RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DaddySatyr -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 1:49:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Danemora

My opinion is that I actually agree with the backlash Ellen Degeneres is receiving. I agree that had a man tweeted a pic of him staring the same way Ellen was, he'd be raked over the coals. Just because Ellen Degeneres is a lesbian and a female, it doesnt give her a free pass. I am a female and have a more liberal view. So its not all leftists or liberals feel the way Bosco expressed.



I think I'll take it a step further in one way and back up a step, in another (all at the same time! Hold my beer!)

I think Ellen, being a female, it wouldn't have been such a big deal.

But then, the fact that she's a lesbian and staring at what's considered to be a sexual part on a woman ...

If she were staring at a man's junk, I would say: "Well, she's being a comedian. She doesn't like guys in that way."

So, if she were a straight woman, and this photo made its way into the public arena, she'd get the "benefit of the doubt" that she wasn't being sexual which, of course, kind of negates any cries of "sexism".

There too, is our desire (in general) to give people a pass and what I like to call the "Victimhood Olympics". There's a hierarchy of oppression that is the grass roots of identity politics. Now that homosexuality has been "main-streamed", it was just Ellen's turn in the barrel. To my mind, this means she (at least and maybe a good portion of women on the whole) have achieved equality because they're being held to the same standards as others instead of the "soft discrimination of low expectations".



Michael




Danemora -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 2:09:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Danemora
I am a female and have a more liberal view. So its not all leftists or liberals feel the way Bosco expressed.


nothing is really monolithic, so we are either consigned to understanding that labels often speak in a general way, or doomed to have to always use modifying phrases like "I know not every liberal thinks like this but..."



Thats exactly my point. You and I share vastly differing views, but you arent an obnoxious little shit about it. Bosco...on the other hand...itty bitty cock trying to be a big dick. The phrase "all hat and no cowboy" fits when describing little dude. You may know that not every X feels Y, but little dude B isnt so fortunate unfortunately. Sadly B just shit cans anyone who doesnt match his viewpoint as "leftist trash," "liberal howlers," and other such general jackassery.





heavyblinker -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 2:20:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Danemora
Thats exactly my point. You and I share vastly differing views, but you arent an obnoxious little shit about it. Bosco...on the other hand...itty bitty cock trying to be a big dick. The phrase "all hat and no cowboy" fits when describing little dude. You may know that not every X feels Y, but little dude B isnt so fortunate unfortunately. Sadly B just shit cans anyone who doesnt match his viewpoint as "leftist trash," "liberal howlers," and other such general jackassery.


I see that you haven't seen the real bounty 'oh no comrades! townhall!' 44 yet.




Danemora -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 4:24:40 AM)

I ignore the "oh no townhall comrades" stuff because it just seems really silly and nonsensical. Bosco still comes in first for top prize at the douchebag awards in my honest opinion. Because while Bounty might run around trying to rally the comrades, Bosco sits as a lone howler monley flinging his shit at anyone who happens by.




heavyblinker -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 9:01:50 AM)

I agree.
bounty isn't interesting and never offers anything of substance... sort of like Nancy without the lonely, bitter old man stuff... but he usually seems to have impulse control.

Bosco is all about gloating over points he hasn't proven. He only ever responds to strawmen, and actual communication perpetually fails. He takes pride in total, mind-blowing degrees of ignorance. He mocks people who are smarter, better informed and more rational than he is. He insults people without even knowing what the insults really mean. He is all impulse, and no actual critical thought is ever involved.

He's like that annoying douche in class who wastes everybody's time trying to humiliate the teacher, without realizing he's actually humiliating himself, and anyone who gets angry is the enemy. He is a perfect RWNJ troll... almost too perfect, actually. It's possible he's a piece of software or was grown in a lab somewhere.




sissificationsub -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 9:33:13 AM)

I know you will not read this one as you right wing nutters are blinded in ways of those brainwashed "mooselambs" you speak so highly off so I picked one clip.
Trump is very strange with his daughter


He is getting away with this (below) do none of you Americans care?

quote:

ORIGINAL: sissificationsub

Trump says sex harassment claims are fake news, but there are corroborators

“All I can say is it’s totally fake news. It’s just fake. It’s fake. It’s made-up stuff, and it’s disgraceful, what happens, but that happens in the world of politics.”
— President Trump, remarks to reporters, Oct. 16, 2017


Jacqueline Alemany of CBS News: “Obviously, sexual harassment has been in the news. At least 16 women accused the president of sexually harassing them throughout the course of the campaign. Last week, during a news conference in the Rose Garden, the president called these accusations ‘fake news.’ Is the official White House position that all of these women are lying?”

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders: “Yeah, we’ve been clear on that from the beginning, and the president’s spoken on it.”
— exchange on Oct. 27

As Alemany noted, 16 women have accused Trump of sexually harassing them. While the president dismisses this as “fake news,” the problem for the White House is that some of these women have produced witnesses who say they heard about the incident at the time — long before Trump made his political aspirations known.

Such contemporaneous accounts are essential to establishing the credibility of the allegation because they reduce the chances that a person is making up a story for political purposes. In the case of sexual allegations, such accounts can help bolster the credibility of the “she said” side of the equation. Often, a sexual assault will happen behind closed doors. The contemporary corroborators can explain what they heard at the time and whether the story being told now is consistent with how the story was told years earlier. This does not necessarily mean the allegation is true, but it does give journalistic organizations more confidence to report on the allegation.

Below is a summary of the corroborators provided by three of the women who have accusations, drawn from a fact check written during the presidential campaign. That fact check also detailed the witnesses who backed up claims of sexual accusations against former president Bill Clinton — who, like Trump, insisted the women accusing him were not telling the truth.

Readers can judge for themselves.

Kristin Anderson
Her allegation: While at a Manhattan nightclub in the early 1990s, Trump slid his fingers under her miniskirt, moved up her inner thigh and touched her vagina through her underwear.

Corroborators:

Kelly Stedman, a friend. She said she was told about the incident at a women’s brunch a few days later. The women found themselves “laughing at how pathetic it was” on Trump’s part.
Brad Trent, a New York photographer. He says he heard the story from Anderson at a dinner in 2007. “It was just girls saying stories about how they got hit on by creepy old guys,” Trent said of the conversation around the table.



Natasha Stoynoff
Her allegation: While interviewing Trump in 2005 for an article for People magazine about the first anniversary of his third marriage, Trump lured her into a room at Mar-a-Lago and abruptly kissed her, forcing his tongue down her throat. He then said they were going to have an affair.

Corroborators:

Marina Grasic, who has known Stoynoff for more than 25 years. She said she got a call from her friend the day after the attack, detailing exactly how Trump pushed Stoynoff against a wall.


Liz McNeil, at the time a reporter for People (she is now an editor). She said that she heard about the incident the day after Stoynoff returned from her assignment. “She was very upset and told me how he shoved her against a wall,” she said.

Mary Green, another People reporter (now editor) who had just returned to New York. “In an early conversation we had in her office, she told me about what happened with Donald Trump,” Green said. “She was shaky, sitting at her desk, relaying that, ‘He took me to this other room, and when we stepped inside, he pushed me against a wall and stuck his tongue down my throat. Melania was upstairs and could have walked in at any time.’ ”

Liza Hamm, part of a “tightknit’ group of friends. “Natasha has always been a vivacious person who wants to believe in the best of people, and this experience definitely messed with that outlook,” she said.

Paul McLaughlin, Stoynoff’s former journalism professor. He said Stoynoff called him at the time of the alleged incident seeking advice on how to handle it: “She didn’t know what to do, she was very conflicted, she was angry, she was really confused about how to deal with this.” After a discussion, he said, Stoynoff decided it would be best if she kept the incident to herself.



Rachel Crooks
Her allegation: Trump in 2005 kissed her directly on the lips after she introduced herself and said she was a receptionist who worked for a company that did business with Trump.

Corroborators:

Brianne Webb, her sister. She said Crooks called her immediately about the incident as soon as she returned to her desk. “Being from a town of 1,600 people, being naive, I was like, ‘Are you sure he didn’t just miss trying to kiss you on the cheek?’ She said, ‘No, he kissed me on the mouth.’ I was like, ‘That is not normal.’ ”

Clint Hackenburg, her boyfriend at the time. After he asked her that evening how her day had gone, “she paused for a second, and then started hysterically crying.”


As we all know President Trump has the utmost respect for women bleeders tidy bints. And if he offended thewomen bleeders tidy bints then I am sure he in no way embarked on a massive public smear campaign against them ,and in no way reduced his daughter to tears, nor did he parade out “Randy Bill’s alleged victims on national TV, or his women to tell the baying mob he (trump) is an utter gentlemen with the women bints.

Trump defends crude language from 2005 as "locker room" talk

Donald Trump's comments about daughter raise eyebrows

Trump is very strange with his daughter







sissificationsub -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 9:38:52 AM)

Him and his gang can attack me all they like…but I would rather they talk about the issues threads etc and then add in the attack if they feel the need too.

Rhetoric is not a debate or argument. Have some of you became that lost?




bounty44 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 10:33:10 AM)

i say "oh no comrades" for a few reasons, the most prominent of which is a fairly good sized handful of collectivists here have given me grief, and repeatedly so, over using the site.

another is, their news and commentary does a really good job of representing the conservative and/or libertarian view--and so pretty much everything written there is anathema to the left.

it may indeed have a "silly" aspect to it---but at the same time, its dead on and given what i said above, far from "nonsensical."




Sir4you59 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 12:39:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sissificationsub

I know you will not read this one as you right wing nutters are blinded in ways of those brainwashed "mooselambs" you speak so highly off so I picked one clip.
Trump is very strange with his daughter


He is getting away with this (below) do none of you Americans care?

quote:

ORIGINAL: sissificationsub

Trump says sex harassment claims are fake news, but there are corroborators

“All I can say is it’s totally fake news. It’s just fake. It’s fake. It’s made-up stuff, and it’s disgraceful, what happens, but that happens in the world of politics.”
— President Trump, remarks to reporters, Oct. 16, 2017


Jacqueline Alemany of CBS News: “Obviously, sexual harassment has been in the news. At least 16 women accused the president of sexually harassing them throughout the course of the campaign. Last week, during a news conference in the Rose Garden, the president called these accusations ‘fake news.’ Is the official White House position that all of these women are lying?”

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders: “Yeah, we’ve been clear on that from the beginning, and the president’s spoken on it.”
— exchange on Oct. 27

As Alemany noted, 16 women have accused Trump of sexually harassing them. While the president dismisses this as “fake news,” the problem for the White House is that some of these women have produced witnesses who say they heard about the incident at the time — long before Trump made his political aspirations known.

Such contemporaneous accounts are essential to establishing the credibility of the allegation because they reduce the chances that a person is making up a story for political purposes. In the case of sexual allegations, such accounts can help bolster the credibility of the “she said” side of the equation. Often, a sexual assault will happen behind closed doors. The contemporary corroborators can explain what they heard at the time and whether the story being told now is consistent with how the story was told years earlier. This does not necessarily mean the allegation is true, but it does give journalistic organizations more confidence to report on the allegation.

Below is a summary of the corroborators provided by three of the women who have accusations, drawn from a fact check written during the presidential campaign. That fact check also detailed the witnesses who backed up claims of sexual accusations against former president Bill Clinton — who, like Trump, insisted the women accusing him were not telling the truth.

Readers can judge for themselves.

Kristin Anderson
Her allegation: While at a Manhattan nightclub in the early 1990s, Trump slid his fingers under her miniskirt, moved up her inner thigh and touched her vagina through her underwear.

Corroborators:

Kelly Stedman, a friend. She said she was told about the incident at a women’s brunch a few days later. The women found themselves “laughing at how pathetic it was” on Trump’s part.
Brad Trent, a New York photographer. He says he heard the story from Anderson at a dinner in 2007. “It was just girls saying stories about how they got hit on by creepy old guys,” Trent said of the conversation around the table.



Natasha Stoynoff
Her allegation: While interviewing Trump in 2005 for an article for People magazine about the first anniversary of his third marriage, Trump lured her into a room at Mar-a-Lago and abruptly kissed her, forcing his tongue down her throat. He then said they were going to have an affair.

Corroborators:

Marina Grasic, who has known Stoynoff for more than 25 years. She said she got a call from her friend the day after the attack, detailing exactly how Trump pushed Stoynoff against a wall.


Liz McNeil, at the time a reporter for People (she is now an editor). She said that she heard about the incident the day after Stoynoff returned from her assignment. “She was very upset and told me how he shoved her against a wall,” she said.

Mary Green, another People reporter (now editor) who had just returned to New York. “In an early conversation we had in her office, she told me about what happened with Donald Trump,” Green said. “She was shaky, sitting at her desk, relaying that, ‘He took me to this other room, and when we stepped inside, he pushed me against a wall and stuck his tongue down my throat. Melania was upstairs and could have walked in at any time.’ ”

Liza Hamm, part of a “tightknit’ group of friends. “Natasha has always been a vivacious person who wants to believe in the best of people, and this experience definitely messed with that outlook,” she said.

Paul McLaughlin, Stoynoff’s former journalism professor. He said Stoynoff called him at the time of the alleged incident seeking advice on how to handle it: “She didn’t know what to do, she was very conflicted, she was angry, she was really confused about how to deal with this.” After a discussion, he said, Stoynoff decided it would be best if she kept the incident to herself.



Rachel Crooks
Her allegation: Trump in 2005 kissed her directly on the lips after she introduced herself and said she was a receptionist who worked for a company that did business with Trump.

Corroborators:

Brianne Webb, her sister. She said Crooks called her immediately about the incident as soon as she returned to her desk. “Being from a town of 1,600 people, being naive, I was like, ‘Are you sure he didn’t just miss trying to kiss you on the cheek?’ She said, ‘No, he kissed me on the mouth.’ I was like, ‘That is not normal.’ ”

Clint Hackenburg, her boyfriend at the time. After he asked her that evening how her day had gone, “she paused for a second, and then started hysterically crying.”


As we all know President Trump has the utmost respect for women bleeders tidy bints. And if he offended thewomen bleeders tidy bints then I am sure he in no way embarked on a massive public smear campaign against them ,and in no way reduced his daughter to tears, nor did he parade out “Randy Bill’s alleged victims on national TV, or his women to tell the baying mob he (trump) is an utter gentlemen with the women bints.

Trump defends crude language from 2005 as "locker room" talk

Donald Trump's comments about daughter raise eyebrows

Trump is very strange with his daughter








heavyblinker -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 12:52:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
i say "oh no comrades" for a few reasons, the most prominent of which is a fairly good sized handful of collectivists here have given me grief, and repeatedly so, over using the site.


I am sorry that you are such a victim, bounty.
It's so sad.




Sir4you59 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 1:04:17 PM)

There is no you here for anyone to like. You should probably fuk off then? I feel that would be for the best and yo will not be missed.
Does anyone who is not a sock muppet give a flying fuk about the ugly 2ichher cunt called ninja? I m all for the debate sicko.

Has anyone actually emailed you on here?




Sir4you59 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 1:07:16 PM)

Look at them all.




Nnanji -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 1:39:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
i say "oh no comrades" for a few reasons, the most prominent of which is a fairly good sized handful of collectivists here have given me grief, and repeatedly so, over using the site.


I am sorry that you are such a victim, bounty.
It's so sad.

LMAO, no you're not sorry. You don't understand other people enough to be sorry. Even the other day when you were set down by the women on here for being a sexist pig, it only took you about an hour to be back blamimg them. Lol, you have no more ability to connect with other humans than a five year old. It's ironic for this thread isn't it?




bounty44 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 2:47:59 PM)

and i don't feel victimized in the least blinker---im merely pointing out my mocking tactic in response to yours and others' juvenile complaints against a legitimate source of news and commentary.




JVoV -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 3:44:08 PM)

I think Ellen had really bad timing posting the picture, but I don't see anything wrong with it.

As far as the words in the tweet, they're taken directly from Katy's song Happy Birthday.

quote:

So let me get you in your birthday suit
It's time to bring out the big balloons


Sure, the tweet can be taken as double entendre, or literally. That's how a lot of words and phrases work in the English language, thanks to euphimisms being used in America. But since the words weren't aimed at any of us, I think it's up to Katy how she chooses to interpret them and the pic.

But I am quite certain that Ellen won't be the last celebrity called out for being inappropriate in the wake of the Weinstein allegations.




Nnanji -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 4:55:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

I think Ellen had really bad timing posting the picture, but I don't see anything wrong with it.

As far as the words in the tweet, they're taken directly from Katy's song Happy Birthday.

quote:

So let me get you in your birthday suit
It's time to bring out the big balloons


Sure, the tweet can be taken as double entendre, or literally. That's how a lot of words and phrases work in the English language, thanks to euphimisms being used in America. But since the words weren't aimed at any of us, I think it's up to Katy how she chooses to interpret them and the pic.

But I am quite certain that Ellen won't be the last celebrity called out for being inappropriate in the wake of the Weinstein allegations.

I didn't know those were words to Katy's song. When I first read the tweet I thought it was pretty explicit coupled with the picture. That first impression changes when I understand the context.




Aylee -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 5:49:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

Pffft there is nothing sexual or inappropriate about Ellen's pic with Katy.

You know how to tell if a lesbian is sexually harassing you? She shows up with a UHaul.


I thought U-Hauls were for the second date.




shiftyw -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 7:33:04 PM)

I don't think Ellen is that great a feminist? She's problematic as helllllll like many comedians.

First of all- I think this backlash is pretty justified. Although I don't know if they're friends or this was posted with Perry's permission....but yah...I happen to agree this deserves some backlash and I'd have issues with this also.

Secondly- She's casually racist (she's also super "white feminism")

Thirdly- That transphobic joke she made about Liza a few years ago left a bad taste in many's mouth also.





JVoV -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/28/2017 11:55:11 PM)

I've seen accusations, but I haven't seen anything truly offensive from Ellen.

Insinuating that Nicki Minaj has a big ass isn't racist, it's just true. If you see pics of her mom, you'll see that the curves are genetic.

Nor is it transphobic to suggest that men dress up as Liza Minneli. Female impersonators are not necessarily transgender or transsexual. Don't confuse dressing up and performing for a crowd with gender identity or a kink.

I think sometimes you (general you, not you you) have to accept the possibility of something being controversial or upsetting, but try to understand that not everybody sees things the same, and that unless it's blatant and obvious, there may be something you're missing.

If we live in a world of black people and white people, then any joke can be viewed as racist. But if we're all just people that may happen to be different skin colors, then racism has no place to hide.




Greta75 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 12:42:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
With that in mind, do you think it would be just another day if president Trump (or any Republican) acted similarly

I defended Trump when people make such a big hoo ha about him perving his own wife by pinching her ass or something.

Like how he sexually assaulted his own wife in public.

As I said, guys, sexual assault or harrassment is only an assault or harrassment IF IT IS NON CONSENSUAL. Same with rape!

Girlfriends oogling each other is normal and we always have each other consent before doing so.

Presidents touching women WHO ARE NOT THEIR WIVES is non-consensual, Unless that woman is their sex mistress or something or that women gave clear consent.

An example is Bill Clinton touching Monica Lewinsky on her butt. 100% acceptable and consensual. As Monica gave him permission to do so. And Bill can feel her up all he wants, and Monica is happy.

Bush Senior touching Lind on her butt as a greeting, instead of shaking her hands, is 100% not acceptable as he just touched a woman butt he just met without her permission.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875