Kirata
Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006 From: USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonxquote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata This business of blaming the state of our inner-city neighborhoods on "racism" only serves to infantilize blacks, absolving them of responsibility for the conditions that exist on their streets and in their schools, and is in itself a pernicious form of racism. Extorting $2 million dollars a year from the black residents of fergustan is clearly a pernicious form of racism as deliniated in the doj report. To fail to recognize this will infantilze yor argument that the blacks were simply extorting themselves You're just spouting rhetoric. The sometimes aggressive use of fines for non-criminal traffic and other offenses as a source of revenue is common in municipalities where income from property taxes and excise fees is insufficient to meet budget requirements (see here, for example). The DOJ's conclusion that these practices reflect racism depends solely on a specious "disparate impact" argument. Ferguson’s law enforcement practices overwhelmingly impact African Americans. Data collected by the Ferguson Police Department from 2012 to 2014 shows that African Americans account for 85% of vehicle stops, 90% of citations, and 93% of arrests made by FPD officers, despite comprising only 67% of Ferguson’s population. The implication here is that if African Americans accounted for only 67% of vehicle stops, citations, and arrests then all would be well. But clearly, this is nonsense. What if African Americans could be shown to offend at a rate equal to only half their representation in the population? Would all still be well at 67%? Obviously not. The reality is, national data show that African Americans offend at rates ranging from roughly twice to more than five times their representation in the population across all crime categories except alcohol-related offenses (see here). K.
|