Edwird
Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote:
ORIGINAL: Edwird And . . . so, this means just WHAT to his daughter who needs a kidney? who needs her father? Do you think you could at least get the gender of the child involved right? Yeah! I might! Sorry, had it right the first time, I think. quote:
Well, there we are with the Republican 'family values thing'. Keep -artificially- and -arbitrarily- raising the threshold of what constitutes crime in the first place, and then lower the threshold for what constitutes jail time. Baloney. The parole thing isn't all that difficult. A person gets to remain out of jail as long as they fulfill their conditions of parole. It's really not that difficult of a thing to refrain from ripping people off while carrying a weapon. Something this kid's father couldn't manage to do even knowing he would be needed for this surgery. It's kind of why he missed the appointment on October 28. He was too busy out "making mistakes." quote:
BTY, if you are a woman wearing a nightgown while driving a car in California, you should be in jail now and have your child removed from your province. That law is still on the books. Dude, if I'm driving in any state while wearing a nightgown, I'd better have a fever of 106 and headed for an ER. Unless I'm completely out of my head, I'll put pants on. Do you have any other crap that you have to reach so far up your own tail to rant about on this thread? It's been beyond ridiculous. quote:
We can and DO completely make shit up all day long about what is 'crime' or not. It was a crime to harbor slaves, if you insist on sticking to whatever is 'crime' at this juncture. I'm pretty sure theft is still a crime. I'm even willing to stick my neck out and say that getting caught ripping people off three times in the past two years is something people should go to jail over. quote:
READ some American history, sweetheart. But DON'T even think of giving me any crap about 'family values' if your claim is that "The Law" supercedes any of that. Just. Don't. I didn't say jack sh^t about family values. I don't have one bit of problem saying I'm more concerned about the innocent child than I do for the screw up father who couldn't bother obeying the law when his kid needed him. The Catholic Church wasn't making him steal. It wasn't the military doing him wrong. He wasn't being forced into criminal activity because of wearing nightgowns or not knowing the definition of the word . I don't think the dad's chickenshit minor 'criminality' is of much consequence to society, here. his absence from faterhood, as DEMANDED BY SOCOIETY might or might not be another matter. Do you ever walk down 'poor streets'? I hope you don't, and I'm not there anymore for decades myself. But I learned something in any case. "But did you ever consider that maybe the dude's just a thief?" What? A thief with out permission from the SEC? I think that's obvious. The guy could have made at least a $20 mil bonus stealing home equity and foreclosing houses of retirees, and been well rewarded. But that doesn't bother you, it seems. Obviously, the guy should have known himself that petty theft is anti-family, whereas predatory lending and grand theft of national wealth is, seemingly, 'pro family' by Republicans. Nothing 'criminal' about THAT, right? So yeah, if that makes you feel better.
|