quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

In the old days, kids used to take their new rifle to school for show and tell.

Not in your lifetime has that ever been true.



Of course it is and was - the liberal area you grew up in doesn't reflect how everyone grew up.

Who knew that houston ,texas and newport bch. california were a hotbed of liberalism?

You forget probably, that you could buy thompson machine guns (fully automatic 50 rounds a minute) machine guns - in hardware stores. Sears sold them in its catalogs.


The thompson originally fired 1200 rpm later reduced to 800 rpm. The navy ordered some that would fire at 600 rpm but no dumbass they did not fire 50 rpm.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

Sears, Montgomery Ward, other mainstream department stores sold guns over the counter. It was sort of a rite of passage for a boy to get his first .22 rifle.
I remember going out shooting when I was around 7.

What is your point. You did not buy the gun because they would not sell a gun to a child dumbass.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

So logically the presence of guns is not the problemTermyn8or I find it almost impossible to debate with bad malarkey...so I will deal with you firstly.

Gathers up his picnic basket and goes of to watch the first battle in the America civil war 36,000 v 36000 racists...throws up his picnic on his lap ( I had cake if you wondered :) I had no idea such carnage as i thought it would be pretty....4000 dead, or was it injured and dead..... what do I look like an American historian. So let me do some maths 4000/72000 Termyn8or 6 in 100. I think that's pretty bad going really and believe the rate these days a lot less..and gun ownership more prolific.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Nothing, of course.

Its only democrats that riot and burn down cvs's.

I'd be perfectly happy to give out arms at the doors of the republican convention, If the democrats will agree to have their convention after midnight in the southside of chicago - without police protection and without guns.
Yes, I think thats a fair trade.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef
No, it's abundantly clear that you don't. Please stop speaking.

Stef, one thing you and thompson have in common is when ya do appear, it's only negative comments but contributing nothing enlightening or interesting to the topic discussion at hand.

This is what I call, a pointless comment! Just proves my point that Libs is against freedom of speech.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Nothing, of course.

Its only democrats that riot and burn down cvs's.

I'd be perfectly happy to give out arms at the doors of the republican convention, If the democrats will agree to have their convention after midnight in the southside of chicago - without police protection and without guns.
Yes, I think thats a fair trade.

The dems have nothing to do with this so why do you think they should have to agree with anything?

quote:


How did they silence the opposition? Trump has put himself infront of all the hateful libs interviewer and taken them head on. That's pretty respectful of freedom of speech. Allowing them to mock him to his face.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

Actually, taking a second look at the article, it turns out that the poll was intended as satire to start a discussion about gun control. http://www.newsweek.com/gop-convention-open-carry-petition-441808

I support the 2nd amendment, but I think that he poses some relevant questions.

Jim, a public health worker who says he is “absolutely” a gun control advocate, is based on the West Coast. He wonders why “the Republicans acquiesce so docilely” to the Secret Service simply denying them the right to have guns at their convention. In the petition, Jim quotes all three Republican candidates—Trump, Ted Cruz and John Kasich—each of whom have said they’d eliminate “gun-free zones” in areas such as schools and military facilities.

“Why shouldn’t guns be allowed [at the convention] if they should be allowed everywhere else?” says Jim. “I think it gives the candidates the easy out. Why doesn’t the Secret Service allow guns at the convention? Is it possible that it makes candidates and convention-goers less safe? Then can we ask them what they think about guns on playgrounds? Can we follow that advice?”

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Thank you, you have confirmed that the advocates of the Reps engageing in a PR disaster are pro gun control.

Yes, I saw that and thought it should be pointed out, if there is going to be any legitimate discussion on the article.

I am opposed to gun free zones per se, however I do favor not allowing them in both college and military dorms. You are trying to expanf the anti gun free zone position to something entirely different. Sad thing is you most likely believe it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, nothing is confirmed as you say it, in fact the opposite is true.

Americans for Responsible Open Carry opened a Change.org petition this week, asserting that the people attending the upcoming Republican Convention have a right to bring their guns.

https://www.change.org/p/quicken-loans-arena-allow-open-carry-of-firearms-at-the-quicken-loans-arena-during-the-rnc-convention-in-july-2

So, nutsuckers are slinking away from themselves and propagandizing out of the other side of their mouth. Face it, these chickenshit nutsuckers blame their doings on anyone but themselves.

There aint no gun control in those quotes, none of them. The nutsuckers are imploding. Do as I say pantshitting, and not as I do asswiping.