Edwurde
Posts: 42
Joined: 3/27/2016 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 hard to say exactly what your intent is there with that post in general, or with me in particular, until you get to the seemingly snide remarks of "noise" and more importantly "void of meaning" in any event, more information concerning the quote you seem to be taking umbrage with: quote:
A fascinating poll on the Norman Lear Center website about the musical tastes of conservatives and liberals... Conservatives’ favorite music is classical (60%) followed by country (56%) and rock (55%). Liberals, on the other hand, are more likely than other respondents to enjoy almost every music genre, including world, punk, Latin, hip-hop and rap, blues, reggae, electronica, R&B and soul, jazz, folk and traditional music. Rock was the most popular genre among liberals (67%). [note the absence of “country’'] http://rogerbourland.com/2008/04/21/liberal-vs-conservative-listening-habits/ quote:
People’s musical preferences good indicators of their personality make up. Now confident that people really do use musical preferences as indicators of personal qualities, Rentfrow and Gosling next sought to map out the dimensions of those preferences. They started by identifying different musical genres… This process yielded 80 different musical genres, which were then divided into fourteen, with 66 subgenres. Using these genres and subgenres, Rentfrow and Gosling developed a questionnaire they called the “Short Test of Musical Preferences,” or STOMP, which they gave to participants along with several personality measures. The STOMP results were fed into a factor analysis, which yielded four factors, or dimensions, of musical preferences. Rentfrow and Gosling labeled these dimensions “Reflective and Complex,” which included the genres blues, jazz, classical, and folk; “Intense and Rebellious,” which included rock, alternative, and heavy metal; “Upbeat and Conventional,” including country, sound tracks, religious, and pop; and “Energetic and Rhythmic,” including rap and hip/hop, soul and funk, as well as electronica and dance…. The results indicated that the different dimensions of musical preferences do in fact correlate with different personality features. Here’s a summary of the results (from pp. 1248-1249): Upbeat and Conventional (country, soundtracks, religious and pop): positively correlated with extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, self-esteem, political conservatism, physical attractiveness (self-perceived), wealth, and athleticism. Negatively correlated with…political liberalism http://scienceblogs.com/mixingmemory/2007/03/12/what-does-your-music-say-about-1/ quote:
(though this does have a bit of a condescension in its tone, its fairly true) In the car, I listen to country music. Country has an ideology. Not to say country has a position on abortion, exactly. But country music, taken as a whole, has a position on life, taken as a whole. Small towns. Dirt roads. Love at first sight. Hot-blooded kids havin’ a good ol’ time. Gettin’ hitched. America! Raisin’ up ruddy-cheeked scamps who you will surely one day worry are having too good a hot-blooded time. Showing up for Church. Venturing confused into the big wide world only to come back to Alabama forever since there ain’t a damn single thing out there in the Orient or Paris, France what compares to that spot by the river under the trembling willows where first you kissed the girl you’ve known in your heart since second grade is the only girl you would ever truly love. Fishin’! How grandpa, who fought in two wars, worked three jobs, raised four kids, and never once complained, can’t hardly wait to join grandma up in heaven, cuz life just ain’t no good without her delicious pies. Wilkinson [the fellow quoted above]— who is, if you don’t know, a libertarian — points to other research showing that country music listeners tend to be culturally conservative. What’s the connection between the ideological stance of country music, as he describes it, and this psychology? Wilkinson cites that story about rural Washington, Okla., that I wrote about last week (“Sad Town Lacks Vibrancy”), in particular a quote from a local who says he wants to preserve the town as it is for his children. Here’s Wilkinson’s commentary on this: “Country music is a bulwark against cultural change, a reminder that “what you see is what you get,” a means of keeping the charge of enchantment in “the little things” that make up the texture of the every day, and a way of literally broadcasting the emotional and cultural centrality of the conventional big-ticket experiences that make a life a life.” http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/conservative-culture-of-country-music/ "When Country Went Right" [the author has a phd in music history] quote:
Country music married into the conservative movement... making the first-ever presidential visit to the Grand Ole Opry, [president Nixon said]…"I wanted to take this opportunity on behalf of all the American people to thank country music for what it does to make America a better country," he said. "It talks about family. It talks about religion, the faith in God that is so important to our country ... Country music radiates a love of this nation. Country music, therefore, has those combinations which are so essential to America's character." That evening he also made an extraordinary claim about a music so closely identified with its Southern roots: "Country music also has a magnificent appeal all across the country. It comes from ... out here in Middle America." And he was right. By 1970, over two-thirds of country record sales were made outside the South. What largely united listeners from coast to coast was a longing for a more simple, more stable, and more wholesome time than the present. While country's appeal had much to do with these values, however, overtly political songs were a tiny minority. http://prospect.org/article/when-country-went-right (there are some things in here that might help to explain thompson’s bringing up merle haggard’s song) so yeah---religion, god, love of country, hard work, family, hometowns, you know, all those things liberals love hearing about that are "void of meaning" for us non liberal types. cant watch this so im going to have to take the title's word for it: http://patriotvideos.net/liberal-tv-host-says-people-who-listen-to-country-music-are-pyschopaths/ Wow, you went to all that trouble, just for me. I am flattered. I'm a 90% classical music listener, myself. I only listed all the artistes in question, and who likes them, to disprove your silly assertion. Based on reality. But hey, if you get ahold of all these stats from wingnut wacko sources, who am I to argue? I'm only going by the fact that there are maybe 5% of 'conservatives,' and at most, 15% of ... (what's the term? "commie'? "liberal"?, hell I forget ...) who can even stand 'classical music' at all. Yet another person who digs deeply, daily, to escape from the reality around him. At least you didn't get that straight from talk radio, but no doubt that's what led you there. If anyone actually believes that "60% of conservatives" (or even 20% of *anybody*) actually give a crap at all about 'classical music,' ... Oh lord. But aside from taking two statistics classes at the uni (which allows me to shoot shotgun holes through all those bogus stats of yours), I worked in 'live shows' for over 25 years, and I have met, -maybe-, 60-100 people (all total) out of the many many thousands, who actually "liked classical music." No need to ask political affiliation.
< Message edited by Edwurde -- 4/8/2016 11:45:21 PM >
|