quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


http://www.al.com/news/anniston-gadsden/index.ssf/2016/04/oxford_passes_law_aimed_at_tar.html#incart_river_home_pop

Oxford approves transgender bathroom ordinance with threat of $500 fine, 6 months in jail

quote:

"If somebody sees something that makes them uncomfortable, they would call the police," he said. "If the person is still there when the officer arrives, the officer has to witness the crime. Then we take down the person's information, and the person who reported it has to sign out a warrant."

Jesus Christ. Can you imagine it? As a TG you're terrified of going into one bar-toilet, lest you get beaten up by the neanderthals. But go in the other, and you could end up in jail.

How much worse do they want to make the lives of these poor sods, before they'll be satisfied?

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

You know, when I was little my Dad used to take me to the pool, and he would take me into the men's change room with him where I would change along with a whole bunch of men of all ages. I never once felt distressed or harmed by seeing dicks, it never harmed me or scared me. Want to know why? Because the sight of a penis is NOT traumatic.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

You know, when I was little my Dad used to take me to the pool, and he would take me into the men's change room with him where I would change along with a whole bunch of men of all ages. I never once felt distressed or harmed by seeing dicks, it never harmed me or scared me. Want to know why? Because the sight of a penis is NOT traumatic.

For you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrongSpirit

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

You know, when I was little my Dad used to take me to the pool, and he would take me into the men's change room with him where I would change along with a whole bunch of men of all ages. I never once felt distressed or harmed by seeing dicks, it never harmed me or scared me. Want to know why? Because the sight of a penis is NOT traumatic.

For you.

So are you saying we should set up our laws to coddle the weakest, most barely sane people?

That's ridiculous. My father is a psychiatrist and he treats people that are afraid of the dark. Should all cities light every part to cater to their fears?

Don't be silly.

quote:

So are you saying we should set up our laws to coddle the weakest, most barely sane people?That's ridiculous. My father is a psychiatrist and he treats people that are afraid of the dark. Should all cities light every part to cater to their fears?

Don't be silly.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

So are you saying we should set up our laws to coddle the weakest, most barely sane people?That's ridiculous. My father is a psychiatrist and he treats people that are afraid of the dark. Should all cities light every part to cater to their fears?

Don't be silly.

That is one of the dumbest post rationales I have ever heard.
Barely sane?
Coddle?
your father only deals with people who have a phobia of the dark??
Such profound ignorance shouldnt be a surprise, but it still sticks in the craw.

BY the way to whoever it was said the right to privacy ...Trans folk have that right too.
PS I can think of a 101 places where they are breaking that particular fallacy.(open wound)
Just like the opinion that trans people molest kids
Its more likely to be a family member or someone you know, than a stranger.
And putting trans people down because they get abused, arrested, beaten, killed is not anyway equal to being afraid of the fucking dark.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

So are you saying we should set up our laws to coddle the weakest, most barely sane people?That's ridiculous. My father is a psychiatrist and he treats people that are afraid of the dark. Should all cities light every part to cater to their fears?

Don't be silly.

That is one of the dumbest post rationales I have ever heard.
Barely sane?
Coddle?
your father only deals with people who have a phobia of the dark??
Such profound ignorance shouldnt be a surprise, but it still sticks in the craw.

BY the way to whoever it was said the right to privacy ...Trans folk have that right too.
PS I can think of a 101 places where they are breaking that particular fallacy.(open wound)
Just like the opinion that trans people molest kids
Its more likely to be a family member or someone you know, than a stranger.
And putting trans people down because they get abused, arrested, beaten, killed is not anyway equal to being afraid of the fucking dark.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

So are you saying we should set up our laws to coddle the weakest, most barely sane people?That's ridiculous. My father is a psychiatrist and he treats people that are afraid of the dark. Should all cities light every part to cater to their fears?

Don't be silly.

That is one of the dumbest post rationales I have ever heard.
Barely sane?
Coddle?
your father only deals with people who have a phobia of the dark??
Such profound ignorance shouldnt be a surprise, but it still sticks in the craw.

BY the way to whoever it was said the right to privacy ...Trans folk have that right too.
PS I can think of a 101 places where they are breaking that particular fallacy.(open wound)
Just like the opinion that trans people molest kids
Its more likely to be a family member or someone you know, than a stranger.
And putting trans people down because they get abused, arrested, beaten, killed is not anyway equal to being afraid of the fucking dark.

I for one, have not said that it endangers anyone from the "trans menace", however it does provide cover for predators, laying it on trans.

quote:

And your argument still says that the rights of one Trans outweighs the rights of 1000 women.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

So are you saying we should set up our laws to coddle the weakest, most barely sane people?That's ridiculous. My father is a psychiatrist and he treats people that are afraid of the dark. Should all cities light every part to cater to their fears?

Don't be silly.

That is one of the dumbest post rationales I have ever heard.
Barely sane?
Coddle?
your father only deals with people who have a phobia of the dark??
Such profound ignorance shouldnt be a surprise, but it still sticks in the craw.

BY the way to whoever it was said the right to privacy ...Trans folk have that right too.
PS I can think of a 101 places where they are breaking that particular fallacy.(open wound)
Just like the opinion that trans people molest kids
Its more likely to be a family member or someone you know, than a stranger.
And putting trans people down because they get abused, arrested, beaten, killed is not anyway equal to being afraid of the fucking dark.

I for one, have not said that it endangers anyone from the "trans menace", however it does provide cover for predators, laying it on trans.

I didnt say you did, I quoted the other bloke.
Yes and you have been able to find predators everywhere before now. without haunting bathrooms and destroying a trans " right to privacy".

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
How can you say that we have to let trans into womens locker rooms without opening them to all males, isn't that discimination against all non trans?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Basically you just shitlered the whole point of having a point of view, LMAO
Your diatribe is so ironic
What time is your next declaration of truth, so I can be ready for it.
Thank you for making my day...

quote:


So are you saying we should set up our laws to coddle the weakest, most barely sane people?