Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/7/2017 9:56:27 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11227
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

They don’t need them and that admission means their right to own an unnecessary weapon is more important to them then the life of innocents... it is that simple.

Butch


Remy - "People Will Die"

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 5:07:05 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

Right, so how long till the next mass-slaughter, then? A month, two weeks? Get ready with those thoughts and prayers, folks!


What a callous, and horrifically insensitive remark.

How do you all handle acts of domestic terror/or mass slaughters across the pond?
Have you all given up hope, and decided not to pray and mourn the dead?

What measures have you all put in place to stop the next mass slaughter over there?

It is obvious that laws need to changed/measures should be taken to try to prevent incidents like this, but those killed
deserve respect, prayers and to be mourned.


There's only so much respect-giving, praying and mourning you can do before you just stop caring.
I didn't know these people personally and it would be pretty insincere to tell everyone that I suddenly care so much about them because they died in yet another mass shooting instead of a series of separate car accidents or living in a war zone or something.

There are too many of these things going on all the time... if you start to seriously care about each and every one, you'll go crazy.
The last one that really got to me was Sandy Hook because it was kids... now I just sort of say 'oh, another one?'.

You can talk about other countries preventing mass slaughters, but the fact is that this shit simply does not happen as often in other countries.
Still, nothing is going to happen as long as you have people like the posters on this board actively refusing to talk about guns, deflecting, making weak analogies about cars and hammers and baseball bats, etc.

There are too many people like that to ever prevent this sort of thing from happening or to make the kind of changes that need to be made.
It's time to throw your hands up and accept that in America, being shot by a lunatic is practically 'natural causes'.

(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 5:50:41 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

They don’t need them and that admission means their right to own an unnecessary weapon is more important to them then the life of innocents... it is that simple.

Butch


Various people have given you practical examples of how those weapons have a use in civilian hands, the fact that you cannot accept that is your own problem, but I tell you what:

You come down to my neck of the woods, I will be glad for you to use a bolt action rifle to deal with feral hogs, and when you figure out that a the boars you did not have the ammo in said rifle is not going to stop the pissed off 500 pound animals that are trying to get to you, I will gladly rent another to you for a significant amount, or be more than happy to call 911 when said animals have ripped you open with those razor sharp 6 inch tusks.

And if you dont think that these animals are a particularly bad problem, look at these.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 6:52:54 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Jeff... I could do just fine with any number of weapons. But I must tell you here in Missouri the conservation department has recommended NOT shooting feral hogs as it just scatters the herd causing an increase in the population. They say to notify them and they will capture to whole herd at once.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 6:57:10 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Check THIS out

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 7:31:46 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

They don’t need them and that admission means their right to own an unnecessary weapon is more important to them then the life of innocents... it is that simple.

Butch


Remy - "People Will Die"


lol... that was pretty good.

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 9:17:36 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Jeff... I could do just fine with any number of weapons. But I must tell you here in Missouri the conservation department has recommended NOT shooting feral hogs as it just scatters the herd causing an increase in the population. They say to notify them and they will capture to whole herd at once.

Butch


Gee, the MDC caught just over 5000 last year, great dent in an estimated population of 50,000, which considering how fast the hogs breed means that the state is not even keeping up with the birth rate.

Not to mention that the problem is in an estimated 30 Missouri counties.

You might want to look at how many states tried the "dont shoot em let us catch em" plan and failed because the state could not keep up with number of hogs.

In point of fact, only six states with a hog problem have a do not hunt rule.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 12:00:52 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3657
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
Thoughts & prayers to Senate Democrats who presented a new assault weapons ban today.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 12:42:53 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

Thoughts & prayers to Senate Democrats who presented a new assault weapons ban today.


No, they presented a new ban on a style of weapon that they call an assault weapon, based on certain features, completely disregarding the fact that in ALL of the mass shootings since Columbine, this type of weapon has only been used in a total of 14.

Which makes as much sense as the Democrat who introduced a bill to make it mandatory for car makers to put a motion detector in the back seat of cars to prevent parents from accidentally leaving children in the cars.

I find it funny as fucking hell that with all the noise being raised about how the Air Force neglected to supply the information that would have kept the shooter from buying a gun in the first place, there is no fucking mention of making that kind of reporting of information manadatory.

Nor did they seem to remember that the previous 'assault weapon' ban did nothing in the way of preventing mass shootings, or make a dent in gun crime at any level, because criminals went and used different guns that werent banned.

So, lets consider the logic, if you ban one type of firearm and all criminals do is go to a different type of gun and commit the same crimes, what is the next step?

Well if you are trying to prevent gun crime, if banning one gun doesnt work, then you need to ban the gun that replaced the first one and keep going till you have banned all of them.

I am in full support of gun regulations that work, and when these dipshit dumbasses finally realize (you would have thought this incident would have brought it home) why the present laws arent working, MAYBE someone will come up with a sensible way to fix the fucking problem.

Lets face it, a semi automatic pistol is easier to handle, the ammo is much lighter, you have a faster reload time, and if you are a half way decent marksmen, you can do more damage in a shorter amount of time.

See Virginia Tech, no assault weapons there and 32 killed.

Funny, that guy should not have been able to buy a gun either, and the lawmakers in Virginia figured out why he was able to do it and passed a law to prevent it from happening again.

But, the lesson learned then as now is not fix the problem, but place blame or fucking completely fucking ignore it.

Which democrats are oh so fucking good at.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 12:58:58 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
the news comingout about the shooter and his '''behaviour" whilst in the forces sadly doesnt surprise me, not that its the military, specifically but mental health reporting in the first place, Im not excusing the issue, i hope the victims sue... this opens a whole other bunch of worms regarding domestic violence, and guns, and then we get into the rights of someone innocent being accused and jailed.
But it is time to discuss it. Isnt it?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 1:23:46 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

the news comingout about the shooter and his '''behaviour" whilst in the forces sadly doesnt surprise me, not that its the military, specifically but mental health reporting in the first place, Im not excusing the issue, i hope the victims sue... this opens a whole other bunch of worms regarding domestic violence, and guns, and then we get into the rights of someone innocent being accused and jailed.
But it is time to discuss it. Isnt it?



Yes it is time to discuss it.

And there is this article that I hope the survivors follow up on!

Of course, in Texas, the dems have made their move, ignoring the most pressing fact and coming up with this:

quote:

At a news conference organized by Texas Gun Sense at the state capitol on Wednesday, state Reps. Poncho Nevárez, D-Eagle Pass, and Nicole Collier, D-Fort Worth, urged state leaders to declare gun violence a public health issue and reform existing gun regulations.

Nevárez proposed limiting the ability of Texans to "walk around" with long rifles, such as the AR-15 variant used by the shooter Sunday. Texas has allowed long gun owners to openly carry their weapons for decades.

Collier urged state leaders to declare gun violence a public health issue, comparing it to other health crises such as obesity and the opioid epidemic. She also denounced those, such as President Donald Trump, who have focused on addressing mental health issues following the shooting rather than guns themselves. While acknowledging mental health plays a critical role in gun violence, she said focusing entirely on mental health is a "distraction" from the role of easy access to guns and "stigmatizes" those with mental health issues.
source


_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 1:47:05 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

the news comingout about the shooter and his '''behaviour" whilst in the forces sadly doesnt surprise me, not that its the military, specifically but mental health reporting in the first place, Im not excusing the issue, i hope the victims sue... this opens a whole other bunch of worms regarding domestic violence, and guns, and then we get into the rights of someone innocent being accused and jailed.
But it is time to discuss it. Isnt it?



Yes it is time to discuss it.

And there is this article that I hope the survivors follow up on!

Of course, in Texas, the dems have made their move, ignoring the most pressing fact and coming up with this:

quote:

At a news conference organized by Texas Gun Sense at the state capitol on Wednesday, state Reps. Poncho Nevárez, D-Eagle Pass, and Nicole Collier, D-Fort Worth, urged state leaders to declare gun violence a public health issue and reform existing gun regulations.

Nevárez proposed limiting the ability of Texans to "walk around" with long rifles, such as the AR-15 variant used by the shooter Sunday. Texas has allowed long gun owners to openly carry their weapons for decades.

Collier urged state leaders to declare gun violence a public health issue, comparing it to other health crises such as obesity and the opioid epidemic. She also denounced those, such as President Donald Trump, who have focused on addressing mental health issues following the shooting rather than guns themselves. While acknowledging mental health plays a critical role in gun violence, she said focusing entirely on mental health is a "distraction" from the role of easy access to guns and "stigmatizes" those with mental health issues.
source


Funny that they all yell about how he shouldn't have been able to get the
guns but they ignore the fact that current law didn't allow him to except that
putting his information in the system isn't required by law. That is the change that
needs to be made.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 2:00:11 PM   
AtUrCervix


Posts: 2111
Joined: 1/15/2016
Status: offline
WTF is all this "whilst" shit?

When the fuck did everyone become British?

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 2:13:20 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

You come down to my neck of the woods, I will be glad for you to use a bolt action rifle to deal with feral hogs


It astonishes me that the Native Americans managed to survive, and even flourish, without firearms - and for thousands of years, despite the lethal fauna that existed - and indeed in far greater numbers - before the Europeans arrived. How do you think they managed that, Jeff? Were they just lucky?

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 2:34:25 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

You come down to my neck of the woods, I will be glad for you to use a bolt action rifle to deal with feral hogs


It astonishes me that the Native Americans managed to survive, and even flourish, without firearms - and for thousands of years, despite the lethal fauna that existed - and indeed in far greater numbers - before the Europeans arrived. How do you think they managed that, Jeff? Were they just lucky?



Hogs are not native to the Americas.

Secondly, before horses, native Americans would stampede herds of animals off cliffs, read it for yourself, and hunted in groups, not alone, for mutual protection.

And as for predators, they rarely attack groups of humans, if you used your brain for more than stupid posts, you might have actually learned that in school, and rarely do they attack single humans unless the human does something exceedingly stupid, or the animal is sick, old or hurt.

Carrying this a bit further, contrary to the arguments of farmers and ranchers, predators rarely go after healthy livestock, instead killing livestock that is old, sick or injured, in other words, they kill domesticated animals with the same criteria as they kill natural prey animals.

However, in point of fact, the feral hog problem in the United States is directly related to European explorers having them on expeditions where they either escaped or were released. Feral hogs are also prolific breeders, a single sow can have as many as fifteen piglets at a time.

They destroy farmland, pastures, eat hay and feed placed for domesticated livestock, pose a threat to humans since they will charge people wondering around in the brush (you know farmers and ranchers tend to do that sort of thing if they notice an animal missing) and they are so bad they are starting to invade urban areas as well.

Again, if you actually used your brain to learn something you could have googled the subject, but you didnt, proving you would rather post an invalid argument rather than figure out the facts.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 4:21:41 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
It has not failed here... it works very well... and you do not need an AR-15 or its type to kill pigs... If you can't do it with your 06 or 30 30 then you should not own any weapon.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 4:33:17 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:


Again, if you actually used your brain to learn something you could have googled the subject, but you didnt, proving you would rather post an invalid argument rather than figure out the facts.


I was taking the piss, to be honest, Jeff. I don't really give a swivelling rat's anus about the relatively tiny number of people who may have trouble with feral hogs as a result of not having the requisite guns to to shoot them, should a ban on the relevant guns come into effect - which it almost certainly won't, anyway. As a matter of fact, I find it almost surreal - as well as mind-numbingly disgusting - that this thread has even got on to the matter of feral hogs and the need for guns to deal with them, so soon after this appalling massacre - about which, to recall, all you gunsters were so keen to express your utterly heartfelt 'thoughts and prayers'. It's always the same: "Terrible massacre - deplorable - but, hey, the crucial thing is NOBODY SHOULD BE TAKING OUR GUNS!". And that's how this this thread has gone, just as every thread has gone on this forum, after every one of the atrocious mass-shootings that's taken place, since I can remember.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 4:45:19 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
What about alcohol and cars?

It seems like it doesn't matter if people get killed, unless of course it is by a gun.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 4:54:47 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
tamaka... these 26 people were not killed with cars or alcohol... go ahead and start another thread on those if you like...

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church - 11/8/2017 4:56:38 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

There are too many people like that to ever prevent this sort of thing from happening or to make the kind of changes that need to be made.

It's time to throw your hands up and accept that in America, being shot by a lunatic is practically 'natural causes'.


I actually do think that there *is* something of that as an underlying subtext, HB. The gunsters here do seem to talk in terms of these massacres as though they're almost like cataclysmic weather-events: they're ' horrible, but a part of nature' - it's 'terrible that they happen, and we should all cry about it and pray and offer our thoughts', but at the same time 'there's nothing to be done about it - and anybody who tries is subverting Nature, and probably also the Bible - but definitely everything Truly American'.

Or something. I don't know. It seems strange to me, as it probably seems strange to pretty much every non-American. The culture seems to be such that the most noble, impressive and laudible thing to do after one of these atrocities is to show just how much you're crying about them. But to *do* anything about them - policy change, legal change - oh no - that's *low*; that's *ignoble*. Making it 'political'. (Well, of course, unless the atrocity in question has been perpetrated by a brown man with a funny name. Then absolutely the most laudible thing to do is to talk about putting up walls and putting a stop to certain kinds of unsavoury immigrants. But nothing political about that.)

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.113