verbatimguy
Posts: 203
Joined: 5/11/2016 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote:
ORIGINAL: peppermint quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Yes, LIFE requires sex. Look kinkroids, because we have no choice but to obey the etymology of the words, I offer the following: Bondage itself has acted as foreplay to sex. (especially when practiced unclothed, the 'binder' enjoying and the bound also...the tease aspect) Discipline does not require sex but does also often act as foreplay to sex. Sadism: the word is derived from the Marquis DeSade who inflicted pain as foreplay to sex and very often while simultaneously having sex and has subsequently been described as a kinky, sexual, fetish pleasure. Masochism the origin of which followed Sadism by a few years, is defined as pleasure derived from receiving pain with that pleasure being almost exclusively but not entirely...as sexual foreplay or on occasion, simultaneously enjoyed during the act of sex. I will agree that much of BDSM "can" include sex. However, so much of it does not include sex. Sex is not a requirement to be part of BDSM. If you don't believe me wait until you're 75, diabetic, bad heart, transplants. Guess you'll have to give up BDSM then as your BDSM world won't be all about sex. I can look up meanings of words too. Sadism Psychiatry. the condition in which sexual gratification depends on causing pain or degradation to others. Compare masochism. 2. any enjoyment in being cruel. 3. extreme cruelty. OOPS? Two definitions of sadism that do not include sex. Masochism Psychiatry. the condition in which sexual gratification depends on suffering physical pain or humiliation. 2. gratification gained from pain, deprivation, degradation, etc., inflicted or imposed on oneself, either as a result of one's own actions or the actions of others, especially the tendency to seek this form of gratification. 3. the act of turning one's destructive tendencies inward or upon oneself. 4. the tendency to find pleasure in self-denial, submissiveness, etc. OOPS again. Sex mentioned in one definition and not in 3. Did the dictionary get it wrong? Perhaps they need to consult you before deciding on the meaning of words. Didn't refer to definition, I referred to the etymology or the creation of the word. The so-called definitions of words and the publications there of, have assumed the right to be very malleable over the years. The creation of the word Sadism comes from DeSade and he gives us no choice in the matter and had nothing whatever to do with degradation or cruelty. Those additions to the so-called definition which were added, much more describe the reaction to such sadism as in 'that must be cruel or degrading.' but were not in anyway defined as cruelty or degradation. And no, these publishers do not need to consult me when they take it upon themselves...to ADD to the meaning of many, many original words. Masochism was also created for the reasons I give. Even some of [his] subjects made it plain that they found DeSade's actions neither degrading or cruel....they were aroused. If one reads the original purpose for the creation of the word as in at least two, sadism and masochism it reflects that they were created as the original definition i.e., a sexual reaction to giving and receiving pain...nothing more. Adding these words to psychiatry in medicine...came later and of course, it multiplied their patients. You cant speak cense to them because they cant undestand the origin of the words is sexual in nature. There BONDAGFE sessions are always with full clothes on becasue they would NEVER do BDSM with nude people. That would be sexual and tehy say they only do with clohes on all the time and never nude.
|