NookieNotes
Posts: 1720
Joined: 11/10/2013 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance Hmm, I guess parties these days are more sexual than I remember. The play parties, unless held in a private home and very limited to invited guests, that I've been to had strict no penetration and only partial nudity (underwear at all times and nipples covered with type etc). If there is a problem with non-consensual acts taking place you probably would be doing better to clean house and get rid of the sexual offenders and/or players remorse victims in your midst. I know that's easier said than done, sometimes, and barring that I can see how this card could help. I have to say I hope it does take care of the issues because that sounds like a huge headache for the group/DMs/Hosts etc. The parties are different in various areas. I, for one, don't do pick-up play much at all, and certainly not sexual, with people I don't know or in public. That's me. That said, there have been instances of confusion as to what's agreed on. This is a simple card to explain "not beyond this point," to augment safe wording as needed. quote:
ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul As Nookie stated, this is being done because there have recently been issues in the community, and this is one way that they are trying to combat that. Not all consent violations are intentional; particularly in casual play situations, there is always a risk of misunderstandings between players. This is just one more way to facilitate clear negotiation and informed consent. I really don't understand why that is considered a bad thing. And these are not required. Simply there for those who are concerned. quote:
ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance I do think that in the long run, problem children will be a problem: until made accountable. The form may not stop the issue, but hopefully it will hold people accountable for the things they consent to do/have done. Maybe I'm just too far removed from today's scene. I'm still thinking in terms of my experiences being non-sexual at parties. So, I'm extremely appalled at the idea of there being a spate of non-consent issues. That sounds pretty serious to me. The issues, have, so far, been at other events. The Venue is a new spot, and we're doing our best to put preventative measures in place, as well as plan, in case something does go wrong, how to create a safe and welcoming way to handle the reports and such. quote:
ORIGINAL: artemiss Simply because something is agreed to, does not mean consent cannot be withdrawn. And the cards should not be allowed to be used to justify an action, but rather simply a tool in communication. The intent of my comment got sidetracked by personal attacks. The cards are setting the "going in" agreements. A safe word will stop a scene. At least in the issues we've been having int he community near us, the problem is misunderstood limits, rather than whether the safe word is honored. Once a violation has happened, a safe word does not undo it. quote:
ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul quote:
ORIGINAL: artemiss Simply because something is agreed to, does not mean consent cannot be withdrawn. And the cards should not be allowed to be used to justify an action, but rather simply a tool in communication. Agreed. And judging by what I know of Nookie, I am pretty comfortable stating that she would refuse to be a part of anything that implied consent could not be withdrawn. The card is just one way to jumpstart communication . But it does not replace negotiation. Neither does it replace communication during negotiation. Nor does it cancel-out safewording. Although this is a good point, and may work well adding a disclaimer to the next version of the card. quote:
ORIGINAL: HoneyBears Perhaps with index-card size, these stipulations (for the benefit of the clueless) could be spelled out in small print at the bottom, NookieNotes? (Possible Disclaimers:) [which should not be necessary in the first place for those with half a brain] -- Implied consent can be withdrawn at any time by either party. -- Nothing contained on this card cancels out safewording. -- This card does not replace standardly observed play negotiation between play partners. -- This card does not replace regular communications during such negotiations, as noted above. Yes! Thank you! I love crowdsourcing! *smiles* quote:
ORIGINAL: Kana I'm usually a pretty level headed dude, but I get downright Italian about some shit and one of those things is slaves, as in "You toucha My slave-a, I breaka your face-a" These are for negotiated and agreed upon scenes, to avoid very specific communication related to sexual contact. Not non-consensual touching of something that isn't yours without permission. Just to be clear.
_____________________________
Nookie -- https://datingkinky.com I Write! A few of my books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/author/msnnotes
|