novicecourtesan
Posts: 116
Joined: 2/11/2007 Status: offline
|
I am and have been a feminist since I can remember. I took the classes, followed the movement, supported the causes, everything. I have to reconcile the essential inequalities I see in this society towards women with the fact that I like strong, dominant men, that I think I could only submit to someone who is well above my equal. I don't know what the word feminist means anymore. It used to be equal rights for women and men in front of the law and society. Now girls appear totally sexually knowing at 12 but are expected to be virgins, feminists are called feminazis, and rightly so sometimes. Some have made ending pornography an actual goal, which is hilarious when you think about it. We see these damn "modern feminists" on the MPAA boards or yelling about Janet Jackson's nipple or Howard Stern. I think, what the fuck is wrong with these women? Aren't there other women with bigger problems who we, as feminists, should be helping? And equality--am I allowed to choose when I don't want it? Not according to many. If I tell someone I want a totally unequal sexual relationship--define it by the vanilla sense, please--then I'm a throwback. A traitor to the cause. Some people will not be happy until you start spelling "women" as "womyn." And some people cannot take a joke--feminists, masculinists, whatever. I don't know what wave of feminism I am. It's a combination of West Coast East Coast submissive independent opinionated pleasure-seeking hedonistic easygoing debate-avoiding feminism. There are many ways to figure out how submissiveness fits into your feminism or vice versa. You are choosing to give up equality in the bedroom, and feminism is about choice. You are taking care of your own needs and demanding that they be respected, and feminism is about self-respect. You support the right of other women to make their own choices in the bedroom, and feminism is about women's rights in general. It goes on and on, but I don't know if there's a set answer. It's still obviously a hot-button word. I've been impressed with what I've read on this thread, on both sides. There's no question in my mind that men have been pulled through the ringer in the last few decades in terms of "reorienting" their behavior towards men. So many men equate gentlemen with "wimp" or "submissive" or "gay" instead of seeing it for good manners, social harmony and sheer sexy class. But there are strident feminists taking things too far, just like there are certain male chauvinists who need to unclench. (I mean, seriously, guys. It's not all Basic Instinct out there). I like the dominant, rough, masculine, confident, streetwise men--and I know a lot of little inequalities can come from that. But that's why I'm here, because a lot of those inequalities are things I'm happy to part with or dying to give away, even if it isn't politically correct. It's redundant, but I don't think labels matter. Personally, I think reconciling a self-defined feminist sensibility to the need to be submissive is going to be ongoing for me. But I find the conflict really liberating; I felt like I couldn't even bring up the thought of being both a feminist and a submissive without being shouted down by everyone in the room. Secretly, I'll bet a lot of those so-called "feminazis" are closet slaves or submissives. Wouldn't it make sense?
|