Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: US elections general thread


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: US elections general thread Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
[Poll]

US elections general thread


Jeb Bush
  2% (1)
Donald Trump
  31% (12)
Marco Rubio
  0% (0)
Ben Carson
  2% (1)
Ted Cruz
  10% (4)
John Kasich
  5% (2)
Bernie Sanders
  34% (13)
Hillary Clinton
  13% (5)


Total Votes : 38


(last vote on : 3/21/2016 6:14:52 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: US elections general thread - 2/26/2016 10:47:40 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
http://time.com/4059030/republican-primary-calendar-2016-nomination-convention/
http://uspolitics.about.com/od/Election-2016/fl/2016-Republican-Primaries-How-Delegates-Will-be-Awarded.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016

I include the winner take most, because for you nutsucker slobber blog posters who are known innumerates, the numbers are such that you could win every leftover in the winner take most, and if thats what you won, you wouldnt have enough delegates to do your normal felching, nobody would be looking to do any special deals for your delegates.

Like one state in winner take most is 95/92, that is, winner take most gets 92 and three are able to go to second place.

But even not counting winner take most, it is well over 8.

But that is what you get for citing nutsucker slobber blogs, you wont have any fact available, just something for you feebleminded to felch.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: US elections general thread - 2/26/2016 11:34:09 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Your cite characterizes delegate selection by congressional district as winner take all, which since it allows wins by multiple different candidates - isn't.
Additionally, it characterizes states such as georgia which has a variable trigger as winner take all. Which it is not. It is proportional, so long as multiple candidates fall within the same band, but winner take all if they do not.

Being a hybrid system, one cannot characterize it as wta.

< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 2/26/2016 11:44:07 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: US elections general thread - 2/26/2016 12:02:35 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
http://www.270towin.com/2016-republican-nomination/georgia-primary

Wonder how the nutsuckers in Georgia are so bold as to disagree with other untutored nutsuckers, not in their state. I am sure it is a states-rights issue nutsucker style, don't you?

So, looks like the nutsucker gerrymander of last census, is going to bite them in the ass.

I submit, looking at the rules and numbers, the available candidates to get are going to go pretty much to the idiot trump.
If there is a chance in a couple places, the idiot cruz, or the idiot rubio get a 20% threshold, they will get the occasional one off delegate. Otherwise, its take all, and the real issue (which will keep the convention from being a runaway, the party machine holds 32 uncommitted (superdelagates) or some such number).

It dont matter no nutsucker will be elected president.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: US elections general thread - 2/26/2016 2:20:57 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Look mate,

This is another one of those times you are simply wrong, and can't admit it.

Georgia uses a hybrid system. Variable trigger for the 31 at large districts. Winner of each congressional delegate gets 2, runner up gets 1. Overall winner gets the 3 RNC delegates.

Rules here: GEORGIA

Election type: primary
Date: March 1
Number of delegates: 76 [31 at-large, 42 congressional district, 3 automatic (bound)]
Allocation method: proportional (with winner-take-most trigger statewide and congressional district)
Threshold to qualify for delegates: 20% (to win statewide, at-large delegates)1
2012: proportional primary

--
For the most part Georgia Republicans have retained the same method for allocating national convention delegates as the state party utilized in 2012. Unlike states such as Ohio, though, the Georgia interpretation of proportional in 2012 is still consistent with the changed definition the national party is using in 2016. But in 2012, the allocation of delegates in the Peach state was overly proportional.2 In 2016, Georgia is still compliant with the RNC proportionality requirement with much the same rules.

At-large delegates
Georgia Republicans will proportionally allocate the 31 at-large delegates apportioned to the state by the RNC to candidates who clear the 20% threshold in the statewide vote in the presidential primary election. If no candidate receives 20% of the vote, the threshold is lowered to 15%. Should no candidate reach 15%, then that threshold is decreased to just 10% of the statewide vote.

It is worth noting that despite the varying thresholds, if only one candidate clears whatever barrier is established, then that candidate would be entitled to all 31 of the statewide, at-large delegates. If, for instance, Ted Cruz is the top votegetter statewide at 10.1% and Marco Rubio is the runner-up at 9.9%, then Cruz would win all 31 at-large delegates, even with such a narrow advantage. The fact that the Georgia threshold for a candidate to qualify for delegates is a bit of a moving target adds some intrigue to the process, but it does make it more difficult to game out. It is a potentially low mark to trigger a possible backdoor winner-take-all scenario for the at-large delegates.

One new aspect in Georgia for 2016 is that if a candidate wins 50% of the statewide vote, then that candidate wins all of the at-large delegates. If the field remains even somewhat crowded though, this seems more unlikely than a backdoor winner-take-all scenario.

Unlike the RNC summary, the Georgia rules specify that winning a majority statewide entitles a candidate to all at-large delegates, not all delegates in the state.


Congressional district delegates
The bulk of the Georgia delegation -- as is the case the larger a state gets -- will be allocated at the congressional district level. Each of the 14 congressional districts in the Peach state is apportioned three delegates by the RNC. The state party has opted again in 2016 to allocated those three delegates in a Top Two manner. The district winner is allocated two delegates while each district runner-up is awarded the remaining one delegate. There is no threshold to qualify. Candidates simply have to get into the top two in the district vote count.

This roughly simulates the proportional allocation of three delegates, but does present the potential to hurt a third place finisher who is tightly clustered with the top two. That third place candidate would likely be deprived of a delegate in that scenario; a delegate that goes to the winner of the district count. On the other hand, the top two method does eliminate the possibility of a candidate winning all the delegates in a district by clearing a low threshold (as is the case with at-large delegates).

There is no threshold to qualify for congressional district delegates, but there is a threshold to qualify for all three of a district's delegates. Should a candidate win a majority of the vote in a district, then that candidate would be allocated all three delegates. Newt Gingrich was able to exercise this option in a handful of districts in his 2012 win in the Georgia primary.

The method is the same at the congressional district level in Georgia as it was in 2012.

Automatic delegates
The three party delegates are functionally at-large delegates in the Georgia delegate allocation plan. The party chairperson, the national committeeman and the national committeewoman are all allocated and bound to the statewide winner of the Georgia primary. As was the case with the congressional district delegates, the automatic delegates are allocated and bound in the same manner in which they were during the 2012 cycle.

--
All Georgia delegates are bound through the first ballot of the national convention. Additionally, there is no explicit guidance in the bylaws concerning the release of delegates upon the suspension of a presidential campaign or candidate withdrawal from race. Those delegates would theoretically continue to be bound to the candidates throughout, assuming the contest is unresolved throughout. If it is not competitive, the fact that the Georgia delegation voted unanimously for Romney at the convention in Tampa in 2012 speaks to the ability of delegates to be released from those bindings.

< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 2/26/2016 2:30:09 PM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: US elections general thread - 2/26/2016 2:27:09 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
IF neither trump nor rubio unites/drops by Mar 11, then the result will be Trump getting the a large majority of the votes. Cruz will pick up the bulk of texas, kasich will pick up ohio, and rubio might get most of the votes of minnesota. Trump gets the rest.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: US elections general thread - 2/26/2016 2:35:39 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I dont know what nutsucker slobber blog you got that off of, but it is not correct.

It is winner take most, You dont get 20% in the congressional district, you get nothing.

This is certainly not the same as it was in 2012.

Tuesday 1 March 2016: All 76 of Georgia's delegates to the Republican National Convention are bound to presidential contenders in today's Presidential Primary.

42 district delegates bound to presidential contenders based on the primary results in each of the 14 congressional districts: each congressional district is assigned 3 National Convention delegates.
If a candidate receives a majority of the vote (more than 50%), that candidate is allocated all 3 of the district's delegates.
If no candidate receives a majority of the vote, the candidate with the most votes (plurality) receives 2 delegates and the candidate receiving the next highest number of votes receives 1 delegate. [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(3)]
34 statewide delegates (10 base at-large, 21 bonus, plus 3 RNC delegates) are bound to presidential contenders according to the statewide vote. A mandatory 20% threshold is required for a presidential contender to receive National Convention delegates. If no candidate receives 20%, the threshold is 15%, if no candidate receives 15%, the threshold is 10%. [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(4)]
If a candidate receives a majority of the vote (more than 50%), or only 1 candidate meets the threshold, that candidate is allocated the 34 statewide delegates.
If no candidate receives a majority of the vote then, for each candidate receiving the threshold or more of the vote, delegates = [the number of votes received by that candidate] × [31 statewide delegates] ÷ [the statewide vote for those candidates received the threshold or more]. Each candidate receives the whole number of delegates (that is, round down to the whole number). If delegates remain, award them to the candidate receiving the most votes statewide (not sure of rounding). [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(4)]
The 3 RNC party leader delegates, the National Committeeman, National Committeewoman, and the chairman of the Georgia's Republican Party are bound to the candidate receiving the most votes statewide. [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(4)]

Thats out of GA, not some nutsucker blog. But you go ahead with your slobber blog, and I will go with the rules for the republican party of georgia. I have NOT anywhere (since you are so good at toiletlicking your lying propaganda) said this is winner take all, but a rose by any other name...........again, the next fucking shitbreather in line after the winner gets as much as like 14? cuz three are pledged to the winner free and clear, and of course the 32 or so SUPER-DELEGATES are working the national machine. So if the pants shitters think their breath smells too much like shit, they will use superdelegates to lift trump off the toilet with their tongues.

So you get at best your second place delegates, but if you dont have 20% when it counts at national, those delegates go away. So, other than innumerates, do the math. The reality is different than the hype, they get the delegates to count for now, to jazz up this fucking clown show, but they probably dont get to keep them, unless they grab 20% of the entire nutsucker vote in the state.

All this is just more nutsucker pants shitting, and felch gob swallowing, since NONE of these fucking idiots on the nutsucker slate will be elected dogcatcher in the General Election.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: US elections general thread - 2/26/2016 10:07:29 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Since Hillary or Sanders would be the option yes.
It isn't that I would vote Rep no matter what, it is that Hillary and Sanders are much worse than trump.
Who would I vote for, Truman?


You realize there are more than two parties, right?


I realize that voting for one of them is as effective as refusing to vote, do you?


As long as people think like this we'll be stuck with the two party system we currently have. 5% of the vote could change quite a bit.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: US elections general thread - 2/27/2016 8:19:37 AM   
hot4bondage


Posts: 403
Joined: 7/29/2009
Status: offline
That's right. 5% qualifies for public funding. 15% to get invited to the debates.

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: US elections general thread - 2/27/2016 8:30:44 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I dont know what nutsucker slobber blog you got that off of, but it is not correct.

It is winner take most, You dont get 20% in the congressional district, you get nothing.

This is certainly not the same as it was in 2012.

Tuesday 1 March 2016: All 76 of Georgia's delegates to the Republican National Convention are bound to presidential contenders in today's Presidential Primary.

42 district delegates bound to presidential contenders based on the primary results in each of the 14 congressional districts: each congressional district is assigned 3 National Convention delegates.
If a candidate receives a majority of the vote (more than 50%), that candidate is allocated all 3 of the district's delegates.
If no candidate receives a majority of the vote, the candidate with the most votes (plurality) receives 2 delegates and the candidate receiving the next highest number of votes receives 1 delegate. [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(3)]
34 statewide delegates (10 base at-large, 21 bonus, plus 3 RNC delegates) are bound to presidential contenders according to the statewide vote. A mandatory 20% threshold is required for a presidential contender to receive National Convention delegates. If no candidate receives 20%, the threshold is 15%, if no candidate receives 15%, the threshold is 10%. [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(4)]
If a candidate receives a majority of the vote (more than 50%), or only 1 candidate meets the threshold, that candidate is allocated the 34 statewide delegates.
If no candidate receives a majority of the vote then, for each candidate receiving the threshold or more of the vote, delegates = [the number of votes received by that candidate] × [31 statewide delegates] ÷ [the statewide vote for those candidates received the threshold or more]. Each candidate receives the whole number of delegates (that is, round down to the whole number). If delegates remain, award them to the candidate receiving the most votes statewide (not sure of rounding). [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(4)]
The 3 RNC party leader delegates, the National Committeeman, National Committeewoman, and the chairman of the Georgia's Republican Party are bound to the candidate receiving the most votes statewide. [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(4)]

Thats out of GA, not some nutsucker blog. But you go ahead with your slobber blog, and I will go with the rules for the republican party of georgia. I have NOT anywhere (since you are so good at toiletlicking your lying propaganda) said this is winner take all, but a rose by any other name...........again, the next fucking shitbreather in line after the winner gets as much as like 14? cuz three are pledged to the winner free and clear, and of course the 32 or so SUPER-DELEGATES are working the national machine. So if the pants shitters think their breath smells too much like shit, they will use superdelegates to lift trump off the toilet with their tongues.

So you get at best your second place delegates, but if you dont have 20% when it counts at national, those delegates go away. So, other than innumerates, do the math. The reality is different than the hype, they get the delegates to count for now, to jazz up this fucking clown show, but they probably dont get to keep them, unless they grab 20% of the entire nutsucker vote in the state.

All this is just more nutsucker pants shitting, and felch gob swallowing, since NONE of these fucking idiots on the nutsucker slate will be elected dogcatcher in the General Election.




Your cite says the EXACT same thing as mine for the rules of the nomination. Perhaps you'd like to document a difference, little gnome?

Second, you contested that there are more than 8 WTA states. (which I allowed might be 1-2 off) - and quoted sources that listed georgia as a WTA state; as well as states that awarded by congressional district as being WTA. Your source - and you - said 20(+) wta.

Awarding by CD is not WTA; Georgia is an example of another state that has variable triggers and thus should be qualified as a hybrid system, not wta. Your source was wrong; you were wrong.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: US elections general thread - 2/27/2016 8:32:42 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Since Hillary or Sanders would be the option yes.
It isn't that I would vote Rep no matter what, it is that Hillary and Sanders are much worse than trump.
Who would I vote for, Truman?


You realize there are more than two parties, right?


I realize that voting for one of them is as effective as refusing to vote, do you?


As long as people think like this we'll be stuck with the two party system we currently have. 5% of the vote could change quite a bit.



I"m quite happy with the two party system - especially compared to countries like italy, (17 elections, 17 governments in what 13 years?) belgium, (no government for a year... hey wait.. they might be on to something...

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: US elections general thread - 2/27/2016 8:43:23 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
No it does not. My source is hardly wrong because it is the Georgia Republican Party primary rules. So you are imploding and arguing with your own nutsuckers amongst yourselves. I guess the original source is more factual than the shitsucking gob felching cockgargling you are known for.

Unless you are cockgargling that all nutsuckers are liars, which we can, without let or hindrance, agree wholeheartedly upon.

I said 20+ WTA because I count WTM as the same because.........well, look at Nevada.......
Trump 79 the next closet like 15.

How many 15s does it take to make 1237? (because you are an innumerate retard, this will be a rhetorical question) answer: a little over 82.............Fuck, how many states 50....82-50, 50-82 oh woe is me Fido the nutsucker doesnt know any math but common core, and unfortunately, he was a child left behind (many times) and it is looking like GA is only giving AT MAXIMUM 14 delegates to a consistent 20%er.


And it they dont meet the threshold of 20% (statewide) they lose the delegates at the national. This is just nutsuckers whipping feebleminded twatwaffles like yourself into a frenzy of hallucination. No more.


You can mince asswipe all day long, but it is still asswipe hamburger, but here in the real world, people can count.

A rose by any other name.....





< Message edited by mnottertail -- 2/27/2016 8:46:56 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: US elections general thread - 2/29/2016 7:17:08 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
FR

I am still amuse that nobody in this forum vote for Rubio in the poll! Sanders and Trump are the two most popular!

Will the Rubio fans please represent and give the poor man some vote! Lol!

(For idiot proof understanding, I am referring to the polling at the top of this forum)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: US elections general thread - 2/29/2016 10:21:12 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I dont know what nutsucker slobber blog you got that off of, but it is not correct.

It is winner take most, You dont get 20% in the congressional district, you get nothing.

This is certainly not the same as it was in 2012.

Tuesday 1 March 2016: All 76 of Georgia's delegates to the Republican National Convention are bound to presidential contenders in today's Presidential Primary.

42 district delegates bound to presidential contenders based on the primary results in each of the 14 congressional districts: each congressional district is assigned 3 National Convention delegates.
If a candidate receives a majority of the vote (more than 50%), that candidate is allocated all 3 of the district's delegates.
If no candidate receives a majority of the vote, the candidate with the most votes (plurality) receives 2 delegates and the candidate receiving the next highest number of votes receives 1 delegate. [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(3)]
34 statewide delegates (10 base at-large, 21 bonus, plus 3 RNC delegates) are bound to presidential contenders according to the statewide vote. A mandatory 20% threshold is required for a presidential contender to receive National Convention delegates. If no candidate receives 20%, the threshold is 15%, if no candidate receives 15%, the threshold is 10%. [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(4)]
If a candidate receives a majority of the vote (more than 50%), or only 1 candidate meets the threshold, that candidate is allocated the 34 statewide delegates.
If no candidate receives a majority of the vote then, for each candidate receiving the threshold or more of the vote, delegates = [the number of votes received by that candidate] × [31 statewide delegates] ÷ [the statewide vote for those candidates received the threshold or more]. Each candidate receives the whole number of delegates (that is, round down to the whole number). If delegates remain, award them to the candidate receiving the most votes statewide (not sure of rounding). [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(4)]
The 3 RNC party leader delegates, the National Committeeman, National Committeewoman, and the chairman of the Georgia's Republican Party are bound to the candidate receiving the most votes statewide. [Rules of the Georgia Republican Party. 7.3(B)(4)]

Thats out of GA, not some nutsucker blog. But you go ahead with your slobber blog, and I will go with the rules for the republican party of georgia. I have NOT anywhere (since you are so good at toiletlicking your lying propaganda) said this is winner take all, but a rose by any other name...........again, the next fucking shitbreather in line after the winner gets as much as like 14? cuz three are pledged to the winner free and clear, and of course the 32 or so SUPER-DELEGATES are working the national machine. So if the pants shitters think their breath smells too much like shit, they will use superdelegates to lift trump off the toilet with their tongues.

So you get at best your second place delegates, but if you dont have 20% when it counts at national, those delegates go away. So, other than innumerates, do the math. The reality is different than the hype, they get the delegates to count for now, to jazz up this fucking clown show, but they probably dont get to keep them, unless they grab 20% of the entire nutsucker vote in the state.

All this is just more nutsucker pants shitting, and felch gob swallowing, since NONE of these fucking idiots on the nutsucker slate will be elected dogcatcher in the General Election.




Your cite says the EXACT same thing as mine for the rules of the nomination. Perhaps you'd like to document a difference, little gnome?

Second, you contested that there are more than 8 WTA states. (which I allowed might be 1-2 off) - and quoted sources that listed georgia as a WTA state; as well as states that awarded by congressional district as being WTA. Your source - and you - said 20(+) wta.

Awarding by CD is not WTA; Georgia is an example of another state that has variable triggers and thus should be qualified as a hybrid system, not wta. Your source was wrong; you were wrong.




Ok, I get it, you are still felching. Your left-handed, smokeshifting variable rate annuity, kick in the bucket asswipe has convinced me. You are right. You are the best gobswallower of felch in the world.

Again, if they dont pull 20% statewide, they are jacking their dicks at the national.

First place gets a new caddillac, second place, if they are exceptional, gets a set of steak knives, otherwise they are fired, there is no third place.

It is a fucking distinction without a difference.

You can pore over the miniscule scraps of mincing words, but you are a known retard, and I just told you how those rules will really work.

But you done real good toiletlicking, nevertheless, wtm is equivalent to wta in all these cases, with the exception of the vast number of super delegates states are with holding, but you dont have them, either.

LOL.

We will see who is right at the convention. As trump waltzes in with the delegates for a first round walk away, and Cruz comes in with his 30, and wants a place in the government that will never materialize. Rubio will be gone as a fuckin christmas tree on december 26th.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: US elections general thread - 3/3/2016 9:11:33 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
FR

Aww, it's like Kasich is the nice old man in Rep Camp and Sanders is the nice old man in Dem Camp.

I do like Kasich but nice guys don't win.

I hope he will be VP.

And it sounds like from Trump latest debate answer, he is gonna be very sore loser if he didn't get the nomination.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: US elections general thread - 3/5/2016 1:20:33 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I submit, looking at the rules and numbers, the available candidates to get are going to go pretty much to the idiot trump.


Just following up on your claim that georgia was a winner take all state. The actual results are of course in - Trump took 40. People not named Trump took 32.
So much for your claim that it was winner take all...

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: US elections general thread - 3/5/2016 7:17:36 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I made no claim GA is a winner take all. Not ever. That is lying nutsucker propaganda right out of the strawman bale.

I always maintained it was a winner take most, and it is fundamentally a distinction without a difference, in that the other two nutsuckers got steak knives.

with their massive combined total of a hundred or so, together they are almost a full 1/12th of the way there. But not how elections work, as most people know. Cruz took Atlanta, saving his ass, and Rubio a couple heavy Florida border districts. The whole issue here is the 42 or whatever number superdelegates there.

I am sure that is known by anyone who does not walk into a nuclear reactor full of deadly neutrons armed only with a piece of paper and a bit of drywall. Or JadeHelm guys, or fiscally conservative insightful nutsuckers who are nothing of the kind.

The gravamen of the issue, is and has always been, nutsuckers are cretins and not fiscally conservative, and not conservative at all, and cannot count they are wholly innumerate.

Now the nutsucker party shows their colors though, as they shit their pants, and whine, and will end up trying to derail their buffoonery as a leftist media plot or some other such asswipe.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: US elections general thread - 3/6/2016 12:15:32 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
Looking at Louisiana, which is I think a high black population place.

I said black people didn't like Sanders. And man, he lost by a landslide. I wonder if it has anything to do with him being Jew and black people don't like Jewish people or something.
According to CNN, the two states he won has 85% white population. He just can't win states with high black population.

I also say, black people prefer Trump to anybody else in the Republican Party. And Trump won that state by a decent margin too.

Think it makes sense.

I know people don't like to talk about race preferences, but in elections, there is usually a pattern to what races vote for.

So it's quite interesting that Black people likes Trump.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 3/6/2016 12:22:13 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: US elections general thread - 3/6/2016 12:18:42 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
Also just curious, between Kansas and Kentucky, which one is more hillbilly?

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: US elections general thread - 3/6/2016 4:35:17 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Greta75


And it sounds like from Trump latest debate answer, he is gonna be very sore loser if he didn't get the nomination.

When has this punkassmotherfucker ever been other than a sore looser? A sore looser is still just a looser.


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 3/6/2016 4:38:35 AM >

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: US elections general thread - 3/6/2016 4:38:27 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Also just curious, between Kansas and Kentucky, which one is more hillbilly?

How is it that you know about all the mountains in kansas and no one else does?

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: US elections general thread Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109