RE: 'SEXIST PIG'

RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

WhoreMods -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 10:39:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 seemingly double standards aside for a moment, at the same time, I see a conversation along the lines of---if women are putting their breasts on purposeful and prominent display, what do we expect to occur? women are sex objects. (have fun with that one comrades) Could it be that leftist trash wants us to all become puritan nuns in the name of political correctness No, that was Kenneth Starr, who clearly felt that a president should have his cock cut off as soon as he was sworn in so that nobody can suck it while he's in office. But...but...Hillary...opp....but...but...Ken Starr. If you'll recall, it's no longer the '90's. You should look up your whiny rules. You and your posse shut your traps about Obama and Clinton (and Carter, JFK, Johnson, probably all the fucking way back to that piece of shit Jackson), and I won't mention Starr again. Deal?

Nnanji -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 10:41:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Dear OP and all your little buddies that are sucking your tiny cock, Please buy a fucking dictionary and learn the definition of "sexist". The action shown is not "sexist" It COULD be considered 'sexual harassment' if the action causes the recipient to feel in any way uncomfortable (especially if there is some sort of power imbalance) but it is not "sexist". Just when I think you have hit rock bottom for ignorance, you grab a shovel and dig deeper.[sm=happy-smiley58.gif] I believe the term sexist comes from the article and it seems to be used in proper context. Perhaps you'll read it and see if you agree? So, an ignorant person quotes an ignorant author and the usual ignorati jump on the bandwagon in a giant circle jerk. Why am I not surprised? Apparently you didn't read the article before you posted on the OP, which would make you ignorant regarding the article. You'll have to insert that somewhere above in your statement.

Nnanji -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 10:45:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 seemingly double standards aside for a moment, at the same time, I see a conversation along the lines of---if women are putting their breasts on purposeful and prominent display, what do we expect to occur? women are sex objects. (have fun with that one comrades) Could it be that leftist trash wants us to all become puritan nuns in the name of political correctness No, that was Kenneth Starr, who clearly felt that a president should have his cock cut off as soon as he was sworn in so that nobody can suck it while he's in office. But...but...Hillary...opp....but...but...Ken Starr. If you'll recall, it's no longer the '90's. You should look up your whiny rules. You and your posse shut your traps about Obama and Clinton (and Carter, JFK, Johnson, probably all the fucking way back to that piece of shit Jackson), and I won't mention Starr again. Deal? Nope. I didn't make your rule so I don't have to adhere to it. Obama and Clinton are relevant. It's you that wants to pretend otherwise. Maybe you should just shut up about the rule and anyone can post any relevant information despite how much hearing about the foibles of the lefty loons bother you.

WhoreMods -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 10:53:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 seemingly double standards aside for a moment, at the same time, I see a conversation along the lines of---if women are putting their breasts on purposeful and prominent display, what do we expect to occur? women are sex objects. (have fun with that one comrades) Could it be that leftist trash wants us to all become puritan nuns in the name of political correctness No, that was Kenneth Starr, who clearly felt that a president should have his cock cut off as soon as he was sworn in so that nobody can suck it while he's in office. But...but...Hillary...opp....but...but...Ken Starr. If you'll recall, it's no longer the '90's. You should look up your whiny rules. You and your posse shut your traps about Obama and Clinton (and Carter, JFK, Johnson, probably all the fucking way back to that piece of shit Jackson), and I won't mention Starr again. Deal? Nope. I didn't make your rule so I don't have to adhere to it. Obama and Clinton are relevant. It's you that wants to pretend otherwise. Maybe you should just shut up about the rule and anyone can post any relevant information despite how much hearing about the foibles of the lefty loons bother you. Which is what I did, and what you whined about like a an incontinent toddler, nancy.

Hillwilliam -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 10:54:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Dear OP and all your little buddies that are sucking your tiny cock, Please buy a fucking dictionary and learn the definition of "sexist". The action shown is not "sexist" It COULD be considered 'sexual harassment' if the action causes the recipient to feel in any way uncomfortable (especially if there is some sort of power imbalance) but it is not "sexist". Just when I think you have hit rock bottom for ignorance, you grab a shovel and dig deeper.[sm=happy-smiley58.gif] I believe the term sexist comes from the article and it seems to be used in proper context. Perhaps you'll read it and see if you agree? So, an ignorant person quotes an ignorant author and the usual ignorati jump on the bandwagon in a giant circle jerk. Why am I not surprised? Apparently you didn't read the article before you posted on the OP, which would make you ignorant regarding the article. You'll have to insert that somewhere above in your statement. Actually, I did read the article. Why do you think I called the author ignorant? Just because someone writes an article doesn't mean they have a fucking clue. The only thing it means is that those who blindly support the author are even more ignorant.

Nnanji -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 10:56:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 seemingly double standards aside for a moment, at the same time, I see a conversation along the lines of---if women are putting their breasts on purposeful and prominent display, what do we expect to occur? women are sex objects. (have fun with that one comrades) Could it be that leftist trash wants us to all become puritan nuns in the name of political correctness No, that was Kenneth Starr, who clearly felt that a president should have his cock cut off as soon as he was sworn in so that nobody can suck it while he's in office. But...but...Hillary...opp....but...but...Ken Starr. If you'll recall, it's no longer the '90's. You should look up your whiny rules. You and your posse shut your traps about Obama and Clinton (and Carter, JFK, Johnson, probably all the fucking way back to that piece of shit Jackson), and I won't mention Starr again. Deal? Nope. I didn't make your rule so I don't have to adhere to it. Obama and Clinton are relevant. It's you that wants to pretend otherwise. Maybe you should just shut up about the rule and anyone can post any relevant information despite how much hearing about the foibles of the lefty loons bother you. Which is what I did, and what you whined about like a an incontinent toddler, nancy. Oh dear girl. You DID something. [sm=cheering.gif] We should all fall to our knees and praise you. [sm=happy-smiley58.gif]

WhoreMods -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 10:57:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 seemingly double standards aside for a moment, at the same time, I see a conversation along the lines of---if women are putting their breasts on purposeful and prominent display, what do we expect to occur? women are sex objects. (have fun with that one comrades) Could it be that leftist trash wants us to all become puritan nuns in the name of political correctness No, that was Kenneth Starr, who clearly felt that a president should have his cock cut off as soon as he was sworn in so that nobody can suck it while he's in office. But...but...Hillary...opp....but...but...Ken Starr. If you'll recall, it's no longer the '90's. You should look up your whiny rules. You and your posse shut your traps about Obama and Clinton (and Carter, JFK, Johnson, probably all the fucking way back to that piece of shit Jackson), and I won't mention Starr again. Deal? Nope. I didn't make your rule so I don't have to adhere to it. Obama and Clinton are relevant. It's you that wants to pretend otherwise. Maybe you should just shut up about the rule and anyone can post any relevant information despite how much hearing about the foibles of the lefty loons bother you. Which is what I did, and what you whined about like a an incontinent toddler, nancy. Oh dear girl. You DID something. [sm=cheering.gif] We should all fall to our knees and praise you. [sm=happy-smiley58.gif] I'm not putting my cock anywhere near your mouth, nancy: your mum will shout at me if you don't brush your teeth afterwards.

JVoV -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 10:59:49 AM)
Pffft there is nothing sexual or inappropriate about Ellen's pic with Katy. You know how to tell if a lesbian is sexually harassing you? She shows up with a UHaul.

Nnanji -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 11:01:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 seemingly double standards aside for a moment, at the same time, I see a conversation along the lines of---if women are putting their breasts on purposeful and prominent display, what do we expect to occur? women are sex objects. (have fun with that one comrades) Could it be that leftist trash wants us to all become puritan nuns in the name of political correctness No, that was Kenneth Starr, who clearly felt that a president should have his cock cut off as soon as he was sworn in so that nobody can suck it while he's in office. But...but...Hillary...opp....but...but...Ken Starr. If you'll recall, it's no longer the '90's. You should look up your whiny rules. You and your posse shut your traps about Obama and Clinton (and Carter, JFK, Johnson, probably all the fucking way back to that piece of shit Jackson), and I won't mention Starr again. Deal? Nope. I didn't make your rule so I don't have to adhere to it. Obama and Clinton are relevant. It's you that wants to pretend otherwise. Maybe you should just shut up about the rule and anyone can post any relevant information despite how much hearing about the foibles of the lefty loons bother you. Which is what I did, and what you whined about like a an incontinent toddler, nancy. Oh dear girl. You DID something. [sm=cheering.gif] We should all fall to our knees and praise you. [sm=happy-smiley58.gif] I'm not putting my cock anywhere near your mouth, nancy: your mum will shout at me if you don't brush your teeth afterwards. You go girl! Tell me how many more troll posts I need to respond to before you cum. I do ever so much want you to have completion.

WhoreMods -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 11:03:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 seemingly double standards aside for a moment, at the same time, I see a conversation along the lines of---if women are putting their breasts on purposeful and prominent display, what do we expect to occur? women are sex objects. (have fun with that one comrades) Could it be that leftist trash wants us to all become puritan nuns in the name of political correctness No, that was Kenneth Starr, who clearly felt that a president should have his cock cut off as soon as he was sworn in so that nobody can suck it while he's in office. But...but...Hillary...opp....but...but...Ken Starr. If you'll recall, it's no longer the '90's. You should look up your whiny rules. You and your posse shut your traps about Obama and Clinton (and Carter, JFK, Johnson, probably all the fucking way back to that piece of shit Jackson), and I won't mention Starr again. Deal? Nope. I didn't make your rule so I don't have to adhere to it. Obama and Clinton are relevant. It's you that wants to pretend otherwise. Maybe you should just shut up about the rule and anyone can post any relevant information despite how much hearing about the foibles of the lefty loons bother you. Which is what I did, and what you whined about like a an incontinent toddler, nancy. Oh dear girl. You DID something. [sm=cheering.gif] We should all fall to our knees and praise you. [sm=happy-smiley58.gif] I'm not putting my cock anywhere near your mouth, nancy: your mum will shout at me if you don't brush your teeth afterwards. You go girl! Tell me how many more troll posts I need to respond to before you cum. I do ever so much want you to have completion. I just told you: if you make me come, they'll lock me up for being a pedo.

sissificationsub -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 1:43:16 PM)
A strong entity is required then is what you are alluding too King of the worthless trolls? The Trump Curtsy Situation I have no real idea who Ellen is but if that is her wife then she has fine choice. No one played the bleeder argument yet?

bounty44 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 6:00:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Dear OP and all your little buddies that are sucking your tiny cock, its both a legitimate rib and a legitimate conversation academically. other people raise similar points and questions. intellectual articles are written about the phenomenon. that you don't see it and instead chose to be insulting simply marks you a fool. quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Please buy a fucking dictionary and learn the definition of "sexist". The action shown is not "sexist" It COULD be considered 'sexual harassment' if the action causes the recipient to feel in any way uncomfortable (especially if there is some sort of power imbalance) but it is not "sexist". as has been pointed out to you, that was the word in the ARTICLE itself and at the same time, if you weren't so frickin' hellbent on being an ass, you perhaps could reflect a bit and realize the word "sexist" gets used much more broadly than the narrow dictionary definition quite frequently. quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Just when I think you have hit rock bottom for ignorance, you grab a shovel and dig deeper.[sm=happy-smiley58.gif] see my first sentence above. by the way, since are you apparently a fan of the dictionary, look up the word "ignorant" and then visit "irony" to see if you can make the connection.

BoscoX -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 6:01:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 its a little challenge to keep up with the sarcasm over this topic but that said... lets see---women can dress in such a way as to attract attention and then in the same breath are allowed to use the phrase "unwanted attention." pointing that out is not simply "another point of view" or insightful thinking, but rather a view that is denigrated by the belittling phrase "mansplaining." did you ever notice some people are like walking clichés of liberal thought? what, is it supposed to go like this? "im sorry, excuse me, but I cannot help but notice your attractive breasts (oh wait, can I say that by way of prelude?) are purposely on display by virtue of the low cut dress you've chosen to wear. may I ask please what your purpose is in doing so? if it is to attract men's attention, do I have your permission please to give you some attention over them? " Women dress for Attention Why do women dress sexy to seek attention, but carry an attitude Do women dress revealingly in order to attract sexual actual dresses called "capture my attention" Why Do Women Wear Sexy Clothes If They Don’t Want Attention? looks like a goodie: Why do Girls Dress so Provocatively? - TheHopeLine https://www.thehopeline.com/why-do-girls-dress-so-provocatively Dawson addresses the question, "Why do girls dress so provocatively one minute, then complain that guys are superficial the next?" seems to me some women are in need of some 'splaining. unless of course half the population of the world can be reduced to "chucklehead" status because women are allowed to have their cake and eat it too. Weinstein only took things a bit further. "You sit there and have a drink while I shower" could be construed as seeking consent The gist of it is, leftists want sexual harassment to mean whatever they decide, when they decide on a case-by-case basis. "You grab 'em by the pussy and they let you" means one thing when ED acts out a similar script, and something else entirely if said by a Republican presidential candidate in private conversation years and years before seeking office Bubba Clinton can literally rape women, and Hillary can actively cover up his crimes and that's fine... And so on

bounty44 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 6:11:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX The gist of it is, leftists want sexual harassment to mean whatever they decide, when they decide on a case-by-case basis.... absolutely agree... and interestingly enough hillwilliam, if what bosco said (and I agree with) is not indeed the case, it should be no problem for a man with a large penis to set us all straight eh?

Danemora -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 6:20:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX The gist of it is, leftists want sexual harassment to mean whatever they decide, when they decide on a case-by-case basis.... absolutely agree... and interestingly enough hillwilliam, if that what bosco said (and I agree with) is not indeed the case, it should be no problem for a man with a large penis to set us all straight eh? I honestly disagree...and Bosco has already labeled me...let's see..."leftish trash," "a liberal howler," and other such Bosco drivel leaking from his gaping maw of a shit chute. My opinion is that I actually agree with the backlash Ellen Degeneres is receiving. I agree that had a man tweeted a pic of him staring the same way Ellen was, he'd be raked over the coals. Just because Ellen Degeneres is a lesbian and a female, it doesnt give her a free pass. I am a female and have a more liberal view. So its not all leftists or liberals feel the way Bosco expressed.

Wayward5oul -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 6:40:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Danemora quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX The gist of it is, leftists want sexual harassment to mean whatever they decide, when they decide on a case-by-case basis.... absolutely agree... and interestingly enough hillwilliam, if that what bosco said (and I agree with) is not indeed the case, it should be no problem for a man with a large penis to set us all straight eh? I honestly disagree...and Bosco has already labeled me...let's see..."leftish trash," "a liberal howler," and other such Bosco drivel leaking from his gaping maw of a shit chute. My opinion is that I actually agree with the backlash Ellen Degeneres is receiving. I agree that had a man tweeted a pic of him staring the same way Ellen was, he'd be raked over the coals. Just because Ellen Degeneres is a lesbian and a female, it doesnt give her a free pass. I am a female and have a more liberal view. So its not all leftists or liberals feel the way Bosco expressed. I think you stunned them into silence. [8\|]

Danemora -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 7:18:41 PM)
I figure it will take a little time to go from missile launch to missile hitting the target. Plus we have to throw in some screaming chaos time and a bit of "oh my god, what the fuck did I just read?!?!" I fully expect Bosco will do his usual, but Bounty isnt so head-up-ass connected the way Bosco is. Like Ninja, I can talk rationally with Bounty even though we dont see eye to eye

BoscoX -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 8:04:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul I think you stunned them into silence. [8\|] Few of us read her posts. She is like WDs crazy sister or mom or whatever

Danemora -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/27/2017 8:17:01 PM)
Aww, too cute. You thpught this would fix my wagon, didntcha? And yet here you come running jaws-a-snappin' to reply like a post Taco Bell foul fucking dump. The harbinger of bullshit speweth forth from his rectum of lunacy. Knew it would be that. Nothing even remotely intelligent to add, so you flings your own shit like a monkey at a zoo. Way to go, Chimp Bosco...you are a shit flinging rawkstar! Funny part is now you are my tiny little dancing monkey dancing to the tune played. That'll do, pig...that'll do [Babe movie quote] That is exactly why you are a tiny little amoeba among men. Psst...you arent even that clever or witty. Your schtick is just dated, old, and just this side of crypt dust mixed with decomposition. Shit, B..my grandpa died in 2000 and his stuff is still fresher than your offering. Im so sorry to bust your tiny little bubble...since I know that is what keeps your skull fully inflated. You're funny in a sad way, Bosco. I actually find myself feeling pity for you. Its so sad how shallow and limited your life is. Its a big world, baby...open your eyes

bounty44 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 1:28:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Danemora I am a female and have a more liberal view. So its not all leftists or liberals feel the way Bosco expressed. nothing is really monolithic, so we are either consigned to understanding that labels often speak in a general way, or doomed to have to always use modifying phrases like "I know not every liberal thinks like this but..."

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625