise and focus…blurred pixels from edge blending… misaligned pore patterns…color gradation and shading… None of theses can be determined conclusively on a low resolution picture full of compression artifacts. To make this claim is unprofessional and I believe intentionally misleading.

Butch



< Message edited by kdsub -- 7/28/2015 9:50:14 AM >


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 136
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/28/2015 11:48:32 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

I think the quote from the Los Angeles Police Captain speaks volumes about the overall mentality and culture within police departments. This idea that "officers have complete discretion" is where most of these problems emanate from. In this traffic stop, the only pretext the officer had to pull her over was failure to signal. So, his whole purpose in this instance was to cite the driver for failure to signal. Anything he did which deviated from that specific purpose was improper. He should have just written the ticket and kept his mouth shut, so it's his behavior which was out of line. But if Police Captains and others in the field believe they have "complete discretion" to do things beyond the scope of their job, then it seems that the source of this problem is very much embedded and deep-seated in the mindsets of our law enforcement community.



Sorry. That's not quite right.

She failed to stop at a stop sign. She did a "rolling stop". Something that lots of people are guilty of. It drives me nuts (especially at a "four-way stop" intersection).

He turned around to follow her and possibly issue a warning (later on, in the video, he points her to his note pad and says: "You were getting a warning until you did all this" (or words to that effect). When she committed a second summons-worthy infraction (failure to properly signal a lane change), he hit the lights.

He was still well within policy for any police department of which I'm aware.

He took her credentials, asked her for a few minutes while he went back to his car and ran those credentials. At this point, obviously, her past history didn't come up (either because everything was satisfied, previously or because of an error) because he went back to her car with a written warning (as he later pointed out to her, while she was screaming about "all of this over a traffic signal" he said: "All of this over a warning").

When he asked if she was upset (which might have been him, throwing some itching powder into the situation), she started getting mouthy. That's when he asked her to put out her cigarette. She got even mouthier and was escalating the situation when he decided it was time to ensure his safety to the best of his ability.

When she refused to put out the cigarette (after him telling her, at least twice that it was a lawful order), was when he decided she needed to get out of the car; possibly still worried about that cigarette landing in his eye.

This situation could have ended in a written warning (which you can safely use to wipe your ass with no repercussions) and her, driving away. Instead, she had to get all mouthy and indignant and "know her rights".

Unfortunately, she didn't know them well enough.

Michael



I agree that there were a lot of things she could have done differently, too. But I was mainly referring to the circumstances that led to the escalation of the situation. Whether it was a stop sign or a turn signal violation - it's still a traffic related stop and might warrant a warning or citation. But there's no reason it has to be anything more than that. Maybe it's "within policy" or that they have "complete discretion," but maybe it's the policy that's the problem here.

Perhaps one solution would be to outline very strict and specific policies regarding what is acceptable for a police officer at a traffic stop, along with a public information campaign to inform citizens exactly what their rights are in that situation and make sure the cops know that the citizens know. As long as the rules are very clearly outlined and told to the public - just so there's no confusion or ambiguity about it in these situations. For one thing, it would definitely reduce the chances of cops being accused of racial profiling. The problem lies within a policy that gives officers too much "discretion," which leaves too much doubt as to their intentions and opens them up to these kinds of accusations.

Maybe she didn't know her rights well enough, and that's another aspect of this tragedy that should be addressed. But the cop didn't know either. He was just the one with the badge - the one who should have known better. But more than just a matter of rights, the police are public servants, and as such, the public has a right to demand that they be restrained and put under a tight leash. There needs to be stricter guidelines for cops, and severe penalties for failing to abide by those guidelines.

I'd like to see them impose a 5-minute rule. Once the cop pulls someone over, the clock starts ticking. If they can't get the ticket written in under 5 minutes, then the driver can drive off with no penalty - and the cop has to pay the fine for whatever moving violation the ticket was for. That'll keep them on task so as to avoid these unnecessary confrontations.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 137
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/28/2015 12:04:21 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

Ok I just checked, her mug shot in that video, [the one with her eyes open] has clearly been been photoshopped. (pretty poor job I might add)


May I ask how on such a low resolution picture you base your " clearly Photoshopped claim? What in your opinion are the tell tail signs of manipulation.

Butch




gotta put it in picture editing software and use filters. the one with the eyes open is either 1) a fake or 2) made to look like a fake. the one with the eyes closed has no anomolies that stick out like a sore thumb. If it is fake is a damn good one. (not that it cant be done it sure can just takes a hell of a lot of work to get it right)


Are you experienced enough with photoshop to definitively say it was done to the first image in your earlier post ? As far as the second image goes it's all too common for someone to blink because of the flash or happenstance. There's a whole lot of live people this happens to thus getting that zombie look or with the eyes all the way closed. Can you say for sure she was dead in that image ?

I kind of ranted on some cops in my earlier post in this thread. In general I'm not taking it back. I still don't like out of control cops or militarization of law enforcement. However, based on facts that have now come to light (thanks Kirata for bringing up freakin inconvenient facts once again and excellent research as usual) I may have been a bit harsh IMO of the officer involved.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 138
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/28/2015 12:16:13 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Oneechan

From what i've seen, the cop said some things which were very inappropriate. But all the actions he took were legal and within police regulations.
During a traffic stop an officer has the right to order you, and anyone else, out of the vehicle. As far as i'm aware no reason at all is required for this.

It's the duty of citizens to know the laws of the land, and comply with orders from an officer of the law.

Did his actions break any laws or regulations?

They did.

http://www.texasstandard.org/stories/10-things-about-the-sandra-bland-traffic-stop-every-texan-should-know/

(in reply to Oneechan)
Profile   Post #: 139
RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. - 7/28/2015 6:14:28 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

What filters RealOne... I must tell you I am quite competent with Photoshop so I am all ears.

What may be used to determine manipulation are things like light direction… difference in noise and focus…blurred pixels from edge blending… misaligned pore patterns…color gradation and shading… None of theses can be determined conclusively on a low resolution picture full of compression artifacts. To make this claim is unprofessional and I believe intentionally misleading.

Butch




I see compound compression, color blotching, stepped transitions etc on the first none of which exist on the second. So what is the lowest resolution in your professional opinion that can be analyzed for fraud?

Do you think that is why the gubmint always releases such low resolution pics when ever they are suspected of being naughty?


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 140
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Sandra Bland / I will light you up. Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125