Level
Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jasmyn Puella, I don't take what you have said in your post as a validation that I was incorrect in my opening one, infact it helps to prove it, thank you. 'Virgin' as 'young girl' or 'young women' is a 'puella' by a different name... that being that very real time in a young girl's life where she was neither under her father's control, nor a husbands ... she had the freedom of her growing years, the desires and hormones to explore her sex, her burgeoning womenhood, how to use it, how to beguile, how to exact her feminine charms...the actual sex act ...was neither here nor there ....and 'virgin' did not become synonymous with the actually act of penetration until some time well after the first ever record of it's origins ... ... so I stand by what I said in my opening post ... the 'virgin' was a woman/girl who was not under a man's control, and yes, even her father's ... virgo intacta or not ... engagement and marriage is what made her lose her 'virgin' status...not the breaking of her hymen ... & LaM, you're dictionary definition confirms it ... 1. A girl of marriageable age. Pehaps, Puella, the puella came to be the girl who wasn't a 'virgin' but also was yet to 'marry' ? A 'young maiden' ...which would befit her unwedded status. Hope you all have got your thinking caps on ... Food for thought... is good for the belly. Women's studies from some universities.... do they change things around to "empower" females? "Take women's studies themselves. On the evidence proffered by Sommers, Patai and Koertge, and others, women's studies programs and courses are abysmal swamps of irrational dogma and hatred. The feminist classroom is an arena for emotions rather than intellect or analysis. Agreement with the ideology is mandatory." The incongruity of feminism as an academic subject is heightened by another development. Though most feminists reject the idea of difference between men and women, more recently a coterie has appeared that insists upon, and celebrates just such difference. These women claim that rationality, sometimes called "linear thinking," is a coercive tool of the oppressive patriarchy. That may be because they have noticed that evidence and logic are running heavily against the no-difference position. It is necessary, therefore, to identify evidence and logic with the enemy and to exalt intuitive and emotional "women's ways of knowing." These "difference feminists" claim to perceive all of reality through the "sex/gender lens." Judging from their reports of what they see, that must be like peering at the world through the thick glass of a bottle bottom. Thus, we now have what Patai and Koertge call "TOTAL REJ (total rejection) feminists" whose creed is that "Our culture, including all that we are taught in schools and universities, is so infused with patriarchal thinking that it must be torn up root and branch if genuine change is to occur. Everything must go - even the allegedly universal disciplines of logic, mathematics, and science, and the intellectual values of objectivity, clarity, and precision on which the former depend." excerpts from Robert Bork's Slouching Towards Gomorrah.
_____________________________
Fake the heat and scratch the itch Skinned up knees and salty lips Let go it's harder holding on One more trip and I'll be gone ~~ Stone Temple Pilots
|