JVoV -> RE: Are cakes art? (9/23/2017 8:36:49 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 quote:
ORIGINAL: JVoV And the lady that sued McDonald's had a legitimate case. Please stop spreading malicious lies on the internet. From your article: quote:
Mrs. Liebeck was not driving when her coffee spilled, nor was the car she was in moving. She was the passenger in a car that was stopped in the parking lot of the McDonald’s where she bought the coffee. She had the cup between her knees while removing the lid to add cream and sugar when the cup tipped over and spilled the entire contents on her lap. Anyone stupid enough to place a to go cup of hot coffee between their knees is asking for trouble. As for the McDonald's policy of serving dangerously hot coffee, having personally gotten coffee at McDonald's in just about every state, and taking a drink almost immediately, and never once burning my mouth, this sounds like more bullshit. For this to be true, either McDonald's has its employees microwave already hot coffee to boiling or they are purchasing specially designed coffee makers that keeps coffee at the boiling point. Since the trial, McDonalds has not lowered the temperature of the coffee they serve, and according to the National Coffee Association, McDonald's has always served coffee at the desired temp of between 176 to 194 degrees, and the whole fucking reason Liebeck won the fucking case was that even though there was a warning on the cup, the jury felt it was not worded strongly enough OR written large enough. In point of fact, this case is one of the primary fucking reasons congress passed the Tort reform bills. This case is considered one of the prime examples of a frivolous lawsuit, and if McDonald's had continued its appeals, the case would have been thrown out. The reason the final settlement was reached for under 600k was that McDonald's saw no gain in financially destroying a person, which is exactly what would have happened if McDonalds had continued the court process. Hell the judge in the original case reduced the amount of damages the jury awarded, by a substantial amount, which should indicate what his thoughts were on the entire case. Meanwhile, McDonald's was dealing with similar cases by the hundreds, every year.
|
|
|
|