Sinergy
Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Estring Where did you get the idea that I was defending Foley? I am glad he is gone. My problem is with the painting of all Republicans because of one. And he is not a pedophile either, as many were posting. I don't care about Foley. I care about the truth. Well, I spend a great deal of time painting Republicans as a bunch of mentally challenged idiots who should be forced to actually read a book or turn off Faux news for a change. But that is just me and I could be wrong. It is like my old history teacher in high school, who expressed grave misgivings because the Republicans had nominated Reagan, who had lied to my history teacher (the PTA representative) when Reagan was governer. Apparently, he was faced with the moral dilemma of whether to stay true to the party, or vote against a man who lacked moral character. So he chose loyalty to the party over standing up for moral character and common sense. I still laugh about it. That approach seems to be de rigeur for members of the Republican party. What the Democrats are facing is an exodus of people who are tired of the Democratic party trying to get as close as they can get in their response to an issue to the Republicans, rather than making a stand for what the party believes. I liked my old history teacher very much, even though my senior year in high school was one long argument about politics with him. I got an A+, in case you were wondering. I am not necessarily tarring all Republicans because of Foley. In the same way I did not necessarily tar all Republicans because of Bush, DeLay, Reagan, North, Gingrich, Hastert, everybody listed in the book "The Smartest Men In The Room (Abramhoff scandal)," etc. There are a group of corrupt scoundrels running both houses of Congress. Oddly enough, they generally happen to be members of the Republican party. I am willing to make exception for people like Harmon, etc., who seem to represent the Republican swing vote in the Democratic party, but I might be a bit jaded about her. An adult who has sexual relations with a minor child, either in real life or online or in text messages, is considered a pedophile based on the current laws in place. You may use whatever yardstick you like to determine that he is not one, but I suspect the criminal statutes will trump it. Just me, etc. Sinergy edited to give my history grade
< Message edited by Sinergy -- 10/5/2006 4:17:26 PM >
_____________________________
"There is a fine line between clever and stupid" David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap" "Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle
|