LadyEllen -> RE: Iraq: For Solutions only (10/2/2006 5:52:14 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyMorgynn I understand that. I DO. But... geez. Doesn't anyone here have ANY compassion for the victims in all this? Doesn't anyone grasp at all the consequences to human lives in the hundreds of thousands, in terms of death, sickness, starvation, on a pullout now? Where are all the bleeding hearts who went on and on against the sanctions on Iraq (I wasn't one of 'em), which caused far less suffering, btw, than our invasion. Geez, doesn't anyone CARE???? WE did this... AMERICA. It's OUR goverment, folks, like it or not. We can deny personal responsibility, but not collective responsibility. We can't just pull out and leave all those people to fend for themselves in the kind of turmoil that would erupt in the vacuum left. Yes, the war itself was a criminal act.... to just pull out now would be even more criminal... it would be an act of barbaric inhumanity unequaled in our country's history. quote:
ORIGINAL: sissifytoserve oh Bull....if anyone is responsible...its the draft-dodging chickenhawks in the Whitehouse and all the Armchair quarterbacks screaming "rah-rah" when baghdad was getting "smart-bombed" (yeah right) and being turned into a radioactive DU wasteland. I sure-as-hell aint responsible for that. Hi Lady M & sissify & all - havent read the whole thread yet, so maybe someone else has brought this up later down. The fact is, we are now stuck in Iraq. If we pull out, dont expect any vacuum to last long, as the Iranians will move in damned quick and take control - after all, they already have their people on the ground and in the Iraqi government. If anyone thinks we're screwed now, just wait till the Greater Islamic Republic of Iran stretches from the Med to the Indian ocean, with control of huge oil reserves, the Suez canal, and possibly nuclear weapons. See how our Saudi and Pakistani friends deal with us with that sort of ally on their side rather than us, and such a revised alliance would be good for them both in terms of their own influence in the world and to quiet their own internal strife from Islamists. This scenario is exactly why Saddam was allowed to remain in power after Gulf War I. He might be a twisted fxxk, but he was also a wonderfully terrible buffer between the Islamists of the east and west of the region. I could see that in the 1990s - the soldier I discussed it with thought I must be MI6 or something just for that, which was cool, but way off! But the capability to see this scenario is nothing special - I'm sure thousands have seen it, and you can bet the Iranians have. This is why we have to stay, regardless of how many body bags come back, how many men and women are scarred or crippled, how much it costs and how long it takes. And thats to say nothing of the dead and injured Iraqis as a result of the war and then now the civil war there. Saddam was a monster, the sanctions hurt only his people but now they have a much worse situation on their hands. CD is right - the first step in any solution to this damned fine mess is to get rid of the idiots who started it, and bring in people who can produce a satisfactory settlement with the people who will take control once we move out - the Iranians. Dealing with the devil? Yes, but when one plays dice with the devil, the time comes to pay one's gambling debts to save one's soul from further torment, or in this case perhaps, to lessen the ongoing torment. Whats most annoying is that the idiots who started all this will be well cushioned by wealth and position from the reparations whilst ordinary people will be burying their sons and daughters, caring for their broken minds and bodies and paying the costs for this stupid and ridiculous blunder for years to come. And if there is to be a trial, then Mr Blair should also stand - who is the greater fool, the fool or the fool who follows him? I believe one of the charges at Nuremberg was waging an aggressive war. How they could defend themselves against this one I'd love to see. E
|
|
|
|