Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

cnn presidential "debates" last night


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> cnn presidential "debates" last night Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 5:59:25 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
while I dislike bumping the "Hillary probe" off the first page, I trust she'll be in the news soon enough to bring it back...or the aca thread before comrade bird brain learns what a metaphor is...

I hated the gosh darned thing and was for the most part, embarrassed by it, so much so that I turned the prime time showing off halfway through. some combination of couldn't stand it anymore and not worth the time.

I think the whole thing started badly when the emphasis of the cnn moderator's questions had to do with inciting discord between whoever was being asked the question, and Donald trump. thankfully, governor Pataki picked up on that and lightly chastised the moderator for it, but to no avail. the evening was characterized by the moderators asking questions to one person, about another person's comments or policies.

on the surface, one might say it was designed to allow the candidates to differentiate themselves from one another, however, if it indeed did do that, it ending up doing so at some expense of the character of the person being questioned. I think on the whole, too many people last night looked small and petty.

too much infighting, ranting tones, self-aggrandizement and talking in generalities. its hard to believe the rnc, or the voters, find any worth in this process.



< Message edited by bounty44 -- 9/17/2015 6:07:17 AM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 6:18:02 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

I hated the gosh darned thing and was for the most part, embarrassed by it,


Why christians like yourself think god is stupid has occsionally been a source of concern for me.
Do people like you think god does not know what a euphimism is?

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 6:40:19 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
There was a debate? When?

Oh, you mean that that multi-person press conference? Yeah, that's not a debate. A debate is when people take an issue and explain their view while giving supporting arguments. What was seen out of the 'debate' was a bunch of immature children talking about stuff as if they were adults. An adult would explain a dislike for the President of the United States of America, but show respect at the same time. Which one showed they could represent the nation as a whole? Because if they do, this nation will get a mercy nuking from Russia.....

Normally I might take stuff from the candidates and pick it apart. Frankly, there is not enough substance from any of them to fill a teaspoon let alone, a table to feast upon ideas and concepts. Alot of bullshit and no real reason to elect them to the White House. They catered to the right as much as possible while alienating everyone else in the nation. For Democrats it was amusing to watch the Republicans try to be more selfish than the last asshole to speak up from a question.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 6:55:48 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

while I dislike bumping the "Hillary probe" off the first page, I trust she'll be in the news soon enough to bring it back...or the aca thread before comrade bird brain learns what a metaphor is...

I hated the gosh darned thing and was for the most part, embarrassed by it, so much so that I turned the prime time showing off halfway through. some combination of couldn't stand it anymore and not worth the time.
Im really glad you arent defending it...

I think the whole thing started badly when the emphasis of the cnn moderator's questions had to do with inciting discord between whoever was being asked the question, and Donald trump. thankfully, governor Pataki picked up on that and lightly chastised the moderator for it, but to no avail. the evening was characterized by the moderators asking questions to one person, about another person's comments or policies.
If they had policies to sell they had the chance..however it was trump heavy, but at least Graham and Pataki voiced their concerns.


on the surface, one might say it was designed to allow the candidates to differentiate themselves from one another, however, if it indeed did do that, it ending up doing so at some expense of the character of the person being questioned. I think on the whole, too many people last night looked small and petty.
Thats what I see every day from the republicans, and have for the past 8 years.


too much infighting, ranting tones, self-aggrandizement and talking in generalities. its hard to believe the rnc, or the voters, find any worth in this process.
Again, this has been happening since obama came on the scene, thru the tea party bullshit and its even WORSE today than it was back then.
Last night was a wake up call for many on the right, be they republicans, conservatives, libertarian or otherwise.



I thought it showed them in their glorious ignorance.
from what Ive heard since last night, it became clear to many on the right, just how pathetic they look.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 7:01:20 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
It seems there was fact checking on going thru the debate....the number of "untruths" were debunked within minutes...Its a damned shame, fact checkers couldnt get thru to the hosts, so they could rebut.....I think that should be a part of every presidential debate from now on.
ANd yes I mean all debates.


Oh and the threat to government shut down over planned parenthood, specially fiorinas little sob fest was full of BS and so easily debunkable im surprised she didnt stab trump in the eye with her nose growing.
.
FUcking morons

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 7:12:55 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
while I dislike bumping the "Hillary probe" off the first page, I trust she'll be in the news soon enough to bring it back...or the aca thread before comrade bird brain learns what a metaphor is...


If you want the ACA threads to stay on the front page, all you had to do was ask....

Not that I expect you to show anything resembling a half decent counter argument to a law that benefits you long term.....

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
I hated the gosh darned thing and was for the most part, embarrassed by it, so much so that I turned the prime time showing off halfway through. some combination of couldn't stand it anymore and not worth the time.


What's wrong? Are all the candidates for your party total failures? I could have told you that! Be more than happy to inform you of it a few months ago. You and other conservatives demand next to nothing in 'good caliber individuals whom worry about substance than ego'. With your demands so low are you honestly surprised by what you got?

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
I think the whole thing started badly when the emphasis of the cnn moderator's questions had to do with inciting discord between whoever was being asked the question, and Donald trump. thankfully, governor Pataki picked up on that and lightly chastised the moderator for it, but to no avail. the evening was characterized by the moderators asking questions to one person, about another person's comments or policies.


Yes, blame it all on CNN. The candidates are a horrible excuse of Presidential material to begin with. You want to blame CNN for not asking questions that allow these useless morons to look good before the cameras? That just tells me they can not handle tough questions. Because the Oval Office has to deal with questions that make PH.D. tremble in fear. None of the questions nor their responses even vaguely approached the sort of questions Presidents are asked to handle during their terms.

How well do you understand the sort of questions each President has had to weigh in on? Its easy to second guess someone you dislike as a US President. You wish to look at them in negative terms all the while not directly answering the question yourself. It shows up in your viewpoints all the time. You really have no idea what these individuals have had to deal with, since there are many items still classified.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
on the surface, one might say it was designed to allow the candidates to differentiate themselves from one another, however, if it indeed did do that, it ending up doing so at some expense of the character of the person being questioned. I think on the whole, too many people last night looked small and petty.


Again, you do not demand the people you might vote on to be individuals with actual standards of excellence. In 2008, I had a hard choice between very different and yet, intensive individuals whom had excellence: Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama. That you hate both of them is irrelevant. They each had their qualifications and baggage. Eight years later, if they were both to run for the office, the decision would be a whole lot harder to make. In eight years which of the candidates for the GOP ticket have increased in their ability and handled tough issues? Not just as adults but as people that have responsibilities to the whole of the nation?

You neither ask nor demand anything serious from these people. Nor have done so for months. Kinda of late to be bitching about it now. Your stuck with that bunch for better or worst. But dont worry, in fourteen months, a Democrat will win the race and you can start looking for a good GOP ticket offer in 2024!

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
too much infighting, ranting tones, self-aggrandizement and talking in generalities. its hard to believe the rnc, or the voters, find any worth in this process.


Yeah, we should just throw out debates all together. While we are at it, throw out requiring elected officials to any level of accountability or responsibility with power. Then throw out US History and the Constitution; not like either have helped Republicans in recent years do anything useful for the nation....

I say there should be debates every other night. Pick a topic, and that's the topic those running for office of the President have to discuss. That we weigh in on their abilities and words, rather than the bullshit. That we ask them "OK, you dislike our immigration policy, where is yours?" And not settle for just words but actual text that looks like a bill for Congress to sign off on.

You do not want to challenge these Republicans to hard. You and I both know most of them could not handle a serious inquiry on the majority of subjects. Sadly, most Americans could not follow those high level inquiries. It would require the GOP/TP propaganda machines reducing information down to sound bites for the simple minded to follow and keep up.

Yeah, been fun to bash President Obama, hasn't it? Bet your wishing for a GOP/TP candidates that had not just the education, intelligence, and wisdom of the man; but also be conservative in views, right? Good luck finding that in the candidates on the GOP/TP, right now......

Maybe you might try raising the bar of what is demanded of those seeking office? Oh forgot, that's a liberal notion.....

Because in the general election, your nominee will get 'WTF PWNED' (to use a gamer expression) by a Democrat whom not only has the qualifications, behaves Presidential, but is not afraid to state views and produce concepts in text form on how to fix current problems facing the nation. All the while you'll be trying to undermine that individual while trying to raise your 'lame excuse' of a candidate up to the same degree as the Democrat. An I'll be there to thrash your person, because you lack the will, understanding, knowledge, and conviction, to do it yourself, like a proper US Citizen is required according to the founding fathers.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 9:22:59 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
I think on the whole, too many people last night looked small and petty.

The whole thing was designed as a gotcha trap.
People either gave the Dems soundbites to use against the Rep or they would be trashed for not answering the questions. It was carefully crafted to create exactly the opinion you have.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 9:29:27 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
And the stooges climbed on the clownbus and performed. Just as they would for the feebleminded in our congress.


So, now we know. No change.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 9:34:22 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
LMAO....they did it to themselves...people were talking about megan kelly for weeks after her gotcha questions...except the right
The second was much funnier.
Anyone else think that cruz is trying to come across as a very creepy mix of mr rogers and dick cheney?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 9:45:37 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
Did it remind you of the House or Representatives trying to pass a long term highway funding bill? How about immigration reform? Or infrastructure spending? Psst, guess what, they're not capable of it? Why is that? Would they rather rail against "big government," "taxes," and Obama while letting everything deteriorate?

< Message edited by cloudboy -- 9/17/2015 9:59:06 AM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 11:16:50 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
really have no idea what youre talking about there...

but since you mention "big government", let me add: with little exception, most things in the country get done, and/or get done better, at the state and local level as opposed to the federal. its mind boggling that you liberals just cannot seem to either grasp, or accept that.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 11:20:39 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I think on the whole, too many people last night looked small and petty.

The whole thing was designed as a gotcha trap.
People either gave the Dems soundbites to use against the Rep or they would be trashed for not answering the questions. It was carefully crafted to create exactly the opinion you have.


I wish the rnc would/could create some structure in which the voting public could easily see the candidates and get some in depth looks at what they believe.

and id love to see a large chart set up with the candidates on the rows and the columns full of the issues, with candidate comments/positions at the intersection.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 11:26:01 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

really have no idea what youre talking about there...

but since you mention "big government", let me add: with little exception, most things in the country get done, and/or get done better, at the state and local level as opposed to the federal. its mind boggling that you liberals just cannot seem to either grasp, or accept that.


Fifty interstate highway administrations?
Fifty state nasa programs?
Fifty state armies?
Fifty interstate commerce commissions?
Fifty federal aviation agencies?

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 11:28:59 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

and id love to see a large chart set up with the candidates on the rows and the columns full of the issues, with candidate comments/positions at the intersection.


That would certainly be a lot easier than going on line and looking up their positions. Of course you would be getting someone elses opinion instead of the actual person you were looking for.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 11:30:14 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

really have no idea what youre talking about there...

but since you mention "big government", let me add: with little exception, most things in the country get done, and/or get done better, at the state and local level as opposed to the federal. its mind boggling that you liberals just cannot seem to either grasp, or accept that.



Ever hear the song, when Ebola came to Texas?
How about welfare fraud in the south? (state run programs)
How about toothless mulletheaded imbeciles in the stupidest schools in America (state run)
How about common core? State run.

Something you imbeciles cant either grasp or accept.

What really runs better at the state levels?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 11:32:43 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I think on the whole, too many people last night looked small and petty.

The whole thing was designed as a gotcha trap.
People either gave the Dems soundbites to use against the Rep or they would be trashed for not answering the questions. It was carefully crafted to create exactly the opinion you have.


I wish the rnc would/could create some structure in which the voting public could easily see the candidates and get some in depth looks at what they believe.

and id love to see a large chart set up with the candidates on the rows and the columns full of the issues, with candidate comments/positions at the intersection.

Both parties, and it would be nice if they could give them truth serum before asking the questions. Of course it wouldn't affect Hillary, I don't think she knows when she is lying.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 11:59:13 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
4% on fact check with the rightwingers. Hillary does better.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 3:26:33 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

4% on fact check with the rightwingers. Hillary does better.


That's only because they only ask her questions she knows the answers to.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 4:19:08 PM   
OSGRedux


Posts: 21
Joined: 9/17/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


The second was much funnier.



It certainly was for us. We turned it into a drinking game. Every time someone mentioned Reagan, we took a sip. I had a pretty good buzz going by the end.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: cnn presidential "debates" last night - 9/17/2015 4:46:57 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
unfortunately I get (have?) to see Lucy's comments when people quote her, and the dismissive mocking instead of an actual critique.

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 9/17/2015 4:47:17 PM >

(in reply to OSGRedux)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> cnn presidential "debates" last night Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125