quote:

otherwise you would see that one has absolutely nothing to do with the other.

quote:

The left needs to make up their mind whether a Muslim is a race or not first.

quote:

I say Islam is transferred by their parents, they insist it's not. So they insist it's not a race.

quote:

So anybody against Muslims, is yet a racist?

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

The left needs to make up their mind whether a Muslim is a race or not first.

You're the only one claiming it is.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

and what point would that be? That you claim everyone who disagrees with you is a racist? Because I got to tell you, I didn't have to prove that. Your posts speak for themselves.

You have no room to talk, I clearly recall you, lovmuffin and others telling me that a song about a dead black kid, on White Supremecist site, wasnt racist.

If you dont like being called racist, just stop defending racism. Its not fucking difficult.

Link please

quote:

The pattern has been for liberals to redefine all political debate to the point that anything which does not conform to their agenda is instantly characterized as “rancor,” “extremism,” or “hate.” While liberals have engaged in such tactics for many years, the degree to which it is currently done has grown in recent years. The Tea Party’s devotion to fiscal sanity is “draconian” or “mean spirited.” Concern for the moral preservation and restoration of the nation and its foundational institutions including traditionally defined marriage, is “homophobic” or “hateful.” Protection of the unborn is “sexist” or “anti-woman.” Recognition of the cultural and spiritual roots of the nation, and their critical importance to its future are “religious intolerance” or “xenophobia.” Yet Congresswoman Maxine Waters is called “mainstream” by the MSM...

•racist: The MSM and current administration [and the comrades here] have used this word so much that the word has lost relevance in any honest debate.

quote:

The left is notorious for name-calling. When they hear an opinion contrary their own, the self-proclaimed bastions of tolerance become the most vile, intolerant bullies on the block. Name-calling is their automatic defense mechanism for losing an argument. In moments of desperation, liberals resort to petty name-calling, painting their opposition as a heinous creature unworthy of living on planet earth.

But lately, it’s really getting out of hand. The left’s latest favorite word is “racist.” I’m actually starting to wonder if they know the actual definition.

hallo, Inigo Montoya!

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Not so. According to judaism, children of a jewish woman, even if she renunciates, are still jewish.

So have they mapped the Jew gene yet?

More to the point, doesn't that effectively mean that there's no such thing as a Christian, as all of the early converts and Christ's mother were Jewish?

Only if you are really drunk or lack any understanding of what a christian is. otherwise you would see that one has absolutely nothing to do with the other.

Marked the bit you seem to be missing for you.

quote:

It doesn't have anything to do with who your parents were. It's a belief system.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice
Isn't the key thing whether TDC sees herself as Jewish?

She can see herself whatever she wants to see herself. And define herself whatever she wants to define herself, because she has the right and freedom to do so. But that doesn't mean I have to see her the way she defines herself.

But this is like me, being born to a chinese mom, and then not seeing myself as a chinese. Denying I am chinese. But other people will still see me as chinese as much as I deny that I am a chinese.

But of course it's my right to identify myself as whatever I want. It's like that white woman who was born white but keeps insisting she's black right? But other people will see her as white.

It's like Obama has a white mom, but identifies as solely a black. When his half and half. But everybody calls him a black President when his really a Mixed President and ignores his white blood, even though he has it, but they choose to believe it does not exist, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

No, because religion has no genetic component, it is not a physical characteristic.

Not so. According to judaism, children of a jewish woman, even if she renunciates, are still jewish. Facts are often inconvenient things. You should challenge your prejudices more.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Any decent person caught red handed smearing their opponent would withdraw and apologise. It seems the standard rules of politeness and propriety don't apply to me.

quote:


For example, see the blatant refusal to face facts here: http://www.collarchat.com/m_4906727/tm.htm Please note in particular post # 12 (where fido's 'facts are shown conclusively to be false), post #13 (where fido's reaction is to dismiss post#12 as "bullshit") and post # 17,

quote:

Since the ovum came from a jewish body, it is considered jewish by the jews.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Any decent person caught red handed smearing their opponent would withdraw and apologise. It seems the standard rules of politeness and propriety don't apply to me.

So tweak you originally lied ad said I accused the left of pedophaelia. You still haven't found a single quote by me saying that.

quote:

tweakabelle
For example, see the blatant refusal to face facts here: http://www.collarchat.com/m_4906727/tm.htm Please note in particular post # 12 (where fido's 'facts are shown conclusively to be false), post #13 (where fido's reaction is to dismiss post#12 as "bullshit") and post # 17,

quote:

Phydeaux
Just curious tweak. Which "fact" is shown to be false, hmm?

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

and what point would that be? That you claim everyone who disagrees with you is a racist? Because I got to tell you, I didn't have to prove that. Your posts speak for themselves.

You have no room to talk, I clearly recall you, lovmuffin and others telling me that a song about a dead black kid, on White Supremecist site, wasnt racist.

If you dont like being called racist, just stop defending racism. Its not fucking difficult.

Link please

quote:

The pattern has been for liberals to redefine all political debate to the point that anything which does not conform to their agenda is instantly characterized as “rancor,” “extremism,” or “hate.” While liberals have engaged in such tactics for many years, the degree to which it is currently done has grown in recent years. The Tea Party’s devotion to fiscal sanity is “draconian” or “mean spirited.” Concern for the moral preservation and restoration of the nation and its foundational institutions including traditionally defined marriage, is “homophobic” or “hateful.” Protection of the unborn is “sexist” or “anti-woman.” Recognition of the cultural and spiritual roots of the nation, and their critical importance to its future are “religious intolerance” or “xenophobia.” Yet Congresswoman Maxine Waters is called “mainstream” by the MSM...

•racist: The MSM and current administration [and the comrades here] have used this word so much that the word has lost relevance in any honest debate.

http://www.floppingaces.net/2011/09/03/liberals-redefine-words-reader-post/

quote:

The left is notorious for name-calling. When they hear an opinion contrary their own, the self-proclaimed bastions of tolerance become the most vile, intolerant bullies on the block. Name-calling is their automatic defense mechanism for losing an argument. In moments of desperation, liberals resort to petty name-calling, painting their opposition as a heinous creature unworthy of living on planet earth.

But lately, it’s really getting out of hand. The left’s latest favorite word is “racist.” I’m actually starting to wonder if they know the actual definition.

hallo, Inigo Montoya!

http://www.youngcons.com/cnn-decided-to-redefine-racism-and-its-beyond-ridiculous/

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Any decent person caught red handed smearing their opponent would withdraw and apologise. It seems the standard rules of politeness and propriety don't apply to me.

So tweak you originally lied ad said I accused the left of pedophaelia. You still haven't found a single quote by me saying that.

I'm unaware of you previously asking for evidence to back this claim. Be that as it may, you asked for evidence so here it is:

post #93 on page 5 of this thread ( http://www.collarchat.com/m_4906665/mpage_5/tm.htm ) You posted:
"Liberals and the ACLU love ...... child pornography .... legalisation of sex between adults and children"

That is a blatant case of you accusing the left of pedophilia.

Actually it's a blatant case of him posting something someone else said on the boards, but keep claiming you are going to quote him. Most people will be able to tell it's bullshit.

I also note the devious manner in which you changed my quote above from the original " It seems the standard rules of politeness and propriety don't apply to our looney Right contributors (or perhaps more accurately, in their own minds the rules don't apply). to "It seems the standard rules of politeness and propriety don't apply to me". You altered my text to change its meaning completely and making it disparaging to me. Blatant cheating by any standard. Despicable behaviour.

Leaving aside that this kind of text manipulation is against the TOS, this kind of sly underhand manipulation is precisely what I have come to expect from you. Why is your own case so weak that you are forced to continually resort to ugly smears, devious tricks, blatant lies, inflammatory false accusations and manipulation to make your case? Why are the facts insufficient for you to make your case?

quote:

tweakabelle
For example, see the blatant refusal to face facts here: http://www.collarchat.com/m_4906727/tm.htm Please note in particular post # 12 (where fido's 'facts are shown conclusively to be false), post #13 (where fido's reaction is to dismiss post#12 as "bullshit") and post # 17,

I'd take your claims of his despicable posts more seriously if you stopped calling him Fido. Until then you are just another troll spewing out insults.

quote:

Phydeaux
Just curious tweak. Which "fact" is shown to be false, hmm?

Anyone interested can go to the thread at the link I supplied and see that the entire OP for the thread that you started relied completely on a false news report. When this was brought to your attention by me, your response was to accuse me of "Bullshit". You refused point blank to accept that your OP was negated entirely causing another poster to comment about you:

"Look closely people, these are the words of someone who can't admit when they're wrong in the face of overwhelming evidence. The original article was clearly wrong, so it was removed, which happens sometimes in news. However, despite the fact that major news outlets removed it because of its inaccuracies, Fido here refuses to accept that it, and by extension he, was wrong. (emphasis added) (op cit)

It seems you are making a habit of refusing to accept you are wrong. Hardly surprising when someone is so wrong as often and as comprehensively as you and your fellow looney Right wingers are. A possible explanation is that you are so out of touch with reality and so far up your own behind that you simply don't realise you are wrong, or believe that you are capable of being wrong. Unfortunately for you wilful self delusion is no excuse for your appalling behaviour.

I am sure that, by now, people have all the relevant information so that they can make their own judgements.

Yes I am sure they do, I know I have.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Not so. According to judaism, children of a jewish woman, even if she renunciates, are still jewish.

So have they mapped the Jew gene yet?

More to the point, doesn't that effectively mean that there's no such thing as a Christian, as all of the early converts and Christ's mother were Jewish?

Only if you are really drunk or lack any understanding of what a christian is. otherwise you would see that one has absolutely nothing to do with the other.

Marked the bit you seem to be missing for you.

I didn't miss that part, but your question was about christians and only showed that you know nothing about them. It doesn't have anything to do with who your parents were. It's a belief system.

quote:

I'd take your claims of his despicable posts more seriously if you stopped calling him Fido. Until then you are just another troll spewing out insults.