Nnanji
Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: heavyblinker quote:
ORIGINAL: Nnanji Ah, you've edited this completely from the original. Which is good for you since the original was inane. If you could actually follow/understand a thread, you'd see that your statement here isn't germane to the quotes in the OP. Who posted that OP anyway, who's thread should you understand? Hum, were I you, I wouldn't cast stones about seeing things. Here is from the OP: "It just feels like we are living at the end of the world and everybody expects the apocalypse to come sooner rather than later," says Clara, the nursing student." How is that just opposing Trump? quote:
"There are people who have professed to carrying a gun now because Trump made them feel unsafe," she says. It is not just gun ownership that liberals are reassessing in the wake of Donald Trump's election win. There appears to have been a surge in interest in survivalism too. "A lot of people are worried that not only will [a Trump presidency] fail but that it will fail spectacularly to the point that we are going to end up on in one or more critical situations that we are just not prepared for," says Jeff, 36, one of the group's members. Some of the new members are reluctant first-time gun owners, says Smith, concerned that isolated acts of aggression against minorities could escalate into something more violent and that a Trump administration will dismantle key constitutional rights, leading to a "more fascist rule than the US has ever had". "We are not looking for end of the world Mad Max-type scenarios, we are not looking at a zombie apocalypse," says the author of a left wing survivalist blog, who also reports a surge in interest since Trump's victory. He says it is "fairly easy to predict" an economic collapse under Trump but adds: "No matter what, the country is still going to be here in four years, there's going to be another election." The whole point of the article is that Trump is making these people feel doomed and unsafe, and that is why they are interested in guns. I guess you didn't pick up on that since you didn't actually read it or understand the thread... but yeah, keep pretending the only person who seems to have actually read the article is the clueless one. Pardon the pause. I was out on the porch launching a few rounds down range. I should say here thank you for arguing my point. Even if you didn't realize you were. For years people have owned guns knowing that the second amendment was because of a threat of an overreaching government. Liberals said, no, only militias controlled by the State were protected by the Second amendment while they gagged and said maybe we could hunt too. Liberals have all said the government was benevolent and would protect us so we didn't need guns. Conservative responded that any power you give to government to give you thing or to protect you can be taken by that government. Now, you are seeing people who begin to understand that point. They fear the power they gave the government may be turned on them and they reach for guns. It's a small step in understanding, but an important one. While you didn't realize you were arguing my point, I think those in the article eventually will.
|