RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it"

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it"

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it"

Page: << < prev 5 6 7 8 [9]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/28/2017 6:37:34 AM

Kirata

Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

There is no distortion here... Just reality to the poor and aged that will lose their healthcare and perhaps their lives. There is no excuse for Americans to abandon, for the sake of a "free market", those that cannot afford basic healthcare for themselves and their children. Shame on you and your like.

Yeah, no. You're outta line. You both want to maximize the number of people needing healthcare who receive it at a cost they can afford, including no cost where appropriate. You only differ on the best means to assure that, and there is no reason that anyone should feel ashamed for daring to disagree with your views.

K.

(in reply to kdsub)

Profile

Post #: 161

RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/28/2017 7:07:17 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

thank you yes.

(in reply to Kirata)

Profile

Post #: 162

RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/29/2017 8:14:54 PM

kdsub

Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

There is no distortion here... Just reality to the poor and aged that will lose their healthcare and perhaps their lives. There is no excuse for Americans to abandon, for the sake of a "free market", those that cannot afford basic healthcare for themselves and their children. Shame on you and your like.

Yeah, no. You're outta line. You both want to maximize the number of people needing healthcare who receive it at a cost they can afford, including no cost where appropriate. You only differ on the best means to assure that, and there is no reason that anyone should feel ashamed for daring to disagree with your views.

K.

I don't believe I am out of line... if the Republican plan made it possible for the aged and poor to keep the same benefits under their plan for the same cost then I would agree with you. The main stream plan was bad enough but the freedom caucus is even more shameful... There is just no getting around facts... millions would be without healthcare...and some will die needlessly... Now I don't know what measure you use for shameful but it sure matches mine and it is certainly not Christian values.

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 3/29/2017 8:16:05 PM >

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Kirata)

Profile

Post #: 163