LadyPact -> RE: Do you think "trust" is overrated (10/3/2016 6:31:02 PM)
|
I thought you did pretty good. [:)] While I think I get what you are trying to convey, my problem is that I've seen too much of both sides of it. In ways, I sometimes wish people would think more about trust. I know you said D/s specifically, but I also think of this from the top/bottom angle. I've walked into plenty of kink clubs where, just because I happen to have boobs and a toy bag, you'd be amazed how many people automatically trust me on those two factors alone. Heck, I had one guy in a major city just because he *saw* me at the kink club, thought it would be a great idea if I would tie him up and engage in knife play. He ended up thanking me profusely at the end when I explained to him just exactly what I could do to him if he were placing his trust in the wrong person (me) and he realized the huge error he was making. From the relationship aspect, I hope folks have trust as one of their criteria whether they are doing vanilla or D/s. However, I think the fact of the matter is that most people are aware that not everybody is going to get it right. Nobody ever wants to think their current or former partner would do horrible thing X and yet, that's exactly what happens. Yet, what is the first thing they say? It's not actual horrible thing X. It's "I never thought that Person A would DO horrible thing X". (Check out things like people who get convicted for sexual assault. They aren't all single.) Do I think this holds people back? Not really a whole lot. I don't necessarily think people stay permanently single due to paranoia or fear. Sure, after they've experienced Person A doing horrible thing X, they might become more cautious with the next partner but it's not especially a formulated science. It's a good, thought provoking question. ETA - OK, I wrote my response before you added the edit. I think I'm going to keep my response the way it is, even including my opinions about play. quote:
ORIGINAL: ohthat1percent EDITED TO ADD -- This is relationship based -- not play based question. Also to add, as trust is an ongoing growth in a relationship -- do you believe people negatively utilize the aspect of all or nothing with regard to trust too harshly instead of acknowledging its a growth and ongoing concept? When I started dating Engie, I put it on the table on our second date that a) one of the things he would have to think about before entering a relationship with me is the fact that I had a stalker for the better part of three years and b) this was going to be a factor in a slower trust element being formed. (I hadn't really had to do this with tk, because my stalker had saved me the trouble of showing 90% of the kink community where we lived just how much of a lunatic that he was and displayed just how crazy he was by directly emailing tk, himself.) On our third date, I went to the restaurant armed with a hundred and twenty printed documents of third party accounts to show just how bad it had become. Everything from confirmation from my husband's boss, to the statement from the post Chaplain where I used to live, my phone records, the person's own admission on his journals that he was following me in public, mailing me stuff (snail mail) to my house, and more stuff than you probably want to hear about. When I gave those to him, I told him right up front "this" is why you're not going to get my trust right away. It's also why you are going to get sick to death of me speaking out against consent violators, stalkers, harassers, outers, and pretty much the people I think are the scum buckets who happen to be in our kink communities. He said he could hack it and we've been dating ever since.
|
|
|
|