Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: WTF happened in Normandy


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: WTF happened in Normandy Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 8:42:31 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
Maybe your experiences in Iran are different to what I see, experience, and have been told directly by Islamics here in the UK.
Not only where I live now, but also in the northwest of Peterborough where I lived for about 5 years.

I think that many (as I have been told as well as seen for myself) are very disenchanted with western life when they get here.
They feel very disconnected with us westerners because our philosophy, ideology and society are at opposite ends of the scale.
They find it difficult to truly integrate into our society without dropping an awful lot of their Islamic ways and many refuse to do that.
This is where the conflict occurs.
They don't like our ideology and we don't like many of the Islamic practices.
Simple things like not sending girls to school in Islamic countries is required by law here - and many don't like that idea at all.
There are many areas where there cannot be any compromise because the conflict is mutually exclusive.


Let's compare your experiences from Iran -
  • Women are greatly respected and admired by the men folk in 95 percent of homes.
    Maybe so.
    But many still firmly believe it is right and lawful to beat them if they displease him.
    In Iran (and most Islamic-run countries), it is 'the norm' and nobody takes any notice if they happen to see it.
    It is not allowed here, and that perplexes them.

  • A man who doesn't take care of his wife is disrespected by all around him.
    Yes - within their own belief system and ideology. (see above)
    The idea of 'taking care' of the wife includes beatings because it's part of their culture.

  • The mother, especially elderly, tend to be the boss.
    Not from what I've witnessed here.

  • They live in very modern houses with running water and all the mod cons.
    From news items depicting various homes in Islamic areas (including Iran, Iraq and other places), a lot of homes do not have running water, flushing toilets, electricity for more than a few hours a day, and many 'mod cons' that they cannot use.
    Those at the top end of the social ladder do have these things; but many don't.
    As for 'modern houses', they may be modern for Iran but nowhere near the building standards of western countries.

  • A Muslim man who is seen to use his wife like a pack horse would be condemned and belittled by an entire neighborhood.
    It is commonplace here to see the women doing the work while the man just sits around.

  • More Iranian women divorce their husbands than husbands divorce their wives.
    Then explain why, when here in the UK, many Muslim women refuse to use our legal services for legal divorce and attempt to do so via a sharia court instead.
    Again, they believe that an Islamic divorce has more meaning and is more definitive than a legal divorce via our judicial system.

  • Most of the Muslims I knew and still know don’t give religion a lot of time. They are far more interested in fashion, make-up, popular music. Whilst they may appear be more devout than we are with Christianity, generally they are no more devout than my Christian grandmother who attended church once a week.
    Yet around here, they go to their mosques several times a day.
    In Peterborough, I saw the men sitting around all day chatting on the steps of local mosques while the women were at home seeing to the kids and tending the house.


    Obviously, not all Islamics are the same; just as all religious groups are not the same.
    But my observations and comments that I made in my earlier post seem to show a completely different side than the picture you paint from Iran.

    Maybe in their homeland where they can live an Islamic lifestyle, leads to a different expectation and behaviour than when they arrive here only to find that many things they did at home are illegal here.
    Many do not understand that a law of the land can override a religious doctrine that is accepted and practiced as a normal part of their life.


    _____________________________

    If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
    George Orwell, 1903-1950


    (in reply to MariaB)
  • Profile   Post #: 101
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 8:54:29 AM   
    freedomdwarf1


    Posts: 6845
    Joined: 10/23/2012
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MariaB
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: kdsub
    Thus is war


    But the war in Syria is a civil war and not a war against the West. The West took opposing sides and made one the enemy and the other an ally. We are intervening in an in-house quarrel and have taken the side of the best investors. Why should we get to say who the enemy is?

    The French resistance did some pretty barbaric things to Nazi and Mussolini soldiers. We hailed them heroes, The Germans called them evil barbarians. Who was right?

    We made it a war against the west by interfering.

    Some of the people decided they didn't like the totalitarian regime of Assad Asswipe.
    Assad decided to use chemical warfare and banned barrel bombs on his own people.
    The US and the west decided this was unacceptable and stepped in to back the rebels.

    The rest is a mess.
    The jihadist extremists saw the opportunity and moved into the vacuum that it created.
    The rest, as they say, is now history.


    Wrong, Assad DID NOT use chems. Read my post supra.

    T^T

    It has been confirmed by the UN that he did.
    Wiki says: The deadliest attacks were the Ghouta attack in the suburbs of Damascus in August 2013 and the Khan al-Assal attack in the suburbs of Aleppo in March 2013. Several other attacks have been alleged, reported and/or investigated.

    A U.N. fact-finding mission and a UNHRC Commission of Inquiry have simultaneously investigated the attacks. The U.N. mission found likely use of the nerve agent sarin in the case of Khan Al-Asal (19 March 2013), Saraqib (29 April 2013), Ghouta (21 August 2013), Jobar (24 August 2013) and Ashrafiyat Sahnaya (25 August 2013). The UNHRC commission later confirmed the use of sarin in the Khan al-Asal, Saraqib and Ghouta attacks, but did not mention the Jobar and the Ashrafiyat Sahnaya attacks.

    ETA: barrel bombs have been filmed being released by helicopters in Damascus. The rebel forces do not have access to helicopters.
    Barrel bombs are outlawed by universal warfare rules around the world.
    Assad Asswipe was the only person able to give the order to use them with his own troops.


    < Message edited by freedomdwarf1 -- 7/28/2016 9:19:35 AM >


    _____________________________

    If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
    George Orwell, 1903-1950


    (in reply to Termyn8or)
    Profile   Post #: 102
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 10:11:31 AM   
    PeonForHer


    Posts: 19612
    Joined: 9/27/2008
    Status: offline
    quote:

    MariaB: Most of the Muslims I knew and still know don’t give religion a lot of time. They are far more interested in fashion, make-up, popular music. Whilst they may appear be more devout than we are with Christianity, generally they are no more devout than my Christian grandmother who attended church once a week.

    quote:

    Yet around here, they go to their mosques several times a day.
    In Peterborough, I saw the men sitting around all day chatting on the steps of local mosques while the women were at home seeing to the kids and tending the house.


    For me, it's this kind of assumption that gets the focus wrong. What evidence there is suggests that devoutness is not a good indicator of who's likely to become a terrorist. We're not talking about people who've pored over the Koran for many years and become imbued with thousands of words of doctrine:

    "Religious motivation

    Daniel Benjamin and Steven Simon, in their book, The Age of Sacred Terror, argue that Islamic terrorist attacks are purely religious. They are seen as "a sacrament ... intended to restore to the universe a moral order that had been corrupted by the enemies of Islam." It is neither political or strategic but an "act of redemption" meant to "humiliate and slaughter those who defied the hegemony of God."[32]

    Two studies of the background of Muslim terrorists in Europe—one of the UK and one of France—found little connection between religious piety and terrorism. According to a "restricted" report of hundreds of case studies by the UK domestic counter-intelligence agency MI5,

    [f]ar from being religious zealots, a large number of those involved in terrorism do not practise their faith regularly. Many lack religious literacy and could actually be regarded as religious novices. Very few have been brought up in strongly religious households, and there is a higher than average proportion of converts. Some are involved in drug-taking, drinking alcohol and visiting prostitutes. MI5 says there is evidence that a well-established religious identity actually protects against violent radicalisation.[33]•

    A 2015 "general portrait" by Olivier Roy (see above) of "the conditions and circumstances" under which people living in France become "Islamic radicals" (terrorists or would-be terrorists) found radicalisation was not an "uprising of a Muslim community that is victim to poverty and racism: only young people join, including converts".[34] Or as another observer described it:

    the large majority of French jihadists are second-generation Muslims who, unlike their parents, speak French, grew up with little to no contact with mosques or Muslim organizations, and before their conversions drank, took drugs, and had girlfriends. They are estranged from their parents and don’t know where to fit in. Or they are recent converts, largely from rural areas and many from divorced families. Why is that, Roy asks? If Islam or social conditions are essentially to blame for breeding terrorism, why do such structural problems affect only this very narrowly defined group? Why does it not attract first- or third-generation French Muslims, or those whose Islamic culture is the deepest? And why does its appeal extend to children of the successful middle class? His answer: jihadism is a nihilistic generational revolt, not a religiously inspired utopianism.[35][35]

    Roy believes terrorism/radicalism is "expressed in religious terms" because

    most of the radicals have a Muslim background, which makes them open to a process of re-Islamisation ("almost none of them having been pious before entering the process of radicalisation"), and[34]
    jihad is "the only cause on the global market". If you kill in silence, it will be reported by the local newspaper; "if you kill yelling `Allahuakbar,` you are sure to make the national headlines". Other extreme causes—ultra-left or radical ecology are "too bourgeois and intellectual" for the radicals.[34]"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_terrorism


    < Message edited by PeonForHer -- 7/28/2016 10:14:47 AM >


    _____________________________

    http://www.domme-chronicles.com


    (in reply to freedomdwarf1)
    Profile   Post #: 103
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 10:13:38 AM   
    MariaB


    Posts: 2969
    Joined: 4/3/2007
    Status: offline
    What I don’t understand is how you have managed to make so many Muslim friends that have confided in you about their unhappiness with western culture because even when I embraced their ways over in Iran, I never had anyone confide those sort of thoughts with me. I met plenty of people who had spent a considerable amount of time in both the UK and the U.S. but not once was it even hinted that western culture was corrupt or immoral.



    _____________________________

    My store is http://e-stimstore.com

    (in reply to freedomdwarf1)
    Profile   Post #: 104
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 10:34:06 AM   
    Awareness


    Posts: 3918
    Joined: 9/8/2010
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
    Obviously, not all Islamics are the same; just as all religious groups are not the same.
    But my observations and comments that I made in my earlier post seem to show a completely different side than the picture you paint from Iran.

    Maybe in their homeland where they can live an Islamic lifestyle, leads to a different expectation and behaviour than when they arrive here only to find that many things they did at home are illegal here.
    Many do not understand that a law of the land can override a religious doctrine that is accepted and practiced as a normal part of their life.

    The root conflict which must be dealt with when consider Muslims immigrants in Western societies comes down to our insistence on the primacy of Western law above Sharia law and their insistence upon Sharia law prevailing over Western law.

    You can't legislate positive attitudes. Islam is anti-gay and there's nothing you can do about that - but you can insist on rigid adherence to Western law. Unfortunately, the UK's new Prime Minister Theresa May has previously said that "Many Britons 'benefit greatly' from Sharia law" - a disturbing attitude which raises serious questions about her fitness as Prime Minister and her ability enable the transition away from the EU.




    _____________________________

    Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

    (in reply to freedomdwarf1)
    Profile   Post #: 105
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 10:41:19 AM   
    freedomdwarf1


    Posts: 6845
    Joined: 10/23/2012
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MariaB

    What I don’t understand is how you have managed to make so many Muslim friends that have confided in you about their unhappiness with western culture because even when I embraced their ways over in Iran, I never had anyone confide those sort of thoughts with me. I met plenty of people who had spent a considerable amount of time in both the UK and the U.S. but not once was it even hinted that western culture was corrupt or immoral.



    Quite simply because we see them every day; in their shop or at the wholesalers.
    Their kids went to the same school as ours and the kids were fairly close friends.
    We got a lot of our 'insight' via the kids and what was said between them.

    No way did they say that western culture was corrupt or immoral.
    Where did you get that idea from??
    What they have categorically said is that they wanted, and expected, to live an islamic style of life in the west. The fact that quite a few things that are 'normal' in their culture is declared illegal here is something they find perplexing and cannot understand why it is so.


    _____________________________

    If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
    George Orwell, 1903-1950


    (in reply to MariaB)
    Profile   Post #: 106
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 11:43:06 AM   
    NorthernGent1


    Posts: 218
    Joined: 6/27/2016
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

    If left alone they would not even know of our existence.

    T^T


    A good portion of these people living in remote places such as Afghanistan and Pakistan have no idea that a country named England exists.

    (in reply to Termyn8or)
    Profile   Post #: 107
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 11:50:37 AM   
    NorthernGent1


    Posts: 218
    Joined: 6/27/2016
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Awareness


    quote:

    ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
    Obviously, not all Islamics are the same; just as all religious groups are not the same.
    But my observations and comments that I made in my earlier post seem to show a completely different side than the picture you paint from Iran.

    Maybe in their homeland where they can live an Islamic lifestyle, leads to a different expectation and behaviour than when they arrive here only to find that many things they did at home are illegal here.
    Many do not understand that a law of the land can override a religious doctrine that is accepted and practiced as a normal part of their life.

    The root conflict which must be dealt with when consider Muslims immigrants in Western societies comes down to our insistence on the primacy of Western law above Sharia law and their insistence upon Sharia law prevailing over Western law.

    You can't legislate positive attitudes. Islam is anti-gay and there's nothing you can do about that - but you can insist on rigid adherence to Western law. Unfortunately, the UK's new Prime Minister Theresa May has previously said that "Many Britons 'benefit greatly' from Sharia law" - a disturbing attitude which raises serious questions about her fitness as Prime Minister and her ability enable the transition away from the EU.





    She didn't say that at all.

    I think she actually said there can only be one rule of law in this country.

    And, she is heading up an investigation into Sharia courts as to whether they usurp English Law.

    (in reply to Awareness)
    Profile   Post #: 108
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 11:55:18 AM   
    MariaB


    Posts: 2969
    Joined: 4/3/2007
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Awareness


    The root conflict which must be dealt with when consider Muslims immigrants in Western societies comes down to our insistence on the primacy of Western law above Sharia law and their insistence upon Sharia law prevailing over Western law.

    You can't legislate positive attitudes. Islam is anti-gay and there's nothing you can do about that - but you can insist on rigid adherence to Western law. Unfortunately, the UK's new Prime Minister Theresa May has previously said that "Many Britons 'benefit greatly' from Sharia law" - a disturbing attitude which raises serious questions about her fitness as Prime Minister and her ability enable the transition away from the EU.



    Sharia Law within the UK is not a court of law. Everyone within the UK has to abide by UK law and if you are Muslim you can seek council, especially over religious matters under Sharia law. What Sharia can’t do is overrule a British court. Sharia councils give mediation over things like family matters, divorce and child access for divorced parents but Sharia divorces are always subject to English law.

    Why would we not adopt Sharia law when we’ve been accepting Jewish law for centuries?



    _____________________________

    My store is http://e-stimstore.com

    (in reply to Awareness)
    Profile   Post #: 109
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 11:58:46 AM   
    MariaB


    Posts: 2969
    Joined: 4/3/2007
    Status: offline
    @Peon

    I can agree with all of that. My reply to FD was regarding what he said about Muslims not fitting in here and why. It wasn't about who makes a dedicated terrorist.

    _____________________________

    My store is http://e-stimstore.com

    (in reply to MariaB)
    Profile   Post #: 110
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 12:00:09 PM   
    PeonForHer


    Posts: 19612
    Joined: 9/27/2008
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MariaB

    @Peon

    I can agree with all of that. My reply to FD was regarding what he said about Muslims not fitting in here and why. It wasn't about who makes a dedicated terrorist.


    It's OK - I got that, Maria.


    _____________________________

    http://www.domme-chronicles.com


    (in reply to MariaB)
    Profile   Post #: 111
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 12:29:17 PM   
    freedomdwarf1


    Posts: 6845
    Joined: 10/23/2012
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MariaB
    Sharia Law within the UK is not a court of law.

    Tell that to the myriad of Muslims who do not accept that judicial divorce is legal.
    Many Muslim women seek a 'divorce' in illegal sharia courts in the UK.
    Not counsel or advice, but a Muslim divorce.
    The new Muslim advice lines and charities are getting dozens of calls every day from Muslim women who turn to them when a sharia court have refused to hear a divorce case, refused a divorce, or have put ridiculous constraints on a hearing (like insisting that the couple attend together when there is violence involved).

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MariaB
    Everyone within the UK has to abide by UK law and if you are Muslim you can seek council, especially over religious matters under Sharia law.

    And many Muslim men, especially when their wife has obtained a UK judicial divorce, do not accept it as it is not a Muslim divorce as per Islamic teachings or issued by a sharia court.

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MariaB
    What Sharia can’t do is overrule a British court. Sharia councils give mediation over things like family matters, divorce and child access for divorced parents but Sharia divorces are always subject to English law.

    Tell that to the hundreds of Muslims who don't believe that it does.

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MariaB
    Why would we not adopt Sharia law when we’ve been accepting Jewish law for centuries?

    Because Jewish law, in general, is well within UK laws.
    Sharia law is anathema to UK rule of law and completely different.
    That's why we should never adopt any form of it; ever.


    _____________________________

    If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
    George Orwell, 1903-1950


    (in reply to MariaB)
    Profile   Post #: 112
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 12:36:11 PM   
    Termyn8or


    Posts: 18681
    Joined: 11/12/2005
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MariaB
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: kdsub
    Thus is war


    But the war in Syria is a civil war and not a war against the West. The West took opposing sides and made one the enemy and the other an ally. We are intervening in an in-house quarrel and have taken the side of the best investors. Why should we get to say who the enemy is?

    The French resistance did some pretty barbaric things to Nazi and Mussolini soldiers. We hailed them heroes, The Germans called them evil barbarians. Who was right?

    We made it a war against the west by interfering.

    Some of the people decided they didn't like the totalitarian regime of Assad Asswipe.
    Assad decided to use chemical warfare and banned barrel bombs on his own people.
    The US and the west decided this was unacceptable and stepped in to back the rebels.

    The rest is a mess.
    The jihadist extremists saw the opportunity and moved into the vacuum that it created.
    The rest, as they say, is now history.


    Wrong, Assad DID NOT use chems. Read my post supra.

    T^T

    It has been confirmed by the UN that he did.
    Wiki says: The deadliest attacks were the Ghouta attack in the suburbs of Damascus in August 2013 and the Khan al-Assal attack in the suburbs of Aleppo in March 2013. Several other attacks have been alleged, reported and/or investigated.

    A U.N. fact-finding mission and a UNHRC Commission of Inquiry have simultaneously investigated the attacks. The U.N. mission found likely use of the nerve agent sarin in the case of Khan Al-Asal (19 March 2013), Saraqib (29 April 2013), Ghouta (21 August 2013), Jobar (24 August 2013) and Ashrafiyat Sahnaya (25 August 2013). The UNHRC commission later confirmed the use of sarin in the Khan al-Asal, Saraqib and Ghouta attacks, but did not mention the Jobar and the Ashrafiyat Sahnaya attacks.

    ETA: barrel bombs have been filmed being released by helicopters in Damascus. The rebel forces do not have access to helicopters.
    Barrel bombs are outlawed by universal warfare rules around the world.
    Assad Asswipe was the only person able to give the order to use them with his own troops.



    I trust the experts more than the UN which has a political agenda aligned with the US.

    T^T

    (in reply to freedomdwarf1)
    Profile   Post #: 113
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 1:04:22 PM   
    Termyn8or


    Posts: 18681
    Joined: 11/12/2005
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MariaB

    What I don’t understand is how you have managed to make so many Muslim friends that have confided in you about their unhappiness with western culture because even when I embraced their ways over in Iran, I never had anyone confide those sort of thoughts with me. I met plenty of people who had spent a considerable amount of time in both the UK and the U.S. but not once was it even hinted that western culture was corrupt or immoral.




    Simple, they're not all the same, like we are not all the same. Like I believe revenge is a right. I believe you catch a rapist in the act you kill him immediately. Others say "He is sick", so it is not fair. Some Christians go to church twice a week but when I sorta considered myself one the only time you would ever catch e in a church was at weddings and funerals.

    I do not believe we are all created equal, what that statement means is with equal rights, and even that is not true though it should be. But there are athletes with high IQs and weaklings dumb as a box of rocks. If you are born without defects and have a good environment in the early years you should do well unless you get too much into drugs or whatever. But we are not created equal nor are we treated equal. Not that that is an excuse for some of this shit.

    I believe there are too many people and charity should be very sparse and meted out to those who will at least try for themselves to go something with the life your charity saves, rather than just fuck and produce another generation of lames. Yet Bill Gates wants to vaccinate the world. I want to see natural selection work unimpeded.

    I am sure you find some of these views reprehensible even though you consider yourself conservative leaning. Think of what the liberals think of them, they would like to shoot me but then there's that gun control. Oops, they didn't think again.

    We got seven billion people on this rock and about half of them at least need to go.

    Even among the rich, one, I think maybe of one of the royal families (who ALL need to go) said when he dies he would like to come back as a virus to kill 90 % of the population. A rich fuck like Bill Gates but with a completely different attitude.

    There are alot of misconceptions about other countries. People would not believe what countries have a better standard of living than the US. Even Russia. The state of California has more debt than Russia. A good part of CA has a high standard of living but go to LA sometime. Many ghettos in the US are so bad there is no wonder the people who live there are criminals, they simply don't care if they get thrown in prison.

    Some Christians believe religion is inside and anywhere is a church. Others are evangelical to the point you can't stand being around them. And believe it or not, there are plenty of Jews who are not Zionist. Most of them are Hebrew who supposedly have a blood right to that and, not Ashkenazi who have no such standing but are running the place. They are converts, Hebrews are the true inheritors - if any. Personally I think they got no claim either but it is not my job to make that decision. But as far as that goes, what's done is done.

    Well it is the same with the middle east. First of al you can consider that two groups. those who have been attacked by the west and those who have not. When US bombs fall on your Grandmother's house, you are not going to be too friendly about it. In a way you can say that in most cases, the "victims" of terrorism brought it on themselves. That Priest is what the US would call collateral damage.

    So, I say it is not all religion, unless somewhere in there is "Don't take this kind of shit, fight back". Odinism has it, "...shall not be burnt in my own house".

    T^T

    (in reply to MariaB)
    Profile   Post #: 114
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 1:11:07 PM   
    Termyn8or


    Posts: 18681
    Joined: 11/12/2005
    Status: offline
    "Prime Minister Theresa May has previously said that "Many Britons 'benefit greatly' from Sharia law" "

    I would like to know how she reached that conclusion.

    T^T

    (in reply to Awareness)
    Profile   Post #: 115
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 1:12:54 PM   
    Marini


    Posts: 3629
    Joined: 2/14/2010
    Status: offline
    I would like FD/and or peon to tell me how they feel about the terrorists that we were told were mentally ill.
    *The terrorist that murdered the priest, and the one last week at the mall, we were told had mental health issues.

    How do you feel about that?
    I would think that might be a concern or focus.

    If they were mentally ill, and that triggers and pushes some to become radicalized WHILE living in the West, I would see that as an issue of concern.
    You see, how the US has a gun problem, when people are often triggered.

    I think it's a much bigger issue and concern if they were mentally ill.

    < Message edited by Marini -- 7/28/2016 1:27:14 PM >


    _____________________________

    As always, To EACH their Own.
    "And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
    Nelson Mandela
    Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
    NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

    (in reply to freedomdwarf1)
    Profile   Post #: 116
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 1:24:09 PM   
    Termyn8or


    Posts: 18681
    Joined: 11/12/2005
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Marini

    I would like to FD/and or peon to tell me how they feel about the terrorists that we were told were mentally ill.
    *The terrorist that murdered the priest, and the one last week at the mall, we were told had mental health issues.

    How do you feel about that?



    I know you weren't asking me, but I think the mental illness thing is being used improperly. Do you believe McVeigh was mentally ill because he bombed a building ? That bombing was revenge. Now do you think that fighting back and revenge is a sign of mental illness ?

    I don't. You kill my family I will empty magazines (and not "Time") into your knees and lower abdomen and make you wish you were dead if I get a good enough drop on you. Normally shoot to kill, but when you go for revenge after the fact, make it worth it.

    Is that mental illness ? No, it is just I don't give a shit and now it's your turn.

    These people have seen "collateral damage". That is why they should not be allowed in the country. Not because they are mentally ill or criminals, because they are enemies. Did they allow more Japanese immigration after Pearl Harbor ? Hell no, in fact they locked up the Japanese who were already here, even citizens I think. Doesn't matter.

    Now we are going to go over to their countries, kill their Parents, brothers, friends and then let them into the country ?

    Now tell me what's insane.

    I am not happy about the situation, but it really is simply too late to patch things up.

    T^T

    (in reply to Marini)
    Profile   Post #: 117
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 1:31:02 PM   
    Marini


    Posts: 3629
    Joined: 2/14/2010
    Status: offline
    Oh thanks T, anyone can respond.
    I know you don't consider being "mentally ill" an excuse for terrorist activity.

    I asked them since they both live in the UK.



    < Message edited by Marini -- 7/28/2016 1:35:09 PM >


    _____________________________

    As always, To EACH their Own.
    "And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
    Nelson Mandela
    Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
    NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

    (in reply to Termyn8or)
    Profile   Post #: 118
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 1:33:44 PM   
    Awareness


    Posts: 3918
    Joined: 9/8/2010
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MariaB


    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Awareness


    The root conflict which must be dealt with when consider Muslims immigrants in Western societies comes down to our insistence on the primacy of Western law above Sharia law and their insistence upon Sharia law prevailing over Western law.

    You can't legislate positive attitudes. Islam is anti-gay and there's nothing you can do about that - but you can insist on rigid adherence to Western law. Unfortunately, the UK's new Prime Minister Theresa May has previously said that "Many Britons 'benefit greatly' from Sharia law" - a disturbing attitude which raises serious questions about her fitness as Prime Minister and her ability enable the transition away from the EU.



    Sharia Law within the UK is not a court of law. Everyone within the UK has to abide by UK law and if you are Muslim you can seek council, especially over religious matters under Sharia law. What Sharia can’t do is overrule a British court. Sharia councils give mediation over things like family matters, divorce and child access for divorced parents but Sharia divorces are always subject to English law.

    Why would we not adopt Sharia law when we’ve been accepting Jewish law for centuries?


    Well, because it allows men to beat their wives and it prescribes the death penalty for gay sex. Are you really asking this question Maria?


    _____________________________

    Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

    (in reply to MariaB)
    Profile   Post #: 119
    RE: WTF happened in Normandy - 7/28/2016 1:35:08 PM   
    PeonForHer


    Posts: 19612
    Joined: 9/27/2008
    Status: offline
    quote:

    I think it's a much bigger issue and concern if they were mentally ill.


    I'm not sure what you're asking, Marini. As for punishment/treatment - Here, a plea of insanity isn't usually advisable: you can get chucked into a secure institution (like the notorious Broadmoor Hospital) until you're deemed to be 'safe'. The length of your stay is dependent on what your psychiatric reviewers think - and the Home Secretary can prevent your coming out. (That happened with Myra Hindley, the Moors Murderer.)

    As for preventing them becoming that way, or catching them beforehand: I'm beginning to think that it's not an 'either/or' re 'mentally ill' versus 'rational', with these people. They seem mostly to be young, angry, alienated ... they take the ideology they want to 'justify' and 'rationalise' what they do.

















    _____________________________

    http://www.domme-chronicles.com


    (in reply to Marini)
    Profile   Post #: 120
    Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
    All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: WTF happened in Normandy Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
    Jump to:





    New Messages No New Messages
    Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
    Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
     Post New Thread
     Reply to Message
     Post New Poll
     Submit Vote
     Delete My Own Post
     Delete My Own Thread
     Rate Posts




    Collarchat.com © 2025
    Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

    0.109