Wayward5oul
Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick Any definition of either dominant or submissive will be a posteriori limited and incomplete. So given that reality, tamaka's is pretty good. It covers the basics and encapsulates the general concept, and it fits with the idea that the dominant leads the relationship. Doesn't feel right for me. ..without caveats, one word definitions like that read as "in general", and I know far too many submissives that are not followers, in general. When someone is described as s follower, or a leader, that's usually understood as a general personality characteristic. I see that as more of a stereotype of a sub, not definition.
|