crumpets
Posts: 1614
Joined: 11/5/2014 From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley) Status: offline
|
I had to break up my response 'cuz the captcha thing times out if I take too long, and then it's sheer hell to get a post to stick... quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact I haven't been to the Citadel. I've seen a lot of discussions that are pro and against the space. Not the space, itself, but there has been a lot of talk about who they will allow entry. I can't support that. It's so far away for me, compared to what Edges was and SBS is, that I have only been there a few times, so, I'll let the SF regulars comment on the structuring of the Citadel. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact No top can convey boundaries to onlookers that walk up mid-scene. Fair enough. As I said prior, it's not really your job to keep onlookers at bay. As someone noted, you 'can' (at your discretion) "allow" participation, which, as I noted in the swing club, certainly happens regularly, but, in general, at the dungeons, it doesn't happen all that often, at least not between strangers. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact As a female top, I'm not going to disagree with you on this. I have a pretty good success rate when it comes to pick up play. I'm a chick who can crack a whip, so automatically, I have certain advantages. Yep. Out in the wild, I have freedom that you will never have, simply because nobody gives a hoot about me. I joke that I could lounge about and eat free food in the lobby of almost any business hotel in the planet, and not a single person would even notice me, whereas there are almost no places you can go where you're not instantly and immediately noticed. Everything is almost completely different, when it comes to the sex-related experiences of men versus women, and, in general, we have the freedom to be wholly and completely ignored, and you have the luxury of being noticed (and given perks, like a vastly reduced rate on admission). quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact At swinger events, there is often a different price structure Yep. Don't think I never noticed. It was cheaper to bring a date than to go alone. By a LOT! Some men hung out outside the Power Exchange, as I recall, offering to pay single women $50 or some such amount, just to get a discount on the $70 rate (although it was, of course, against the rules). quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact which some could say is discriminatory to single males. Um... yeah. It's extremely discriminatory. But men aren't gonna complain. If you charged women as much as men, they wouldn't bother showing up. No sheep. No wolves. Simple logic. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact At the same time, if your swingers event is a sausage fest, you're not going to get the women to go. Yup. A delicate balance it is. Not at all worth it, in my book, to go alone. So, I don't bother anymore. Which is probably why I haven't been to the SBS (although I have been planning to go for a while now, just as I plan to go to a munch, and to a LIP/s event, etc.). quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact How do we balance this so that everyone is treated well financially as well as socially? It's certainly interesting to think about. Yeah. Men get screwed and raped all the time. Think of bar promotions where it's often "Ladies Free", which means "Men pay thru the nose!". Still the same dynamic. No sheep. No wolves. No dollars. Now, it's the opposite at the dry cleaners, so, men aren't always the ones raped raw. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact We have more clubs, munches, cons, and groups than we ever have before. Yeah, there must be a half dozen munches in the SF Bay area alone (Palo Alto, Southern Cross, San Jose, Lip/S, etc.). quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact And some of this is good. But, it's coming with a price. Price is almost always the same. Sheep get in for free or nearly free; wolves get raped every time; they gladly allow that rapage, in the hopes of themselves getting their grubby paws on one of 'dem soft sheep. Until they get to be old and wizened as I am, and then they don't bother anymore and stay home reading a book by the fireplace instead. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact The lesson could go either way, couldn't it? The person might never come back. The possibility also exists that, if he comes back, he knows what will happen if he tries to grab somebody's ass. Yup. All I was saying was that the rules should have been explained to him, and they should have been clear to him, and he shouldn't have violated them, and that if he never returns, I'm not so sure that's a good thing or not for the owner, but I don't think anyone is crying over one missing wallet, um, I mean wolf, simply because there is a line of them out the door waiting to get their grubby lil' paws on some soft supple sheep!
|