Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Stupid question


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Stupid question Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 6:29:24 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Just what the fuck is wrong with deporting illegals?

I mean granted, we deport them, they come back and we do it again.

Which leads me to the next idea:

Bring our troops home to patrol the border, and mine the shit out of it.

Ships bringing illegals into ports can be seized, the illegal passengers thrown out and if caught again, put em in a fucking hell hole of a prison till they rot.

Sorry, but I really am tired of the debate, if they really want to come to this country, let em do it legally, or face something that will actually deter others from trying.

I don't think anyone opposes deporting illegal aliens.

But it costs money, and the GOP wants to expand military spending on hardware and overseas missions. We're really spoiling for an expensive fight with China too.

And, a large percentage of illegals are VISA holders overstaying their VISA, so patrolling the border misses the point.

Ironically, Obama was nicknamed the Deporter in Chief for his large number of deportations. But if it happened under Obama, GOP leadership doesn't want to here it.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 7:08:02 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


If we could temporarily sterilize the males as cheaply, safely, and with as little side effects as we could the females, I would be in favor of it. But we can't. So it is a moot point. Just because something cannot be perfect does not mean that we should not do anything at all.

This sounds like it was lifted word for word from Dr Strangelove. The last people to propose and deploy mass sterilizations were the Nazis. No one would ever propose something like this if those on the receiving end were white Europeans. This is straight out of the Nazi guide on how to treat untermenschen.

Horrifying.


Actually, the US government force-sterilized Native Americans up through the 1970s.

It has also happened in US women's prisons fairly recently:

http://ideas.time.com/2013/07/10/eugenics-are-alive-and-well-in-the-united-states/

https://cbhd.org/content/forced-sterilization-native-americans-late-twentieth-century-physician-cooperation-national-

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 7:26:00 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


If we could temporarily sterilize the males as cheaply, safely, and with as little side effects as we could the females, I would be in favor of it. But we can't. So it is a moot point. Just because something cannot be perfect does not mean that we should not do anything at all.

This sounds like it was lifted word for word from Dr Strangelove. The last people to propose and deploy mass sterilizations were the Nazis. No one would ever propose something like this if those on the receiving end were white Europeans. This is straight out of the Nazi guide on how to treat untermenschen.

Horrifying.


Actually, the US government force-sterilized Native Americans up through the 1970s.

It has also happened in US women's prisons fairly recently:

http://ideas.time.com/2013/07/10/eugenics-are-alive-and-well-in-the-united-states/

https://cbhd.org/content/forced-sterilization-native-americans-late-twentieth-century-physician-cooperation-national-

Thanks for that info. I wasn't aware that the US Govt was sterilising Native Americans and prisoners until recently. Not that it makes it any more acceptable - it's still horrifying. I can't imagine any circumstances where mass sterilisations would be acceptable these days.

There's nothing like an immigration debate to bring out some people's inner fascist (and some not-so-inner fascist too) is there?. They really bring out the worst in some people.

_____________________________



(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 7:28:30 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


If we could temporarily sterilize the males as cheaply, safely, and with as little side effects as we could the females, I would be in favor of it. But we can't. So it is a moot point. Just because something cannot be perfect does not mean that we should not do anything at all.

This sounds like it was lifted word for word from Dr Strangelove. The last people to propose and deploy mass sterilizations were the Nazis. No one would ever propose something like this if those on the receiving end were white Europeans. This is straight out of the Nazi guide on how to treat untermenschen.

Horrifying.



I thought it was straight out of the US brit playbook? First you have sterilization of indians, then:


The now-infamous 1932 Tuskegee Syphilis Study was conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service in Macon County, Alabama. During the experiment 600 impoverished black men were studied, 399 of whom had syphilis that went untreated although the health care practitioners knew of their illness. The men were never educated about syphilis, were never told of their status or treated, although treatments did exist; they were merely told they were being seen for “bad blood.” The men underwent painful procedures like spinal taps under the guise of “free healthcare,” and were “compensated” with meals and burial insurance. The intent of the study was never even to actually help the patients, but rather to examine the course of untreated dormant syphilis in black men.

But we have already seen your awesome historical recounts in the holocaust thread.

Wanna talk about US nuclear tests next?






_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 7:37:00 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


I don't think anyone opposes deporting illegal aliens.


I do. Every illegal alien we deport cost the taxpayers money.
The penality for hiring someone who has crossed the border illegally is $250,000 and five years in the federal pen for each violation. If you lock up some high profile employers no one will hire the illegals and they will self deport.
The treasury gets to sell wallmart et al to the highest bidder and the treasury will have a surplus.




(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 7:38:47 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


If we could temporarily sterilize the males as cheaply, safely, and with as little side effects as we could the females, I would be in favor of it. But we can't. So it is a moot point. Just because something cannot be perfect does not mean that we should not do anything at all.

This sounds like it was lifted word for word from Dr Strangelove. The last people to propose and deploy mass sterilizations were the Nazis. No one would ever propose something like this if those on the receiving end were white Europeans. This is straight out of the Nazi guide on how to treat untermenschen.

Horrifying.


Actually, the US government force-sterilized Native Americans up through the 1970s.

It has also happened in US women's prisons fairly recently:

http://ideas.time.com/2013/07/10/eugenics-are-alive-and-well-in-the-united-states/

https://cbhd.org/content/forced-sterilization-native-americans-late-twentieth-century-physician-cooperation-national-

Thanks for that info. I wasn't aware that the US Govt was sterilising Native Americans and prisoners until recently. Not that it makes it any more acceptable - it's still horrifying. I can't imagine any circumstances where mass sterilisations would be acceptable these days.

There's nothing like an immigration debate to bring out some people's inner fascist (and some not-so-inner fascist too) is there?. They really bring out the worst in some people.



suffice to say you arent very good at 'real' history.



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 7:43:03 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


If we could temporarily sterilize the males as cheaply, safely, and with as little side effects as we could the females, I would be in favor of it. But we can't. So it is a moot point. Just because something cannot be perfect does not mean that we should not do anything at all.

This sounds like it was lifted word for word from Dr Strangelove. The last people to propose and deploy mass sterilizations were the Nazis. No one would ever propose something like this if those on the receiving end were white Europeans. This is straight out of the Nazi guide on how to treat untermenschen.

Horrifying.


Actually, the US government force-sterilized Native Americans up through the 1970s.

It has also happened in US women's prisons fairly recently:

http://ideas.time.com/2013/07/10/eugenics-are-alive-and-well-in-the-united-states/

https://cbhd.org/content/forced-sterilization-native-americans-late-twentieth-century-physician-cooperation-national-



land of the 'free'

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 7:47:22 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


I don't think anyone opposes deporting illegal aliens.


I do. Every illegal alien we deport cost the taxpayers money.
The penality for hiring someone who has crossed the border illegally is $250,000 and five years in the federal pen for each violation. If you lock up some high profile employers no one will hire the illegals and they will self deport.
The treasury gets to sell wallmart et al to the highest bidder and the treasury will have a surplus.





We've gone after high profile tax cheats, yet people still cheat on their taxes.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 8:38:00 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


If we could temporarily sterilize the males as cheaply, safely, and with as little side effects as we could the females, I would be in favor of it. But we can't. So it is a moot point. Just because something cannot be perfect does not mean that we should not do anything at all.

This sounds like it was lifted word for word from Dr Strangelove. The last people to propose and deploy mass sterilizations were the Nazis. No one would ever propose something like this if those on the receiving end were white Europeans. This is straight out of the Nazi guide on how to treat untermenschen.

Horrifying.


Have you ever even watched Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb? I am thinking, "NO."

General Ripper was concerned about fluoride and his precious bodily fluids. The only (former) Nazi in the movie talked about men having 10 females each in order to repopulate the Earth after the radiation lessens in 93 years.

As far as temporary sterilization? What is your problem with that? What do you think oral contraception is? Depo-Provera? Implantable Rods? IUDs? All of those methods temporarily sterilize a woman.

They are working on a male contraceptive. A pill or injection that will temporarily sterilize a male.

I am not sure if you are just lying about understanding how birth control works or are just that stupid.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 8:43:45 AM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

As far as temporary sterilization? What is your problem with that? What do you think oral contraception is? Depo-Provera? Implantable Rods? IUDs? All of those methods temporarily sterilize a woman.

Would the sterilization be voluntary?

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 9:20:47 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
~FR~

The basic question neither asked nor answered here is: What harm has illegal Latino migration done to the American worker that has not been done by the export of manufacturing to Mexico and other nations? Tangentially, is the perceived harm great enough to justify the staggeringly inhumane tactics proposed by the OP? Do you all really think Mexico would not retaliate?

The Bracero program of temporary agricultural workers was done with the cooperation of the Mexican government. Good luck with that

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 9:25:27 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


I don't think anyone opposes deporting illegal aliens.


I do. Every illegal alien we deport cost the taxpayers money.
The penality for hiring someone who has crossed the border illegally is $250,000 and five years in the federal pen for each violation. If you lock up some high profile employers no one will hire the illegals and they will self deport.
The treasury gets to sell wallmart et al to the highest bidder and the treasury will have a surplus.



For some, yes, for smart illegal aliens, they would simply go online and form a corporation or LLC and then go online and get a tax number & EIN from the IRS, which btw anyone anywhere in the world (except certain countries) can do.. Then they would not be employees, they would be businesses instead.. but, imo, those are the ones you should want and provide them a way to become legal.. those are the ones that would expand their business and hire Americans, yes, they would hire Americans cuz if they are illegal themselves then to hire illegals could bring them unwanted scrutiny, which of course no illegal alien would want..

The problem in the US is that too few new businesses are being started, it is almost impossible for immigrants to start businesses here.. even student immigrants that have completed college/university and want to start a business here can not, they must leave.. I dont know if that will ever change, given the roadblocks that govt & bureaucrats put in the way, I doubt it will.. The US has a stagnant economy, its not growing anymore.. and there is no indication that is gonna get better, when the next recession comes it will get worse.. And btw, The US no longer has the most powerful economy in the world, China has surpassed the US and by 2050 India too will surpass the US..

"Put more simply: Americans are reeling from the negative effects of too little economic change, not too much. This low-dynamism era is quietly calcifying our economy, resulting in less competition, widening inequality, and fewer pathways to the American Dream.

Take the startup rate: According to the typical economic narrative, the forces of technology and globalization are destroying businesses at a more rapid pace than ever before. The data tell a very different story. The rate at which businesses close has been remarkably stable for the past 30 years and currently sits near an all-time low. What has changed – and changed dramatically – is the rate at which businesses form. In fact, the startup rate has dropped by half since the late 1970s.

Enter the Great Recession, which turned what had been a slow startup decline into an accelerated collapse. For the first time on record, the rate of business formation dropped below the rate of business closures. Even after years of economic recovery, the startup rate has barely budged from its record low. The news gets worse when it comes to geographic mobility and labor turnover rates – two important measures of dynamism that demonstrate the extent to which workers can access better opportunities. Both have fallen to historic lows.

With rates of dynamism shrinking, geographic concentration is on the rise as fewer places power national growth than ever before. Case in point: over the first five years of the recovery, five metropolitan areas alone – New York, Miami, Los Angeles, Houston, and Dallas – produced the same net increase in businesses as the rest of the country combined.

Indeed, the recession ushered in a troubling new normal: most metro areas now see more businesses close than open every year, reversing decades of nearly universal expansion. As a result, an economy that for decades added an average of over 100,000 firms per year instead had 182,000 fewer firms in 2014 than in 2007, even though GDP increased by $1.1 trillion over that period.

Voters may not be aware of the statistics, but they certainly feel their effects. President Trump carried 209 counties that had previously voted twice for President Obama. Of those counties – a diverse combination of urban, rural, and suburban areas – 75 percent saw more businesses close than open during the recovery, well above the national average."

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/02/27/trumps-quiet-economic-crisis.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/pwc-world-economy-report-us-to-fall-behind-india-and-china-by-2050-2017-2

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 10:47:20 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

As far as temporary sterilization? What is your problem with that? What do you think oral contraception is? Depo-Provera? Implantable Rods? IUDs? All of those methods temporarily sterilize a woman.

Would the sterilization be voluntary?


Of course. No one would be forcing them to come into the USA and be harvest workers.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 10:49:46 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

The thing about illegal immigration isn't that it's not a problem, it's that there is no magic bullet. Amnesty seemed like the cheapest, best way to solve at least part of the problem-- that of illegals undercutting legals.

I really don't think that putting RFID chips in people, mining the border and detaining people in horrifying nightmare prisons would go over well with human rights commissions. Maybe it makes you feel good to imagine people you don't like suffering, but others prefer reason to revenge.

To be honest, I don't think it's worse than the wealthy criminals from Russia and China inflating real estate prices to launder their money... those people are fucking scum. Oh yeah, and they won't be touched because Trump was heavily involved with said schemes.



Seriously, do you really think the US government gives a shit about the human rights commissions?

If you do, I suggest you take about 3 months off and tour the Indian Reservations in the Western United States.

Lets start with the most obvious, the average native American living on a reservation west of the Mississippi lives on less than 10k a year.
Medical care is on par with third world countries.
No jobs, and commuting is out of the question because the Government picked the locations to keep them as far away from white folks as possible.
They were told to become farmers, great idea except the land is worthless for farming, barely tolerable for raising sheep and cattle.

Then low and behold, in the forties through the 80's, pretty rich mineral deposits were found on these lands, so the BIA awarded mining contracts to white owned companies to mine the deposits, who then brought in miners to do the work and hired just the minimum number of Indians to look good and in the process polluted the land and water so much what could have been used is now toxic.

Where the EPA spent billions cleaning up super fund sites in locations close to urban areas, they spent squat cleaning up the messes that were made on reservations, since they have a low priority.

A few of those locations makes Love Canal look like central park.

And every year Amnesty International lists all those things as human rights violations committed by the US.

And every year the US government ignores that part of the report.

And ANY organization formed by Native Americans ends to bring these things to light ends up on some DoJ list as subversive.

And these are American citizens.

So, with that in mind, if we can treat a segment of our own people like human garbage, why not mine the border and let a couple thousand people ignore warning signs and get their asses blown to hell?



_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 10:53:06 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

~FR~

The basic question neither asked nor answered here is: What harm has illegal Latino migration done to the American worker that has not been done by the export of manufacturing to Mexico and other nations? Tangentially, is the perceived harm great enough to justify the staggeringly inhumane tactics proposed by the OP? Do you all really think Mexico would not retaliate?

The Bracero program of temporary agricultural workers was done with the cooperation of the Mexican government. Good luck with that



What is the unemployment level for blacks and other POC? What is the unemployment level for those without a HS diploma or college degree? What are the crime levels? Substance abuse levels? Homelessness?

Yes, I would say the harm has been real.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 11:55:59 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

~FR~

The basic question neither asked nor answered here is: What harm has illegal Latino migration done to the American worker that has not been done by the export of manufacturing to Mexico and other nations? Tangentially, is the perceived harm great enough to justify the staggeringly inhumane tactics proposed by the OP? Do you all really think Mexico would not retaliate?

The Bracero program of temporary agricultural workers was done with the cooperation of the Mexican government. Good luck with that



What is the unemployment level for blacks and other POC? What is the unemployment level for those without a HS diploma or college degree? What are the crime levels? Substance abuse levels? Homelessness?

Yes, I would say the harm has been real.

For all of this you blame undocumented immigration from Latin America. However, the unemployment racial gap began in the 1950s. Not at all explained by the entrance of illegals. May have something to do with reaction to Court ordered desegregation of schools in the '50s and civil rights street battles in the '60s. Or, is it your position that biased hiring and layoffs did not exist? Furthermore, How do you correlate the unemployment of college educated blacks with the influx of illiterate farm workers and hotel maids?

My question remains: how has the import of foreign workers been more detrimental than the export of jobs?

I'll wait for your answer.



_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 12:07:58 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

~FR~

The basic question neither asked nor answered here is: What harm has illegal Latino migration done to the American worker that has not been done by the export of manufacturing to Mexico and other nations? Tangentially, is the perceived harm great enough to justify the staggeringly inhumane tactics proposed by the OP? Do you all really think Mexico would not retaliate?

The Bracero program of temporary agricultural workers was done with the cooperation of the Mexican government. Good luck with that



What is the unemployment level for blacks and other POC? What is the unemployment level for those without a HS diploma or college degree? What are the crime levels? Substance abuse levels? Homelessness?

Yes, I would say the harm has been real.

For all of this you blame undocumented immigration from Latin America. However, the unemployment racial gap began in the 1950s. Not at all explained by the entrance of illegals. May have something to do with reaction to Court ordered desegregation of schools in the '50s and civil rights street battles in the '60s. Or, is it your position that biased hiring and layoffs did not exist? Furthermore, How do you correlate the unemployment of college educated blacks with the influx of illiterate farm workers and hotel maids?

My question remains: how has the import of foreign workers been more detrimental than the export of jobs?

I'll wait for your answer.





It hasnt, which is why I say tax the shit out of US companies that move jobs overseas.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 12:13:50 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

~FR~

The basic question neither asked nor answered here is: What harm has illegal Latino migration done to the American worker that has not been done by the export of manufacturing to Mexico and other nations? Tangentially, is the perceived harm great enough to justify the staggeringly inhumane tactics proposed by the OP? Do you all really think Mexico would not retaliate?

The Bracero program of temporary agricultural workers was done with the cooperation of the Mexican government. Good luck with that



What is the unemployment level for blacks and other POC? What is the unemployment level for those without a HS diploma or college degree? What are the crime levels? Substance abuse levels? Homelessness?

Yes, I would say the harm has been real.

For all of this you blame undocumented immigration from Latin America. However, the unemployment racial gap began in the 1950s. Not at all explained by the entrance of illegals. May have something to do with reaction to Court ordered desegregation of schools in the '50s and civil rights street battles in the '60s. Or, is it your position that biased hiring and layoffs did not exist? Furthermore, How do you correlate the unemployment of college educated blacks with the influx of illiterate farm workers and hotel maids?

My question remains: how has the import of foreign workers been more detrimental than the export of jobs?

I'll wait for your answer.





It hasnt, which is why I say tax the shit out of US companies that move jobs overseas.


Perhaps we should plant land mines around the peripheries of corporations who intend to move jobs overseas.




_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 12:13:53 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
A punitive import duty on goods manufactured abroad would be a quick and easy way around corporate tax evasion, come to that.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 12:14:53 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

A punitive import duty on goods manufactured abroad would be a quick and easy way around corporate tax evasion, come to that.

And start a yuuuuuge trade war? Yayyyy . . .

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Stupid question Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094