Alecta
Posts: 1355
Joined: 1/19/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Greta75 What I realise is, in vanilla relationships, very often, I am the dominant one. I usually hook up with men who just accommodates to whatever I want and never liked to be the decision maker and seem to always push all decisions to me, and I got a habit even at work, if nobody steps up, I step up. Work is work, work personas are exempt (although HAVing a work persona is apparently indicative of having a manipulative personality, they say). Submissive personality men in the vanilla world, Asia in particular (I'm from there), like going for stronger personality women because they feel that they would be "easy to cater to". They fear having to guess or take chances towards making the girl happy, just like they're afraid of making guesses and taking chances in general. Strong girls, in their minds, would tell them what they want so there's no guessing, and it's a sure thing. They don't see it as letting the girl take the lead, they see it as fulfilling all her expectations and therefore never having to take the chance of failing. But I don't think not liking to be the decision-maker in vanilla/dating is a submissive trait per say, that, I think, is more tied into our expectations on dating, as women. Even for me, I despise when someone wants to take me out then turns around to ask me to plan everything. The way I see it, you're taking me out on a date. It's your job to plan and take risks, show me things that hopefully are new to me and that hopefully I will like, delight me and impress me. That's courtship! If I wanted to go to a certain place I'd do it on my own or invite you (if I wanted your company there). If I wanted to court you, I would do the planning. Since you want to take me on a date, you should plan the date. It's about who wants whose attention more in this case, not Dominance or submission.
|