RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Greta75 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 12:46:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
lets see---women can dress in such a way as to attract attention and then in the same breath are allowed to use the phrase "unwanted attention."

I have to 100% disagree with you on this!

I live in 32 to 35 degrees celsius everyday in my life.

Trust me, if you live here, you want to dress in a bikini all day, because it's sooo fucking hot!

Not dressing for men to perv us!

WE are fucking dying in the heat!

I am always naked at home because clothes make me feel too warm and I sweat from wearing clothes, so I don't!

So I wear as little as possible outdoors to keep cool too!

But men will look and THINK that we dress for their attention, because of their own dirty minds, when all we are trying to do is stop the sweating and getting overheated!

It's like I always feel sorry for women with enormous boobs and wears a tank top. If you are flat chested, nobody says shit or even looks your way lewdly.

But if you got huge boobs, suddenly every man thinks you are showing off and giving you lewd looks.

When essentially in this crazy 100% humidity and incredible hot weather 365 days a year. When you go out for a walk to get some fresh air, you need tank top or even less. Just wear the sports bra, and that's it cuz it's sooo damn hot and poor women with big boobs got all these lewd men thinking they are just showing off.




bounty44 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 5:29:32 AM)

greta go back and read the sentence of mine you quoted and put an emphasis on the word "CAN."

that doesn't translate into every time they dress, that they "DO" dress for attention.

and not everywhere in the world is Singapore in terms of temperature and humidity.





heavyblinker -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 6:00:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
and i don't feel victimized in the least blinker---im merely pointing out my mocking tactic in response to yours and others' juvenile complaints against a legitimate source of news and commentary.


People aren't mocking the source, they're mocking the fact that all you do is repost whatever it says.

It's easy to guess what townhall is going to say on any given issue, so why would anyone ever waste any time reading it?
RWNJs go to sites like that to feel better about themselves... it's politics porn, nothing more.

This isn't a secret to anyone except you, apparently.




Lucylastic -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 6:08:04 AM)

[image]https://i.imgur.com/0GvCaXs.jpg[/image]




BoscoX -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 7:31:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

[image]https://i.imgur.com/0GvCaXs.jpg[/image]


So you want to smash Ellen DeGeneres's head

[image]http://afamily1.vcmedia.vn/k:thumb_w/600/NuDtl90AyfgmPfKAOzOfhv4jN7VDVP/Image/2014/11/nguc_1-56d02/phu-nu-my-ru-nhau-di-nang-nguc-mot-ngay.jpg[/image]




heavyblinker -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 8:08:01 AM)

Is Ellen doing something that the girl doesn't want her to do?
That's what 'it' means.




BoscoX -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 8:09:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Is Ellen doing something that the girl doesn't want her to do?
That's what 'it' means.


By leftist trash PC culture definition, yes. Everything is rape

You're a howler - you should know that.




heavyblinker -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 8:41:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Is Ellen doing something that the girl doesn't want her to do?
That's what 'it' means.


By leftist trash PC culture definition, yes. Everything is rape

You're a howler - you should know that.


What the actual fuck.
Do you even understand that individuals get to set their own boundaries???

If you were less determined to be as annoyingly partisan as possible, you wouldn't embarrass yourself in these arguments.




JVoV -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 8:43:14 AM)

Uncropped photos from the Grammy event, 2013.

[image]https://s-i.huffpost.com/gen/984199/images/o-ELLEN-DEGENERES-KATY-PERRY-facebook.jpg[/image]

[image]http://static.celebuzz.com/uploads/2013/02/10/katy-perry-ellen-degeneres-portia-de-rossi-grammys-2013-2.jpg[/image]




BoscoX -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 8:44:07 AM)


Perhaps you should consider cropping them




BoscoX -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 8:45:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Is Ellen doing something that the girl doesn't want her to do?
That's what 'it' means.


By leftist trash PC culture definition, yes. Everything is rape

You're a howler - you should know that.


What the actual fuck.
Do you even understand that individuals get to set their own boundaries???



Wow, you really nailed leftist trash PC culture there

(You are so smart)




heavyblinker -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 9:04:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Is Ellen doing something that the girl doesn't want her to do?
That's what 'it' means.


By leftist trash PC culture definition, yes. Everything is rape

You're a howler - you should know that.


What the actual fuck.
Do you even understand that individuals get to set their own boundaries???



Wow, you really nailed leftist trash PC culture there

(You are so smart)


Yeah, it's pretty trashy to suggest that somebody's body belongs to them and not society.
You are not smart, and you also don't make sense.




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 9:54:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i say "oh no comrades" for a few reasons, the most prominent of which is a fairly good sized handful of collectivists here have given me grief, and repeatedly so, over using the site.

another is, their news and commentary does a really good job of representing the conservative and/or libertarian view--and so pretty much everything written there is anathema to the left.

it may indeed have a "silly" aspect to it---but at the same time, its dead on and given what i said above, far from "nonsensical."



I love the conservative and/or libertarian view. The problem with Townhall and Fox News is the reporting is demonstrably inaccurate. Further, the opinions expressed from those organizations are based on wholly counter factual premises.

A perfect example was the Dick Morris opinion you posted on another thread.




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 9:58:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
and i don't feel victimized in the least blinker---im merely pointing out my mocking tactic in response to yours and others' juvenile complaints against a legitimate source of news and commentary.


People aren't mocking the source, they're mocking the fact that all you do is repost whatever it says.

It's easy to guess what townhall is going to say on any given issue, so why would anyone ever waste any time reading it?
RWNJs go to sites like that to feel better about themselves... it's politics porn, nothing more.

This isn't a secret to anyone except you, apparently.



I mock the source, and challenge anyone to find a legitimate journalist that considers townhall a legitimate source of news and/or commentary.




Lucylastic -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 10:29:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


So you want to smash Ellen DeGeneres's head



that you dont get the difference is telling...and is obviously why you are a simple minded dumb fuck.




WhoreMods -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 10:34:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
and i don't feel victimized in the least blinker---im merely pointing out my mocking tactic in response to yours and others' juvenile complaints against a legitimate source of news and commentary.


People aren't mocking the source, they're mocking the fact that all you do is repost whatever it says.

It's easy to guess what townhall is going to say on any given issue, so why would anyone ever waste any time reading it?
RWNJs go to sites like that to feel better about themselves... it's politics porn, nothing more.

This isn't a secret to anyone except you, apparently.



I mock the source, and challenge anyone to find a legitimate journalist that considers townhall a legitimate source of news and/or commentary.

Fancy a bet on bounty declaring that he's PJ O'Rourke, and a serious journalist who takes townhall very seriously indeed?




ownedslavejulia -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 1:01:24 PM)

care to comment on?


quote:

ORIGINAL: sissificationsub

Trump says sex harassment claims are fake news, but there are corroborators

“All I can say is it’s totally fake news. It’s just fake. It’s fake. It’s made-up stuff, and it’s disgraceful, what happens, but that happens in the world of politics.”
— President Trump, remarks to reporters, Oct. 16, 2017


Jacqueline Alemany of CBS News: “Obviously, sexual harassment has been in the news. At least 16 women accused the president of sexually harassing them throughout the course of the campaign. Last week, during a news conference in the Rose Garden, the president called these accusations ‘fake news.’ Is the official White House position that all of these women are lying?”

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders: “Yeah, we’ve been clear on that from the beginning, and the president’s spoken on it.”
— exchange on Oct. 27

As Alemany noted, 16 women have accused Trump of sexually harassing them. While the president dismisses this as “fake news,” the problem for the White House is that some of these women have produced witnesses who say they heard about the incident at the time — long before Trump made his political aspirations known.

Such contemporaneous accounts are essential to establishing the credibility of the allegation because they reduce the chances that a person is making up a story for political purposes. In the case of sexual allegations, such accounts can help bolster the credibility of the “she said” side of the equation. Often, a sexual assault will happen behind closed doors. The contemporary corroborators can explain what they heard at the time and whether the story being told now is consistent with how the story was told years earlier. This does not necessarily mean the allegation is true, but it does give journalistic organizations more confidence to report on the allegation.

Below is a summary of the corroborators provided by three of the women who have accusations, drawn from a fact check written during the presidential campaign. That fact check also detailed the witnesses who backed up claims of sexual accusations against former president Bill Clinton — who, like Trump, insisted the women accusing him were not telling the truth.

Readers can judge for themselves.

Kristin Anderson
Her allegation: While at a Manhattan nightclub in the early 1990s, Trump slid his fingers under her miniskirt, moved up her inner thigh and touched her vagina through her underwear.

Corroborators:

Kelly Stedman, a friend. She said she was told about the incident at a women’s brunch a few days later. The women found themselves “laughing at how pathetic it was” on Trump’s part.
Brad Trent, a New York photographer. He says he heard the story from Anderson at a dinner in 2007. “It was just girls saying stories about how they got hit on by creepy old guys,” Trent said of the conversation around the table.



Natasha Stoynoff
Her allegation: While interviewing Trump in 2005 for an article for People magazine about the first anniversary of his third marriage, Trump lured her into a room at Mar-a-Lago and abruptly kissed her, forcing his tongue down her throat. He then said they were going to have an affair.

Corroborators:

Marina Grasic, who has known Stoynoff for more than 25 years. She said she got a call from her friend the day after the attack, detailing exactly how Trump pushed Stoynoff against a wall.


Liz McNeil, at the time a reporter for People (she is now an editor). She said that she heard about the incident the day after Stoynoff returned from her assignment. “She was very upset and told me how he shoved her against a wall,” she said.

Mary Green, another People reporter (now editor) who had just returned to New York. “In an early conversation we had in her office, she told me about what happened with Donald Trump,” Green said. “She was shaky, sitting at her desk, relaying that, ‘He took me to this other room, and when we stepped inside, he pushed me against a wall and stuck his tongue down my throat. Melania was upstairs and could have walked in at any time.’ ”

Liza Hamm, part of a “tightknit’ group of friends. “Natasha has always been a vivacious person who wants to believe in the best of people, and this experience definitely messed with that outlook,” she said.

Paul McLaughlin, Stoynoff’s former journalism professor. He said Stoynoff called him at the time of the alleged incident seeking advice on how to handle it: “She didn’t know what to do, she was very conflicted, she was angry, she was really confused about how to deal with this.” After a discussion, he said, Stoynoff decided it would be best if she kept the incident to herself.



Rachel Crooks
Her allegation: Trump in 2005 kissed her directly on the lips after she introduced herself and said she was a receptionist who worked for a company that did business with Trump.

Corroborators:

Brianne Webb, her sister. She said Crooks called her immediately about the incident as soon as she returned to her desk. “Being from a town of 1,600 people, being naive, I was like, ‘Are you sure he didn’t just miss trying to kiss you on the cheek?’ She said, ‘No, he kissed me on the mouth.’ I was like, ‘That is not normal.’ ”

Clint Hackenburg, her boyfriend at the time. After he asked her that evening how her day had gone, “she paused for a second, and then started hysterically crying.”


As we all know President Trump has the utmost respect for women bleeders tidy bints. And if he offended thewomen bleeders tidy bints then I am sure he in no way embarked on a massive public smear campaign against them ,and in no way reduced his daughter to tears, nor did he parade out “Randy Bill’s alleged victims on national TV, or his women to tell the baying mob he (trump) is an utter gentlemen with the women bints.

Trump defends crude language from 2005 as "locker room" talk

Donald Trump's comments about daughter raise eyebrows

Trump is very strange with his daughter







JVoV -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 2:52:35 PM)

So 4+ years after the photo was taken, we can accuse Ellen of idontevenknowwhat, yet the headline from Business Insider for the event was "Katy Perry's Cleavage Stole The Show At The Grammys 2013"

http://www.businessinsider.com/katy-perrys-cleavage-stole-the-show-at-the-grammys-2013-2013-2

And of course, that article didn't catch Twitter on fire.

Is it more degrading or dehumanizing to have a friend stare at your rack, or to have articles published in the media about your rack?




Greta75 -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 3:00:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

greta go back and read the sentence of mine you quoted and put an emphasis on the word "CAN."

that doesn't translate into every time they dress, that they "DO" dress for attention.

and not everywhere in the world is Singapore in terms of temperature and humidity.

But my point is that your post is blaming men's bad behaviour on female dressing. You are essentially agreeing with Muslim men that Men has no self-control so ALL women needs to cover up to protect them from unwanted male attention! When civilised males should technically behave like civilise people and shouldn't have any problem with with self control IF they saw anything that arouse their sexual attention.

Because you know what? I hate wearing a bra because it seriously is one of the most uncomfortable devices ever invented to imprison woman's breasts, and I wish I never have to wear bra ever again in my entire life but guess what? IF I don't wear a bra, men will start looking at my nipples sticking out of my t-shirt. And will be accuse of trying to draw attention to myself again.

There is a youtube video of an experiment. All this woman was wearing was yoga pants. And guess what? Nowadays stupid places are considering Yoga pants too sexual too thanks to silly men who can't keep their lewd thoughts. But she was going out for a walk and just wore a yoga pants and tight fitting female cut t-shirt. And she got alot of wolf whistling and harassment just walking on the streets. She was just dress comfortable. This was in NY by the way.

Then she did the same experiment in the full Saudi ninja suit, with whole face covered. She got zero wolf whistling and harassment.

But this is how appalling it is! That women gotta be forced to dress in the whole Saudi Ninja Suit to feel safe on the streets from harassment from men! It's fucking' unacceptable that our education does not teach men how to control themselves!

And sometimes you can google this shit online about office wear. I read advice like, women with big butts should avoid pencil skirts!!!!!!! Because it's too sexual and will not look appropriate in the office! Like WTF? Pencil skirts are perfectly like usually below knee length to knee length! It's super conservative. Men sexualise everything! (Written by Western people by the way)

THIS is a pencil skirt which is apparently inappropriate for females with big butt

[image]http://images.asos-media.com/inv/media/8/2/9/4/3914928/black/image1xl.jpg[/image]




Nnanji -> RE: 'SEXIST PIG' (10/29/2017 3:13:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
and i don't feel victimized in the least blinker---im merely pointing out my mocking tactic in response to yours and others' juvenile complaints against a legitimate source of news and commentary.


People aren't mocking the source, they're mocking the fact that all you do is repost whatever it says.

It's easy to guess what townhall is going to say on any given issue, so why would anyone ever waste any time reading it?
RWNJs go to sites like that to feel better about themselves... it's politics porn, nothing more.

This isn't a secret to anyone except you, apparently.



I mock the source, and challenge anyone to find a legitimate journalist that considers townhall a legitimate source of news and/or commentary.

Ya pops, on the other hand you go to blogs that have two or three views per day but that agree with you. Right on!




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375