Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Stupid question


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Stupid question Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 12:18:37 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
That's the problem with simplistic solutions to complex problems: thy often have side effects.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 1:50:36 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Actually, since these companies are making the products outside the US for sale INSIDE the US, a tax on off shore revenues, which is what it amounts to.

Either that, or just eliminate any tax breaks in the corporate tax code for companies with more than a quarter of their production over seas.

Of course their reasoning is that US labor costs too much.

Now, if I remember the accounting course I took to get an associates in business administration prior to forming my own business, labor was an expense.

Now, you pay taxes on profits in a business so....

Profits=Income-expenses

Now, the story is that higher labor equals higher price for the product.

If that is true, please explain why a unit made in an overseas factory with lower labor costs and brought to the states for sale to American consumers costs exactly the same as a product made in the states with higher labor costs?

The truth is that these people are going to charge the higher price on everything and fuck the consumer, contrary to the story they are telling everyone.

Moving jobs overseas had zero to do with keeping the end price down, and everything to do with fucking the American worker.

So it boils down to, we are going to lie about why we moved jobs to Mexico, or China, and charge the same amount as the units made in the US, simply because we dont have to pay taxes on foreign revenues, even if it ends up in American bank accounts, and you poor idiots are so stupid you wont figure it out.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 1:56:26 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Actually, since these companies are making the products outside the US for sale INSIDE the US, a tax on off shore revenues, which is what it amounts to.

Either that, or just eliminate any tax breaks in the corporate tax code for companies with more than a quarter of their production over seas.

Of course their reasoning is that US labor costs too much.

Now, if I remember the accounting course I took to get an associates in business administration prior to forming my own business, labor was an expense.

Now, you pay taxes on profits in a business so....

Profits=Income-expenses

Now, the story is that higher labor equals higher price for the product.

If that is true, please explain why a unit made in an overseas factory with lower labor costs and brought to the states for sale to American consumers costs exactly the same as a product made in the states with higher labor costs?

The truth is that these people are going to charge the higher price on everything and fuck the consumer, contrary to the story they are telling everyone.

Moving jobs overseas had zero to do with keeping the end price down, and everything to do with fucking the American worker.

So it boils down to, we are going to lie about why we moved jobs to Mexico, or China, and charge the same amount as the units made in the US, simply because we dont have to pay taxes on foreign revenues, even if it ends up in American bank accounts, and you poor idiots are so stupid you wont figure it out.


No... it had everything to do with increasing profits... the primary motivation of all 'For-profit' organizations. Fucking over the American worker was just a bad side effect for American workers.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 2:16:19 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

It hasnt, which is why I say tax the shit out of US companies that move jobs overseas.


Practically all the jobs that companies want to move offshore are already offshore.. you are closing the barn door after the horses have been long gone outta the barn..

What you and your kids and grandkids should be afraid of are the robots, the automation and AI.. a recent study determined that 45% of the jobs are gonna be gone in 20 years but many (including me) think that is gonna happen a lot faster than that.. what do you think that is gonna do to your country? people are blaming immigrants when no one said boo to all the US factories that replaced humans with machines to make cars, etc.. this is not new but it is now accelerating fast.. they have already tested driverless trucks and also driverless busses, all driving jobs for humans will disappear quickly, and thats just one example.. its not just happening here, its happening worldwide.. people need to get their shite together and stop sitting on their arses waiting for the government to "do something".. jmo..

"In the early 1980’s, 20 million Americans worked in factories, assembling consumer products like cars and appliances.
Well, what happened after that?

And when one worker — with the help of a robot army — can do what used to require 100 workers… well, you don’t need 100 workers anymore. You just need one.

The Changying Precision Technology Company manufactures parts for mobile phones. It has 60 robot arms that work on 10 production lines that run 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Each production line has 3 human workers who monitor the robots.
Before these new robots arrived, the factory needed 650 human workers to be able to operate. Now it just needs 30.
Since this factory laid off 95% of its workers, and handed over the task of manufacturing to the machines, its defect rate has dropped by 400%, and its overall output has nearly tripled.

And keep in mind— we’re not talking about the US, where the humans manufacturing workers earn an average of $20 per hour. We’re talking about China, where the average factory worker makes closer to $2 per hour.
This means that if US-based manufacturers took cost cutting as seriously as they are in China, they could afford to spend 10 times as much money automating away each human worker.
In other words, regardless of which country the manufacturing takes place, it’s just a matter of time before most of its physical “building” part of it will be done by robots."


https://medium.freecodecamp.com/we-cant-bring-back-the-old-manufacturing-jobs-12214a0ab057#.7ufpf3uq5


_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 2:50:11 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

people need to get their shite together and stop sitting on their arses waiting for the government to "do something"

So, Bernie Sanders was right? Universal free college education?

And why then is the OP so exorcised about illegal immigrants present in our land; they make up about 3% of the population.

Asking Jeff.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 2:54:40 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

It hasnt, which is why I say tax the shit out of US companies that move jobs overseas.


Practically all the jobs that companies want to move offshore are already offshore.. you are closing the barn door after the horses have been long gone outta the barn..

What you and your kids and grandkids should be afraid of are the robots, the automation and AI.. a recent study determined that 45% of the jobs are gonna be gone in 20 years but many (including me) think that is gonna happen a lot faster than that.. what do you think that is gonna do to your country? people are blaming immigrants when no one said boo to all the US factories that replaced humans with machines to make cars, etc.. this is not new but it is now accelerating fast.. they have already tested driverless trucks and also driverless busses, all driving jobs for humans will disappear quickly, and thats just one example.. its not just happening here, its happening worldwide.. people need to get their shite together and stop sitting on their arses waiting for the government to "do something".. jmo..

"In the early 1980’s, 20 million Americans worked in factories, assembling consumer products like cars and appliances.
Well, what happened after that?

And when one worker — with the help of a robot army — can do what used to require 100 workers… well, you don’t need 100 workers anymore. You just need one.

The Changying Precision Technology Company manufactures parts for mobile phones. It has 60 robot arms that work on 10 production lines that run 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Each production line has 3 human workers who monitor the robots.
Before these new robots arrived, the factory needed 650 human workers to be able to operate. Now it just needs 30.
Since this factory laid off 95% of its workers, and handed over the task of manufacturing to the machines, its defect rate has dropped by 400%, and its overall output has nearly tripled.

And keep in mind— we’re not talking about the US, where the humans manufacturing workers earn an average of $20 per hour. We’re talking about China, where the average factory worker makes closer to $2 per hour.
This means that if US-based manufacturers took cost cutting as seriously as they are in China, they could afford to spend 10 times as much money automating away each human worker.
In other words, regardless of which country the manufacturing takes place, it’s just a matter of time before most of its physical “building” part of it will be done by robots."


https://medium.freecodecamp.com/we-cant-bring-back-the-old-manufacturing-jobs-12214a0ab057#.7ufpf3uq5



Speaking of that...

http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/minimum-wage-wendys-unleashes-1000-robots-to-counter-higher-labor-costs

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 3:51:49 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

~FR~

The basic question neither asked nor answered here is: What harm has illegal Latino migration done to the American worker that has not been done by the export of manufacturing to Mexico and other nations? Tangentially, is the perceived harm great enough to justify the staggeringly inhumane tactics proposed by the OP? Do you all really think Mexico would not retaliate?

The Bracero program of temporary agricultural workers was done with the cooperation of the Mexican government. Good luck with that



What is the unemployment level for blacks and other POC? What is the unemployment level for those without a HS diploma or college degree? What are the crime levels? Substance abuse levels? Homelessness?

Yes, I would say the harm has been real.

For all of this you blame undocumented immigration from Latin America. However, the unemployment racial gap began in the 1950s. Not at all explained by the entrance of illegals. May have something to do with reaction to Court ordered desegregation of schools in the '50s and civil rights street battles in the '60s. Or, is it your position that biased hiring and layoffs did not exist? Furthermore, How do you correlate the unemployment of college educated blacks with the influx of illiterate farm workers and hotel maids?

My question remains: how has the import of foreign workers been more detrimental than the export of jobs?

I'll wait for your answer.




We started allowing more legal immigration from under-developed countries in 1965. So illegal immigrants and folks we bring in as refugees and give amnesty to and all of that, fighting for the same jobs as our native citizens that are on the lower socio-economic ladder.

Now, we also have H-1B visa abuse going on. That needs to stop as well.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 3:55:29 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

It hasnt, which is why I say tax the shit out of US companies that move jobs overseas.


Practically all the jobs that companies want to move offshore are already offshore.. you are closing the barn door after the horses have been long gone outta the barn..

What you and your kids and grandkids should be afraid of are the robots, the automation and AI.. a recent study determined that 45% of the jobs are gonna be gone in 20 years but many (including me) think that is gonna happen a lot faster than that.. what do you think that is gonna do to your country? people are blaming immigrants when no one said boo to all the US factories that replaced humans with machines to make cars, etc.. this is not new but it is now accelerating fast.. they have already tested driverless trucks and also driverless busses, all driving jobs for humans will disappear quickly, and thats just one example.. its not just happening here, its happening worldwide.. people need to get their shite together and stop sitting on their arses waiting for the government to "do something".. jmo..

"In the early 1980’s, 20 million Americans worked in factories, assembling consumer products like cars and appliances.
Well, what happened after that?

And when one worker — with the help of a robot army — can do what used to require 100 workers… well, you don’t need 100 workers anymore. You just need one.

The Changying Precision Technology Company manufactures parts for mobile phones. It has 60 robot arms that work on 10 production lines that run 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Each production line has 3 human workers who monitor the robots.
Before these new robots arrived, the factory needed 650 human workers to be able to operate. Now it just needs 30.
Since this factory laid off 95% of its workers, and handed over the task of manufacturing to the machines, its defect rate has dropped by 400%, and its overall output has nearly tripled.

And keep in mind— we’re not talking about the US, where the humans manufacturing workers earn an average of $20 per hour. We’re talking about China, where the average factory worker makes closer to $2 per hour.
This means that if US-based manufacturers took cost cutting as seriously as they are in China, they could afford to spend 10 times as much money automating away each human worker.
In other words, regardless of which country the manufacturing takes place, it’s just a matter of time before most of its physical “building” part of it will be done by robots."


https://medium.freecodecamp.com/we-cant-bring-back-the-old-manufacturing-jobs-12214a0ab057#.7ufpf3uq5



Speaking of that...

http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/minimum-wage-wendys-unleashes-1000-robots-to-counter-higher-labor-costs


The Kiosks will work great for the first 30 days and then you KNOW what is going to happen!

"Well. . . I was out late last night with the drink machine. You know how it goes. . ."

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 5:54:42 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

It hasnt, which is why I say tax the shit out of US companies that move jobs overseas.


Practically all the jobs that companies want to move offshore are already offshore.. you are closing the barn door after the horses have been long gone outta the barn..

What you and your kids and grandkids should be afraid of are the robots, the automation and AI.. a recent study determined that 45% of the jobs are gonna be gone in 20 years but many (including me) think that is gonna happen a lot faster than that.. what do you think that is gonna do to your country? people are blaming immigrants when no one said boo to all the US factories that replaced humans with machines to make cars, etc.. this is not new but it is now accelerating fast.. they have already tested driverless trucks and also driverless busses, all driving jobs for humans will disappear quickly, and thats just one example.. its not just happening here, its happening worldwide.. people need to get their shite together and stop sitting on their arses waiting for the government to "do something".. jmo..

"In the early 1980’s, 20 million Americans worked in factories, assembling consumer products like cars and appliances.
Well, what happened after that?

And when one worker — with the help of a robot army — can do what used to require 100 workers… well, you don’t need 100 workers anymore. You just need one.

The Changying Precision Technology Company manufactures parts for mobile phones. It has 60 robot arms that work on 10 production lines that run 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Each production line has 3 human workers who monitor the robots.
Before these new robots arrived, the factory needed 650 human workers to be able to operate. Now it just needs 30.
Since this factory laid off 95% of its workers, and handed over the task of manufacturing to the machines, its defect rate has dropped by 400%, and its overall output has nearly tripled.

And keep in mind— we’re not talking about the US, where the humans manufacturing workers earn an average of $20 per hour. We’re talking about China, where the average factory worker makes closer to $2 per hour.
This means that if US-based manufacturers took cost cutting as seriously as they are in China, they could afford to spend 10 times as much money automating away each human worker.
In other words, regardless of which country the manufacturing takes place, it’s just a matter of time before most of its physical “building” part of it will be done by robots."


https://medium.freecodecamp.com/we-cant-bring-back-the-old-manufacturing-jobs-12214a0ab057#.7ufpf3uq5



Speaking of that...

http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/minimum-wage-wendys-unleashes-1000-robots-to-counter-higher-labor-costs


It doesnt actually matter what the minimum wage is or what they pay their workers, you do realize that these companies, especially the largest ones, they are gonna replace humans with robots regardless.. Wendy's didnt invent these robots, a company did and once one company starts using them, all the other ones will follow & get robots just to compete and maximize profits.. these robots pay for themselves in 2 years, no matter how little a human worker is paid, that is impossible to compete with..

If a cheap labor factory worker paid $2/hr in China can lose his job to a robot, no one is safe if their job can be done by a robot instead.. and robots are getting "smarter", in that they are increasingly able to do more and more complex "work".. which means more and more jobs that used to be safe from automation, now arent.. seriously, 10 years ago, who woulda thunk a bus/truck/car could drive itself thru rush hour traffic???

"“The automation of factories has already decimated jobs in traditional manufacturing, and the rise of artificial intelligence is likely to extend this job destruction deep into the middle classes, with only the most caring, creative or supervisory roles remaining.” — Stephen Hawking

Transportation and warehousing employ 5 million Americans
Those self-driving cars you keep hearing about are about to replace a lot of human workers.
Currently in the US, there are:
• 600,000 Uber drivers
• 181,000 taxi drivers
• 168,000 transit bus drivers
• 505,000 school bus drivers
There’s also around 1 million truck drivers in the US. And Uber just bought a self-driving truck company.
As self driving cars become legal in more states, we’ll see a rapid automation of all of these driving jobs. If a one-time $30,000 truck retrofit can replace a $40,000 per year human trucker, there will soon be a million truckers out of work."


https://medium.freecodecamp.com/bill-gates-and-elon-musk-just-warned-us-about-the-one-thing-politicians-are-too-scared-to-talk-8db9815fd398#.m4so8nybl


_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 6:24:13 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

We started allowing more legal immigration from under-developed countries in 1965. So illegal immigrants and folks we bring in as refugees and give amnesty to and all of that, fighting for the same jobs as our native citizens that are on the lower socio-economic ladder.

Now, we also have H-1B visa abuse going on. That needs to stop as well.


The data shows the opposite. In a comprehensive analysis of census data, Jack Strauss found in a report last year (2014) for the American Immigration Council that immigration from Latin America improves not only wages but job opportunities for African Americans.

Census data on cities with greater immigration from Latin America shows that for every 1 percent increase in a city’s share of Latinos:

African American median and mean wages increase by 3 percent.
The city experiences a 1.6 percent increase in relatively well-off African Americans and fall in poor African-Americans.
A 1.4 percent increase in employment rates Among African Americans.
Across different age groups, the 1 percent increase in Latinos yields approximately 1.1 to 2.3 percent fewer African Americans in poverty in the same age group.

Ultimately, even controlling for other possible causes of economic growth in cities, the analysis found “very significant and robust” evidence that African Americans in cities with more Latino immigration “experience much higher wages, lower unemployment, and higher job creation.”


READ HERE

If you have any data to support your claim please share it.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 7:24:51 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
It doesnt actually matter what the minimum wage is or what they pay their workers, you do realize that these companies, especially the largest ones, they are gonna replace humans with robots regardless.. Wendy's didnt invent these robots, a company did and once one company starts using them, all the other ones will follow & get robots just to compete and maximize profits.. these robots pay for themselves in 2 years, no matter how little a human worker is paid, that is impossible to compete with..
If a cheap labor factory worker paid $2/hr in China can lose his job to a robot, no one is safe if their job can be done by a robot instead.. and robots are getting "smarter", in that they are increasingly able to do more and more complex "work".. which means more and more jobs that used to be safe from automation, now arent.. seriously, 10 years ago, who woulda thunk a bus/truck/car could drive itself thru rush hour traffic???


Know what else robots do? They do the jobs that are less safe for humans. Robots are easier to replace than a human, and some jobs are better done risking a robot than a human life. They tend to be more accurate, reliable (in production), and offer more repeatable production. Where I work, we could significantly improve our customer scores by replacing the source of the majority of our issues: humans.

People on here argue as if it's a business's job to employ people. That's not the case at all. A business's prime objective is to put out a viable product at a price that both covers their costs plus some, and people are actually willing to buy at that price. It only needs to employ as many people as it determines is best. Why is that so difficult a concept to grasp?

Lib's and Dem's need to put their money where their mouths are, and create businesses to employ people. And, let them pay them whatever they want to pay them, $10/hr, $15/hr, $1B/hr. Whatever.

Gotta wonder why that isn't happening like crazy.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 8:22:49 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
It doesnt actually matter what the minimum wage is or what they pay their workers, you do realize that these companies, especially the largest ones, they are gonna replace humans with robots regardless.. Wendy's didnt invent these robots, a company did and once one company starts using them, all the other ones will follow & get robots just to compete and maximize profits.. these robots pay for themselves in 2 years, no matter how little a human worker is paid, that is impossible to compete with..
If a cheap labor factory worker paid $2/hr in China can lose his job to a robot, no one is safe if their job can be done by a robot instead.. and robots are getting "smarter", in that they are increasingly able to do more and more complex "work".. which means more and more jobs that used to be safe from automation, now arent.. seriously, 10 years ago, who woulda thunk a bus/truck/car could drive itself thru rush hour traffic???


Know what else robots do? They do the jobs that are less safe for humans. Robots are easier to replace than a human, and some jobs are better done risking a robot than a human life. They tend to be more accurate, reliable (in production), and offer more repeatable production. Where I work, we could significantly improve our customer scores by replacing the source of the majority of our issues: humans.

People on here argue as if it's a business's job to employ people. That's not the case at all. A business's prime objective is to put out a viable product at a price that both covers their costs plus some, and people are actually willing to buy at that price. It only needs to employ as many people as it determines is best. Why is that so difficult a concept to grasp?

Lib's and Dem's need to put their money where their mouths are, and create businesses to employ people. And, let them pay them whatever they want to pay them, $10/hr, $15/hr, $1B/hr. Whatever.

Gotta wonder why that isn't happening like crazy.



Sure, robots do all of that, I never said they didnt.

I never said it was the function of business to employ people but many businesses do need them (for now) to do the work, the services & make products, etc.

What I (not just me either) have said was that people need to wake up to the real threat (imo) to their livelihood and not rely on the govt (who has sold ya out time after time after time), people whose jobs can be automated (like drivers) need to come up with their Plan B and start working on that now.. If they dont, by the time it happens to them/their job it will be too late..

Why is it up to Libs & Dems to create businesses to employ people? Isnt that what Trump campaigned on and said he would do, Make America Great Again & all that shite? He won, thats on him now.. Just sayin'..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 8:24:42 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
Maybe it will end up that robots do all of the work and instead of printing money, everyone will be given x number of points every week to use instead of money. Maybe the idea of having to 'earn' it will dissipate and it will just be given to everyone... like giving tickets to a kid at an amusement park.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 8:46:57 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Maybe it will end up that robots do all of the work and instead of printing money, everyone will be given x number of points every week to use instead of money. Maybe the idea of having to 'earn' it will dissipate and it will just be given to everyone... like giving tickets to a kid at an amusement park.


Businesses arent gonna want your points, they want real money to give to their shareholders & overpaid CEOs, your landlord/mortgage company isnt gonna want stinkin' points, they want real money, the grocery store doesnt want points, they want real money. Where are you going to get money to pay for all that or are ya gonna live in a cardboard box under a bridge? Who is gonna give that to you & all the others whose jobs have been "stolen" by robots? Are there any politicians talking about this & what they are gonna do with the 45% whose jobs are soon gone?

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 9:02:25 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Maybe it will end up that robots do all of the work and instead of printing money, everyone will be given x number of points every week to use instead of money. Maybe the idea of having to 'earn' it will dissipate and it will just be given to everyone... like giving tickets to a kid at an amusement park.


Maybe rich people will have armies of robot servants while everyone else dies jobless, homeless and alone in the streets.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 9:03:18 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
When you come to think of it, money is basically only 'points' or 'credits' under a different name, with the amount you have or own or whatever, printed on pieces of paper. They are a man-made concept and it really doesn't matter what you call them. they come back to the same thing........................the power behind that dollar, credit or point. People are already having their wages paid into their bank accounts and using their bankcards to purchase goods. Some rarely ever handle paper or coin money...........Where is the difference ?

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 11:38:55 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

As far as temporary sterilization? What is your problem with that? What do you think oral contraception is? Depo-Provera? Implantable Rods? IUDs? All of those methods temporarily sterilize a woman.

Would the sterilization be voluntary?

I very much get the impression that Aylee wants compulsory sterilisation before entry into the US is granted. Her post wouldn't make any sense at all if the sterilisation she is proposing is voluntary and penalty free. No one would have an issue if a sterilisation program was entirely voluntary and penalty free but clearly Aylee wants to deny entry to the US to those who decline to be sterilised.

It is precisely the draconian nature of compulsory sterilisation that is objectionable and the substance of my objection. Compulsory sterilisation programs, with or without the free and fully informed consent of the person undergoing sterilisation are anathema to anyone who values human rights and freedom. It is unclear whether her proposal would apply to all people entering the USA, or just certain types of people entering at selected entry points.

Anything less than universal application would raise the ugly sceptre of racism. Yet it seems unlikely that Aylee had affluent Europeans or Aussies in mind when she advanced her proposal. In her own words: "I was referring to migrant farm workers for harvests So this would only be directed at Latinos and South Americans which make her proposal racist to its core.

People like Aylee who propose such programs are more than just violating the human rights of those she wishes to subject to her horrifying scheme, they are displaying naked contempt for those human rights.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 2/28/2017 11:43:30 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Stupid question - 3/1/2017 4:06:13 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Maybe it will end up that robots do all of the work and instead of printing money, everyone will be given x number of points every week to use instead of money. Maybe the idea of having to 'earn' it will dissipate and it will just be given to everyone... like giving tickets to a kid at an amusement park.


Why is that a bad thing?

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Stupid question - 3/1/2017 5:02:17 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: tamaka

Maybe it will end up that robots do all of the work and instead of printing money, everyone will be given x number of points every week to use instead of money. Maybe the idea of having to 'earn' it will dissipate and it will just be given to everyone... like giving tickets to a kid at an amusement park.


Why is that a bad thing?


Because those who like to make out that they're the last people left with a work ethic will lose whining rights about the lazy scum who don't want to work and just expect a hand out from the government for merely existing, obviously.


_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Stupid question - 3/1/2017 5:35:27 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Maybe it will end up that robots do all of the work and instead of printing money, everyone will be given x number of points every week to use instead of money. Maybe the idea of having to 'earn' it will dissipate and it will just be given to everyone... like giving tickets to a kid at an amusement park.


Maybe rich people will have armies of robot servants while everyone else dies jobless, homeless and alone in the streets.


A lot of those robot servants would have to be security guards ....

One of the major reasons why Disraeli, one of the founding fathers of British conservatism, thought that it might be prudent for rich people not to be so greedy as to allow too large a part of the population get too poor and desperate. You can convince a lot of people for a lot of the time that their misery is their own fault - but it's not good to push your luck too far with that line. Rightly or wrongly, a lot of the poor inevitably end up thinking that you're taking the piss, and they get angry about it ....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-nation_conservatism
(Just in case some aren't familiar.)


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Stupid question Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109