Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: recruting women for combat


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: recruting women for combat Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/4/2016 4:42:10 AM   
Cinnamongirl67


Posts: 854
Status: offline
I think women in the armed forces is a benefit, but not in all areas.
Men are much stronger on the average. Honestly I don't believe it would be fair to a man to have a physically lesser in areas such as hand to hand combat as a back up.

_____________________________

Balanced Chakra
http://youtu.be/Gl9AGlbe3YU

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/4/2016 4:56:10 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
Talking about this, I soooooo badly wanna see Ronda Roussey versus Mayweather! I know Ronda got beat up recently, but I'd love to see a girl beat that Mayweather idiot up in a fair inside ring match ha!


sports where quantitative records are indicative of quality provide some insight into this.

in sports like swimming and track and field, top high school boys in the country trounce world class women. in fact, if its a dual meet between the two, the boys shut the women out.

people used to suggesting serena Williams should play on the men's circuit. she once played a guy who was ranked like 130th and got beaten badly, with her acknowledging after the fact there's no way it could happen.

a similar thing happened with Annika sorenstam some years ago in golf when she played some pga events.

at all equivalent levels of competition, and even at the weight classified ones, males are faster, stronger, quicker, more agile, and more aggressive. women have it over men in some measures of flexibility, but not nearly enough to overcome the other deficits.

I cannot help but think this sort of thinking is reinforced by movies like mr and mrs smith where Angelina jolie and brad pitt are represented as combative equals. or avengers where scarlett johansson beats up men close to twice her size. its good for the "you go girl" sentiment, but has little to no basis in reality.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/4/2016 7:49:34 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: littleclip

the military is begining to recruit women for all combat roles. the plans are under review, there could be women serving in the former all male marine and navy infantry.
how do you see this good bad undecided



I think that it is a bad thing. Segregated combat units, done properly, would be better.

Integrated combat forces are less effective and have more injuries. Overall this leads to more deaths.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2394531-marine-corps-force-integration-plan-summary.html

1. Females suffer upwards of 25% greater incidence of debilitating joint, bone and tendon damage over and above what is common for males in even easy level infantry training. Source, our service academies.

The training does not rise to the level of physical demand required for actual infantry training. And infantry training does not rise to the actual level of demand required in many war scenarios.

It is known full well, and tested to the nth, that as the pysicality demands increase, the debilitating injury rate also increases steadily for females far above and beyond that suffered by males.

2. Mixing genders in close confines does, in fact, negatively impact both discipline and cohesiveness.
Source, mixed gender crewed ships. And, on ships, it can be set up so that females and males have completely separate housing and facilities. This can not be done in the field except at large unit HQs.

3. Female biology does not allow the necessary long term physical endurance necessary for infantry in a field of battle. This has long been known. The female body suffers much more destructive problems when exposed to the physical demands common to infantry on campaign than does the typical male body.

For me, the purpose of maintaining armed forces is to fight and win wars. I don't care about "opportunities" for women. And I do believe that an armed force that tells its troops "We're willing to kill some of you to uphold the important principle of "opportunity" for those who can't perform will provide neither opportunity nor performance.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to littleclip)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/4/2016 9:31:01 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
http://www.wearethemighty.com/articles/here-is-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-armys-new-incredible-eye-protection

quote:

The most noticeable feature of the SPS is the new Ballistic Combat Shirt, or BCS, which has been updated with soft armor on the neck, shoulders, high chest and high back to protect against 9mm rounds and shrapnel. The lower part of the shirt is still a breathable, fire-resistant material.

It also features the Integrated Head Protection System, which gives the soldier the ability to attach extra armor to the top of the helmet to provide additional protection against snipers shooting down on soldiers riding in an open turret, as well as the armored facemask to protect against gunfire and shrapnel.

The SPS is also part of the Army’s effort to lighten the soldiers load, Williamson said.
“The goal for the entire system is 10 to 15 percent less weight than the soldier carries today,” he said.

Marine Brig. Gen. Joe Shrader, commander of Marine Corps Systems Command told lawmakers that the Marine Corps often works with the Army on individual protection equipment programs, such as the new “Enhanced Combat Helmet that we have developed with the Army and now are final stages if fielding the first 77,000 of those.”

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/6/2016 6:26:33 AM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2356
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: littleclip

the military is begining to recruit women for all combat roles. the plans are under review, there could be women serving in the former all male marine and navy infantry.
how do you see this good bad undecided



I think that it is a bad thing. Segregated combat units, done properly, would be better.

Integrated combat forces are less effective and have more injuries. Overall this leads to more deaths.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2394531-marine-corps-force-integration-plan-summary.html

1. Females suffer upwards of 25% greater incidence of debilitating joint, bone and tendon damage over and above what is common for males in even easy level infantry training. Source, our service academies.

The training does not rise to the level of physical demand required for actual infantry training. And infantry training does not rise to the actual level of demand required in many war scenarios.

It is known full well, and tested to the nth, that as the pysicality demands increase, the debilitating injury rate also increases steadily for females far above and beyond that suffered by males.

2. Mixing genders in close confines does, in fact, negatively impact both discipline and cohesiveness.
Source, mixed gender crewed ships. And, on ships, it can be set up so that females and males have completely separate housing and facilities. This can not be done in the field except at large unit HQs.

3. Female biology does not allow the necessary long term physical endurance necessary for infantry in a field of battle. This has long been known. The female body suffers much more destructive problems when exposed to the physical demands common to infantry on campaign than does the typical male body.

For me, the purpose of maintaining armed forces is to fight and win wars. I don't care about "opportunities" for women. And I do believe that an armed force that tells its troops "We're willing to kill some of you to uphold the important principle of "opportunity" for those who can't perform will provide neither opportunity nor performance.



Excellent post! I was about to make the same points, until I saw this one.


:)

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/6/2016 6:32:31 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Greta75

No physical requirement is always waterdowned for women no matter what, because it's impossible for women to meet men's physical standards. Not physically possible.

Do you have any validation for this opinion?




All fitness test has lower standards for women.

Would you have any validation for this opinion?

But ya know, in Vietnam war, it was the 4'10 80lbs women that took down 6ft, 250lbs American soldiers with ease, so I guess it could work.

The trigger pull on an ak is about 7 pounds...how big do you have to be to pull 7 pounds?



(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/6/2016 6:35:12 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD

They lied.

Since you were never there how the phoque would you know.


How was she suppossed to have taken them down, with the clap?

Their t.o. weapon was an ak not a vagina.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/6/2016 7:01:27 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: bounty44



sports where quantitative records are indicative of quality provide some insight into this.



Actually it does not.

in sports like swimming and track and field, top high school boys in the country trounce world class women. in fact, if its a dual meet between the two, the boys shut the women out.


Do you have any validation for this opinion?

people used to suggesting serena Williams should play on the men's circuit. she once played a guy who was ranked like 130th and got beaten badly, with her acknowledging after the fact there's no way it could happen.

Actually he was ranked 205.

a similar thing happened with Annika sorenstam some years ago in golf when she played some pga events.

at all equivalent levels of competition, and even at the weight classified ones, males are faster, stronger, quicker, more agile, and more aggressive. women have it over men in some measures of flexibility, but not nearly enough to overcome the other deficits.


Not always.
http://www.therichest.com/sports/10-memorable-times-women-beat-men-in-sports/?view=all


I cannot help but think this sort of thinking is reinforced by movies like mr and mrs smith where Angelina jolie and brad pitt are represented as combative equals. or avengers where scarlett johansson beats up men close to twice her size. its good for the "you go girl" sentiment, but has little to no basis in reality.


Your opinions share a similar position.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/6/2016 7:08:50 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Yes I know they protray us as monsters.

How do you think they should protray those who invaded their country and murdered millions of men women and children?



(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/6/2016 7:10:18 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: bigjb62

I know of one incident in San Diego where a female f14 pilot who couldn't develop the skills to do carrier landings but was allowed to become a carrier pilot anyway and it cost her her life.


Perhaps you could tell us just who this was?



(in reply to bigjb62)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/6/2016 7:11:52 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: BamaD

They certainly don't mention that we kicked their rear in every battle of any size.

Is that why we lost that war


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/6/2016 3:48:39 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
If they're not, then they're compromising the fighting ability of the force. The average infantry grunt has to carry a pack with a minimum weight of 50 pounds and an average weight of between 95 and 135. In Afghanistan, it's frequently 150.

Where did you get this data? What does a soldier need to carry that weighs 150 pounds?


If anyone seriously thinks the average woman is going to carry her own body weight on her back, they're delusional.

Anyone who thinks the average man is going to carry his owh body weight on his back is delusional.


Bottom line, if women can't meet the physical and mental requirements for combat, they just shouldn't be there.

Problem sweetie, is that you have no clue what those requirements are.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/6/2016 3:55:04 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: bigjb62

I know of one incident in San Diego where a female f14 pilot who couldn't develop the skills to do carrier landings but was allowed to become a carrier pilot anyway and it cost her her life.


You are obviously not aware that all naval aviators must be able to land on a carrier?

(in reply to bigjb62)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/7/2016 4:16:10 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: bigjb62
I know of one incident in San Diego where a female f14 pilot who couldn't develop the skills to do carrier landings but was allowed to become a carrier pilot anyway and it cost her her life.

Still waiting for your validation of this bullshit.

(in reply to bigjb62)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/7/2016 8:32:00 PM   
bigjb62


Posts: 124
Joined: 11/23/2011
Status: offline
quote:

I know of one incident in San Diego where a female f14 pilot who couldn't develop the skills to do carrier landings but was allowed to become a carrier pilot anyway and it cost her her life.


Perhaps you could tell us just who this was?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kara_Hultgreen


http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/wew/articles/95/costly-affirmative-action.htm

http://yarchive.net/mil/f14_hultgreen_accident.html

http://www.cmrlink.org/articles/print/34453?author=0&image=0&domain=0

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/7/2016 8:56:01 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
FR

Googling Hultgreen, I came across an interesting tidbit.

The report also found that [Lt. Carey] Lohrenz, a native of Green Bay who graduated in the top 10 percent of her training class, was ordered re-evaluated and removed from flight status while male pilots with worse records in her carrier squadron were allowed to continue flying without re-evaluation.

One of these male pilots, Lt. Cmdr. Stacy Bates, was returned to operations after crashing an F-14. He subsequently crashed again in Tennessee, killing himself, his back-seat radar intercept officer and three civilians on the ground.


http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1997-07-15/news/9707150337_1_carey-lohrenz-kara-hultgreen-pilots

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to bigjb62)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/8/2016 4:34:18 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: bigjb62

quote:

I know of one incident in San Diego where a female f14 pilot who couldn't develop the skills to do carrier landings but was allowed to become a carrier pilot anyway and it cost her her life.


Perhaps you could tell us just who this was?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kara_Hultgreen


http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/wew/articles/95/costly-affirmative-action.htm

http://yarchive.net/mil/f14_hultgreen_accident.html

http://www.cmrlink.org/articles/print/34453?author=0&image=0&domain=0


Would be the same lt. hultgreen who had oer 1200 hours of flight time in the f 14.?
Would be the same lt. hultgreen who had more than 600 landings in a f 14?
Would this be the same lt. hultgreen who had 58 traps (carrier landings) 48 of which were in the f 14?
Would this be the same f 14 that was the most sophistacated aircraft in the world at the time?
Would this be the same f 14 that was crashed by 160 men and one woman?



< Message edited by thompsonx -- 3/8/2016 4:35:50 AM >

(in reply to bigjb62)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/8/2016 6:07:56 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
beginning? what backward land do you come from and is the world still flat. And the bitches, I mean clearly inferior beings, place still behind the kitchen cooker conjuring me up muffins for the want of my belly.

They are easily most men equals. Granted I am not most men but I would like to see the day they are tooled up in boots and corsets - latex ones, for that mood takes me today.

(in reply to littleclip)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/8/2016 8:54:12 AM   
bigjb62


Posts: 124
Joined: 11/23/2011
Status: offline
I lived in San Diego for 30 years and was still living there when all this happened and there was plenty of testimony from people who knew her and were there when all this went down including her co-pilot. I'm not sure if the recording is still available of the accident with her co-pilot yelling at her to apply more power to the aircraft and her not applying enough was the reason for the crash. It's a well known problem with that air craft that when the plane began to stall it would roll over and that's exactly what happened. The co-pilot survived because he new what was happening and ejected albeit almost to late because he was seriously injured.
The Navy and the Government will never admit that it was political correctness that allowed her to be put in a position that ultimately cost Kara Hultgreen's life. I have no doubt that most if not all small minded liberals will not see the truth as political correctness is one of their religious commandments and like all thing's liberal the truth takes a back seat to the their religion.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: recruting women for combat - 3/8/2016 9:01:59 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
there is no question of nutsuckers small minds, and simultaneous zika brains.

An anecdote does not serve as the synecdoche.

Consider John McCain. Professional plane crasher.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bigjb62)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: recruting women for combat Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094