Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 women/children, $70m helicopter


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 women/children, $70m helicopter Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 4:22:12 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		You should read it. It begs the question. The op Maeve has have well been under construction. But it didn't move forward because it wasn't ready. Except to someone who doesn't care about facts and Intel. Got to see y'all killed 19 women and children killed in the $70 billion helicopter gone. Stupid. shortsighted. reckless.

You do get which president gave the order to go ahead with it, don't you?

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 4:25:21 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Everybody read it, approving a plan is not executing it.

A whatever approves a blueprint, lotsa work to be done before a pile is driven in the ground.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 4:28:05 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11270
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

You should read it. It begs the question. The op Maeve has have well been under construction. But it didn't move forward because it wasn't ready. Except to someone who doesn't care about facts and Intel. Got to see y'all killed 19 women and children killed in the $70 billion helicopter gone. Stupid. shortsighted. reckless.

You do get which president gave the order to go ahead with it, don't you?


Both of them did, they were awaiting only a moonless night - that has been pointed out repeatedly.

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 4:39:05 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

You should read it. It begs the question. The op Maeve has have well been under construction. But it didn't move forward because it wasn't ready. Except to someone who doesn't care about facts and Intel. Got to see y'all killed 19 women and children killed in the $70 billion helicopter gone. Stupid. shortsighted. reckless.

You do get which president gave the order to go ahead with it, don't you?


Both of them did, they were awaiting only a moonless night - that has been pointed out repeatedly.

Uh, no, Felchgobbler Gobbles, I know you are a coward, and never served your country, but Generals (and they aint changed for a while) are not in the habit of advising a president, look pal, we got three month old intel at that house, and that is as fresh as the prince of bel-air, and you aint gonna look like a retard here.

Or maybe they do.

Nah, douchebagger said, I am smarter than you, this is me shooting from my ass, I dunno, but just a couple people in a little house and I build YOGE buildings and they are just losers, and we will take them out with one shell.

At the very least, he promised he was going to lock them in a room, and give him a plan to defeat isis in 30 days.

Well he lied, how many lies did he tell?

ALL OF EM.

Hes a retard, lock him up, he is killing American Citizens.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 4:55:00 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

The list of military Intel failures is long and marked through out history.

The operation was planned during the Obama administration, ordered by Trump and failed.

I would not compare it to Benghazi, but there are definite similarities to the Bay of Pigs.

It is not the first time a President gave the go ahead on an op that went south, it wont be the last.

So, in light of that, give it a rest, blasting Trump will not bring back the dead.

He went with the information he had, given him by the men that who were experts in this kind of operation, and it went south.

From the Yahoo link:

But Colin Kahl, a former senior Obama administration security official, said on Twitter that "team Trump didn't do a careful vetting of the overall proposal or raid" and that Obama had taken no decision, believing the raid represented an escalation of US involvement in Yemen.

The operation was said to have targeted the houses of three tribal chiefs linked to Al-Qaeda and a Yemeni official said Apache gunships also hit a school, a mosque and a medical facility all used by Al-Qaeda militants.

The real problem as always, is that when Carter tried it, he was clearly incompetent, when Clinton did it, it was the tail wagging the dog, when Obama did anything he was either incompetent or too weak.

When Trump does it...oh well, shit happens.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 2/5/2017 5:06:24 PM >

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 5:01:44 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11270
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

The list of military Intel failures is long and marked through out history.

The operation was planned during the Obama administration, ordered by Trump and failed.

I would not compare it to Benghazi, but there are definite similarities to the Bay of Pigs.

It is not the first time a President gave the go ahead on an op that went south, it wont be the last.

So, in light of that, give it a rest, blasting Trump will not bring back the dead.

He went with the information he had, given him by the men that who were experts in this kind of operation, and it went south.

From the Yahoo link:

But Colin Kahl, a former senior Obama administration security official, said on Twitter that "team Trump didn't do a careful vetting of the overall proposal or raid" and that Obama had taken no decision, believing the raid represented an escalation of US involvement in Yemen.

The operation was said to have targeted the houses of three tribal chiefs linked to Al-Qaeda and a Yemeni official said Apache gunships also hit a school, a mosque and a medical facility all used by Al-Qaeda militants.

The real problem as always, is that when Carter tried it, he was clearly incompetent, when Obama did anything he was either incompetent or too weak.

When Trump does it...oh well, shit happens.


Shocking that an Obama sycophant would be critical of President trump

Unbelievable

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 5:11:19 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

In the real world, facts do matter.

Well let's go with that. If "the plan had been under consideration since November 7, and officials under the administration of Barack Obama reviewed and approved it January 6," then the failures in intelligence and planning would seem to devolve upon the Obama administration, leaving Trump guilty at worst of relying on the previous administration's assessment. One might also wonder if these unnamed "officials" cited by Reuters expressed their view prior to the raid, and whether it was considered to have merit by the military entities charged with carrying out the plan.

K.




While I totally agree with you, I am not sure why you bother. People were blaming shit on the clown before he ever took office. From this point forward every thing will be down to him no matter what facts may say. But it is nice to see them taking notice of the casualties of war again. They seemed to have lost interest in it for the past 8 years.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 5:28:23 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

You should read it. It begs the question. The op Maeve has have well been under construction. But it didn't move forward because it wasn't ready. Except to someone who doesn't care about facts and Intel. Got to see y'all killed 19 women and children killed in the $70 billion helicopter gone. Stupid. shortsighted. reckless.

You do get which president gave the order to go ahead with it, don't you?


Both of them did, they were awaiting only a moonless night - that has been pointed out repeatedly.

Dumb.
Short-sighted.
Reckless. Dead SEAL.
19 dead women and children.
1 $70 million helicopter gone.

Dumb. Short-sighted. Reckless.

Is the moron president or not? Is he responsible or not?

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 5:31:18 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11270
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

You should read it. It begs the question. The op Maeve has have well been under construction. But it didn't move forward because it wasn't ready. Except to someone who doesn't care about facts and Intel. Got to see y'all killed 19 women and children killed in the $70 billion helicopter gone. Stupid. shortsighted. reckless.

You do get which president gave the order to go ahead with it, don't you?


Both of them did, they were awaiting only a moonless night - that has been pointed out repeatedly.

Dumb.
Short-sighted.
Reckless. Dead SEAL.
19 dead women and children.
1 $70 million helicopter gone.

Dumb. Short-sighted. Reckless.

Is the moron president or not? Is he responsible or not?


If president Trump acts without perfect intel, that's very bad

If president Trump does the things he needs to do to get perfect intel, that's worse

If president Trump doesn't act because he cannot obtain perfect intel, therefore a group of Muslims get away with a massive terrorist attack?

I am sure the alt left will be very forgiving and understanding

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 5:35:39 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		If he acts without sufficient intel (vs. perfect, moron), it's not preventing anything -- it's dumb, short-sighted, reckless. Otherwise, you risk it being exactly the disaster it became. Amateur night, and people were slaughtered because of it -- not saved from slaughter.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 5:50:25 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

Yeah, just like Bush did illegally invading Iraq and how many thousands did that kill (& continue to kill)? plus the trillions it has cost y'all and the egg on yer face, the world will never let you forget that fiasco, ever.. Apparently Repub Prez's dont learn from history, I see this as being the first of many, many military disasters for Trump & the American military.. Dont expect things to get better, Trump is 70 and is gonna keep doing things "his way" and everyone else be damned.. no matter how many people die as a result..


Except:
1) Bush was told that the US did not have enough active duty troops to conduct a two theater war.
2) Every reason that Bush gave for the invasion was absolute and utter bullshit.
A) Iraq was in position of WMD's.
>The only WMD's discovered after the invasion were useless chemical rounds scattered in a disposal area due to the fact
the agent had long since gone inert and therefore the only danger the rounds were to anyone is if they physically hit
somebody.
B) Iraq was an active supporter of Al Qaeda
> Saddam's support of Al Qaeda was clear in view of the fact Bin Laden wanted Saddam dead, and every Al Qaeda operative
captured by Saddam's overt and covert police was executed without trial.
C) Saddam's military was a threat to the region
> After the first Gulf War, Saddam's military was only a threat to his own people, since due to the sanctions and trade embargo
he could not get parts for his Warsaw pact military equipment
3) And there is the fact that every general in the pentagon that disagreed with President Bush was either fired or forced to retire.

But, yeah, other than that, everything was sorta the same.

oh Trump has only been Prez for what, 2 weeks? he has another 4 to 8 (or more?) years to start another fucking endless war (or even WWIII).. I think its highly likely that will happen.. so give Trump time.. given his shoot-from-the-hip style the US will be in for lotsa shock-and-awe.. and y'all will be paying for it, both financially and in dead young bodies.. you have an out-of-control madman at the helm.. Good luck.. I think Peter Thiel has the right idea, buy a place/bunker in NZ, cuz thats probably the safest place in the world to be when the shit hits the fan..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 6:02:54 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11270
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

If he acts without sufficient intel (vs. perfect, moron), it's not preventing anything -- it's dumb, short-sighted, reckless. Otherwise, you risk it being exactly the disaster it became. Amateur night, and people were slaughtered because of it -- not saved from slaughter.


You don't know what the intel was, but you preach like you think you do. The best laid plans and all that

You are just such a blind partisan that reality doesn't exist for you Two presidents gave that operation a thumbs up but you have convinced yourself that you know all of the details better than anyone



_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 6:37:52 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline 		*

< Message edited by tamaka -- 2/5/2017 6:48:59 PM >

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 7:08:35 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

If he acts without sufficient intel (vs. perfect, moron), it's not preventing anything -- it's dumb, short-sighted, reckless. Otherwise, you risk it being exactly the disaster it became. Amateur night, and people were slaughtered because of it -- not saved from slaughter.


You don't know what the intel was, but you preach like you think you do. The best laid plans and all that

You are just such a blind partisan that reality doesn't exist for you Two presidents gave that operation a thumbs up but you have convinced yourself that you know all of the details better than anyone



Who's president now? We have two of them?

No doubt, you're appreciating President Carter's raid on Iran now.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 8:02:08 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

If he acts without sufficient intel (vs. perfect, moron), it's not preventing anything -- it's dumb, short-sighted, reckless. Otherwise, you risk it being exactly the disaster it became. Amateur night, and people were slaughtered because of it -- not saved from slaughter.


You don't know what the intel was, but you preach like you think you do. The best laid plans and all that

You are just such a blind partisan that reality doesn't exist for you Two presidents gave that operation a thumbs up but you have convinced yourself that you know all of the details better than anyone



we know when the intel was. Lock up this killer of American Citizens. Nutsuckerism is no excuse

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 8:40:50 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Who's president now? We have two of them?

No doubt, you're appreciating President Carter's raid on Iran now.


The original operational plan was approved by Obama, and was not given a go order because they were waiting for a moonless night, which did not happen until Trump took office.

So, yes, two presidents approved the plan.

It has been covered fairly well on these points in the news.


_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 8:59:32 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

In the real world, facts do matter.

Well let's go with that. If "the plan had been under consideration since November 7, and officials under the administration of Barack Obama reviewed and approved it January 6," then the failures in intelligence and planning would seem to devolve upon the Obama administration, leaving Trump guilty at worst of relying on the previous administration's assessment. One might also wonder if these unnamed "officials" cited by Reuters expressed their view prior to the raid, and whether it was considered to have merit by the military entities charged with carrying out the plan.

K.




While I totally agree with you, I am not sure why you bother. People were blaming shit on the clown before he ever took office. From this point forward every thing will be down to him no matter what facts may say. But it is nice to see them taking notice of the casualties of war again. They seemed to have lost interest in it for the past 8 years.


As if you would ever disagree.

There was more outrage from the left than the right over the teenager killed by the drone in Yemen.

And you've completely ignored the fact that multiple officials are saying that there wasn't adequate preparation-- just like all of the other terrible things that Trump has done this week.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 9:00:39 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Who's president now? We have two of them?

No doubt, you're appreciating President Carter's raid on Iran now.


The original operational plan was approved by Obama, and was not given a go order because they were waiting for a moonless night, which did not happen until Trump took office.

So, yes, two presidents approved the plan.

It has been covered fairly well on these points in the news.



It was PLANNED under Obama.
He didn't approve it.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 9:16:15 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
It was PLANNED under Obama.
He didn't approve it.

Obama did approve it. The orders was to wait until a moon-less night to execute. So by the time the moon-less night happen, he is no longer President.

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 wom... - 2/5/2017 9:21:10 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
It was PLANNED under Obama.
He didn't approve it.

Obama did approve it. The orders was to wait until a moon-less night to execute. So by the time the moon-less night happen, he is no longer President.


Lies.

Obama did not approve it.

They required a moonless night, but they weren't simply waiting for one. They also required more intelligence that was not available when Trump recklessly approved it, telling them to go ahead.

http://nypost.com/2017/02/02/after-obama-waited-trump-quickly-approved-botched-navy-seal-mission/

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Buffoon-in-Chief goes w/o intel, kills SEAL, 15 women/children, $70m helicopter Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109