tj444
Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers I read every word and saw the documentary. Everything RO has written here about the good Dr. B, is the truth, the FDA/Pharmaceuticals are only rivaled in their outright corruption, by the CIA. And the FDA demonstrated that obvious corruption back in the 70's when [it] disavowed amygdalin when after it worked on cancer in two trials, pulled all the Drs. off both trials and lied through their teeth. Then not only refusing it for further testing but declared amygdalin to be prohibited as treatment in the US...for cancer. How can the FDA constitutionally prohibit an otherwise harmless naturally occurring substance for any reason ? Do you realize how many fruits and vegetables would be cut from your diet if amygdain was put on the controlled substances list, say...like heroin ? AND, this is even after the FDA wrote in the memo refusing further testing of amygdalin, that "Now if the industry can provide a compound similar in [its] attributes. then we would be interested." Meaning, if the industry could create something in the laboratory, that is patentable, the FDA would go forward. We know why don't we ? As I've told you kinkroids, everything but everything in America, is...ALL about money. It is therefore ILLEGAL to cure cancer. Yes, I repeat...IT IS ILLEGAL to cure cancer in the US. Every cancer patient is suppose to spend from $50,000 to $100,000 to the Cancer Industrial Complex and then die. As just as many cancer patients die today per 100,000 according to the WHO...as did in 1950 !! In fact more 194.4 now, 193.4 then. I have not watched the documentary or looked at the research so I wont comment on if the good Dr is right or wrong or if I believe him/his research or not.. but I think its pretty rich to complain about Canada's health care system, calling it a "FAIL" when there is so much corruption due to greed in the US health care system.. not just this Dr's situation (assuming he is right) but all the other instances of greed allowed to go on in the US health care system.. from making patients take unnecessary tests, meds and surgeries to the trickery such as drive-by doctoring to insurance fraud to falsifying trials to up to 5000% increases in drug prices.. the list goes on.. I gotta admit, that's American ingenuity for ya.. always a new money-making scam invented tomorrow.. "Is your doctor lying to you? New study says it's likely (AP) Do you trust your doctor? A survey finds that some doctors aren't always completely honest with their patients. More than half admitted describing someone's prognosis in a way they knew was too rosy. Nearly 20 percent said they hadn't fully disclosed a medical mistake for fear of being sued. And 1 in 10 of those surveyed said they'd told a patient something that wasn't true in the past year." http://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-your-doctor-lying-to-you-new-study-says-its-likely/ "Doc Told Hundreds of Healthy People They Had Cancer Dr. Farid Fata put hundreds of people through hell in order to line his own pockets, and now federal prosecutors are seeking to put the Detroit-area oncologist away for 175 years. Fata has admitted that he misdiagnosed patients — 553 of them, according to prosecutors — and ordered chemotherapy and other unnecessary treatments for patients who didn’t even have cancer, report NBC News, which says some 9,000 needless injections or infusions were allegedly given. " https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/doc-told-hundreds-of-healthy-people-they-had-123370855698.html "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False Corollary 1: The smaller the studies conducted in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. Corollary 2: The smaller the effect sizes in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. Corollary 3: The greater the number and the lesser the selection of tested relationships in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. Corollary 4: The greater the flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. Corollary 5: The greater the financial and other interests and prejudices in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. Corollary 6: The hotter a scientific field (with more scientific teams involved), the less likely the research findings are to be true. " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/ "Biggest Offender of Medical Research Misconduct in History?A recent case that involves a researcher at Duke University could go down in history as one of the biggest medical research frauds ever. After five years of research, in 2010 it was discovered that oncological researcher, Dr. Anil Potti, had manipulated the data in a number of his widely distributed papers to prove a theory worked. Potti was considered by many as being at the forefront of ovarian cancer research. From the Huffington Post: “Potti's work in individualized treatments for cancer was regarded as "the holy grail of cancer," Dr. Rob Califf, the vice chancellor of clinical research at Duke, said on a CBS 60 Minutes segment. "Personalized cancer treatments, if they work, could be a last hope for people whose bodies don't respond to the conventional treatments.” According to CBNnews.com, Potti's "research was published in the most presigious medical journals. And more than a hundred desperately ill people invested their last hopes in Duke's innovation." However, in 2010 it was discovered that Potti had falsified information about his education; saying that he was a Rhode Scholar. It turned out to be untrue. This triggered a further investigation into verification of his research, which turned out to be falsified. To date, nine of Dr. Potti’s papers on individual cancer treatment and related topics have been retracted. The blog Retraction Watch reported that Duke has said about a third of Potti's 40 or so papers would be retracted, and another third would have portions retracted. Journals to retract his work include Nature Medicine, The Lancet Oncology, PLoS ONE and Blood. The implications of these retracted papers go beyond data corrections; patients, some with only months to live, had already enrolled in clinical trials for treatments." http://www.ithenticate.com/plagiarism-detection-blog/bid/78874/Biggest-Offender-of-Medical-Research-Misconduct-in-History "Profiteering neurologist Harrison Mu charged man $117,000 for unnecessary surgical assistance Drier was blindsided with an additional triple-digit bill But as the bills came in, there was one that wasn't expected at all, and it was for just under $117,000. It seems that a neurosurgeon popped into the operating room without Peter's knowledge who was conveniently out of the network that provides reduced costs. Dr. Harrison T. Mu was able to "legitimately" charge his full fee. Peter got that bill in addition to his others that were within limits for his insurer." http://www.naturalnews.com/047218_profiteering_surgical_costs_medical_bills.html# "Biggest healthcare frauds in 2015: Running list" http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/slideshow/biggest-healthcare-frauds-2015-running-list
_____________________________
As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”
|