Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 2:20:40 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
I am led to believe America is allowed to gun itself down at the rate of 40 000 souls per annum.

how to quantify that
1. 40 000
2. 4 times the population of my town
3. 1.5 times the population of my nearest city
4. 10yers almost the population of my country
5. 100 years more than the population of America itself, perhaps you would like to start on the Mexicans - when you run out o soul - technically fter the shoot each other the problem is negated is it not

God does not bless gun totting heathens. i am an educated man and it offends many of the 10 commandants - in god we trust

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 7/19/2016 2:22:49 PM >

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 3:07:31 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Enters the wicked (is it James or Jamie all of time has wondered that or is the other you the mad twin(iisnt she a she(does anyone actually realise that?))

wenches present thyself to me now - your husbands are permitted to watch for a small outargous(godddmt it dspelcheek fee

I myself turn the other cheek with a soft fluffy pillow - filled with horseshoes, and anvils and stampeding elephants ---- and i hurl those sophists ( i think many pof you are mounting up - You should see me mount a women it would stagger your pea brain)

why should i not cull almost all of you right now? (exceptions - know who they are)

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 3:33:41 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

Since the 2nd amendment does exist and will likely to continue to do so for a while it's certainly a reasonable civics lesson.

Exactly, the guns aren't going anywhere any time soon, so you might as well teach people to deal with them properly and safely. It likely won't do anything about the murders and suicides, but it will likely cut down on the accidental fatalities.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 4:00:22 PM   
SunDominant


Posts: 136
Joined: 7/12/2016
Status: offline
"Gun violence" debate is annoying to me because it focuses on the inanimate object rather than the person wielding it.

Why are so many people in the United States taking their own life, and what are friends, family and their community doing to help them?

Why are so many people taking the lives of others, why do they get to that point, and why do they see taking the life of another human being as an option?

Addressing these questions goes along the path of actually lessening the violence. The instrument is hardly important, though it does seem to make for endless (and useless) debate.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 4:07:19 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Really, I'd like to see either a link or know your credentials for making that statement. Having been around groups of people with guns a lot, for a large portion of my life, my experience has been the opposite. It's just like working in a machine shop with lots of people operating lots of potentially very damaging machines. People tend to feel the weight and responsibility of it and take special care. I'd like to know your stats or experience with this that shows my, literally, thousands of experiences as the exception to your rule.


Nnanji! The issue based on the foggy information we have is not the thousands of responsible gun owners who are exceptions to "my rule." The issue is Lovell's actions which seem to be the exception to the expectation of your gun owner buddies. Lovell could have fired at the top of the door or at the bottom. But no, he fired straight on at the kill zone. Man with a gun in his hand. I don't need statistics or experience imagining the power he must have felt. A knowledge of human psychology will suffice.

How many of the thousands of gun owners you know were ever in Lovell's position and refrained from firing? I'd like to know your stats on how many refrained from pulling the trigger. How many times have you witnessed the same situation? What are your credentials? What is the deep store of knowledge of human psychology that permits you to give a free pass to all gun owners?

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 4:30:05 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Teenage gunned down through a closed door in broad daylight

Is there no end to gun killings in America?


Has he sent you a document laying out his views on the 2nd?
How about the fact that two 15 year olds were DRUNK? If they weren't drunk this wouldn't have happened would it? The root cause here isn't the 2nd, or the fact that it sure looks like the homeowner paniced it is that 2 minors got drunk and by extension stupid.

Bama! From the article I posted:

Lovell is a gun enthusiast whose Facebook page prominently features a picture of him aiming a gun, according to MassLive. Several posts reflected enthusiastic support for the Second Amendment, the website reported.

Did it have him talking longingly about the option of shooting someone?
And why do you want to paint all gun owners with a situation that the progun people agree was a screw up.
Only the self avowed communist is ok with the shooting.

If one gun owner can screw up who is to say others will not or cannot? The gun feels mighty powerful in a man's hands. Transforms a man into a delusional hero.

And if one BLM sympathiser can kill murder 5 cops then any of them.
One makes as much sense as the other. In fact my analogy makes more sense as they would have the same motivation.
If one driver can screw up who is to say others will not or cannot?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 4:34:02 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

But you see, this is the legacy of an American 'tradition' This is the 'American culture' where the 2nd amend. is the enabler.

I have a right to own guns.

I have a right to defend my home.

I have a right to call the police.

I have a right to shoot to kill and even before the police arrive.

Another attempt to trash all gun owners because one person screwed up.
And other than me not one word about underage drinking which set the situation up.

Not true. I brought it up in my post that you responded to. I said they were irresponsible for drinking. But that doesn't equal a death sentence.

Sorry, I missed that. I apologize. And again I have stated two or three times that none of this gives the home owner a pass.
We have two serious problems independant of each other. Underage drinking leads to a lot of deaths. And this guy screwed up big time. Neither is negated in any way by the other. ** The kid would be alive if he hadn't been drunk.** The kid would be alive if the homeowner hadn't screwed up.


I disagree, Kids do stupid shit, like knocking on doors when they are not drinking just for kicks, not to mention adults that mistakenly knock on the wrong door. This kid is dead because of this homeowner's pure unadulterated stupidly.
And it's what? Homeowners' jobs to understand and coddle stupid shit from kids whose parents can't be responsible for teaching their spawn respect? I wasn't an angel but I had better ways to blow off steam than running around knocking on people's doors...breaking their glass.

This gun owner made a mistake for damn sure...but so did the kids.



The homeowner is an adult with a gun, it's his responsibly to understand the law, threat assessment and act accordingly .
I don't believe in coddling kids or adults when it comes to disrespect, but don't see the need to shoot them for it.

I have had kids knock on my door and did not find it amusing in the least, it was an nuisance. They posed no threat,
so nothing more than a verbal reprimand was warranted and they didn't do it again. If their parents are so irresponsible
that they don't teach them respect, it's not the kid's fault they are idiots. So someone needs to man up and correct their
behavior hopefully they will learn from it or give them something to think about the next time.

In this case, the homeowner was safe in his house, the police were on the way, there was no need for deadly force.
I'm truly bewilder that some are such wuss's they can't handle a minor confrontation or any confrontation with pertinence.

Note: You cannot fix stupidity, there is no cure, while some would like to eradicate it form this world it's not an executable offense.

The people who say that the kids were wrong and got themselves in this mess because they were drunk are not saying that they deserved to die.
They are to a person saying that the home owner screwed up and should pay.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Chaska)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 4:36:46 PM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Really, I'd like to see either a link or know your credentials for making that statement. Having been around groups of people with guns a lot, for a large portion of my life, my experience has been the opposite. It's just like working in a machine shop with lots of people operating lots of potentially very damaging machines. People tend to feel the weight and responsibility of it and take special care. I'd like to know your stats or experience with this that shows my, literally, thousands of experiences as the exception to your rule.


Nnanji! The issue based on the foggy information we have is not the thousands of responsible gun owners who are exceptions to "my rule." The issue is Lovell's actions which seem to be the exception to the expectation of your gun owner buddies. Lovell could have fired at the top of the door or at the bottom. But no, he fired straight on at the kill zone. Man with a gun in his hand. I don't need statistics or experience imagining the power he must have felt. A knowledge of human psychology will suffice.

How many of the thousands of gun owners you know were ever in Lovell's position and refrained from firing? I'd like to know your stats on how many refrained from pulling the trigger. How many times have you witnessed the same situation? What are your credentials? What is the deep store of knowledge of human psychology that permits you to give a free pass to all gun owners?


I can't answer for all the other gun owners, but I can answer for myself. I was sitting quietly at home one late afternoon, watching TV, when all of a sudden someone was pounding on my door. I don't have glass in my door, but it was being beat on so hard that I could see daylight around the perimeter where the weather strip is every time the door was hit. The area where I live has a fair amount of gang activity, so I didn't know what was going on. I grabbed my gun and went to answer the door. The person banging on my door was a fairly hefty sized young lady that thought she had found the new home where a friend of hers had moved to, so she was trying to surprise her. A situation very similar to the one in the OP. Imagine her surprise when the door was opened and she found herself staring down the barrel of a .357 magnum.

She didn't get shot, but I'd be willing to bet that she never bangs on a door like that again.

_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 4:37:21 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Really, I'd like to see either a link or know your credentials for making that statement. Having been around groups of people with guns a lot, for a large portion of my life, my experience has been the opposite. It's just like working in a machine shop with lots of people operating lots of potentially very damaging machines. People tend to feel the weight and responsibility of it and take special care. I'd like to know your stats or experience with this that shows my, literally, thousands of experiences as the exception to your rule.


Nnanji! The issue based on the foggy information we have is not the thousands of responsible gun owners who are exceptions to "my rule." The issue is Lovell's actions which seem to be the exception to the expectation of your gun owner buddies. Lovell could have fired at the top of the door or at the bottom. But no, he fired straight on at the kill zone. Man with a gun in his hand. I don't need statistics or experience imagining the power he must have felt. A knowledge of human psychology will suffice.

How many of the thousands of gun owners you know were ever in Lovell's position and refrained from firing? I'd like to know your stats on how many refrained from pulling the trigger. How many times have you witnessed the same situation? What are your credentials? What is the deep store of knowledge of human psychology that permits you to give a free pass to all gun owners?

I know 4, counting myself.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 4:43:31 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
For years I thought that satire was a kind of Indonesian sauce based on peanuts Dizzy

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 4:55:17 PM   
deathtothepixies


Posts: 683
Joined: 2/19/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961




Now in rural areas, it is a bit different, you can use deadly force if someone is trying to steal livestock, damage barns or outbuildings




I find this obscene too, the lack of value placed on human life by some people disgusts me
I find your inability to discern that there's value OF life in the hard work involved to obtain and maintain that property disturbing as is your lack of upset at the disrespect shown by the thieves/vandals involved in theft/destruction of property.

Is it worth their life? No...probably not though philosophically, one could argue about the value of a life that has no respect for what belongs to someone else. But one could also argue why the thieves/vandals don't ask that of themselves...after all, it is THEIR life they might lose...before they start the thievery/vandalism in the first place.

"But...just turn it in to insurance". Yep...and watch your premium rise again.



I am self employed, a few months ago one of my shops was broken into, they didn't get much money, not a great night for them but a pretty shitty week for me and my family afterwards. Insurance covered the material loss but it never covers the work we had to put in or the trouble it caused my customers but you can never justify killing someone for a crime against property. Property is just stuff, it can be replaced. Insurance is a bitch, I agree but don't kill someone over a car, or a keepsake, or a cash register

_____________________________


The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."


(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 5:13:41 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961




Now in rural areas, it is a bit different, you can use deadly force if someone is trying to steal livestock, damage barns or outbuildings




I find this obscene too, the lack of value placed on human life by some people disgusts me
I find your inability to discern that there's value OF life in the hard work involved to obtain and maintain that property disturbing as is your lack of upset at the disrespect shown by the thieves/vandals involved in theft/destruction of property.

Is it worth their life? No...probably not though philosophically, one could argue about the value of a life that has no respect for what belongs to someone else. But one could also argue why the thieves/vandals don't ask that of themselves...after all, it is THEIR life they might lose...before they start the thievery/vandalism in the first place.

"But...just turn it in to insurance". Yep...and watch your premium rise again.



I am self employed, a few months ago one of my shops was broken into, they didn't get much money, not a great night for them but a pretty shitty week for me and my family afterwards. Insurance covered the material loss but it never covers the work we had to put in or the trouble it caused my customers but you can never justify killing someone for a crime against property. Property is just stuff, it can be replaced. Insurance is a bitch, I agree but don't kill someone over a car, or a keepsake, or a cash register

Of course you have complete assurance that if you had worked late that night you would not have been harmed?
You have complete assurance that they will not come back time after time till you can't keep your business open.
You clearly do not understand that it is not merely a matter of the property taken that is at stake. You have conceded control and ultimate ownership of what you have worked for to the criminal. You have conceded that they have the right to any of your property they want whenever they want it. You have become a serf to your new masters.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to deathtothepixies)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 5:16:54 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

For years I thought that satire was a kind of Indonesian sauce based on peanuts Dizzy

No, that's lube.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Dvr22999874)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 5:34:22 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Since the 2nd amendment does exist and will likely to continue to do so for a while it's certainly a reasonable civics lesson.


Exactly, the guns aren't going anywhere any time soon, so you might as well teach people to deal with them properly and safely. It likely won't do anything about the murders and suicides, but it will likely cut down on the accidental fatalities.


" the guns aren't going anywhere any time soon." No, but ownership has declined from ~ 50% of households in the '70s to 34% in 2014. It's not an upward trend.

So then gun classes should be an enforced requirement for children of 66% of the households which don't have guns and don't plan to? Against the wishes of the parents?

What sort of fucked up civics lesson is that?

Does the second amendment require gun ownership or just allow it?

The much better civics lesson would be enlightening both kids and parents of the destruction to society both domestic and abroad wrought by out of control corporations.

Otherwise, 60-120 years from now (maybe sooner) we may indeed find ourselves in a situation where gun ownership is near ubiquitous, by necessity.




< Message edited by Edwird -- 7/19/2016 6:01:38 PM >

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 5:58:02 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
"Elder, what happened in the old days?"

"Well, these things called corporations, they were big companies, kept getting bigger and bigger, and the bigger they got the more they were able to make the government start wars and take money from people and give it to banks and foul up the land and the waters."

"Why? Wasn't there a council that had to vote on what they could do?"

"Sort of. That's what the government was. But the corporations got more powerful than the government, and at the end the government couldn't stop them. It wound up with the government working for the corporations."

"Didn't anybody see what was happening?"

"Not really. The people who told the news didn't say much about it, and a lot of people didn't want to know anyway. They worried a lot more about things that didn't have much affect on everyday life, or things that made everybody argue all the time."

"Like what?"

"There was this thing called The Second Amendment that was in the original rules of the old government. This was considered very holy and very sacred by a minor part of the people, but the news tellers liked to focus on that a lot. They made more advertising money if they got people upset all the time. So that's why many people didn't see what the corporations were doing, since the news tellers were very big corporations too."

"Elder, is that how there got to be so many guns like we have now?"

"Yeah, I guess so. People cared more about preparing for the worst instead of stopping the worst from happening."


"Elder, what does a bullet look like?"




< Message edited by Edwird -- 7/19/2016 6:15:27 PM >

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 5:59:14 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Really, I'd like to see either a link or know your credentials for making that statement. Having been around groups of people with guns a lot, for a large portion of my life, my experience has been the opposite. It's just like working in a machine shop with lots of people operating lots of potentially very damaging machines. People tend to feel the weight and responsibility of it and take special care. I'd like to know your stats or experience with this that shows my, literally, thousands of experiences as the exception to your rule.


Nnanji! The issue based on the foggy information we have is not the thousands of responsible gun owners who are exceptions to "my rule." The issue is Lovell's actions which seem to be the exception to the expectation of your gun owner buddies. Lovell could have fired at the top of the door or at the bottom. But no, he fired straight on at the kill zone. Man with a gun in his hand. I don't need statistics or experience imagining the power he must have felt. A knowledge of human psychology will suffice.

How many of the thousands of gun owners you know were ever in Lovell's position and refrained from firing? I'd like to know your stats on how many refrained from pulling the trigger. How many times have you witnessed the same situation? What are your credentials? What is the deep store of knowledge of human psychology that permits you to give a free pass to all gun owners?

I posted the stats of people defending themselves with guns earlier and the vast majority didn't pull the trigger. On the other hand you're still just imagining the power someone felt. So...I'm not seeing you having any sort of a valid point here.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 6:00:26 PM   
Chaska


Posts: 301
Joined: 7/15/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

But you see, this is the legacy of an American 'tradition' This is the 'American culture' where the 2nd amend. is the enabler.

I have a right to own guns.

I have a right to defend my home.

I have a right to call the police.

I have a right to shoot to kill and even before the police arrive.

Another attempt to trash all gun owners because one person screwed up.
And other than me not one word about underage drinking which set the situation up.

Not true. I brought it up in my post that you responded to. I said they were irresponsible for drinking. But that doesn't equal a death sentence.

Sorry, I missed that. I apologize. And again I have stated two or three times that none of this gives the home owner a pass.
We have two serious problems independant of each other. Underage drinking leads to a lot of deaths. And this guy screwed up big time. Neither is negated in any way by the other. ** The kid would be alive if he hadn't been drunk.** The kid would be alive if the homeowner hadn't screwed up.


I disagree, Kids do stupid shit, like knocking on doors when they are not drinking just for kicks, not to mention adults that mistakenly knock on the wrong door. This kid is dead because of this homeowner's pure unadulterated stupidly.
And it's what? Homeowners' jobs to understand and coddle stupid shit from kids whose parents can't be responsible for teaching their spawn respect? I wasn't an angel but I had better ways to blow off steam than running around knocking on people's doors...breaking their glass.

This gun owner made a mistake for damn sure...but so did the kids.



The homeowner is an adult with a gun, it's his responsibly to understand the law, threat assessment and act accordingly .
I don't believe in coddling kids or adults when it comes to disrespect, but don't see the need to shoot them for it.

I have had kids knock on my door and did not find it amusing in the least, it was an nuisance. They posed no threat,
so nothing more than a verbal reprimand was warranted and they didn't do it again. If their parents are so irresponsible
that they don't teach them respect, it's not the kid's fault they are idiots. So someone needs to man up and correct their
behavior hopefully they will learn from it or give them something to think about the next time.

In this case, the homeowner was safe in his house, the police were on the way, there was no need for deadly force.
I'm truly bewilder that some are such wuss's they can't handle a minor confrontation or any confrontation with pertinence.

Note: You cannot fix stupidity, there is no cure, while some would like to eradicate it form this world it's not an executable offense.
Yes...he's an adult with a gun. He has responsibilities both as an adult and as a gun owner. Did he screw up on those responsibilities? He did...as I noted earlier.

But who screwed up first? The 15 Year old. Getting drunk (illegal), mistaking his location (not illegal but certainly helped along by the illegally consumed substance), harassing the owner of the property when he'd been asked to leave (illegal), damaging the property of the homeowner (illegal).

Did his mistakes make him eligible to die? No. Do his actions and choices make him at least partially responsible for his death? Yes. If we can hold 15 Year olds responsible for causing death when a weapon is in their hands, we can certainly make them at least partially responsible when their actions lead them to their own deaths, even when that death comes at the hands of someone who should have chosen a more responsible path.



Have you ever killed someone or had to?
I've been in war and have, it ain't pretty. Ever had you bother in arms shoot right next to you blood shooting out of his body, cover in
his and your blood while trying to stop the bleeding until medics get there? I ain't no hero, my PTSD mercury switch is about to short- circuit. and I am not about to go on with more gore.

Have you ever lost a child?
My 41 year old daughter had here fucking brains blowout by a fukwit igit, now her 13 year old son doesn't have a mother, I'll never
be able to hold her again to tell how much I love her. Not to mention family, friends or anything else. Have I thought about blowing
the motherfucker away hell YES, preferable I would like to see him suffer until his last drop of blood and last breath leave his pathetic corpse but, this is up to the court of law. Nuff said, I'm about to go thermonuclear. Note: This did not make national news it was just a small article in the back of the local paper where she was at the time.

Who screwed up first? Are you frickin serious? That's akin to, who/he started it first? What kind of rationale is that? Sounds like the
immature reasoning of, he hit me first. This ain't no kids game, It's serious shit this boy is dead as a doornail. I've not negated his was
drunk and broke a window accidentally or deliberately. His actions are matter of law and for them to decided the appropriate punishment
if any, not the homeowner to be judge, jury and executioner. Not to mention the fact they were outside with no way of determining they
were drunk while he is safe in his damn house or if window was purposely broken. They were of no threat to him or able to cause him any harm from outside the house, It was not as if they had guns blazing through his door or house.

I've had numerous encounters throughout life that did not require shooting anyone under more stressful conditions and much more
dangers circumstances and did not have to shoot anyone. All of this kind of shit is pure insanity and all anyone wants to do is debate
more guns, less guns, no guns or all the other horseshit. Instead of looking at the root cause, solutions and doing something about it
This includes all the people up to the president, all the damn politicians do is put on a dog an pony show then rinse and repeat.
Just read the forum here same shit here rinse and repeat. Is everyone so ate up the dumb-ass that don't see what the fuck is going
on and just want to piss and moan about this or that stupid shit. Wake the fuck up people it ain't gonna get no better until we come
together as one and do something about this madness.

I honestly would like to hear some answers about, how or what we can change or do about the morally bankrupt people with no regard for human life in this or any other society until something is done it will remain the status quo, off my soapbox.
.

< Message edited by Chaska -- 7/19/2016 6:30:29 PM >

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 6:16:35 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

you're still just imagining the power someone felt

That just his inner gangsta talking.

K.


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 6:18:57 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Really, I'd like to see either a link or know your credentials for making that statement. Having been around groups of people with guns a lot, for a large portion of my life, my experience has been the opposite. It's just like working in a machine shop with lots of people operating lots of potentially very damaging machines. People tend to feel the weight and responsibility of it and take special care. I'd like to know your stats or experience with this that shows my, literally, thousands of experiences as the exception to your rule.


Nnanji! The issue based on the foggy information we have is not the thousands of responsible gun owners who are exceptions to "my rule." The issue is Lovell's actions which seem to be the exception to the expectation of your gun owner buddies. Lovell could have fired at the top of the door or at the bottom. But no, he fired straight on at the kill zone. Man with a gun in his hand. I don't need statistics or experience imagining the power he must have felt. A knowledge of human psychology will suffice.

How many of the thousands of gun owners you know were ever in Lovell's position and refrained from firing? I'd like to know your stats on how many refrained from pulling the trigger. How many times have you witnessed the same situation? What are your credentials? What is the deep store of knowledge of human psychology that permits you to give a free pass to all gun owners?

I posted the stats of people defending themselves with guns earlier and the vast majority didn't pull the trigger. On the other hand you're still just imagining the power someone felt. So...I'm not seeing you having any sort of a valid point here.

In 1967, Leonard Berkowitz and Anthony LePage conducted a fascinating study.[1] First, participants were angered by a person pretending to be another participant (called a confederate). Next, participants were seated at a table that had a shotgun and a revolver on it—or, in the control condition, badminton racquets and shuttlecocks. The items on the table were described as part of another experiment that the researcher had supposedly forgotten to put away. The participant was supposed to decide what level of electric shock to deliver to the confederate who had angered them, and the electric shocks were used to measure aggression. The experimenter told participants to ignore the items on the table, but apparently they could not. Participants who saw the guns were more aggressive than were participants who saw the sports items. This effect was dubbed the “weapons effect.”

The weapons effect occurs outside of the lab too. In one field experiment,[2] a confederate driving a pickup truck purposely remained stalled at a traffic light for 12 seconds to see whether the motorists trapped behind him would honk their horns (the measure of aggression). The truck contained either a .303-calibre military rifle in a gun rack mounted to the rear window, or no rifle. The results showed that motorists were more likely to honk their horns if the confederate was driving a truck with a gun visible in the rear window than if the confederate was driving the same truck but with no gun. What is amazing about this study is that you would have to be pretty stupid to honk your horn at a driver with a military rifle in his truck—if you were thinking, that is! But people were not thinking—they just naturally honked their horns after seeing the gun. The mere presence of a weapon automatically triggered aggression.

Research also shows that drivers with guns in their cars more likely to drive aggressively.[3] A nationally representative sample of over 2,000 American drivers found that those who had a gun in the car were significantly more likely to make obscene gestures at other motorists (23% vs. 16%), aggressively follow another vehicle too closely (14% vs. 8%), or both (6.3% vs. 2.8%), even after controlling for many other factors related to aggressive driving (e.g., gender, age, urbanization, census region, driving frequency).

Human beings can identify potentially dangerous, threatening stimuli such as spiders and snakes very quickly. This makes sense from an evolutionary perspective because some spiders and snakes are poisonous, and our ancient ancestors who could identify them quickly were more likely to avoid them and live to pass on their genes. Recent research shows that people can identify guns as quickly as they can identify spiders and snakes.[4],[5],[6] These findings are very interesting because guns are modern threats and cannot be explained using evolutionary principles. Yet guns are a far more dangerous to people today than spiders or snakes. Poisonous spiders (e.g., Black Widows, Brown Recluses) kill about 6 Americans each year.[7] Poisonous snakes (e.g., rattlesnakes) kill about 5 Americans each year.[8] In comparison, guns kill about 31,000 Americans each year.[9]

Several studies have replicated the weapons effect. A review of 56 published studies confirmed that the mere sight of weapons increases aggression in both angry and nonangry individuals.[10] Perhaps the weapons effect occurs because weapons are closely linked to aggression in our brains.


THE WEAPONS EFFECT

Give me the number of your post and I will have a look at your statistics.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2... - 7/19/2016 6:18:59 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

you're still just imagining the power someone felt

That just his inner gangsta talking.

K.



He projects his inner spite is all.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109