Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 1:58:28 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

post any mainstream factual one in the last 5 years that says it is turning away from socialism. All you have is slobbering nutsuckers spewing asswipe in non-sequiturs and strawmen.

Mainstream media usually dont do articles on nothing happening. Nutsucker slobber blogs and nutsuckers shit their pants and cockgargle incessantly about nothing.

The democratic socialist party has been the largest party in the Riksdag since 1917.

Wrong. It was not the largest party 2006 - 2016. The name of the party is the Social Democratic Party, by the way.
quote:


The (parliament) is composed of several parties, like England, and the socialists are at 40-55% consistently, holding the largest share of seats in government.


Like I said. Your information is outdated. Up to 1980 or so the social democrats got 40-55% of the vote. Since 1988 however its has lost about 1/3 of its voter base, and now scores around 35%.

No small part that due to progressive policies that caused an economic crash in the 1990's, sweden went from #4 wealthiest nation to #23. This caused a rapid realigniment.

The SD is currently in power, due to a partnership with the greens, but they are not the largest political party. IIRC, the moderates came 1 mp short of ruling by itself.

As for the rest - once again no links, no facts nothing but your outdated, uninformed opinion. I know reading is tough for you. Almost as tough as challenging your preconceived notions.

In some ways, Sweden is now less progressive than the United States. Harvard professor Gregory Mankiw writes that the wealthiest decile of Swedes carries 26.7 percent of the tax burden. In The United States, the figure is a whopping 45.1 percent. Additionally, wealth inequality is more pronounced in Scandinavian countries than it is in the United States. In Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Norway, the top decile of earners own between 65 and 69 percent of the country’s total wealth, an astonishing figure. Sanders is apparently unaware of this reality, given that one of his primary reasons for praising Scandinavia was their low levels of wealth inequality.

http://thefederalist.com/2015/08/11/scandinavia-isnt-a-socialist-paradise/

< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 1/25/2016 1:59:50 PM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 2:07:39 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Oh, please. Negotiations happen prior to the previous contract's expiration, unless the negotiations go poorly and extend beyond the previous contract. Imagine how many teachers could get fired if the CBA is no longer in effect, which could also prevent them from being rehired under the new CBA. No way the Unions are going to risk that. That would be shitty representation, at the very least.
Just prior to or at expiration, it's the same thing. There is anticipation of a disruptive situation. You're just being picky.

quote:

That means jack shit. The TPS teachers aren't negotiating with government, thus, their situation doesn't meet the reasons of the 1st Amendment.
There is so much SCOTUS case law to show that the constitution does not stop at the classroom door for both students and teachers to make your claim sadly ridiculous or blind.

quote:

Yes, they exist with curtailed powers. That was my point. The laws that grant those powers can be changed, removing those powers. In the case of WI, it wasn't all.
It was always understood in Florida that the laws could be changed. That's why the Union always and continuously lobbied the state legislature. Oh wait, I forgot your silly claim we were not negotiating with government.

quote:

You've now moved from low socioeconomic status to "impoverished family environments." I maintain that academics supporting home environments are more important to student success than how much money that home brings in. You can have poor home environments without that home being impoverished, and the academic results will tend to reflect that.
I thought I made that pretty clear.

quote:

Are you going to pass a law that demands families set up home environments that are supportive of academic success? Do you have to have highly developed cognitive abilities to get good paying jobs?
No, of course not. America does not give a shit about the poor or people of color to spend the money needed for more effective intervention. We would rather spend the money on a bloated defense system now gearing up for a war with 30,000 Arabs running around the desert in pick up trucks, a pathetic force our pols would have us believe constitute an imminent threat. We are a people so imbued with irrational fear that we let our infrastructure go to hell. Inner city kids and poor country kids are an important part of our infrastructure. But all our pols are interested in is dressing them in uniform and providing cannon fodder for unjustified, colonial warfare.

quote:

It has to start in the home. The parent(s) has to be supportive of academic success. How do we legislate that sort of thing?
True, but there is a big difference between the mindset of immigrants who had the moxie to get up and move their families to a new world verses those who are caught up in the long cycle of indigenous racism, and who continue to struggle against systemic racism. My dad was from Sicily and never got beyond the 3rd grad but I went through grad school because by my generation the prejudice against southern European immigrants was dissipated. So, why can't we help our own? Because we need some group to look down upon? Some group that makes us feel better than them? Some group to whom we ascribe mental, spiritual deficiencies. Them lazy, ignorant, shiftless, blacks.

The truth is we do not give a shit about them. The truth is we need their failure to make us feel god almighty okay with our puny accomplishments. Hey, look at how great I am! How great are you? Well, I'm better than those ignorant fucks who live downtown. White, suburban Americans live lives of ever changing fear. They are pathetic. "Gotta buy me another gun before that black man in the White House confiscates them all and leaves us vulnerable to the newest boogie man. Shit!

< Message edited by vincentML -- 1/25/2016 2:13:47 PM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 2:18:36 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
So, nothing saying it isnt socialist, and you can mince all you want, it was minority from 6-10.

Thats like saying nutsuckers rule this country because you had W in for two terms. But they dont.

And internet relay chat is not a party in sweden. But wherever the cockgargling comes from you are felching, here it is from the actual Sveirges Riksdag:


http://www.riksdagen.se/en/How-the-Riksdag-works/The-parties-in-the-Riksdag/

the mod doesnt come close to the socdem.

You have no information, just mythical hallucination and asswipe. 113/236 looks about like close enough to 48% for one that has any mathematical underpinnings to call it that, so they hold 32% of the seats with a 48% vote, plus the greens and the mods often side with them, and it is unlikely the entire rest of the riksdag would vote against them, so, you got nothing.

And their conservatives are not nutsuckers instead of conservatives like ours are.

They are the majority party.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 1/25/2016 2:24:24 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 2:30:39 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
but as usual people in a two party system dont understand monte carlo analysis.

They were out of majority 12 years in a hundred, 8 by a coalition of left to moderates (the last two) which will never happen again as they fucked things up and couldnt get along anyhow.

Oh, the turning from socialism is fucking carnage there, I tell ya. Sun Myung Moon says so.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 1/25/2016 2:38:52 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 2:42:10 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:



They are the majority party.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Social_Democratic_Party


No they are not. They govern as part of a coalition with the greens

< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 1/25/2016 2:50:36 PM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 2:50:43 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Oh, please. Negotiations happen prior to the previous contract's expiration, unless the negotiations go poorly and extend beyond the previous contract. Imagine how many teachers could get fired if the CBA is no longer in effect, which could also prevent them from being rehired under the new CBA. No way the Unions are going to risk that. That would be shitty representation, at the very least.
Just prior to or at expiration, it's the same thing. There is anticipation of a disruptive situation. You're just being picky.


Ridiculous. But since you are making the assertion that union negotiations with local school boards are an example of a citizen's First ammendment right - please find a cite or two that supports that.

The right of redress (wiki)

While the prohibition of abridgment of the right to petition originally referred only to the federal legislature (the Congress) and courts, the incorporation doctrine later expanded the protection of the right to its current scope, over all state and federal courts and legislatures and the executive branches of the state[8][dead link] and federal governments. The right to petition includes under its umbrella the right to sue the government,[9][dead link] and the right of individuals, groups and possibly corporations to lobby the government.

See anything in that that says school boards?

quote:

. So, why can't we help our own? Because we need some group to look down upon? Some group that makes us feel better than them? Some group to whom we ascribe mental, spiritual deficiencies. Them lazy, ignorant, shiftless, blacks.

The truth is we do not give a shit about them. The truth is we need their failure to make us feel god almighty okay with our puny accomplishments. Hey, look at how great I am! How great are you? Well, I'm better than those ignorant fucks who live downtown. White, suburban Americans live lives of ever changing fear. They are pathetic. "Gotta buy me another gun before that black man in the White House confiscates them all and leaves us vulnerable to the newest boogie man. Shit!


You are not qualified to speak for anyone but yourself. And your attitude toward black and republicans is enlightening.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 2:58:37 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
it was minority from 6-10.


by which you were admitting you were wrong eh?

quote:

nothing about not being socialist


I've already given you five cites saying that sweden isn't the socialist paradise sanders portrays it to be. Since you didn't read those, or provide any kind of link contradicting it - there is no further need to discuss it with you. Your opinion is meaningless, and your lack of facts will persuade no one.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 3:03:47 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:



They are the majority party.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Social_Democratic_Party


No they are not. They govern as part of a coalition with the greens



You are behind the times, I just showed you the Riksdag. That is old old news.
Course why believe the actual Swedes, when you can find something that will support your hallucinatorv views.

So, we have went from the swedes turning away from socialism to well, maybe they are in a coalition to what now?

So, you were wrong at the outset, and it turns out that they like all scandinavia is overwhelmingly social democratic, it comes from their egalitarian underpinnings since the days of the althing. And they are handing us our ass, in terms of their financials. China also is handing us our ass. You want to compare and contrast them and their coalition with nutsucker slobber blogs? Seems like american leadership and fiscal responsibility is sort of fucked up, and I see that our tax revenue shortfall (due to some tax cuts kicking in from nutsuckers) are gonna put us in a half trillion deficit this year, and I bet that will go right to the bottom line and hit debt.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 3:58:37 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:



They are the majority party.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Social_Democratic_Party


No they are not. They govern as part of a coalition with the greens



You are behind the times, I just showed you the Riksdag. That is old old news.
Course why believe the actual Swedes, when you can find something that will support your hallucinatorv views.

So, we have went from the swedes turning away from socialism to well, maybe they are in a coalition to what now?

So, you were wrong at the outset, and it turns out that they like all scandinavia is overwhelmingly social democratic, it comes from their egalitarian underpinnings since the days of the althing. And they are handing us our ass, in terms of their financials. China also is handing us our ass. You want to compare and contrast them and their coalition with nutsucker slobber blogs? Seems like american leadership and fiscal responsibility is sort of fucked up, and I see that our tax revenue shortfall (due to some tax cuts kicking in from nutsuckers) are gonna put us in a half trillion deficit this year, and I bet that will go right to the bottom line and hit debt.


Come up with some cites man. Your opinion is worthless. Here are some facts: Lower tax rates for companies than the us. Less progressive tax structure than the us. More business friendly than the US (ie., few rules, regulations).

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 5:26:01 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

Oh, please. Negotiations happen prior to the previous contract's expiration, unless the negotiations go poorly and extend beyond the previous contract. Imagine how many teachers could get fired if the CBA is no longer in effect, which could also prevent them from being rehired under the new CBA. No way the Unions are going to risk that. That would be shitty representation, at the very least.
Just prior to or at expiration, it's the same thing. There is anticipation of a disruptive situation. You're just being picky.


Picky? How long do negotiations usually take? What is your definition of "just prior to..."?

quote:

quote:

That means jack shit. The TPS teachers aren't negotiating with government, thus, their situation doesn't meet the reasons of the 1st Amendment.

There is so much SCOTUS case law to show that the constitution does not stop at the classroom door for both students and teachers to make your claim sadly ridiculous or blind.


LOL!! Nowhere did I say the Constitution stops at the classroom door for anyone. Your statement is incredibly irrelevant.

quote:

quote:

Yes, they exist with curtailed powers. That was my point. The laws that grant those powers can be changed, removing those powers. In the case of WI, it wasn't all.
It was always understood in Florida that the laws could be changed. That's why the Union always and continuously lobbied the state legislature. Oh wait, I forgot your silly claim we were not negotiating with government.


If you noticed, I've always mentioned Toledo Public Schools. I know they don't negotiate with government. I've even acknowledged that Florida has passed legislation dictating what a teachers union can bargain over. But, nowhere have you shown that pay, benefits, etc. are wrongs that need to be righted (which is what "petitioning government for a redress of grievances" means).

quote:

quote:

You've now moved from low socioeconomic status to "impoverished family environments." I maintain that academics supporting home environments are more important to student success than how much money that home brings in. You can have poor home environments without that home being impoverished, and the academic results will tend to reflect that.

I thought I made that pretty clear.


Nope. Your initial claim was that being poor was the cause of diminished cognitive development.

quote:

quote:

Are you going to pass a law that demands families set up home environments that are supportive of academic success? Do you have to have highly developed cognitive abilities to get good paying jobs?

No, of course not. America does not give a shit about the poor or people of color to spend the money needed for more effective intervention. We would rather spend the money on a bloated defense system now gearing up for a war with 30,000 Arabs running around the desert in pick up trucks, a pathetic force our pols would have us believe constitute an imminent threat. We are a people so imbued with irrational fear that we let our infrastructure go to hell. Inner city kids and poor country kids are an important part of our infrastructure. But all our pols are interested in is dressing them in uniform and providing cannon fodder for unjustified, colonial warfare.


LMMFAO!!! This has nothing to do with race! Blacks are not the only race that suffers academically because of crappy home environments! I thought you wanted everyone to be treated equally? Why single out blacks?

quote:

quote:

It has to start in the home. The parent(s) has to be supportive of academic success. How do we legislate that sort of thing?

True, but there is a big difference between the mindset of immigrants who had the moxie to get up and move their families to a new world verses those who are caught up in the long cycle of indigenous racism, and who continue to struggle against systemic racism. My dad was from Sicily and never got beyond the 3rd grad but I went through grad school because by my generation the prejudice against southern European immigrants was dissipated. So, why can't we help our own? Because we need some group to look down upon? Some group that makes us feel better than them? Some group to whom we ascribe mental, spiritual deficiencies. Them lazy, ignorant, shiftless, blacks.


Again, this isn't about blacks alone.

quote:

The truth is we do not give a shit about them. The truth is we need their failure to make us feel god almighty okay with our puny accomplishments. Hey, look at how great I am! How great are you? Well, I'm better than those ignorant fucks who live downtown. White, suburban Americans live lives of ever changing fear. They are pathetic. "Gotta buy me another gun before that black man in the White House confiscates them all and leaves us vulnerable to the newest boogie man. Shit!


You've gone off the rails, vincent. Be well.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 6:05:41 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
You've gone off the rails, vincent. Be well.


that's why I stopped talking to him.

but while im here:

"School monopoly is a drag on downtowns"

quote:

Inner-city homeowners and businesses pay half their total property tax bill to the San Antonio Independent School District, with little to show for it.

While the 53,700-student school system receives a “Met Standards” rating from the Texas Education Agency, the outcomes are dreadful:

•Just 15.5 percent of students passed at least one Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate exam (versus 51.3 percent statewide).
•The average SAT score is 1201 (1417 statewide).
•Only 39 percent of SAISD graduates are deemed college-ready in English and math (54 percent statewide).
•The four-year graduation rate for whites is 69.8 percent (93 percent statewide). The overall rate of 80.8 is eight points below the Texas average.

Poor district? Think again. SAISD teachers earn bigger salaries across the board. Starting pay of $49,424 is $5,000 over the state average.

With a $550 million budget, SAISD expenditures work out to $10,185 per pupil — roughly double any charter school allocation in Texas....

“Under the current monopoly-only approach, (public schools) continue to fail.”

For a quality K-12 education, parents double down to put their children in private schools while continuing to pay taxes for scholastic services they do not or cannot use.

“Until we rein in the out-of-control spending of public school districts, we’re never going to see the end to confiscatory property taxes in Texas,” said Terri Hall, president of Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom.

Hall and others believe San Antonio’s downtown revitalization efforts will be deflated as long as high-achieving parents are scared off by low-performing schools.

Venable says school choice ["choice" is only good when you want to kill babies in the womb] — through education savings accounts — are the answer.

“When education bureaucrats start seeing students and parents as their clients and customers, schools will improve,” she predicts.


http://watchdog.org/254741/school-choice-texas/

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/25/2016 6:14:02 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
"The libertarian case for school choice"

quote:

Less than 24 hours before Snowmaggedon was scheduled to hit Washington, D.C., libertarians and other school choice supporters gathered to hear the latest evidence that public education needs to move into the 21st century...

“The traditional public school system, K through 12, which is a $600 billion a year industry, is filled with abuses, waste, and misdirected attention,” Gillespie added...

As it turns out, Snell explained, many high-performing schools, typically public charter schools, are located in strip malls, old churches or even warehouses. The building itself seems to have little to do with the learning.

The root of the problem stems from traditional public education’s unwillingness to adapt. We live in an age of mass customization, so why not have that in education?

He likened the current education system to buying a car that still performs like it was built in the 1970s, but at an increased cost: “We are basically spending 200 percent more for a product that is circa 1970.” Spending at all levels of government on K-12 public education is up nearly 200 percent, but student achievement is flat.

Snell joked that the solution was to send America’s children to a foreign country.

“The Unites States spends more than almost any country in the world on public education … and [the OECD] found that schools that spend 50 percent of the what the United State spends basically get the same performance or even more, so one of the solutions might be that we could just send kids to Estonia because they are spending a lot less money than us and they are performing better than us,” she said.

The real solution, both speakers agreed, was to embrace the changes that are occurring in the economy and apply them to public education. Just as companies like Uber and inventions like 3D printers are enabling personalization and customization in the economy, charter schools, virtual schools, vouchers, education savings accounts, and other forms of school choice are revolutionizing education and giving students and parents the ability to customize and personalize education.


http://watchdog.org/254789/clear-reason-for-school-choice-week/



< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/25/2016 6:17:06 PM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/26/2016 7:26:14 AM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
And, Scandinavia. Your lack of any factual knowledge betrays a lack of intellect on the actual world...


Once again your "knowledge" is myth and out of date.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/jun/16/20070616-080932-5740r/?page=all
http://nypost.com/2015/10/19/sorry-bernie-scandinavia-is-no-socialist-paradise-after-all/
http://reason.com/blog/2012/06/08/sweden-not-a-socialist-standard-bearer-a
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/248263/swedens-quiet-revolution-duncan-currie
http://patriotupdate.com/sweden-leads-way-dumping-socialism/
Here, let me quote a bit


Since the early 1990s, when it suffered a painful financial crisis, the Scandinavian country has deregulated key industries (such as airlines, telecommunications, and electricity), lowered its overall tax burden, established universal school vouchers, partially privatized its pension system, abolished certain government monopolies, sold a number of state-owned enterprises (including the parent company of Absolut vodka), and trimmed public spending. Several years ago, it eliminated gift and inheritance taxes. The World Economic Forum now ranks Sweden as the second-most competitive economy on earth, behind only Switzerland. According to the 2010 Index of Economic Freedom (compiled by the Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation), Sweden offers greater business freedom, trade freedom, monetary freedom, investment freedom, financial freedom, freedom from corruption, and property-rights protection than does the United States.



Tax dodgers will go to tax havens like Johns will go to the fleshpots of the world. Doesn't mean they are moral



It also doesn't mean oppressive taxes or the governments that inflict them are moral, either. Pretty stupid comment.

I may frame it. First time I've ever heard sweden, with an income tax of 56% and a VAT tax of 25% as a tax haven.


You later say Sweden is less socialist than us with 56% income tax and socialized healthcare

Scandinavia is the tax haven if you read your own citations. Lowering taxes in one country moves companies there, it does not create additional global wealth. In fact, it often lowers it as location is chosen for taxes, not ease of production

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/26/2016 9:28:27 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Bahamas has 0% taxation as do dozens of other countries. Calling sweden a tax haven is ridiculous; you're just trying to save face. Have some intellectual honesty. A tax haven is a place you move money to, in order to avoid taxes.

No one is moving money to sweden for a tax haven.

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/26/2016 9:37:30 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Swedens corporate taxes (effective rate) are higher than US corporate taxes (effective rate).

I guess that means we should be more effective and get more corporate taxes.

You are talking like a socialist nutsucker now.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/26/2016 9:38:16 AM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
SCANDANAVIA is a TAX HAVEN. Please read. Sweden is socialist

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/26/2016 9:55:33 AM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
And, Scandinavia. Your lack of any factual knowledge betrays a lack of intellect on the actual world...


Once again your "knowledge" is myth and out of date.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/jun/16/20070616-080932-5740r/?page=all
http://nypost.com/2015/10/19/sorry-bernie-scandinavia-is-no-socialist-paradise-after-all/
http://reason.com/blog/2012/06/08/sweden-not-a-socialist-standard-bearer-a
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/248263/swedens-quiet-revolution-duncan-currie
http://patriotupdate.com/sweden-leads-way-dumping-socialism/
Here, let me quote a bit


Since the early 1990s, when it suffered a painful financial crisis, the Scandinavian country has deregulated key industries (such as airlines, telecommunications, and electricity), lowered its overall tax burden, established universal school vouchers, partially privatized its pension system, abolished certain government monopolies, sold a number of state-owned enterprises (including the parent company of Absolut vodka), and trimmed public spending. Several years ago, it eliminated gift and inheritance taxes. The World Economic Forum now ranks Sweden as the second-most competitive economy on earth, behind only Switzerland. According to the 2010 Index of Economic Freedom (compiled by the Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation), Sweden offers greater business freedom, trade freedom, monetary freedom, investment freedom, financial freedom, freedom from corruption, and property-rights protection than does the United States.



Tax dodgers will go to tax havens like Johns will go to the fleshpots of the world. Doesn't mean they are moral



It also doesn't mean oppressive taxes or the governments that inflict them are moral, either. Pretty stupid comment.

I may frame it. First time I've ever heard sweden, with an income tax of 56% and a VAT tax of 25% as a tax haven.


You later say Sweden is less socialist than us with 56% income tax and socialized healthcare

Scandinavia is the tax haven if you read your own citations. Lowering taxes in one country moves companies there, it does not create additional global wealth. In fact, it often lowers it as location is chosen for taxes, not ease of production



quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Bahamas has 0% taxation as do dozens of other countries. Calling sweden a tax haven is ridiculous; you're just trying to save face. Have some intellectual honesty. A tax haven is a place you move money to, in order to avoid taxes.

No one is moving money to sweden for a tax haven.


Scandinavia and Sweden are two different countries. Try reading your own links and other's posts before acting the fool

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/26/2016 10:33:40 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Scandinavia is an area. Made up of Denmark, Norway, Sweden.
Nordic countries are those plus Iceland, Finland, Faroes, Greenland and Aland.


Sweden is a country part of Scandinavia and part of the Nordic countries.


England is England.
Great Britain is England, Wales, and Scotland.
The United Kingdom is England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/26/2016 11:54:41 AM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
Exactly. His news sources and references are all over the place. It's rediculous. He even has articles posted that are not mathematically consistent, some not possible

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association - 1/26/2016 11:58:53 AM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
Percentages don't add up, the guninfo.com, it's fricking unbelievable. Then a place that has mostly socialized Medicare and 56% income tax is the conservative el dorado

Up is down, black is white

< Message edited by DominantWrestler -- 1/26/2016 12:08:40 PM >

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125