DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML quote:
Oh, please. Negotiations happen prior to the previous contract's expiration, unless the negotiations go poorly and extend beyond the previous contract. Imagine how many teachers could get fired if the CBA is no longer in effect, which could also prevent them from being rehired under the new CBA. No way the Unions are going to risk that. That would be shitty representation, at the very least. Just prior to or at expiration, it's the same thing. There is anticipation of a disruptive situation. You're just being picky. Picky? How long do negotiations usually take? What is your definition of "just prior to..."? quote:
quote:
That means jack shit. The TPS teachers aren't negotiating with government, thus, their situation doesn't meet the reasons of the 1st Amendment. There is so much SCOTUS case law to show that the constitution does not stop at the classroom door for both students and teachers to make your claim sadly ridiculous or blind. LOL!! Nowhere did I say the Constitution stops at the classroom door for anyone. Your statement is incredibly irrelevant. quote:
quote:
Yes, they exist with curtailed powers. That was my point. The laws that grant those powers can be changed, removing those powers. In the case of WI, it wasn't all. It was always understood in Florida that the laws could be changed. That's why the Union always and continuously lobbied the state legislature. Oh wait, I forgot your silly claim we were not negotiating with government. If you noticed, I've always mentioned Toledo Public Schools. I know they don't negotiate with government. I've even acknowledged that Florida has passed legislation dictating what a teachers union can bargain over. But, nowhere have you shown that pay, benefits, etc. are wrongs that need to be righted (which is what "petitioning government for a redress of grievances" means). quote:
quote:
You've now moved from low socioeconomic status to "impoverished family environments." I maintain that academics supporting home environments are more important to student success than how much money that home brings in. You can have poor home environments without that home being impoverished, and the academic results will tend to reflect that. I thought I made that pretty clear. Nope. Your initial claim was that being poor was the cause of diminished cognitive development. quote:
quote:
Are you going to pass a law that demands families set up home environments that are supportive of academic success? Do you have to have highly developed cognitive abilities to get good paying jobs? No, of course not. America does not give a shit about the poor or people of color to spend the money needed for more effective intervention. We would rather spend the money on a bloated defense system now gearing up for a war with 30,000 Arabs running around the desert in pick up trucks, a pathetic force our pols would have us believe constitute an imminent threat. We are a people so imbued with irrational fear that we let our infrastructure go to hell. Inner city kids and poor country kids are an important part of our infrastructure. But all our pols are interested in is dressing them in uniform and providing cannon fodder for unjustified, colonial warfare. LMMFAO!!! This has nothing to do with race! Blacks are not the only race that suffers academically because of crappy home environments! I thought you wanted everyone to be treated equally? Why single out blacks? quote:
quote:
It has to start in the home. The parent(s) has to be supportive of academic success. How do we legislate that sort of thing? True, but there is a big difference between the mindset of immigrants who had the moxie to get up and move their families to a new world verses those who are caught up in the long cycle of indigenous racism, and who continue to struggle against systemic racism. My dad was from Sicily and never got beyond the 3rd grad but I went through grad school because by my generation the prejudice against southern European immigrants was dissipated. So, why can't we help our own? Because we need some group to look down upon? Some group that makes us feel better than them? Some group to whom we ascribe mental, spiritual deficiencies. Them lazy, ignorant, shiftless, blacks. Again, this isn't about blacks alone. quote:
The truth is we do not give a shit about them. The truth is we need their failure to make us feel god almighty okay with our puny accomplishments. Hey, look at how great I am! How great are you? Well, I'm better than those ignorant fucks who live downtown. White, suburban Americans live lives of ever changing fear. They are pathetic. "Gotta buy me another gun before that black man in the White House confiscates them all and leaves us vulnerable to the newest boogie man. Shit! You've gone off the rails, vincent. Be well.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|