RE: Why would someone do this? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 6:57:55 PM)

This is rather general and a fast reply.

There are women here looking to fuck. There are men here looking to fuck.

The numbers of each type we could quibble about to doomsday.

We both understand pretty much the same word FUCK.

the foreplay (in all respects) I firmly believe is what is going to put despair to those who want to fuck.

You can quote me, but there is such a number will not understand, that I am betting I will never see this monograph for the rest of my life.




Lucylastic -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:09:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

He started a thread down in Ask a Sub asking about messaging after being asked not to in hopes of getting a different response and is getting told the same thing he got told here. [:D]

Yeah I havent really been following closely...too much going on.

[;)]




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:11:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

I am on a frikkin kink site, I would argue my morals are already in question.

Ok, I can see this is really pointless, since we obviously see the world very, VERY differently.


Yes. If your position is that your morals are in question by virtue of you being on a kink site (and that it's thus impossible for somebody to be a moral kinkster) then we indeed see the world from very different perspectives, considering that for me, me being on a kink site has no impact on my morality at all.




princessmika -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:13:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SuaveGentleman

Ok little bit of a rant but honestly I want to know why someone would do this, outside of being plain rude or insensitive.

3 girls within a period of 3 weeks. I read through their profiles and posts in great detail. I felt there was a potential connection, so I wrote to them. Nothing creepy, plain old fashioned introduction, what I am looking for, why I liked her profile. An invitation to connect if she felt she would like to know me as well.

If they did not respond at this stage I would say its more than understandable. Surely girls get 100s of messages - makes perfect sense. Maybe did not read mine. Maybe read it but did not feel any possible chemistry. Perfectly good reasons. In an ideal world I would have loved it if they wrote a single line saying "No sorry". But forget it, that's just fine.

Here's the problem. They reply back. They exchange a few mails getting to know each other. Sometimes they will say we should chat on Skype, sometimes I brought it up while keeping it completely optional on their comfort level. Often they said yes. If they did not - great, just keep the mails going back and forth until the trust develops.

Then one fine day - boom! Girl 1 stops replying to any emails. Girl 2 blocks me. Girl 3 closes account and runs away. Honestly I am not hiding anything here - it was not that I said something shitty which caused them to do this. Then I would not be asking this question out in the open. It was like a bolt from the blue.

Seriously? For all the time we invested in each other, could I not have expected at least a "Sorry I dont think we'll gel well" ?

I dont mean to say girls are the only ones that do this. I am sure men (boys?) have done it too, just that it would be outside of my personal experience.

I would like to believe these people were not outright fakes. Yet... what is it about an online connection that makes people treat it as so fragile and cheap? I am sorry if I am being silly here but with time we start investing not only time but emotions too. Sometimes I go to the extent of worrying whether something actually happened to her.

Just to be clear that these fears are not unfounded - this had happened previously with a "little" I had been in touch with. Very attached, very sweet, perfectly genuine. Then disappeared for 4 FULL MONTHS. Turns up later. Turned out she had major mental illness (I knew about it) and was borderline suicidal. I wish she had trusted me enough to tell me about it. Nevertheless we are friends now.

Any thoughts gentlemen / ladies?



From ImperialPath's request here (http://www.collarchat.com/m_4893401/tm.htm), I figured I'd take a stab at answering this.

As others have stated, every woman is different. I can only answer for what I personally would do or think, as oppose to making assumptions about women in general. Take from it what you will ^_^; Keep in mind that I'm a professional domme brat by day but pretty vanilla, leaning on the submissive side, in my personal dating life.

For me, I would stop responding and not bother to tell the guy directly, if I felt things were just really turning south. Maybe I found an incompatibility I couldn't get past. Maybe I just wasn't "feeling it" after further exchanges. Why don't I tell you the reason(s)? Well, there are a lot of reasons for this. I may not want to spend the time to explain myself, especially when I'm unsure of what your reaction would be. Would you get upset and request further clarification? Would I have to explain myself further? What if I can't really put into words what it is? What if I can and it'd be offensive like "I think I'm smarter than you and I don't respect you as a man". Haha. Would you try to convince me otherwise? Would you feel bad and then I feel a bit obligated to deal with your feelings? Most likely, the incompatibility (whatever it was) was so strong that I felt it best for me (and us, subsequently) to not want to deal with the situation at all and to just end it by removing all communication.

As to why things appeared to be going well prior to this sudden break... agreeing to Skype, exchanging messages, etc. This would be me trying to get to know you better and feeling you out. Testing the waters of basic compatibility. For me, I really enjoy someone that has taken the time to read my profile and is drawn to me by some compatibility, rather than just my photos going on and on about how great I look or with generic inquiries with only hellos or requests for me to dominate or what have you.

Now, I admit, I am the type of girl who also likes to hear things directly with clean closure. So, I do understand the frustration and it does go both ways.

Hopefully, this gives you one more perspective to work with ^_^




Darkfeather -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:29:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

I am on a frikkin kink site, I would argue my morals are already in question.

Ok, I can see this is really pointless, since we obviously see the world very, VERY differently.


Yes. If your position is that your morals are in question by virtue of you being on a kink site (and that it's thus impossible for somebody to be a moral kinkster) then we indeed see the world from very different perspectives, considering that for me, me being on a kink site has no impact on my morality at all.


Wow, still arguing the point? You know, you are the first person, ever, that I have seen not only defending people acting like an asshole, but are adamant about their god given right to be so. This is why I love this site, ya meet all kinds, every day




ImperialPath -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:30:52 PM)

quote:

Do you also think that when a telemarketers refuses to put a customer on the 'do not call' list and keeps calling, it says something about the customer when they feel harassed, and not about the telemarketer?


I fully understand the problem with telemarketers but I do pause to reflect how telemarketers and guys approaching girls on a dating site are like telemarketers to women here on CS. It does explain your position well though, thanks.




Darkfeather -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:34:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

How long do you spend on the phone being 'polite' to someone who won't take no for an answer?



That's an interesting off-shoot.

My best answer it depends on how much time I have. I have run the gamut from: "I'm sorry. You caught me, heading out the door. I can't chat at the moment" to: "Wait. let me stop you. I'm probably not going to buy anything from you, but we can chat for a bit. What did you say your name was, again?" to (when I was much younger): "I can't talk right now, but if you give me your number, I'll call you back at about 22.30" Them: "I'm at home, then." Me: "Well, give me your home number and I promise I'll call" Them: "I don't take calls at home" Me: "Oh, good! Then, you'll understand this ... click"

Honestly, these days, I'm usually in the second camp. I've entertained door knockers on my porch that want to "talk about God". I've gone so far as to offer them refreshment. I tend to treat people the way they treat me.



Michael



[image]https://media.giphy.com/media/xQAkOKngoJXOw/giphy.gif[/image]




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:35:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

I am on a frikkin kink site, I would argue my morals are already in question.

Ok, I can see this is really pointless, since we obviously see the world very, VERY differently.


Yes. If your position is that your morals are in question by virtue of you being on a kink site (and that it's thus impossible for somebody to be a moral kinkster) then we indeed see the world from very different perspectives, considering that for me, me being on a kink site has no impact on my morality at all.


Wow, still arguing the point?


What? I'm honestly confused now.

I wasn't arguing with you are all. I was agreeing with you.

You said that we see the world too different to ever find common ground on this.

I agreed with that assessment and used a difference of agreement we have on morals to illustrate WHY I agree with you.
I'm not claiming your position on morality is wrong, if you feel your morals are in question because of being on a kink site, than that's obviously the case, considering that morals are a deeply personal thing (a Jew isn't going to have the same moral base as an Agnostic, and therefore isn't going to consider 'being on a kink site' to affect their morals in the same way).
My morals, however, aren't in question by being on a kink site... and that's not to imply that there's anything wrong with you or your morals, it's just an indication that we really do come from two VERY different perspectives... hence me agreeing with you that our worlds are too far apart to ever find common ground.

I am totally lost as how you saw that as an argument.




ImperialPath -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:37:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Strange but all these women here are receiving messages, they dont want and wont answer, with the tiniest population of guys stating they are wrong.

Btw, the women you email arent customer service, or wait staff that are paid..to be nice to you....but im not surprised,you feel entitled to be ignorant.




What a beautiful spin! No, the ladies respond negatively and the male writes a second message also polite which they can ignore or enjoy or chose to fill harassed, I suppose. But doesn't that say a lot about the woman rather than the guy, now that I think a bit more about it?

anyone who says that the women are too small a population here is ignorant of the demographics here......AND is not only spinning, its actively flinging steaming bullcrap.
But then you did tell me you love whipping little liberal girlies(supposedly me).....so you already have a problem with not listening to anyone who disagrees with you. without enforcing your own personal brand of entitlement.
Fah
Dark Feather is a decent guy. Even tho I can disagree with him.



Lol you still make me laugh at how seriously you take your insults. Whip you? Hmmmm... you are fantasizing here and maybe sitting on your unstripped ass wondering how you can both insult and capture my interest.

But "I don't want to date you, sorry".




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:47:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

You know, you are the first person, ever, that I have seen not only defending people acting like an asshole, but are adamant about their god given right to be so.



Oh and yeah. I consider freedom to be the highest value a person can attain to. I believe that people have a right to do as they please, as long as doing so does not impede the freedom of other people.

And I consider any type of behavior that infringes on somebody else's freedom to do as they please (so long as it doesn't impede others' freedom) to be immoral.

So yes, if you hold the door open for me without me asking you to, I consider it my God given (well sorta, cause I don't believe in God) to be rude to you and ignore you. I might be ignoring you because my grandfather just died, and I'm distracted, or just because I don't feel like it. Or because you opened the door too soon, with me too far away, and now there's that annoying pressure for me to hurry up so that you don't have to stand there too long with that damn door I didn't even ask you to hold open for me in the first place. It doesn't really matter, because I have the freedom to NOT talk to you, considering that not talking to you does not impede on your freedom.

My (or anybody's) freedom to not talk to you is the highest thing that counts for me in this situation. It surpasses my desire for a polite society. It surpasses my own personal desire to not be rude. It surpasses my desire for other people not to be rude.
As such, I don't really care about the reason why somebody would decide to be rude. I don't care whether the reason is a good one, or a bad one. I still hold that it's a person's God given right to be rude, should they so desire to be.

Is it rude to not thank somebody to open a door? Maybe. Probably most of the time it is, some of the time it isn't (like when I'm too distracted by more important shit than that damn door to remember to say thanks... in fact, if I really have something important on my mind, you distracting me with the door is probably what's the rude thing, though you really wouldn't know it while you did it).
Do I have a right to be rude? Yup.
Especially when you're the one forcing an interaction on me that I neither wanted, nor asked for, nor desired. I would have preferred it if you had just left that damn door alone, and had let me get it for myself, but you took it upon yourself to ignore my preferences, and force your preference to get the door for me, on me instead. You have the freedom to do that, ya know, considering that your freedom to get the door doesn't impede my freedom in any way. The fact that I think it's rather annoying that you insist on doing something for me I don't want done doesn't really matter, because just like I'm free to ignore you and be rude, you're free to be rude to me by getting a door for me that I wanted to get for myself.*

So again: I agree. We are too far apart to ever find common ground on this. That's not an insult to you or an implication that you're wrong (though I obviously disagree with you), because I don't think that this is an issue where there really is a right/wrong answer. It's just us coming from two completely different approaches to the world, and so obviously we're going to disagree on this until the bitter end.

*And I actually do always thank men who get the door for me, just because I know they're doing it in an attempt to be nice, and so I thank them because I count the thought, not the action, even though I find it incredibly annoying that they do so in a lot of circumstances.




ImperialPath -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:51:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath





What a beautiful spin! No, the ladies respond negatively and the male writes a second message also polite which they can ignore or enjoy or chose to fill harassed, I suppose. But doesn't that say a lot about the woman rather than the guy, now that I think a bit more about it?


Perhaps it says simply that the lady is not interested but the guy is a telemarketer and those guys just hate taking no for an answer.

How long do you spend on the phone being 'polite' to someone who won't take no for an answer?

[8D]



You know, I respect your position and since it is yours it is right for you and no doubt other or even most of the women. I just have a hard time with equating men earnestly being men while interacting with women as like "telemarketers". I suppose I will get over that but frankly it kind of puts a damper on any of my interest to even send one email to a woman on here, it would be easier and more pleasurable to not run the risk of being thought of as a telemarketer and focus only on the bar scene or the regular dating sites and that would be fine if I have to.




ImperialPath -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:56:44 PM)

Perhaps the problem is I have been successful on CS using this approach. Always confident and always positive and charming. Maybe the problem is I have a narcissistic ego problem.

No, I'm too great for that to be the issue.




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:58:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath

You know, I respect your position and since it is yours it is right for you and no doubt other or even most of the women. I just have a hard time with equating men earnestly being men while interacting with women as like "telemarketers". I suppose I will get over that but frankly it kind of puts a damper on any of my interest to even send one email to a woman on here, it would be easier and more pleasurable to not run the risk of being thought of as a telemarketer and focus only on the bar scene or the regular dating sites and that would be fine if I have to.



I suggest you go to a bar then, because I can guarantee you that just about every women you have mailed a second time after she told you she wished no further communication from you, has felt the same way about you as she does about telemarketers who called yet again...




ImperialPath -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 7:59:13 PM)

quote:

So yes, if you hold the door open for me without me asking you to, I consider it my God given (well sorta, cause I don't believe in God) to be rude to you and ignore you.


I'll have to remember that should the opportunity come up some day. So, I guess most women on CS feel this way too?




ImperialPath -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 8:03:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath

You know, I respect your position and since it is yours it is right for you and no doubt other or even most of the women. I just have a hard time with equating men earnestly being men while interacting with women as like "telemarketers". I suppose I will get over that but frankly it kind of puts a damper on any of my interest to even send one email to a woman on here, it would be easier and more pleasurable to not run the risk of being thought of as a telemarketer and focus only on the bar scene or the regular dating sites and that would be fine if I have to.



I suggest you go to a bar then, because I can guarantee you that just about every women you have mailed a second time after she told you she wished no further communication from you, has felt the same way about you as she does about telemarketers who called yet again...



Then I must have been lucky every time that came up over the last 10 years here. Because contacting her a second time never hurt and sometimes helped and that applies to this and other sites. I cannot believe I am just luckier than most guys. This means women say they will do one thing but in reality they will do something else when the situation arises, present company excepted. Huh, go figure, what women do that?




ImperialPath -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 8:04:41 PM)

Thanks all and good night ladies. I appreciate your time and patience.




dcnovice -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 8:05:47 PM)

quote:

Especially when you're the one forcing an interaction on me that I neither wanted, nor asked for, nor desired. I would have preferred it if you had just left that damn door alone, and had let me get it for myself, but you took it upon yourself to ignore my preferences, and force your preference to get the door for me, on me instead.

Wow. That's a lot of drama to pack into one doorway.




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 8:23:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Especially when you're the one forcing an interaction on me that I neither wanted, nor asked for, nor desired. I would have preferred it if you had just left that damn door alone, and had let me get it for myself, but you took it upon yourself to ignore my preferences, and force your preference to get the door for me, on me instead.

Wow. That's a lot of drama to pack into one doorway.


Yeah, it's a lot of drama packed into one door, when apparently getting the door for me somehow makes it so that me remaining silent in return is no longer my right.

For the record. I actually rarely object to guys getting the door for me, what I stated was an example of how a person could feel about it. At the most I'm sometimes slightly irritated when guys hold the door when I'm still 15' away and then holler at me "Come on, hurry up!" with a smile, when I don't increase my speed in response to them standing there ridiculously long with that door... and yes... that's happened, more than once... and nope sorry, I don't care if I'm rude by not trying to hurry up in high heels when a guy decides to be a moron and get a door from 15' away, nor consider it my obligation to go any faster than I was already planning to go up at that point.
Although, in those cases I really would rather get the door myself, but oh well, no biggie really (but don't expect a "Thank you." either at that point).

But I sure as fuck object to the idea that somehow somebody getting a door for me takes away my right to not respond (even if that's rude), should I so please.

And again, also for the record: In almost in all circumstances (barring ones like the guy hollering "hurry up!") I thank the person holding doors for me, even though I do consider it my right to NOT do so.






Darkfeather -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 9:37:25 PM)

Uh huh... yeah.



quote:



ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

quote:



ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

See, beautiful, wonderful... A straight answer. Finally, someone willing to say, "suck it up guys". So take this to heard men (or women) seeing cold contact, go into it with absolutely no expectations of an answer



I have said from the start that you should not expect and answer, because you doing something you choose to do does not create the obligation on another person to respond.

Nobody should expect anything from a stranger they haven't had any previous interaction with, just because they chose to do something out of their desire.

There's certain situations in which its certainly nice, or polite, or courteous to respond positively to a stranger approaching you, but there is no obligation to do so, and as such you shouldn't expect it.

If you hold open a door for a random woman you don't know, it's certainly nice if she says 'thank you', but you should expect it, because she did not ASK you to hold open that door for her, and so she is in no way obligated to acknowledge your desire to do so.
In fact, she would be perfectly justified if she stopped walking the second you attempted to hold open that door for her, and refused to go through it unless she got to open it herself, if that's what she wants to do, because you are not entitled to expect her to respond positively for something she didn't desire you to do.


quote:


I would argue the opposite. In polite society, it is absolutely expected to get/say please and thank you. If I hold a door for someone, I damn well expect a thank you. Do I get it, more often than not, no. But you better be sure, I expect it. To that end, if someone holds a door for me, guess what? I say thank you. A waiter brings me a menu, I say thank you. A cashier gives me change, I say thank you. Why, because its what ya do in polite society. We are talking about expectation versus result here... There are no laws forcing us to be polite, hell in some cities people take it as their right to be rude pricks. But to say we should not expect politeness? We should not go into every exchange with another human being, both offering and receiving common courtesy/politeness? No. Again, this is expectation versus result. I put it out there that everyone should expect politeness.



So your argument is that by your actions, you have the right to force your morals, values and ideals on others?

And that, by voluntarily doing something for somebody else they didn't ask you to do, you are now creating an obligation upon them to be grateful?

And BTW, your argument towards cashiers or waiters doesn't apply, considering that we're talking about private businesses where you create an obligation for them to do something for you. You create the obligation on the waitress and cashier to do something for you (which comes from their boss expecting them to provide you a service, which comes from their desire to earn a living). Considering that you engage with them on the terms that they should have to do something for you, it's obviously reasonable for them to expect you to be courteous and respect their work in return.

The same doesn't apply when you open a door for somebody. When you open a door, you don't do so in reply to an expectation of work you have placed on them. You do it because you feel like doing so.
As such, your desire to do so doesn't create an obligation on them to do anything in return. They didn't ask you to open the door. They didn't expect it. They didn't require it from you. And they didn't place the obligation on you to open the door.

As such, you doing so regardless of your own free will does not create an obligation on them. Sure, it's nice of them if they're courteous in return. But your act of free will does not place any sort of obligation on them, not even to be polite, because they didn't ask you to do something for them.



Bolded to really make these points... Bold 1, this is where you defend a person for not acting nice. Now, I have never said a person has to act nice, only the other person has an expectation of being treated nice. Note that you go on to say that expectation is false, where we don't even get the expectation of being treated nicely...

Bold 2, somehow my morals come into this discussion. I even underlined the word expectation, to emphasize the fact that it is not enforced on another but personal viewpoint. My expectations of a situation in no way dictates what the other person does, in most cases that person doesn't heven have a clue as to my own personal expectations. This is why I honestly said, you are the first person to even bring morals into this. And for some reason, still wanted to discuss morals...

After those two points, where it is obvious you see the world skewed towards people not having a personal or societal compelling to act nice/civil towards each other, I concluded that any further discussion would be pointless. And still do, by the way, since I actually have to go through this pointed explanation.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Why would someone do this? (3/23/2016 10:05:01 PM)

quote:

since I actually have to go through this pointed explanation.

Actually you don't have to, you chose to, though for what reason escapes me.




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.347656E-02