RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


ThatDizzyChick -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:30:56 PM)

quote:

it does not EMBRACE dishonesty and corruption. in fact, it punishes and diminishes them.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL




Nnanji -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:31:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

and you somehow think that the need to support what one says gets thrown out the window just because of the venue?

Nope, not at all, read more carefully.

Back to hustling drunks for spare change.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:32:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

and you somehow think that the need to support what one says gets thrown out the window just because of the venue?

Nope, not at all, read more carefully.

Back to hustling drunks for spare change.

See what I mean by the hierarchy of worth?




Marini -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:36:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

So what is the solution?

Honestly? There isn't one. Communism offers the best possible model, but it runs counter to those aforementioned human traits, and so will always fail unless there is some influence that will override those traits. So far, that has only been found in extreme religiosity, but even that is not a sure counter, as many communal religious bodies/communities have fallen prey to the greed of leaders or members, etc.
Of course, even when it does manage to overcome greed, etc., it opens the believers up to manipulation and exploitation, so the strength can also be a weakness.
Rather than there being a single solution, there are some basic principles that alleviate the deliterious effects of the greed, etc., however, many of them are more or less unworkable given the curent world population and degree of urbanization.
These principles are
1. The broader the interest in an enterprise, the less subject it is to being corrupted.
2. The more closely an enterprise is connected and interdependent with it's local community, the less likely it is to be corrupted. This principle, however, often runs counter to the first.
3. The more the focus of an enterprise is on profit for profit's sake, the more susceptible it is to corruption.
4. The more diffuse the authority in an enterprise is, the less susceptible it is to corruption.

As to what is required of us (meaning people in general)
A. A fundamental shift in societal mores is required, away from individualism and the glorification of material wealth towards a greater sense of community and a broader societal acceptance of the concept of "having enough".
B. A societal shift away from the worship of excess and consumption as a measure of personal worth, basically to value people for who and what they are rather than how much they have.
C. The abandonment of the concept of a "productive member of society", and the idea of a hierarchy of worth based on what one does for a living. Garbage men and janitors are looked down on, yet our entire society would implode without them. We could not get by without them, or truck drivers, longshoremen, farm workers, grocery store cashiers, etc., yet those jobs are generally seen as being the realm of failures, of people who can't do any better (just look at how many people try to attack me for my decision to remain a barmaid rather than get some corporate job).

As you can see, the "solution" involves such a deep and fundamental change in the basic assumptions of our whole societal model as to be effectively impossible.


Thank you for writing such a thoughtful post.
I agree societal shift/or uprisings/revolution, etc. would be necessary.

I read something, I am not sure where, that I found "deep".
The premise was, that so many of those who are suffering the most, and would benefit the most---still "believe" the American dream.
We worship sports figures, celebrities, those with money, because many believe no matter what is in front of their face, that a certain status is achievable for most if not all.
The current me generation/facebook/social media/celebrity worship, etc. does not have the collective mindset to even rise up against the system that is oppressive and often holding them back.

I have said for years on here, that we will not have great societal change in America, until things get progressively worse for even greater numbers of people.
At that time, we might have a chance of introducing societal changes.

Many of the poor want to get out of poverty, the homeless want a home, the unemployed or underemployed want jobs, we want better schools, we want a better health care system, we want safer housing, we want less crime, we want better opportunities, we want and we want.

We focus on what we want in this country, rather than focusing on the economic system, BEHIND everything.
The whole system needs to be addressed.

The reason I have lost respect for most of those in the Democratic Party, is they are in bed with the soulless greedy corporate bastards, that I despise.
Have you heard about corporate liberals?
When society is willing to settle for crumbs kicked at them to placate them, there can be no significant changes.
When people are content, with the status quo, the status quo remains.




Nnanji -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:40:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

and you somehow think that the need to support what one says gets thrown out the window just because of the venue?

Nope, not at all, read more carefully.

Back to hustling drunks for spare change.

See what I mean by the hierarchy of worth?

Don't have a problem with an honest worker dearie. Hustling drunks for your gain is the problem. The attitude that you deserve and they are stupid. You're the example of exploration.




Nnanji -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:41:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

So what is the solution?

Honestly? There isn't one. Communism offers the best possible model, but it runs counter to those aforementioned human traits, and so will always fail unless there is some influence that will override those traits. So far, that has only been found in extreme religiosity, but even that is not a sure counter, as many communal religious bodies/communities have fallen prey to the greed of leaders or members, etc.
Of course, even when it does manage to overcome greed, etc., it opens the believers up to manipulation and exploitation, so the strength can also be a weakness.
Rather than there being a single solution, there are some basic principles that alleviate the deliterious effects of the greed, etc., however, many of them are more or less unworkable given the curent world population and degree of urbanization.
These principles are
1. The broader the interest in an enterprise, the less subject it is to being corrupted.
2. The more closely an enterprise is connected and interdependent with it's local community, the less likely it is to be corrupted. This principle, however, often runs counter to the first.
3. The more the focus of an enterprise is on profit for profit's sake, the more susceptible it is to corruption.
4. The more diffuse the authority in an enterprise is, the less susceptible it is to corruption.

As to what is required of us (meaning people in general)
A. A fundamental shift in societal mores is required, away from individualism and the glorification of material wealth towards a greater sense of community and a broader societal acceptance of the concept of "having enough".
B. A societal shift away from the worship of excess and consumption as a measure of personal worth, basically to value people for who and what they are rather than how much they have.
C. The abandonment of the concept of a "productive member of society", and the idea of a hierarchy of worth based on what one does for a living. Garbage men and janitors are looked down on, yet our entire society would implode without them. We could not get by without them, or truck drivers, longshoremen, farm workers, grocery store cashiers, etc., yet those jobs are generally seen as being the realm of failures, of people who can't do any better (just look at how many people try to attack me for my decision to remain a barmaid rather than get some corporate job).

As you can see, the "solution" involves such a deep and fundamental change in the basic assumptions of our whole societal model as to be effectively impossible.


Thank you for writing such a thoughtful post.
I agree societal shift/or uprisings/revolution, etc. would be necessary.

I read something, I am not sure where, that I found "deep".
The premise was, that so many of those who are suffering the most, and would benefit the most---still "believe" the American dream.
We worship sports figures, celebrities, those with money, because many believe no matter what is in front of their face, that a certain status is achievable for most if not all.
The current me generation/facebook/social media/celebrity worship, etc. does not have the collective mindset to even rise up against the system that is oppressive and often holding them back.

I have said for years on here, that we will not have great societal change in America, until things get progressively worse for even greater numbers of people.
At that time, we might have a chance of introducing societal changes.

Many of the poor, displaced, disenfranchised, "you name it", still believe in the current capitalist system of the US.

Of course all of those societal shifts to date have been at the barrel of a gun. But they don't mention that.




bounty44 -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:43:20 PM)

quote:

Isn’t capitalism immoral?

“The moral justification of capitalism does not lie in the altruist claim that it represents the best way to achieve “the common good.” It is true that capitalism does—if that catch-phrase has any meaning—but this is merely a secondary consequence. The moral justification of capitalism lies in the fact that it is the only system consonant with man’s rational nature, that it protects man’s survival qua man, and that its ruling principle is: justice.” — AYN RAND

Capitalism is the moral system, since it is the only system that allows man to be virtuous — to pursue the good — by leaving him free to act by the use of his reason. Freedom to act is a precondition of morality. This is Capitalism’s moral justification


http://capitalism.org/category/morality/

of course this is only true if you value freedom---AND have objections to having to FORCE people to act according to other than their own best interests.




BoscoX -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:47:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

What's wrong with greed?

It leads to the exploitation and abuse of others. Slavery is a result of greed. Bhopal was a result of greed. Love canal was the result of greed.



If you really want to go there, look to communism for enslavement. Look to North Korea, the USSR.

You like your computer, obviously - thank a greedy capitalist who paid a lot of workers very handsomely to get it to you

Especially when compared to how communist systems work




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:48:44 PM)

Uprisings and revolutions will not do it, as those only result in a temporary repreive followed by a redefinition of the exploitative class. Take Russia for example, in the immediate aftermath of the revolution, the nascent structure of local soviets began the process of altering society, but Lenin and the Bolsheviks crushed them and suborned them into instruments of oppression in the service of his terror state, and suddenly the party apparatchiks appeared to replace the old aristocracy, and while the external and rhetorical trappings changed, the underlying societal value system did not.
The same process can be seen in every revolution throughout history.




BoscoX -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:49:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

Isn’t capitalism immoral?

“The moral justification of capitalism does not lie in the altruist claim that it represents the best way to achieve “the common good.” It is true that capitalism does—if that catch-phrase has any meaning—but this is merely a secondary consequence. The moral justification of capitalism lies in the fact that it is the only system consonant with man’s rational nature, that it protects man’s survival qua man, and that its ruling principle is: justice.” — AYN RAND

Capitalism is the moral system, since it is the only system that allows man to be virtuous — to pursue the good — by leaving him free to act by the use of his reason. Freedom to act is a precondition of morality. This is Capitalism’s moral justification


http://capitalism.org/category/morality/

of course this is only true if you value freedom---AND have objections to having to FORCE people to act according to other than their own best interests.


Right - capitalism allows not only unparalleled freedom, but also the pursuit of happiness




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:50:19 PM)

quote:

Of course all of those societal shifts to date have been at the barrel of a gun. But they don't mention that.

The societal shifts never happened you stupid git.




Edwird -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:51:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

and you somehow think that the need to support what one says gets thrown out the window just because of the venue?

Nope, not at all, read more carefully.

Back to hustling drunks for spare change.


Even if that be the case, as per your delusion, you should put it in plainer terms.

You have higher aspirations and more expensive tastes, so you invite the drunks up your ass to maintain the lifestyle to which you delude yourself as deserving.

That is the Republican platform, and anyone who admits to it comes clean as to what they're all about.

This is a 'safe place' for people like you.\\

OK, maybe not, but all this hair on fire crap is getting old, seriously.

There's a reason why people are spraying you, with whatever they have at hand.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:52:34 PM)

quote:

Look to North Korea, the USSR.

neither of those is communist, they are both examples of totalitarian fascistic state capitalist societies.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:54:18 PM)

quote:

capitalism allows not only unparalleled freedom, but also the pursuit of happiness

As does any socio-economic model. the fact that you think it is somehow exclusive to capitalism is proof that you don't know what capitalism is.




Marini -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:54:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

So what is the solution?

Honestly? There isn't one. Communism offers the best possible model, but it runs counter to those aforementioned human traits, and so will always fail unless there is some influence that will override those traits. So far, that has only been found in extreme religiosity, but even that is not a sure counter, as many communal religious bodies/communities have fallen prey to the greed of leaders or members, etc.
Of course, even when it does manage to overcome greed, etc., it opens the believers up to manipulation and exploitation, so the strength can also be a weakness.
Rather than there being a single solution, there are some basic principles that alleviate the deliterious effects of the greed, etc., however, many of them are more or less unworkable given the curent world population and degree of urbanization.
These principles are
1. The broader the interest in an enterprise, the less subject it is to being corrupted.
2. The more closely an enterprise is connected and interdependent with it's local community, the less likely it is to be corrupted. This principle, however, often runs counter to the first.
3. The more the focus of an enterprise is on profit for profit's sake, the more susceptible it is to corruption.
4. The more diffuse the authority in an enterprise is, the less susceptible it is to corruption.

As to what is required of us (meaning people in general)
A. A fundamental shift in societal mores is required, away from individualism and the glorification of material wealth towards a greater sense of community and a broader societal acceptance of the concept of "having enough".
B. A societal shift away from the worship of excess and consumption as a measure of personal worth, basically to value people for who and what they are rather than how much they have.
C. The abandonment of the concept of a "productive member of society", and the idea of a hierarchy of worth based on what one does for a living. Garbage men and janitors are looked down on, yet our entire society would implode without them. We could not get by without them, or truck drivers, longshoremen, farm workers, grocery store cashiers, etc., yet those jobs are generally seen as being the realm of failures, of people who can't do any better (just look at how many people try to attack me for my decision to remain a barmaid rather than get some corporate job).

As you can see, the "solution" involves such a deep and fundamental change in the basic assumptions of our whole societal model as to be effectively impossible.


Thank you for writing such a thoughtful post.
I agree societal shift/or uprisings/revolution, etc. would be necessary.

I read something, I am not sure where, that I found "deep".
The premise was, that so many of those who are suffering the most, and would benefit the most---still "believe" the American dream.
We worship sports figures, celebrities, those with money, because many believe no matter what is in front of their face, that a certain status is achievable for most if not all.
The current me generation/facebook/social media/celebrity worship, etc. does not have the collective mindset to even rise up against the system that is oppressive and often holding them back.

I have said for years on here, that we will not have great societal change in America, until things get progressively worse for even greater numbers of people.
At that time, we might have a chance of introducing societal changes.

Many of the poor, displaced, disenfranchised, "you name it", still believe in the current capitalist system of the US.

Of course all of those societal shifts to date have been at the barrel of a gun. But they don't mention that.


Well well
Do you think the powers that be, behind everything, are going to welcome significant societal and economic changes?

Another question could be, is the current American system sustainable indefinitely?




Nnanji -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:56:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Of course all of those societal shifts to date have been at the barrel of a gun. But they don't mention that.

The societal shifts never happened you stupid git.

Of course they didn't because those societal shifts are contrary to human nature no matter what method you attempt to bring them about. It didn't make the impact of the barrel of the gun any less however.




Edwird -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 6:59:52 PM)

~FR~

I don't know how anyone with any semblance of 'own mind' could advocate whatever is being proposed by -ideology- of any sort.

First of all, we are mislead, and some apparently deluded, by this fatuous notion that it can all be figured out at a certain moment in history. That is as far away from reality as it gets.




Nnanji -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 7:06:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Look to North Korea, the USSR.

neither of those is communist, they are both examples of totalitarian fascistic state capitalist societies.

I believe that the NK regime frankly doesn't even give lip service to communism. I believe that the USSR was the inevitable attempt at those societal shifts you discuss. So it appears I'd have to agree with you. However, if you get 12 socialists/communists in a room together you'll get 15 definitions of socialism/communism and, at least the early, USSR would not only not agree with you but would probably stand you against a wall. I'm sure if Che was in town they'd do it to get him all hot and bothered.




BoscoX -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 7:12:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Look to North Korea, the USSR.

neither of those is communist, they are both examples of totalitarian fascistic state capitalist societies.

I believe that the NK regime frankly doesn't even give lip service to communism. I believe that the USSR was the inevitable attempt at those societal shifts you discuss. So it appears I'd have to agree with you. However, if you get 12 socialists/communists in a room together you'll get 15 definitions of socialism/communism and, at least the early, USSR would not only not agree with you but would probably stand you against a wall. I'm sure if Che was in town they'd do it to get him all hot and bothered.


That NK may not be "genuine" communism isn't much comfort to the people who suffer there

Communism starts with grandiose promises and ends with enslavement

NK is in fact the end product of communism




Nnanji -> RE: The Swedish socialist utopia (8/22/2017 7:16:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

So what is the solution?

Honestly? There isn't one. Communism offers the best possible model, but it runs counter to those aforementioned human traits, and so will always fail unless there is some influence that will override those traits. So far, that has only been found in extreme religiosity, but even that is not a sure counter, as many communal religious bodies/communities have fallen prey to the greed of leaders or members, etc.
Of course, even when it does manage to overcome greed, etc., it opens the believers up to manipulation and exploitation, so the strength can also be a weakness.
Rather than there being a single solution, there are some basic principles that alleviate the deliterious effects of the greed, etc., however, many of them are more or less unworkable given the curent world population and degree of urbanization.
These principles are
1. The broader the interest in an enterprise, the less subject it is to being corrupted.
2. The more closely an enterprise is connected and interdependent with it's local community, the less likely it is to be corrupted. This principle, however, often runs counter to the first.
3. The more the focus of an enterprise is on profit for profit's sake, the more susceptible it is to corruption.
4. The more diffuse the authority in an enterprise is, the less susceptible it is to corruption.

As to what is required of us (meaning people in general)
A. A fundamental shift in societal mores is required, away from individualism and the glorification of material wealth towards a greater sense of community and a broader societal acceptance of the concept of "having enough".
B. A societal shift away from the worship of excess and consumption as a measure of personal worth, basically to value people for who and what they are rather than how much they have.
C. The abandonment of the concept of a "productive member of society", and the idea of a hierarchy of worth based on what one does for a living. Garbage men and janitors are looked down on, yet our entire society would implode without them. We could not get by without them, or truck drivers, longshoremen, farm workers, grocery store cashiers, etc., yet those jobs are generally seen as being the realm of failures, of people who can't do any better (just look at how many people try to attack me for my decision to remain a barmaid rather than get some corporate job).

As you can see, the "solution" involves such a deep and fundamental change in the basic assumptions of our whole societal model as to be effectively impossible.


Thank you for writing such a thoughtful post.
I agree societal shift/or uprisings/revolution, etc. would be necessary.

I read something, I am not sure where, that I found "deep".
The premise was, that so many of those who are suffering the most, and would benefit the most---still "believe" the American dream.
We worship sports figures, celebrities, those with money, because many believe no matter what is in front of their face, that a certain status is achievable for most if not all.
The current me generation/facebook/social media/celebrity worship, etc. does not have the collective mindset to even rise up against the system that is oppressive and often holding them back.

I have said for years on here, that we will not have great societal change in America, until things get progressively worse for even greater numbers of people.
At that time, we might have a chance of introducing societal changes.

Many of the poor, displaced, disenfranchised, "you name it", still believe in the current capitalist system of the US.

Of course all of those societal shifts to date have been at the barrel of a gun. But they don't mention that.


Well well
Do you think the powers that be, behind everything, are going to welcome significant societal and economic changes?



I'm not a conspiracy theorist like so many here. I don't set any powers to be over me. As much as people bitch about the powers that be, I know that if you get three or more people in a room pretty much nothing ever will get done. So I don't worry about imaginary boogie men controlling us all. Actually, I'm more than happy with congressional gridlock and no laws being passed because every law that is passed reduces my liberty by that much...if I acknowledge it.




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875