caitlyn
Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyMorgynn And as for those who still believe we are "liberating" the Iraqi people... grow up already, and get an education. Who the HELL do you think kept Saddam (AND all his ethnocentric policies) in power all these years? Our government WANTED Saddam there, they WANTED Iraq to be in his firm, dictatorial, homicidal maniac grip to keep the balance of power, and they didn't give a flying fatoot what he was doing to the people in his country. For decades, a select minority terrorized the entire country, with OUR blessing and support... and now we are "liberating" them from the dictator WE put in place, by destroying their country, their infrastructure, slaughtering a hundred thousand people, man woman and child indiscrimniately, and they are supposed to THANK US??? Excuse me? If I was Iraqi I would fight the US forces to the last breath. I don't blame them one bit. As a person that is undecided on this issue, I can only say that these vast statements of conjecture, after a call to "get an education", does your position no good at all. Can you prove (as is from official sources), that we wanted Saddam in charge? Can you prove we preferred a homicidal maniac in control? Can you prove, as you claim, that we put Saddam in place? (I'm dying to hear this one) Can you prove anything, other than Iraq was once heavily supported by the Soviet Union, and pre-revolution Iran was our horse in this race? Prior to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, about all that can be categorically said about US relations with Iraq, is that we were somewhat indifferent, other than our thirst to BUY their oil. Isn't that exactly what your side wants ... for us to be indifferent? Are you saying that we should have backed off support for our friend, Kuwait? Good debate. I'm hoping you can respond with something a little more subtantial than a source from nuttyliftist or nuttyrightist dot com.
|