Edwird
Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle In addition, queers were subject to police harassment, physical attacks by gangs of 'queer bashers' who invariably went unpunished, and from time to time, murder. . . . So queers were forced to live their lives in the shadows, living in dread of exposure, imprisonment and ostracism. The queer rights movements that began after Stonewall in the late 1960s reversed all that. Well thank goodness. How did we ever lose that wonderful term? I'm glad somebody else has held onto it. I always liked the designation because in the first place, "queer" said "different," which always attracted me, since I was 'different' even if not attracted to males. In fact, I'm about as hyper-heterosexual as they come. I'm tired of having to distinguish between 'gay' and 'lesbian' all the time. Why can't we just do like in the good old days, say "queer" and be done with it? To tamaka; I don't know where you came upon the notion that all queers (OK, 'homosexuals') are unhappy with their congenital inclination. I've met plenty of homosexuals in r/l who quite obviously have no issue with it at all. My former career was in show business, so I'm sure I've come across more 'queers' than most people, but even still, the two guys across the hall from me and the lesbian in the next hall, none in show-biz, don't display or convey any "issues" about it at all. The lesbian emailed me a most wonderful account of my brother's (who being also my neighbor) many good deeds to her and other's benefit after I informed her of his passing, which letter I passed on to the rest of the family. Tears and sniffles. Perhaps you were thinking of queers' getting tired and annoyed at all the grief and retribution and antagonization they've gotten for just being who they were. That's not the same as being sorry for who they were.
|