RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


vincentML -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/10/2016 5:30:42 PM)

~FR~

Let me say this right off the bat: I don't at all condone any shooting of police officers or attacking them in any way. I hope that the people responsible are caught and punished to the fullest extent of the law - which, given that the attacks appear to have been premeditated and directed at law enforcement, means the death penalty. I assume, given that these idiots chose to perpetrate their crime in Texas, that this is exactly what will happen.

Fine. Good, even.

Now let's take a step back and look at the forces that would drive someone to do something like this yesterday. Here's the reality that we don't often talk about - that societies are held together less by laws and force and threats of force than we are by ethereal and fragile concepts like mutual respect and belief in the justness of the system itself.

In America, there are 376 police officers per 100,000 citizens - or one police officer per every 266 citizens. Stop and think about that. Could every police officer in America maintain order over 266 unruly people who had no respect for him him or the badge he wields? Absolutely not. The only thing that makes the situation even a little bit tenable is that the vast majority of people never think about confronting or challenging a police officer, and instead get up each day with the commitment to live their lives peacefully and lawfully, because they believe a) that they live in a society that is basically just and b) they believe that the few policemen who do exist will be there to protect them if something goes wrong and c) they have faith, by and large, that if someone commits a crime against them, they will be caught and punished.

Think, though, about what happens when these invisible bonds that are the most important part of maintaining law and order begin to dissolve - especially within a given subcommunity. Perception is, quite often, more important than reality. We are, in addition, creatures of our upbringing. The way our parents raise us to think about people and institutions shapes us to degrees that we often can't or won't acknowledge.

As the child of white parents who grew up in the rural panhandle of Texas, I was taught that police were there to help, any time I had a problem I should go to them. I should always follow their orders and show them the utmost respect. No one is more important and helpful to your community than the police.

Now imagine, for a minute, that your parents instead grew up as black people in the 50s or 60s in one of the many areas where police were often the agents of - let's call it what it was - white oppression. How might that have changed, for understandable reasons, the way not only those people but also their children and their children's children interact with the police? More importantly, how might it impact the belief that police will ever be held accountable for abuses of their power?

I think the evidence would show that the vast majority of police do their jobs with the greatest professionalism possible. I don't think that's a sufficient answer to the reality of lingering mistrust between police and minority communities, especially in certain areas of the country. And the proliferation of cell phone video recording has really confirmed (in their minds) something they have long anecdotally believed or been taught - that police often interact with minority communities in different ways than they do with the white community.

And here's the most important part: when they do so, they never or almost never face punishment.

Look, I don't know. I don't want to rush to judgment on either the Baton Rouge shooting or the Falcon Heights shooting, but based upon what we have seen, they look bad. Very bad. They look, at least at first glance, to confirm a lot of biases that people have. They look like a scenario that has played out all too often that the white community either doesn't believe ever happens (or at least believes is at most a freak occurrence) and minority communities believe is a systemic occurrence. And they look, most importantly, like many other scenarios in which officers have skated either scot free or with a slap on their wrist.

And here is the important point and the point I have been trying to make with this excessively wordy post. The most important safety valve to prevent violence like we saw in Dallas last night is the belief that when officers do go off the rails, the legal system will punish them accordingly. If minority communities (and everyone else, for that matter) believed that, resort to reprisal killings would be either non existent or far less frequent.

But they don't, and there's good reason for that. And that is because a huge, overwhelming segment of America does not really give a damn what cops do in the course of maintaining order because they assume (probably correctly) that abuse at the hands of police will never happen to them. As long as the cops keep people away from my door, they have my blessing handling "the thugs" in whatever way they see fit.

[SNIP]

Here's all you need to know: since 2000, NYPD officers have shot and killed about 180 people. Only 3 of those officers was even indicted for anything and only 1 was convicted, for a non-jail time offense. And these statistics are fairly typical of the nation at large.


Leon Wolf at RedState




Edwird -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/10/2016 7:21:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

At the end of the day, a black guy got killed.

That's all that matters.

I'd like to think that you're being sarcastic.

K.



Somewhat, yes that was the intent.

But still, whatever intent, I don't mind admitting that was probably my worst post. Ever.

And I'm not being facetious.




kdsub -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/10/2016 8:13:02 PM)

Vince there is history that cannot be denied. We must remember that we are just a few generations away from institutionalized segregation. Wounds are deep and the grandparents of young black men and women remember it well because they experienced it first hand.

I believe much as changed since then but the anger and distrust are passed along from generation to generation. The wounds heal slowly and I believe that in the black community these memories are still open wounds. I also believe my children and grandchildren have long rejected the notion that blacks are somehow inferior. My children's generation are now gaining control both economically and politically. They think of blacks as equals as my mother and father's generation did not do. Otherwise most middle aged and younger whites are not racist and are rebelling when blacks are calling them racist when they know they are not.

I do believe blacks see racism where it does not exist as it once did. Whites forget that racism did not just touch past generations but continues today indirectly. For instance... education... it is hard for a black mother and father to help their son and daughter with their education when they were denied an education in their youth. With less education even with no racism they are at a disadvantage competing for jobs with their white peers... Again with no racism directly involved.... But today's black youth are still having to fight the legacy of past racism and today's economic down turn is much harder on African Americans than better educated whites.

I again believe... whites do not see this but blacks sure do when they look around their neighborhoods and see the difference between theirs and their white peers. To them it is still racism and a good reason for anger and frustration that can and does lead to crime.

There is also no denying crime is rampant among African Americans because of the social problems above and the police must respond. In almost every case in the last few years African Americans that are killed or injured have resisted arrest. The resulting injury, police will use as much force as needed, is looked at as racism when it is not. There can be no negotiation when dealing with the law and the police have no choice but to enforce it....even to the extreme of death.

The answer to this problem is not something the police should or can do... it is not their job... or their fault. African Americans must come to understand this. The only answer is education and economic improvement... This will take all of us not just whites... today's white youth do not owe anyone an apology or special consideration because of their skin color but they do owe a helping hand to throw off generations of racism.

To me at least the Black Lives Movement has done a lot of good in increasing accountability and training of our law enforcement organisations. It has brought to light the frustration of being harassed by police because of the crime in the black communities. But now it is loosing its moral direction and purpose and turning to anger and irresponsible hate and is loosing support of even the younger white generation.

I can only hope the leadership of black lives matter can become organized and pursue justice in a just way before all the gains of the last few years are lost.

Butch




thompsonx -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 6:53:56 AM)


ORIGINAL: kdsub

Vince there is history that cannot be denied. We must remember that we are just a few generations away from institutionalized segregation. Wounds are deep and the grandparents of young black men and women remember it well because they experienced it first hand.

I believe much as changed since then but the anger and distrust are passed along from generation to generation.


What exctly has changed in the past 50 years?



The wounds heal slowly and I believe that in the black community these memories are still open wounds. I also believe my children and grandchildren have long rejected the notion that blacks are somehow inferior. My children's generation are now gaining control both economically and politically. They think of blacks as equals as my mother and father's generation did not do. Otherwise most middle aged and younger whites are not racist and are rebelling when blacks are calling them racist when they know they are not.

How do they "know" that they are not?

I do believe blacks see racism where it does not exist as it once did. Whites forget that racism did not just touch past generations but continues today indirectly. For instance... education... it is hard for a black mother and father to help their son and daughter with their education when they were denied an education in their youth. With less education even with no racism they are at a disadvantage competing for jobs with their white peers... Again with no racism directly involved....


Get a fifth grade english teacher to read this back to you and explain how it is self contradictory.





But today's black youth are still having to fight the legacy of past racism and today's economic down turn is much harder on African Americans than better educated whites.

How, exactly, does "fighting the legacy" of racism differ from fighting racism?[8|]

I again believe... whites do not see this but blacks sure do when they look around their neighborhoods and see the difference between theirs and their white peers. To them it is still racism and a good reason for anger and frustration that can and does lead to crime.

There is also no denying crime is rampant among African Americans because of the social problems above and the police must respond. In almost every case in the last few years African Americans that are killed or injured have resisted arrest.


We have seen the videos of them resisting and being murdered and having evidence planted on the corpse.
What is your point?[8|]



The resulting injury, police will use as much force as needed, is looked at as racism when it is not.


According to the doj report on furgistan a man was arrested for "manner of walking", beaten unconscious and charged with assault on a police officer for bleeding on the cops uniform.
Perhaps the reason you see no racism is because you choose not to see it. You still have not read the two doj reports on furgistan yet you post this disingenuous tripe.



There can be no negotiation when dealing with the law and the police have no choice but to enforce it....even to the extreme of death.

In texas it is legal to resist an unlawful arrest with deadly force.

The answer to this problem is not something the police should or can do... it is not their job... or their fault.


How is arresting someone for "manner of walking" (which is not a crime) not their fault?


African Americans must come to understand this.

Really???You might want to look into the "no knock" law and why the cops decided to recind it.


The only answer is education and economic improvement... This will take all of us not just whites... today's white youth do not owe anyone an apology or special consideration because of their skin color but they do owe a helping hand to throw off generations of racism.


How do you owe someone help for past transgressions without at the same time owing an apology for those past transgressions?
Logic was not a required course at the university of dumbass?


To me at least the Black Lives Movement has done a lot of good in increasing accountability and training of our law enforcement organisations.

Is this your tacit admission, without apology, for the racist behaviour of the cops?


It has brought to light the frustration of being harassed by police because of the crime in the black communities.

That is a lie. It has brought to light the frustration of being harassed by the police for being black in public.



But now it is loosing its moral direction and purpose and turning to anger and irresponsible hate and is loosing support of even the younger white generation.


Are you trying to say that they are somehow responsible or condone what happened simply because they are protesting cop violence on blacks?

I can only hope the leadership of black lives matter can become organized and pursue justice in a just way before all the gains of the last few years are lost.

What has blm done that is unjust? If they have not done anything unjust then why are you implying that now is the time to become just as if up until now they had not been just.




vincentML -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 7:21:50 AM)

~FR~

In the era of Facebook Live and smart phones, it’s hard to come to any conclusion other than the fact that police brutality toward African-Americans is a pervasive problem that has been going on for generations. Seriously, absent video proof, how many innocent African-Americans have been beaten or killed over the last hundred years by the police—with little or no media coverage or scrutiny?

There’s no telling the damage this has done to us collectively, not to mention the specific families and individuals that were victimized. And, of course, the long-term psychic damage transcends the physical. All sorts of negative externalities can be expected of someone who rightly feels he’s living under an occupying army.





Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/08/a-confession/#ixzz4E6qVDGDe





kdsub -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 9:35:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Officer Nakia Jones has some interesting comments:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hbO1wocfNM



Here is another Black police officer with interesting comments:

Butch




vincentML -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 12:04:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Officer Nakia Jones has some interesting comments:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hbO1wocfNM



Here is another Black police officer with interesting comments:

Butch

Butch, I fail to understand why this black officer is so confused. Here's some background information that might clear up his dismay over why blacks feel besieged:

Judge Shira Scheindlin of Federal District Court in New York upheld the bedrock principle of individual liberty on Monday when she ruled that the tactics underlying New York City’s stop-and-frisk program violated the constitutional rights of minority citizens. She found that the city had been “deliberately indifferent” to police officers illegally detaining and frisking minority residents on the streets over many years.

Judge Scheindlin was clearly speaking of Mayor Michael Bloomberg when she concluded: “The City’s highest officials have turned a blind eye to the evidence that officers are conducting stops in a racially discriminatory manner. In their zeal to defend a policy that they believe to be effective, they have willfully ignored overwhelming proof that the policy of singling out “the right people” is racially discriminatory and therefore violates the United States Constitution.”

The judge made clear that she was not striking down the program — which remains an important tool for law enforcement — but requiring the city to use that tool in a way that does not discriminate against African-Americans and Hispanics and that comports with constitutional guarantees against unreasonable search and seizure. Given the city’s refusal to alter its practices significantly, Judge Scheindlin had little choice but to appoint an outside monitor to oversee sweeping changes in how the New York Police Department trains its officers and carries out the stop-and-frisk policy.

Under the Fourth Amendment, police officers can legally stop and detain a person only when they have a reasonable suspicion that the person is committing, has committed or is about to commit a crime. Over the years, however, the Police Department has adopted a strategy that encourages cops to stop and question mainly minority citizens first and to come up with reasons for having done so later. This has resulted in people in some neighborhoods being stopped without reason scores of times a year. These unconstitutional stops, Judge Scheindlin wrote, have exacted a “human toll” in demeaning and humiliating law-abiding citizens. She is currently overseeing three lawsuits against this troubled program. The ruling issued on Monday, in Floyd v. The City of New York, was filed by plaintiffs alleging racial profiling in street stops.

At the heart of the Floyd case are statistics showing that the city conducted an astounding 4.4 million stops between January 2004 and June 2012. Of these, only 6 percent resulted in arrests and 6 percent resulted in summonses. In other words, 88 percent of the 4.4 million stops resulted in no further action — meaning a vast majority of those stopped were doing nothing wrong. More than half of all people stopped were frisked, yet only 1.5 percent of frisks found weapons. In about 83 percent of cases, the person stopped was black or Hispanic, even though the two groups accounted for just over half the population.

The city has consistently said that the disparity was justified because minority citizens commit more crimes. But Judge Scheindlin trenchantly rejected this argument. As she pointed out, “this reasoning is flawed because the stopped population is overwhelmingly innocent — not criminal. There is no basis for assuming that an innocent population shares the same characteristics as the criminal suspect population in the same area.”

The evidence clearly showed that the police carried out more stops on black and Hispanic residents even when other relevant factors were controlled for, and officers were more likely to use force against minority residents even though stops of minorities were less likely to result in weapons seizures than stops of whites.



Federal Judge Reins in NYC discriminatory storm trooper tactics

Butch, you think black people in Ferguson or Baton Rouge were not aware of stop and frisk in NYC? I was long aware of it from where I sit down in Florida.

African Americans have reason to distrust the police. Castille was stopped 52 times while driving black before he was killed. Good Grief!




vincentML -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 12:36:38 PM)

Butch, a very thoughtful post which deserves a respectful reply, which you did not get above. I will give you the respect but I will disagree with you.

quote:

Vince there is history that cannot be denied. We must remember that we are just a few generations away from institutionalized segregation. Wounds are deep and the grandparents of young black men and women remember it well because they experienced it first hand.

I believe much as changed since then but the anger and distrust are passed along from generation to generation. The wounds heal slowly and I believe that in the black community these memories are still open wounds. I also believe my children and grandchildren have long rejected the notion that blacks are somehow inferior. My children's generation are now gaining control both economically and politically. They think of blacks as equals as my mother and father's generation did not do. Otherwise most middle aged and younger whites are not racist and are rebelling when blacks are calling them racist when they know they are not.


We disagree that institutionalized segregation is a thing of the past. It is still difficult for blacks to get a decent education, a good job, and to own a home. The laws have changed but the practices persist.

quote:

I do believe blacks see racism where it does not exist as it once did. Whites forget that racism did not just touch past generations but continues today indirectly. For instance... education... it is hard for a black mother and father to help their son and daughter with their education when they were denied an education in their youth. With less education even with no racism they are at a disadvantage competing for jobs with their white peers... Again with no racism directly involved.... But today's black youth are still having to fight the legacy of past racism and today's economic down turn is much harder on African Americans than better educated whites.
We agree on most of what you have written here. But racism is not just about disliking or shunning a people and viewing them as inferior. To paraphrase Johhny Cochran who defended OJ: "Racism is about power. The cop on the street is your greatest danger because he has the power to kill you." speaking to a predominantly black jury.

quote:

In almost every case in the last few years African Americans that are killed or injured have resisted arrest. The resulting injury, police will use as much force as needed, is looked at as racism when it is not. There can be no negotiation when dealing with the law and the police have no choice but to enforce it....even to the extreme of death.

This fantasy of resistance is highly questionable. What is the definition of resistance that warrants an execution? We saw a black man in NY raise his arms in the air and die of a chokehold. We saw a black man running away shot several times in the back. We saw a child playing with a toy gun in the park shot dead. We saw a cop sitting on Sterling shoot him four times. Where's the video tape the police took from the store? It has gone missing. The cop who killed Castile has a lawyer who is now claiming his client fired when he saw the dead man's gun. Nah. It doesn't add up.

Your last statement is appalling. You give police carte blanch license to kill when you say there can be no negotiating with them.

quote:

The answer to this problem is not something the police should or can do... it is not their job...


We disagree. The DOJ has programs of Community Policing available but state and local police have ignored them for the most part.

Vince




thompsonx -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 12:58:14 PM)

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Butch, a very thoughtful post which deserves a respectful reply, which you did not get above. I will give you the respect but I will disagree with you.

What respect is due disingenuous tripe that could not come out of the mouth of an adult.




kdsub -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 1:18:42 PM)

Thanks Vince …we may disagree, although I think we are closer than you may think, but we remain civil in our disagreements and I don’t know about you but on occasion you have changed my mind on some issues…. Or at least made me step back and rethink a position.

I think the difficulties in education…a good job…and home are not the result of institutionalized segregation today… but just as real…are the result of past racial policies… Lack of family wealth at top of that list.

Yes racism is about power and to me right now the BLM is racist and using its power targeting the wrong people.

We saw a man in NY resist arrest Vince… although it does amaze me how people can see the same video and come away with opposite perceptions… After the facts were gathered they were exonerated… The cop that shot the man in his back is prosecuted … The man shot we DID NOT see… they rolled out of the camera view… for all we know the man may very well have been reaching for his weapon… Lets wait until the investigation comes up with. There is no doubt there are bad police… hell there are a million of them… they do need to be weeded out but in most of these cases the cops are just doing their job and subduing a suspect that resists.

I’ll continue later I have an appointment.

Butch




thompsonx -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 1:21:48 PM)


ORIGINAL: kdsub



Yes racism is about power and to me right now the BLM is racist and using its power targeting the wrong people.


Who has blm targeted?[8|]




jlf1961 -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 1:57:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Butch, I fail to understand why this black officer is so confused. Here's some background information that might clear up his dismay over why blacks feel besieged:

Judge Shira Scheindlin of Federal District Court in New York upheld the bedrock principle of individual liberty on Monday when she ruled that the tactics underlying New York City’s stop-and-frisk program violated the constitutional rights of minority citizens. She found that the city had been “deliberately indifferent” to police officers illegally detaining and frisking minority residents on the streets over many years.

Judge Scheindlin was clearly speaking of Mayor Michael Bloomberg when she concluded: “The City’s highest officials have turned a blind eye to the evidence that officers are conducting stops in a racially discriminatory manner. In their zeal to defend a policy that they believe to be effective, they have willfully ignored overwhelming proof that the policy of singling out “the right people” is racially discriminatory and therefore violates the United States Constitution.”

The judge made clear that she was not striking down the program — which remains an important tool for law enforcement — but requiring the city to use that tool in a way that does not discriminate against African-Americans and Hispanics and that comports with constitutional guarantees against unreasonable search and seizure. Given the city’s refusal to alter its practices significantly, Judge Scheindlin had little choice but to appoint an outside monitor to oversee sweeping changes in how the New York Police Department trains its officers and carries out the stop-and-frisk policy.

Under the Fourth Amendment, police officers can legally stop and detain a person only when they have a reasonable suspicion that the person is committing, has committed or is about to commit a crime. Over the years, however, the Police Department has adopted a strategy that encourages cops to stop and question mainly minority citizens first and to come up with reasons for having done so later. This has resulted in people in some neighborhoods being stopped without reason scores of times a year. These unconstitutional stops, Judge Scheindlin wrote, have exacted a “human toll” in demeaning and humiliating law-abiding citizens. She is currently overseeing three lawsuits against this troubled program. The ruling issued on Monday, in Floyd v. The City of New York, was filed by plaintiffs alleging racial profiling in street stops.

At the heart of the Floyd case are statistics showing that the city conducted an astounding 4.4 million stops between January 2004 and June 2012. Of these, only 6 percent resulted in arrests and 6 percent resulted in summonses. In other words, 88 percent of the 4.4 million stops resulted in no further action — meaning a vast majority of those stopped were doing nothing wrong. More than half of all people stopped were frisked, yet only 1.5 percent of frisks found weapons. In about 83 percent of cases, the person stopped was black or Hispanic, even though the two groups accounted for just over half the population.

The city has consistently said that the disparity was justified because minority citizens commit more crimes. But Judge Scheindlin trenchantly rejected this argument. As she pointed out, “this reasoning is flawed because the stopped population is overwhelmingly innocent — not criminal. There is no basis for assuming that an innocent population shares the same characteristics as the criminal suspect population in the same area.”

The evidence clearly showed that the police carried out more stops on black and Hispanic residents even when other relevant factors were controlled for, and officers were more likely to use force against minority residents even though stops of minorities were less likely to result in weapons seizures than stops of whites.



Federal Judge Reins in NYC discriminatory storm trooper tactics

Butch, you think black people in Ferguson or Baton Rouge were not aware of stop and frisk in NYC? I was long aware of it from where I sit down in Florida.

African Americans have reason to distrust the police. Castille was stopped 52 times while driving black before he was killed. Good Grief!



Vincent, no one, absolutely no one, is saying that there are not problems in many parts of the country in which blacks are singled out and profiled.

What this officer is saying that in some cities, such as the one where he works, the reasons are demographic.

Look, you go down to the Rio Grande region of Texas and you got Hispanics saying the same thing, and the reason is that there are 7 times more Hispanics in that part of Texas than the rest of the state.

But the Black Lives Matter movement is saying, screaming and got the world believing is that African American Males are killed by police more often than any other race in the states, and it is not true.

I could understand the movement, even support it, if they not only addressed the problems with police, but the problems within their own communities. They are ignoring the facts, misrepresenting the numbers (fucking hell they are inflating the numbers to the point of being meaningless) and putting the blame on white cops.

Even after the woman who streamed the shooting of the man in Minnesota stated she thought the cop was Asian, BLM was making the claims it was a WHITE cop that shot him. When it came out that he was Hispanic, they maintained it was a WHITE cop that shot the man.

Then, to top it all, white cops who have been supportive, helpful and making damn sure the protests in Dallas were peaceful by working with the movement, who were present at every march and rally, were targeted by a African American male.

That fact has been all over the news, but have you, or any BLM spokesperson said a damn thing about the white cops that supported the movement being killed by a black man who believed the bullshit from BLM, and other more milatant African American movements, hell no.

It is only in one fluff piece in the Post and only contained the statements from the locals who worked with the dead cops.

But hey, it was only five white cops who were killed, kinda like the joke "what do you call 20 dead lawyers at the bottom of a lake? A start."




thompsonx -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 2:31:03 PM)

ORIGINAL: jlf1961



Vincent, no one, absolutely no one, is saying that there are not problems in many parts of the country in which blacks are singled out and profiled.


But then the speaker goes on to say it is the blacks own fault...which is what you do in this rant.

What this officer is saying that in some cities, such as the one where he works, the reasons are demographic.

Look, you go down to the Rio Grande region of Texas and you got Hispanics saying the same thing, and the reason is that there are 7 times more Hispanics in that part of Texas than the rest of the state.

But the Black Lives Matter movement is saying, screaming and got the world believing is that African American Males are killed by police more often than any other race in the states, and it is not true.


On a per capita basis it is true but you refuse to notice that.

I could understand the movement, even support it, if they not only addressed the problems with police, but the problems within their own communities.

So until blacks stop killing blacks you could give a phoque less. Might we say the same about whites. Until whites stop killing whites they need to shut the phoque up about any cops killing a white man.




They are ignoring the facts, misrepresenting the numbers (fucking hell they are inflating the numbers to the point of being meaningless) and putting the blame on white cops.

Well it is caucasian cops that are doing the the majority of the shooting.

Even after the woman who streamed the shooting of the man in Minnesota stated she thought the cop was Asian, BLM was making the claims it was a WHITE cop that shot him. When it came out that he was Hispanic, they maintained it was a WHITE cop that shot the man.


Hispanics are caucasians dumbass

Then, to top it all, white cops who have been supportive, helpful and making damn sure the protests in Dallas were peaceful by working with the movement, who were present at every march and rally, were targeted by a African American male.


Would you have felt better if he had been white?

That fact has been all over the news, but have you, or any BLM spokesperson said a damn thing about the white cops that supported the movement being killed by a black man who believed the bullshit from BLM, and other more milatant African American movements, hell no.

What bullshit did the shooter believe that was said by the blm that was not true?

It is only in one fluff piece in the Post and only contained the statements from the locals who worked with the dead cops.


Who else would you expect to know about them except the ones who worked with them?[8|]

But hey, it was only five white cops who were killed, kinda like the joke "what do you call 20 dead lawyers at the bottom of a lake? A start."


Don't tell me you think this is a "good start"[8|]




BamaD -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 2:33:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Officer Nakia Jones has some interesting comments:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hbO1wocfNM



Here is another Black police officer with interesting comments:

Butch

Butch, I fail to understand why this black officer is so confused. Here's some background information that might clear up his dismay over why blacks feel besieged:

Judge Shira Scheindlin of Federal District Court in New York upheld the bedrock principle of individual liberty on Monday when she ruled that the tactics underlying New York City’s stop-and-frisk program violated the constitutional rights of minority citizens. She found that the city had been “deliberately indifferent” to police officers illegally detaining and frisking minority residents on the streets over many years.

Judge Scheindlin was clearly speaking of Mayor Michael Bloomberg when she concluded: “The City’s highest officials have turned a blind eye to the evidence that officers are conducting stops in a racially discriminatory manner. In their zeal to defend a policy that they believe to be effective, they have willfully ignored overwhelming proof that the policy of singling out “the right people” is racially discriminatory and therefore violates the United States Constitution.”

The judge made clear that she was not striking down the program — which remains an important tool for law enforcement — but requiring the city to use that tool in a way that does not discriminate against African-Americans and Hispanics and that comports with constitutional guarantees against unreasonable search and seizure. Given the city’s refusal to alter its practices significantly, Judge Scheindlin had little choice but to appoint an outside monitor to oversee sweeping changes in how the New York Police Department trains its officers and carries out the stop-and-frisk policy.

Under the Fourth Amendment, police officers can legally stop and detain a person only when they have a reasonable suspicion that the person is committing, has committed or is about to commit a crime. Over the years, however, the Police Department has adopted a strategy that encourages cops to stop and question mainly minority citizens first and to come up with reasons for having done so later. This has resulted in people in some neighborhoods being stopped without reason scores of times a year. These unconstitutional stops, Judge Scheindlin wrote, have exacted a “human toll” in demeaning and humiliating law-abiding citizens. She is currently overseeing three lawsuits against this troubled program. The ruling issued on Monday, in Floyd v. The City of New York, was filed by plaintiffs alleging racial profiling in street stops.

At the heart of the Floyd case are statistics showing that the city conducted an astounding 4.4 million stops between January 2004 and June 2012. Of these, only 6 percent resulted in arrests and 6 percent resulted in summonses. In other words, 88 percent of the 4.4 million stops resulted in no further action — meaning a vast majority of those stopped were doing nothing wrong. More than half of all people stopped were frisked, yet only 1.5 percent of frisks found weapons. In about 83 percent of cases, the person stopped was black or Hispanic, even though the two groups accounted for just over half the population.

The city has consistently said that the disparity was justified because minority citizens commit more crimes. But Judge Scheindlin trenchantly rejected this argument. As she pointed out, “this reasoning is flawed because the stopped population is overwhelmingly innocent — not criminal. There is no basis for assuming that an innocent population shares the same characteristics as the criminal suspect population in the same area.”

The evidence clearly showed that the police carried out more stops on black and Hispanic residents even when other relevant factors were controlled for, and officers were more likely to use force against minority residents even though stops of minorities were less likely to result in weapons seizures than stops of whites.



Federal Judge Reins in NYC discriminatory storm trooper tactics

Butch, you think black people in Ferguson or Baton Rouge were not aware of stop and frisk in NYC? I was long aware of it from where I sit down in Florida.

African Americans have reason to distrust the police. Castille was stopped 52 times while driving black before he was killed. Good Grief!


Maybe he should have learned how to drive.

Yep, stop and frisk in NY is a legitimate reason to burn and loot in St Louis.




thompsonx -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 2:40:05 PM)

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe he should have learned how to drive.

It would seem he did know how to dirve, was his license ever suspended or revoked?
Or is this your racist attempt to paint the victim as a criminal.


Yep, stop and frisk in NY is a legitimate reason to burn and loot in St Louis.

Was bombing pearl harbor a legitimate reason to nuke hiroshima and nagasaki?[8|]
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.





Kirata -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 3:59:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Here's some background information that might clear up his dismay over why blacks feel besieged:

Here's some more...

Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Ray Kelly have repeatedly made the point that stop and frisk rates, while higher among non-whites, generally match the racial statistics on crime suspects . . . 90 percent of the city's murder suspects are black or Latino, and 87 percent of people stopped by police are black and Latino. Whites are 7 percent of suspects and 9 percent of stops. ~NBC

K.




bounty44 -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 4:21:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
African Americans have reason to distrust the police. Castille was stopped 52 times while driving black before he was killed. Good Grief!



you left out (conveniently perhaps?) that he also received ~80 citations for legitimate violations.

that's driving while black?





thompsonx -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 4:29:03 PM)


ORIGINAL: bounty44


you left out (conveniently perhaps?) that he also received ~80 citations for legitimate violations.

that's driving while black?


Tell us comrade how does one get 80 citations and still have a drivers license?




BamaD -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 4:39:33 PM)

We saw a black man in NY raise his arms in the air and die of a chokehold.



There was no chokehold, we saw him die of a heart attack from the effort of resisting. Then we saw the DA overcharged to such an extent that even though the cop who pushed to far was clearly guilty of excessive force couldn't be convicted of murder.




mnottertail -> RE: COPS OVERREACTING OR JUSTIFIED KILLINGS (7/11/2016 4:41:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
African Americans have reason to distrust the police. Castille was stopped 52 times while driving black before he was killed. Good Grief!



you left out (conveniently perhaps?) that he also received ~80 citations for legitimate violations.

that's driving while black?



uh, 55 and about 1/3 dismissed for being black, but yeah, lets off the black bastard (the cop didnt know about them) for having expired tabs and that is probable cause for killing the guy. What are you thinking a nutsucker cop? Zimmerman Jr? last ticket was like 2008. You want us to forget nutsuckers and they are beyond 2008.




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125