Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 11:59:26 AM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlackSinMaster

Imagine the planning behind this. Then imagine his motive?

Pay no heed to jlf1961 Donald Trump signs bill allowing mentally ill people to buy guns

Trump, a man, who boasted openly he could shoot anyone on 5th avenue and not lose any voters


Ignore the click bait headline.
The Obama era bill was one that removed constitutional rights without due process by removing 2nd amendment rights from veterans who had a third party listed as responsible for their bills and medical care.

Problems with the bill include,
No due process for removing civil rights.
No indication of mental health or if it is just an older relative living with younger children and the kids taking care of the bills. Just a blanket removal of rights if you had someone doing the legwork of your fiscal responsibilities.

My thesis is that civil rights should never be removed without being able to challenge in court. Due Process!!

(in reply to BlackSinMaster)
Profile   Post #: 461
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:00:12 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3657
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
The Second Amendment, as ratified by the States:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

That's all it says. Right to bear arms! It doesn't say ANY arms. And it doesn't say you can't put a maximum limit.

People will still be able to bear arms. Just selective ones. I know the fact that there are already some type of weapons that are considered illegal, so this amendment can be worked around to some kind of realistic compromise.


THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

Never mind that you completely ignored the rest of my post, explaining the Second Amendment. The right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

No other Constitutional Amendment is worded so strongly. None of them.

So presumably it's cool to complete ignore those the way a lot of "christians" ignore the whole of Leviticus besides the thing about not laying with another man as one lays with a woman.
Just out of interest, how many of the constitutional scholars/gun bunnies on here can name the other nine amendments in the original bill of rights without resorting to Google?


What's being ignored?

This has nothing to do with the freedom of speech, religion, or the press. Yes, the shooter did disrupt the concertgoers freedom of assembly, but the First Amendment technically only prohibits Congress from doing that.
We aren't dealing with the military taking over anyone's homes.
We aren't dealing with due process of the law, though I doubt the cops had a warrant to search the hotel room so quickly.
Since the shooter killed himself, he has taken full advantage of his Fifth Amendment rights.
Sixth Amendment doesn't apply, since you can't convict and punish a dead guy.
Civil suits may be possible, for wrongful death. And I hope the victims and families take everything he had.
Dead people don't get bail. And it's too late for cruel & unusual punishment.
9th & 10th Amendments don't even apply here.

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 462
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:01:47 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

A good man with a gun didn't stop him, you see, so it's unwise to mention that one.
(Really, you'd have thought that a big country concert in Nevada, somebody in the crowd would have been packing and might have shot back, wouldn't you?)


I read that there were armed roadies there. But they immediately worked it out that if they opened fire, they'd be mistaken by the cops for the perp, and get shot themselves. (However were such a mistake to have happened, of course, the judge would have completely understood the cops' position.)

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 463
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:05:24 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
The Second Amendment, as ratified by the States:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

That's all it says. Right to bear arms! It doesn't say ANY arms. And it doesn't say you can't put a maximum limit.

People will still be able to bear arms. Just selective ones. I know the fact that there are already some type of weapons that are considered illegal, so this amendment can be worked around to some kind of realistic compromise.


THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

Never mind that you completely ignored the rest of my post, explaining the Second Amendment. The right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

No other Constitutional Amendment is worded so strongly. None of them.

So presumably it's cool to complete ignore those the way a lot of "christians" ignore the whole of Leviticus besides the thing about not laying with another man as one lays with a woman.
Just out of interest, how many of the constitutional scholars/gun bunnies on here can name the other nine amendments in the original bill of rights without resorting to Google?


What's being ignored?

This has nothing to do with the freedom of speech, religion, or the press. Yes, the shooter did disrupt the concertgoers freedom of assembly, but the First Amendment technically only prohibits Congress from doing that.
We aren't dealing with the military taking over anyone's homes.
We aren't dealing with due process of the law, though I doubt the cops had a warrant to search the hotel room so quickly.
Since the shooter killed himself, he has taken full advantage of his Fifth Amendment rights.
Sixth Amendment doesn't apply, since you can't convict and punish a dead guy.
Civil suits may be possible, for wrongful death. And I hope the victims and families take everything he had.
Dead people don't get bail. And it's too late for cruel & unusual punishment.
9th & 10th Amendments don't even apply here.

I'm not talking about any other amendments applying here, just that there's always a lot more noise the second than any of the others. Was that not clear?
(You are familiar with the others, it seems, so nice work on that.)

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 464
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:14:19 PM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
There was a federal ban from 1994-2004, and when it expired nothing replaced it.
The GOP has been fighting every single new bill.

I just looked it up-- 43 states have no assault weapons ban.


Probably because an "assault weapon" is a made up term based on cosmetic appearance, has no basis in reality, police departments state it has absolutely no effect on crime to ban them, is a total waste of time, and irritates the hell out of hunters and tactical competition aficionados.

An "assault rifle" is a medium caliber, magazine fed, fully automatic rifle. An "assault weapon" is such a non item no three legislators give the same definition other than "scary looking" stuff.

BTW, if you want to own an "assault rifle" you need federal permits, an expensive tax stamp, pass an extensive background check similar to getting a SECRET secuity clearance, find a Class III firearms dealer, and pay a few thousand dollars.

An AR-15 is NOT an assault rifle and can be purchased at any local Class II firearms dealer such as a sporting goods store. ($250 to $600 depending on accouterments.)

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 465
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:15:49 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
If a deer is wounded, would it still be able to run so fast that you can't catch up with the deer to make the second shot? With a normal gun that doesn't load as fast?
I would think it would immediately go down. And as you said, "crawl off". Which is in slow motion.

No, Greta. It honestly doesn't work that way. When deer are wounded, they run to the best of their ability, meaning even up to top speed. You're talking about a scared, wounded animal that by instinct is running for it's life. You want to put the animal down, rather than let it suffer.

I've hit a deer with a car going 60 MPH. The deer ran away after the impact. I have no idea if it died from it's injuries or not.

I also wanted to add something about your comment about how it's not sportsmanship to use more than one bullet. That's nice and all, but you are conveniently forgetting that hunting isn't just sport for some people. There are still people in this country that hunt to eat/supplement their food budget. They depend on the meat from hunting to feed their families. If it takes two shots to put the deer down, it's better to do it.





_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 466
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:17:06 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
What I never get is why the second amendment is so fucking sacred that it can't be re-evaluated or changed in any way.
Seriously, it's like saying that it's an amendment and it's in the constitution equals 'time to turn off your brains and accept that there's nothing to be done here, this is just how it has to be'.

It's like people aren't allowed to adapt to modern times because history ended in the 18th century.

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 467
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:22:29 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
If you look at the number of gun deaths a year, you get 1 out of 6246 of legal gun owners responsible. Again not even 1% of the legal gun owners in the US are responsible, of course in that number you threw out there, does not even figure the number of guns used in those deaths that were stolen, or used by someone that should not, by law have a gun.

Yet every fucking time, its punish all gun owners, hold all them responsible for the actions of not even one percent of the gun owning population.

However, the same bunch is quick to say "you cannot blame all <insert group> for the actions of a small minority."


I think maybe the problem is that 'liberals' can't get into the headspace where owning a gun somehow defines you as a person the same as race, culture or religion does.

You are so persecuted because someone wants to take away your guns (which you don't need, no matter how much you want to believe you do), and yet punishing people for being mentally ill is a good idea.



tell you what old boy, you go out some night around here with a bolt action or single shot rifle to deal with a pack of wild hogs destroying pastures, hay crops, cotton fields and then tell me that you did not want something with a magazine that all you had to do was keep pulling the fucking trigger.

I have seen those fuckers shake off a 308 round and still charge the truck you are shooting from.

And before you say it was poor aim, I have seen a semi hit a wild hog and the semi needed a tow truck and the fucking hog walked away. Some of these animals are tipping the scales at 600 plus pounds.

And in parts of the country that have more abundant food supplies, some wild hogs are bumping a thousand pounds. You want to deal with this monster with a bolt action?

On the nights I go out, I earn between $200 and $500 a hog, depending on the size. And a head shot does not necessarily mean a kill, these bastards have skulls that defy description.

Of course, the state hunting laws, which apply to even hunting pest animals dont help. You are limited to straight ball ammo. Personally, I think some of these bastards would shake off armor piercing or hydroshocks.

And, if it were legal to hunt them with a belt fed machine gun, every person with a hog eradication business would do it in a heartbeat. I know one local using a fucking elephant gun.

But, I do have bolt action that, should you visit the area, I would be glad to loan you for a night of hog hunting, and after you deal with them for one night, you can give an educated opinion.

Now, I agree that one does not need an Ar15 type rifle with a 10 or 20 round mag to go deer hunting, a five round should be plenty. Hell a lever action rifle is good enough for deer, and considering that the deer around here are on the smallish side(thanks in part to the fucking hogs eating everything,) you could probably do fairly well with a freaking sling shot.




quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

What I never get is why the second amendment is so fucking sacred that it can't be re-evaluated or changed in any way.
Seriously, it's like saying that it's an amendment and it's in the constitution equals 'time to turn off your brains and accept that there's nothing to be done here, this is just how it has to be'.

It's like people aren't allowed to adapt to modern times because history ended in the 18th century.



In some respects it has, and I will explain.

Up until around 1935, a person in the US could legally buy a fully automatic Thompson submachine gun through any catalog. In fact, when Thompson could not get the military to buy his weapon, he advertised it in western states as a way to deal with various pests, such as Coyotes.

Another point, from the writing of the bill of rights until the 20th century, the weapons used by the military were either the same caliber as those that were purchased by civilians, 44, 45 long colt, 45-70 for rifles and carbines, etc.

With the exception of the trap door single shot rifles and carbines, pistols used by the military and civilians were basically the same gun.

The government's and even SCOTUS attitude started to change during prohibition, meaning that select fire guns became harder to purchase by civilians. For example the infamous Tommy gun.

They did not actually make the purchase illegal or regulated until 1986, buy all automatics that already existed could be bought and sold with no problems.

However, to purchase a machine gun or select fire weapon, the following applies:

1 You need to be eligible to possess firearms in general.

2 You must live in a state where NFA items are permitted and machine guns, specifically, are legal to possess.

3 The machine gun you wish to acquire must have been manufactured on or before May 19, 1986. That is the cutoff date for entries to be made in the NFRTR (National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record), the registry of all NFA items in the United States including machine guns.

4 You must locate a Class III dealer (FFL01+SOT) that sells or can transfer in the machine gun you wish to acquire in your state of residence.

5 You must purchase the machine gun upfront prior to transfer and have it shipped to your Class III dealer. For a full-auto M16, this will be anywhere from $12,000 and up. Typical prices for an M16 hover around $14,000 to $16,000.
Once purchased and with your dealer, the dealer will fill out the Form 4 application on your behalf to submission to the BATFE and collect your $200 NFA transfer stamp tax.

6 The application will be submitted. Now you wait 8+ months for the full FBI background check and BATFE processing to complete.

7 Once the Form 4 is processed, it will be returned to the dealer along with the tax stamp which is part of your paperwork. You can then take possession of your military grade fully automatic firearm and take it home.

8 The tax stamp must be kept with the firearm it belongs to at all times! The tax stamp is your only affirmative defense to prove you are not in possession of an illegal machine gun. The tax stamp is proof you paid the transfer tax and legally transferred the machine gun. Ranges that allow Class III will want to see the stamp. If you get pulled over and the gun is discovered/inspected, law enforcement will definitely want to see it too. You may be required to present the firearm for inspection on demand by the BATFE.

9 You may not transport the fully automatic firearm across state lines for any purpose without prior consent of the Federal government. You must request this in advance and provide details on where the firearm is going, when you are leaving and when it will return to its registered location of residence.

10 You cannot leave the presence of your fully automatic firearm. If someone else is shooting it, you must be with it, legally speaking. The one exception to this is if you have formed a legal trust for the purpose of possessing the firearm, in which case all beneficiaries of the trust (usually family or employees) may have access to the firearm.

So, contrary to popular belief, or the propaganda put out by many, the second amendment has evolved, or the laws regarding it has.

< Message edited by jlf1961 -- 10/5/2017 12:26:31 PM >


_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 468
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:23:24 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

yes and I can go on about all the victims of gun nuts. and the hypocrisy.



'Gun nuts' as in everyone that owns a gun or guns?


would you like to stick your hand up my arse and carry on telling me what I think?
You seem to be doing that a lot lately....
Its non consensual, stop it.
your attempt to dismiss deaths/victims is not working.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 469
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:24:45 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3657
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Talking about freedom especially where it concerns 'rights' is unhelpful in practically every situation.


The standard thing is to talk about 'positive rights' (freedom to) and 'negative rights' (freedom from). That way you get used to balancing - on the basis that one man's freedom often means another man's restriction. In the US gun debate, though, it's seemed to me that freedom is largely debated in terms of the positive freedom to carry a gun and use it. It doesn't seem to be talked about in terms of freedom from the fear of getting shot.


I didn't start carrying concealed because I was afraid of being shot. I was afraid of being attacked by multiple people, as I walked to my car at night after performing in drag, or just coming out of a gay bar for the night. I was afraid of my mom having to come identify my bloody remains and worrying about my smudged mascara. I was afraid of being drugged and dateraped. (I had my drink spiked no less than twice before I turned 21)

So I started carrying a small, cute Derringer in early 95. After Matthew Sheppard, I started carrying a bigger gun. (Whatever you believe of the incident, as a gay man, it scared the hell out of me)

I chose to be proactive in my personal safety. I drew my gun twice over the years, between the club and my car. And though I never had to shoot it, I know that I would have. Because I made the conscious decision not to be a victim or a statistic. Or to let anyone make me be afraid of living my life as I chose to.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 470
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:30:30 PM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

A good man with a gun didn't stop him, you see, so it's unwise to mention that one.
(Really, you'd have thought that a big country concert in Nevada, somebody in the crowd would have been packing and might have shot back, wouldn't you?)


I read that there were armed roadies there. But they immediately worked it out that if they opened fire, they'd be mistaken by the cops for the perp, and get shot themselves. (However were such a mistake to have happened, of course, the judge would have completely understood the cops' position.)


A security guard, or anyone who has passed a decent firearms safety course, could tell you that returning fire on a sniper at distance with a handgun is more likely to hit anonymous bystanders as a short barrel handgun doesn't have the range.

A really good handgunner can consistently group rounds in a target at 50 yards with a short barrel 9mm automatic such as is common with police and security guards. At 400 yards, with a short barrel such as police and security guards carry, hitting anywhere near the sniper would be a serendipitous fluke.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 471
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:37:29 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3657
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
I doubt anyone on the ground would have been able to see what floor the shooter was on, if they could even identify which hotel the shots were coming from.

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 472
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:38:16 PM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

What I never get is why the second amendment is so fucking sacred that it can't be re-evaluated or changed in any way.
Seriously, it's like saying that it's an amendment and it's in the constitution equals 'time to turn off your brains and accept that there's nothing to be done here, this is just how it has to be'.

It's like people aren't allowed to adapt to modern times because history ended in the 18th century.


The Second Amendment is not sacred. It can be changed by a bill before congress, passed by a 2/3 majority, then ratified by 3/4 of the state legislatures.

Good luck on getting enough support on the issue to pass such a change.

No matter a person's feelings on the issue of personal firearm ownership there is one underlying fact. A firearm can put a 95 lb young female on an equal footing with a 250 lb male body builder with a bludgeon.
A person firearm is a veto on the "might makes right" point of view.

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 473
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:44:26 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

yes and I can go on about all the victims of gun nuts. and the hypocrisy.



'Gun nuts' as in everyone that owns a gun or guns?


would you like to stick your hand up my arse and carry on telling me what I think?
You seem to be doing that a lot lately....
Its non consensual, stop it.
your attempt to dismiss deaths/victims is not working.




I am not dismissing anything.

I am trying very hard to make a simple point, guns or the overwhelming majority of gun owners are not now, nor ever have been the problem.

However, if you insist on using the terms that every jackass out to ban or severly regulate firearms in the US, then how in the fuck am I to know just what the fuck you mean.

I do apologize for my attitude, but this is getting fucking old.

Every anti gun liberal in the states are holding all gun owners responsible, and you are using the same damn terms they are.

The guy that buys a gun because his business has been robbed half a dozen times is a gun nut.
The guy that buys a gun because he is tired of his livestock being killed by predators is a gun nut.
The guy that buys a gun because he is sick and tired of paying out the ass for meat in a grocery store and is hunting to cut that bill is a gun nut.

Anyone that buys a gun other than a flintlock is a gun nut.

Chirst, this morning my dogs were barking at a rattlesnake so I went and got a gun to kill it. My neighbor almost walked up on the damn thing and I stopped her before she got bit so I could kill the mother fucker and I was called a gun nut.

No thank you, nothing.

Should have let the mother fucking snake bite her, but then the snake probably would have suffered given this bitches attitude.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 474
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 12:45:10 PM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline
quote:

This has nothing to do with the freedom of speech, religion, or the press. Yes, the shooter did disrupt the concertgoers freedom of assembly, but the First Amendment technically only prohibits Congress from doing that.


When an individual disrupts a peaceful assembly; that can be prosecuted as assault, criminal trespass, or even insighting a riot. Or, at lest spend a night in jail on a "disorderly conduct" charge.

It isn't a first amendment issue but a criminal conduct issue.


(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 475
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 1:23:50 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

A good man with a gun didn't stop him, you see, so it's unwise to mention that one.
(Really, you'd have thought that a big country concert in Nevada, somebody in the crowd would have been packing and might have shot back, wouldn't you?)


I read that there were armed roadies there. But they immediately worked it out that if they opened fire, they'd be mistaken by the cops for the perp, and get shot themselves. (However were such a mistake to have happened, of course, the judge would have completely understood the cops' position.)


A security guard, or anyone who has passed a decent firearms safety course, could tell you that returning fire on a sniper at distance with a handgun is more likely to hit anonymous bystanders as a short barrel handgun doesn't have the range.

A really good handgunner can consistently group rounds in a target at 50 yards with a short barrel 9mm automatic such as is common with police and security guards. At 400 yards, with a short barrel such as police and security guards carry, hitting anywhere near the sniper would be a serendipitous fluke.



I didn't think there was the slightest chance - but thanks for confirming.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 476
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 1:48:14 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3657
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

What I never get is why the second amendment is so fucking sacred that it can't be re-evaluated or changed in any way.
Seriously, it's like saying that it's an amendment and it's in the constitution equals 'time to turn off your brains and accept that there's nothing to be done here, this is just how it has to be'.

It's like people aren't allowed to adapt to modern times because history ended in the 18th century.


I said this earlier in the thread, but the Second Amendment provides American citizens with a backup plan, in case we are ever invaded. If our government fails, for any reason, then we still have a chance to carry on as a nation, under our own terms. We still have the ability to defend ourselves from invaders, and to band together as a militia to take on foreign attackers.

We weren't always the strongest nation on Earth, and it's like that we won't always be.

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 477
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 1:51:37 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3657
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

quote:

This has nothing to do with the freedom of speech, religion, or the press. Yes, the shooter did disrupt the concertgoers freedom of assembly, but the First Amendment technically only prohibits Congress from doing that.


When an individual disrupts a peaceful assembly; that can be prosecuted as assault, criminal trespass, or even insighting a riot. Or, at lest spend a night in jail on a "disorderly conduct" charge.

It isn't a first amendment issue but a criminal conduct issue.




Agreed. And this will be investigated as if there is to be a trial. But you can only prosecute the living.

This dude's gonna be spending a few nights in the morgue, and then he'll get planted, or cremated, or turned into a freakin diamond, or whatever the hell.

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 478
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 2:09:22 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3657
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

What's being ignored?

This has nothing to do with the freedom of speech, religion, or the press. Yes, the shooter did disrupt the concertgoers freedom of assembly, but the First Amendment technically only prohibits Congress from doing that.
We aren't dealing with the military taking over anyone's homes.
We aren't dealing with due process of the law, though I doubt the cops had a warrant to search the hotel room so quickly.
Since the shooter killed himself, he has taken full advantage of his Fifth Amendment rights.
Sixth Amendment doesn't apply, since you can't convict and punish a dead guy.
Civil suits may be possible, for wrongful death. And I hope the victims and families take everything he had.
Dead people don't get bail. And it's too late for cruel & unusual punishment.
9th & 10th Amendments don't even apply here.

I'm not talking about any other amendments applying here, just that there's always a lot more noise the second than any of the others. Was that not clear?
(You are familiar with the others, it seems, so nice work on that.)


It's a gun thread. The Second Amendment will always be invoked.

But there are quite a few First Amendment threads lately, specifically Freedom of Religion. Gay cakes was a big one last week or so.

The attitude of the Supreme Court concerning the Second Amendment shifted drastically after the Civil War, giving States and localities the right to legislate firearms, in every way but outright prohibiting them, and that only States had the right to organize an armed militia. This interpretation was that the Constitution only limited the Federal government. This attitude was held until 2008's District of Columbia vs Heller, which was reaffirmed and clarified in 2010's McDonald vs Chicago.

So no, the Second Amendment has not been a sacred right for many Americans.

Fun reading: https://ammo.com/articles/second-amendment-supreme-court-cases-guide

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 479
RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now - 10/5/2017 2:20:55 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
I said this earlier in the thread, but the Second Amendment provides American citizens with a backup plan, in case we are ever invaded. If our government fails, for any reason, then we still have a chance to carry on as a nation, under our own terms. We still have the ability to defend ourselves from invaders, and to band together as a militia to take on foreign attackers.

We weren't always the strongest nation on Earth, and it's like that we won't always be.


I am really struggling to think of a scenario where the US could be invaded by a foreign power at all, let alone where the only remaining defense would be citizens with guns. Even if the US military is antiquated by 2100, I still can't imagine anyone else's military becoming so powerful that the US is unable to resist, or suddenly becomes an inviting target. Are we talking about a president selling off military assets to pay off foreign debts or something?

How far into the future would we even have to go before over 7200 nukes as well as ONE of the world's most powerful militaries stopped being a deterrent? Global civilization would practically need to collapse, I think. Muskets and swords can become obsolete, but thousands of nuclear bombs will always be able to render the entire planet practically uninhabitable and probably kill off most living things. Even a limited nuclear exchange would seriously affect crop yields.

If nuclear weapons are no longer the most powerful weapons in the world, then I have no idea how it would even be possible to fight a war that would inevitably accompany an invasion.
It would just be flat out extinction at that point. So who is going to invade a country that has the ability to destroy the entire human race??? Why would anyone take the risk that they will send a few missiles flying their way?
Are we talking about weapons that can stop nukes here?

Bear in mind, you are talking about scenarios where people will still be able to fight back with guns... so not mind control weapons, cyberattacks, nanobots, drones, satellites, chemicals, biological weapons, radiation, etc.

I think this is why the gun-lovers tend to emphasize internal threats over foreign ones... they think they can fight back against the most powerful military in the world when it comes for them. How is a well-armed population going to fight back against a drone that is invisible to the naked eye, and can launch a powerful missile directly at their face without them even knowing it? By constantly shooting at random into the sky? And this is just what's available now-- this shit will only get worse and worse.

Look, I get that you're scared and a gun makes you feel safe... but does feeling safe mean you actually are safe? If you're afraid of getting jumped, why not take up self defense or a martial art? That would definitely make me feel safe-- knowing I can handle myself. Why go all the way to a weapon that could potentially be taken from you and used against you? Maybe if you have training... but I don't know how it's going to protect you if someone drops GHB into your drink.

I know I've never felt so unsafe that I needed a gun... ever. Maybe I just haven't been living the nightmare areas that everyone else seems to live in?

< Message edited by heavyblinker -- 10/5/2017 2:27:28 PM >

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 480
Page:   <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Las Vegas shooting unfolding now Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109